You deserve aHolman wrote:Obviously the market should be allowed to determine the weather.

Moderators: $iljanus, LawBeefaroni
You deserve aHolman wrote:Obviously the market should be allowed to determine the weather.
If you're able to make the next Octocon, let me know. I'll have fresh cider donuts and a stripper pole available.LordMortis wrote:Fresh cider donuts or maybe a chocolate cake donut with a cup of coffee. Nothing else really grabs my goat.hepcat wrote:I would need to know the types of doughnuts before I pass judgement on this. Sugar? Forget it. But I'd shake my money maker for a boston creme.
With meteorologist gone, will there be hope for the Blob?Zarathud wrote:When there are no more meteorologists, there can be no evidence of global warming. It's a rather transparent hatchet job.
Will you grab my goat?hepcat wrote:If you're able to make the next Octocon, let me know. I'll have fresh cider donuts and a stripper pole available.LordMortis wrote:Fresh cider donuts or maybe a chocolate cake donut with a cup of coffee. Nothing else really grabs my goat.hepcat wrote:I would need to know the types of doughnuts before I pass judgement on this. Sugar? Forget it. But I'd shake my money maker for a boston creme.
By the hair on its chinny chin chin.LordMortis wrote:Will you grab my goat?
A decade-old statewide ban on deep fryers and soda machines was lifted by Texas Agriculture Commissioner Sid Miller on Thursday, The Texas Tribune reported.
The plan is part of an anti-obesity campaign in Texas. A core part of the policy, on top of lifting the ban, is to bring local, farm-raised food to schools. According to a statement released by the Commissioner’s office, the policy is also designed to build community and student involvement in nutrition at a school district level, “where families and community leaders are in the best position to make decisions about what works for the children they serve.”
...
If putting soda and fries back in the mix seems counterintuitive, Mr. Miller said in a post to his Facebook page that he believed control over food needed to be more local:
“Michelle Obama and liberal do gooder friends don't like this, but they just don't understand. This isn't about French Fries – its about Freedom. I believe we need fewer state and federal mandates and more local control.”
This guy. This guy. We can be 100% sure that this decision was made to battle obesity, not to pander to special interests and score political points.Isgrimnur wrote:Freedom Fries!
A decade-old statewide ban on deep fryers and soda machines was lifted by Texas Agriculture Commissioner Sid Miller on Thursday, The Texas Tribune reported.
The plan is part of an anti-obesity campaign in Texas. A core part of the policy, on top of lifting the ban, is to bring local, farm-raised food to schools. According to a statement released by the Commissioner’s office, the policy is also designed to build community and student involvement in nutrition at a school district level, “where families and community leaders are in the best position to make decisions about what works for the children they serve.”
...
If putting soda and fries back in the mix seems counterintuitive, Mr. Miller said in a post to his Facebook page that he believed control over food needed to be more local:
“Michelle Obama and liberal do gooder friends don't like this, but they just don't understand. This isn't about French Fries – its about Freedom. I believe we need fewer state and federal mandates and more local control.”
Rick Perry on Friday suggested the fatal shooting of nine black people at a church in Charleston, South Carolina, by a white male was a drug-induced “accident”...
...In addition to steering the conversation away from race and terrorism, Perry also accused Barack Obama of trying to take firearms away from the American people by pushing for stricter gun laws in the wake of mass shootings like the one in Charleston.
Apologizing and explaining how he was misquoted or taken out of context by the liberal media in 3....2...Pyperkub wrote:Is Rick Perry really this stupid?
Rip wrote:Piss sniffer?Moliere wrote:Last Week Tonight with John Oliver: Bail
I think we may have found a new profession for Drazzil.
Daehawk wrote:Thats Drazzil's chair damnit.
I don't think he can count that low.Moliere wrote:Apologizing and explaining how he was misquoted or taken out of context by the liberal media in 3....2...Pyperkub wrote:Is Rick Perry really this stupid?
Take down the #ConfederateFlag at the SC Capitol. To many, it is a symbol of racial hatred. Remove it now to honor #Charleston victims.
— Mitt Romney (@MittRomney) June 20, 2015
He's right.Defiant wrote:Mitt Romney Calls for Removal of Confederate Flag at South Carolina Capitol
Take down the #ConfederateFlag at the SC Capitol. To many, it is a symbol of racial hatred. Remove it now to honor #Charleston victims.
— Mitt Romney (@MittRomney) June 20, 2015
Yeah, but he's not running for the GOP nomination this time around. Has any current GOP candidate taken the same stand?Pyperkub wrote:He's right.Defiant wrote:Mitt Romney Calls for Removal of Confederate Flag at South Carolina Capitol
Take down the #ConfederateFlag at the SC Capitol. To many, it is a symbol of racial hatred. Remove it now to honor #Charleston victims.
— Mitt Romney (@MittRomney) June 20, 2015
They're watching Fox, so they haven't heard that racism was a factor.Captain Caveman wrote:Has any current GOP candidate taken the same stand?
He is positioning himself as the party elder and kingmaker, so his words carry weight.Captain Caveman wrote:Yeah, but he's not running for the GOP nomination this time around. Has any current GOP candidate taken the same stand?Pyperkub wrote:He's right.Defiant wrote:Mitt Romney Calls for Removal of Confederate Flag at South Carolina Capitol
Take down the #ConfederateFlag at the SC Capitol. To many, it is a symbol of racial hatred. Remove it now to honor #Charleston victims.
— Mitt Romney (@MittRomney) June 20, 2015
So he wants to run the federal government so he can look for every reason to punt everything down to the states? Why, sure, I want my chief executive to attempt to dismantle federal authority.Captain Caveman wrote:Right on cue...
