Tapatalk test thread

Post by **FishPants** » Mon Nov 25, 2013 8:25 am

For tapatalk support to test in whenever they show up.

Jag · Post by **Jag** » Mon Nov 25, 2013 10:47 am

Reporting in for duty, SIR!

Love the forum title graphics btw.

Post by **FishPants** » Tue Nov 26, 2013 8:26 pm

FishPants wrote:For tapatalk support to test in whenever they show up.

Test test test

Post by **FishPants** » Tue Nov 26, 2013 8:28 pm

FishPants wrote:
FishPants wrote:For tapatalk support to test in whenever they show up.
Test test test

Ok so that worked, although it took about 15 seconds to post the message vs almost instant on my laptop.

Post by **FishPants** » Tue Nov 26, 2013 8:39 pm

FishPants wrote:
FishPants wrote:
FishPants wrote:For tapatalk support to test in whenever they show up.
Test test test
Ok so that worked, although it took about 15 seconds to post the message vs almost instant on my laptop.

More testing.

Post by **FishPants** » Tue Nov 26, 2013 9:01 pm

FishPants wrote:
FishPants wrote:
FishPants wrote:
FishPants wrote:For tapatalk support to test in whenever they show up.
Test test test
Ok so that worked, although it took about 15 seconds to post the message vs almost instant on my laptop.
More testing.

And again

Post by **FishPants** » Tue Nov 26, 2013 9:02 pm

FishPants wrote:
FishPants wrote:
FishPants wrote:
FishPants wrote:
FishPants wrote:For tapatalk support to test in whenever they show up.
Test test test
Ok so that worked, although it took about 15 seconds to post the message vs almost instant on my laptop.
More testing.
And again

Still slow

Post by **FishPants** » Tue Nov 26, 2013 9:10 pm

FishPants wrote:
FishPants wrote:
FishPants wrote:
FishPants wrote:
FishPants wrote:
FishPants wrote:For tapatalk support to test in whenever they show up.
Test test test
Ok so that worked, although it took about 15 seconds to post the message vs almost instant on my laptop.
More testing.
And again
Still slow

1 2 3

Pyperkub · Post by **Pyperkub** » Tue Nov 26, 2013 9:26 pm

Hello

Pyperkub · Post by **Pyperkub** » Tue Nov 26, 2013 9:27 pm

Pyperkub wrote:Hello

Yeah, the connecting to server on tapa 4 is still slow, and was before the changes, afaik

Post by **FishPants** » Tue Nov 26, 2013 9:48 pm

Pyperkub wrote:
Pyperkub wrote:Hello
Yeah, the connecting to server on tapa 4 is still slow, and was before the changes, afaik

Yep, the support guy is MIA and ignoring my requests for help (he asked for the URL, and hasn't replied since). I'm not hopeful, time to start looking at Forum Runner & the PHPBB mobile style template.

Pyperkub · Post by **Pyperkub** » Wed Nov 27, 2013 12:23 am

It is thanksgiving week - they're probably short staffed

Post by **FishPants** » Tue Dec 03, 2013 11:37 am

Testing

Post by **FishPants** » Tue Dec 03, 2013 11:52 am

Another test

Teggy · Post by **Teggy** » Fri Dec 27, 2013 4:36 pm

I started seeing pictures in the topic headers, is that new?

cheeba · Post by **cheeba** » Wed Apr 30, 2014 8:26 pm

Why do some people have a thing at the bottom of their posts saying tapatalk but I don't?

Post by **ImLawBoy** » Thu May 01, 2014 11:04 am

Because the people who have the Tapatalk auto-signature on their posts haven't been considerate enough to the rest of us to disable the auto-signature.

IceBear · Post by **IceBear** » Thu May 01, 2014 12:18 pm

I don't know why people find auto signatures any worse than normal ones... I ignore them regardless

silverjon · Post by **silverjon** » Thu May 01, 2014 1:26 pm

The placement of the auto-signature integrates it into the post rather than falling below the break line indicating "ignore this bit".

And to my thinking, it's a form of advertising which we can opt out of (or rather opt our readers out of), and none of us needs to be exposed to more ads.