Running__ | __2014: 1300.55 miles__ | __2015: 2036.13 miles__ | __2016: 1012.75 miles__ | __2017: 1105.82 miles__ | __2018: 1318.91 miles | __2019: 2000.00 miles |
I don't have time to find the reference, but last night I read that Romney did make negative remarks about the Confederate flag when he was a candidate. He then came in fourth in the SC primaries.Captain Caveman wrote: Yeah, but he's not running for the GOP nomination this time around. Has any current GOP candidate taken the same stand?
Not just SC. He lost every competitive southern primary. The first GOP nominee in the modern era to do so.Holman wrote:I don't have time to find the reference, but last night I read that Romney did make negative remarks about the Confederate flag when he was a candidate. He then came in fourth in the SC primaries.Captain Caveman wrote: Yeah, but he's not running for the GOP nomination this time around. Has any current GOP candidate taken the same stand?
divorced from this situation, that alone says they aren't ever honoring anyone ever, right?stessier wrote: and because it is not on a pulley system - it's either up or not up.
But the breakdown of extremist ideologies behind those attacks may come as a surprise. Since Sept. 11, 2001, nearly twice as many people have been killed by white supremacists, antigovernment fanatics and other non-Muslim extremists than by radical Muslims: 48 have been killed by extremists who are not Muslim, including the recent mass killing in Charleston, S.C., compared with 26 by self-proclaimed jihadists, according to a count by New America, a Washington research center.
Also, I had no idea we've had 7 lethal muslim militant attacks in the US since 9/11. I can think of 2.Non-Muslim extremists have carried out 19 such attacks since Sept. 11, according to the latest count, compiled by David Sterman, a New America program associate, and overseen by Peter Bergen, a terrorism expert. By comparison, seven lethal attacks by Islamic militants have taken place in the same period.
Looking at that graph - Thanks Obama!*LordMortis wrote:I wasn't sure where to put this as the there was tangent about domestic non jihadist terrorism in the Charleston thread and then there are all of the Home Land Security threads and modern Right thread, and a host of tea party threads, so I'll just put this here:
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/06/25/us/ta ... -news&_r=0
But the breakdown of extremist ideologies behind those attacks may come as a surprise. Since Sept. 11, 2001, nearly twice as many people have been killed by white supremacists, antigovernment fanatics and other non-Muslim extremists than by radical Muslims: 48 have been killed by extremists who are not Muslim, including the recent mass killing in Charleston, S.C., compared with 26 by self-proclaimed jihadists, according to a count by New America, a Washington research center.Also, I had no idea we've had 7 lethal muslim militant attacks in the US since 9/11. I can think of 2.Non-Muslim extremists have carried out 19 such attacks since Sept. 11, according to the latest count, compiled by David Sterman, a New America program associate, and overseen by Peter Bergen, a terrorism expert. By comparison, seven lethal attacks by Islamic militants have taken place in the same period.
Pyperkub wrote:*though my guess would be the hyperbolic hatred of Obama is driving this more than anything else.
An undocumented transgender activist was escorted out of the White House Wednesday night after she called on the president to release LGBTQ immigrants in detention centers.
“President Obama, release all LGBTQ immigrants from detention and stop all deportations,” activist Jennicet Gutiérrez shouted, interrupting the beginning of President Obama’s speech during a LGBT Pride Month Reception.
Attendees drowned out her pleas with chants of “Obama! Obama! Obama!” One attendee shouted at Gutiérrez, “Enough! Enough. This is not for you. This is for all of us.” Another attendee shouted, “Shame on you” — words Obama then echoed, as he called for Gutiérrez’s removal from the reception.
“Last night I spoke out to demand respect and acknowledgement of our gender expression and the release of the estimated 75 transgender immigrants in detention right now,” Gutiérrez wrote in a Washington Blade op-ed. Gutiérrez is a founding member of FAMILIA TQLM, an LGBTQ immigrant advocacy group. “There is no pride in how LGBTQ immigrants are treated in this country and there can be no celebration with an administration that has the ability to keep us detained and in danger or release us to freedom.”
Nothing gains respect like crashing a party and trying to shout the PotUS down. I guess throwing your shoes at him might be a step up.Moliere wrote:I'm trying to imagine the response if this had been Bush instead of Obama.
Obama to LGBTQ: “Shame on you”
An undocumented transgender activist was escorted out of the White House Wednesday night after she called on the president to release LGBTQ immigrants in detention centers.
“President Obama, release all LGBTQ immigrants from detention and stop all deportations,” activist Jennicet Gutiérrez shouted, interrupting the beginning of President Obama’s speech during a LGBT Pride Month Reception.
Attendees drowned out her pleas with chants of “Obama! Obama! Obama!” One attendee shouted at Gutiérrez, “Enough! Enough. This is not for you. This is for all of us.” Another attendee shouted, “Shame on you” — words Obama then echoed, as he called for Gutiérrez’s removal from the reception.
“Last night I spoke out to demand respect and acknowledgement of our gender expression and the release of the estimated 75 transgender immigrants in detention right now,” Gutiérrez wrote in a Washington Blade op-ed. Gutiérrez is a founding member of FAMILIA TQLM, an LGBTQ immigrant advocacy group. “There is no pride in how LGBTQ immigrants are treated in this country and there can be no celebration with an administration that has the ability to keep us detained and in danger or release us to freedom.”
Most of the articles I read point out that the room is shouting down one of their own because she is being critical of Obama.GreenGoo wrote:It's particularly amusing to read Obama to LGBTQ: Shame on You, while at a reception for those very people, and with those in attendance uttering "shame on you" first to the activist. It's like everyone at the reception are meaningless but the one activist becomes the entirety of the LGBTQ population when spoken to.