Isgrimnur · Post by **Isgrimnur** » Thu May 01, 2014 1:32 pm

1) User Control Panel
2) Board Preferences
3) Edit Display Options
4) Display Signatures > No

I have no clue as to whether or not this takes away the Tapatalk signatures or not.

IceBear · Post by **IceBear** » Thu May 01, 2014 1:48 pm

silverjon wrote:The placement of the auto-signature integrates it into the post rather than falling below the break line indicating "ignore this bit".

And to my thinking, it's a form of advertising which we can opt out of (or rather opt our readers out of), and none of us needs to be exposed to more ads.

I figured that was why... Just doesn't rackle my nerves like it does many others... I just ignore them all

silverjon · Post by **silverjon** » Thu May 01, 2014 1:49 pm

I would guess that it doesn't because that probably again only turns off the stuff that falls below the line, the actual forum signature.

Post by **ImLawBoy** » Thu May 01, 2014 2:52 pm

Correct. The Tapatalk signature is part of the text of the message, and not a part of the forum signature.

Z-Corn · Post by **Z-Corn** » Thu May 01, 2014 4:29 pm

ImLawBoy wrote:Because the people who have the Tapatalk auto-signature on their posts haven't been considerate enough to the rest of us to disable the auto-signature.

They are the same type of people whose VCRs blinked "12:00"...

cheeba · Post by **cheeba** » Thu May 01, 2014 9:02 pm

I can't find where one would turn the ad spam on or off in tapatalk, lol.

IceBear · Post by **IceBear** » Thu May 01, 2014 9:16 pm

You need to go into settings from the main page (ie, before you enter a forum). There should be a signature setting towards the bottom

cheeba · Post by **cheeba** » Thu May 01, 2014 9:17 pm

Testes.

cheeba · Post by **cheeba** » Thu May 01, 2014 9:19 pm

And yeah I see the signature, but not where to turn it on. Not that I want it on, heh.

cheeba · Post by **cheeba** » Thu May 01, 2014 9:21 pm

Maybe it's because I'm using quick reply.

cheeba · Post by **cheeba** » Thu May 01, 2014 9:22 pm

Ok last test.

IceBear · Post by **IceBear** » Thu May 01, 2014 9:26 pm

On mine I click on Tapatalk signature and then select none

cheeba · Post by **cheeba** » Thu May 01, 2014 10:47 pm

Yep I can see my options there, for None, a couple variants and customize. But I don't see where to enable it. That's what bugs me, even though I don't want it enabled, lol. By default it is enabled, so I don't understand why it's not appearing.

Post by **FishPants** » Sat May 03, 2014 2:04 pm

cheeba wrote:Yep I can see my options there, for None, a couple variants and customize. But I don't see where to enable it. That's what bugs me, even though I don't want it enabled, lol. By default it is enabled, so I don't understand why it's not appearing.

Because I override the setting in the server config. It shouldn't post it at all.

cheeba · Post by **cheeba** » Sat May 03, 2014 3:16 pm

Well that explains it! Lol.

Grundbegriff · Post by **Grundbegriff** » Sun Jul 20, 2014 10:50 am

Test of bbcode: three blind

mice

; see how they waltz.

Grundbegriff · Post by **Grundbegriff** » Sun Jul 20, 2014 10:55 am

Grundbegriff wrote:Test of bbcode: three blind
mice
; see how they waltz.

Tapatalk doesn't recognize strikethrough. Can that be changed without much hassle?

Post by **FishPants** » Tue Jul 22, 2014 3:50 pm

Seems not.

Tapatalk support thread 2012 - Limitation of IOS

That reminds me I'm way out of date on the server side plugin.. Son of a bitch, I'm going to have to upgrade that nightmare soon.

LordMortis · Post by **LordMortis** » Tue Jul 22, 2014 4:00 pm

We love you, fishpants. <3

Grundbegriff · Post by **Grundbegriff** » Tue Jul 22, 2014 5:30 pm

FishPants wrote:Seems not.Tapatalk support thread 2012 - Limitation of IOS

Thanks for checking. I'm using Android, so I guess it supports 20th century markup on neither of the core platforms for which it was crudely hackedwritten