Pictures and Videos for R&P

hepcat · Post by **hepcat** » Wed Oct 12, 2016 8:48 am

I feel kind of bad for these folks though. I doubt they'll survive the aftermath of Trump's meltdown. I'm guessing they've burned a lot of bridges by standing with Trump as he torches everyone around him.

Enough · Post by **Enough** » Wed Oct 12, 2016 5:08 pm

Enough · Post by **Enough** » Wed Oct 12, 2016 7:03 pm

Rip · Post by **Rip** » Thu Oct 13, 2016 11:10 am

hepcat · Post by **hepcat** » Thu Oct 13, 2016 11:19 am

I don't get it.

Isgrimnur · Post by **Isgrimnur** » Thu Oct 13, 2016 11:23 am

Here, let me do the work for him:

The video was captured by CNN back in 2008 while then-Senator Obama was first running for the highest office in the land. The 1:38 clip (below) features Obama seeming to proudly show off his erection to giggling female reporters, even giving them a full 360-degree display of his manhood while they cheer him on.

Because it's totally the same as sexual assault and violating the privacy of underage girls.

GreenGoo · Post by **GreenGoo** » Thu Oct 13, 2016 4:51 pm

If that's true then I would be against him becoming President as well. Unfortunately this is a little late, Rip. Not like you to give a Dem a break for 8 years before bringing up problems when it's too late to do anything about it.

Obama thanks you, though.

Max Peck · Post by **Max Peck** » Thu Oct 13, 2016 5:16 pm

Rip wrote:

Snopes is on the case, and they're not impressed.

It should also be noted that this video has been circulating since at least 2008, when it was used to smear then-Senator Obama during his first presidential campaign. The web site Obambi was one of the first to share the video along with the baseless claim that it depicted Obama with an erection. Ironically, back then Obambi posted the video along with an exhortation to vote for Hillary Clinton:

Obambi wrote:Regards Obama’s erection. I’ve seen middle school boys handle this with more decorum. This type of behavior is juvenile and just one more example of Obama’s exhibiting poor judgement.

Please, we have an admittedly flawed but exceedingly superior woman whom we could run against McCain.

I love Senator McCain, I really do. I’m an Arizonan. But change is what we need. The only woman who could deliver that for us right now is Senator Hillary Clinton. A classy lady. America will never opt for a classless Obama.
We examined the video and tried to find screenshots where Obama's "erection" was most visible, but we came up empty-handed. While some viewers may argue that a bulge is visible in Obama's pants, there's no definitive evidence that the future president had an erection, and certainly nothing to suggest that he "flaunted" his manhood in front of female reporters.

Enough · Post by **Enough** » Thu Oct 13, 2016 5:26 pm

‘Bane’ Trump Delivers a Speech to the People

GreenGoo · Post by **GreenGoo** » Thu Oct 13, 2016 5:29 pm

Thanks Max.

Geezus Rip.

Fuck. You.

Max Peck · Post by **Max Peck** » Thu Oct 13, 2016 5:36 pm

Enough wrote:‘Bane’ Trump Delivers a Speech to the People

The weird thing is that the video is being posted by the Washington Free Beacon. Given their reputation, I'm left to wonder if they see it as a pro-Trump video...

Unagi · Post by **Unagi** » Thu Oct 13, 2016 5:44 pm

Max Peck wrote:
Enough wrote:‘Bane’ Trump Delivers a Speech to the People
The weird thing is that the video is being posted by the Washington Free Beacon. Given their reputation, I'm left to wonder if they see it as a pro-Trump video...

Seriously.
That's just hard to understand, unless I lower my opinion Even Further of the element that supports him
Wtf!?

Unagi · Post by **Unagi** » Thu Oct 13, 2016 5:46 pm

GreenGoo wrote:If that's true then I would be against him becoming President as well. Unfortunately this is a little late, Rip. Not like you to give a Dem a break for 8 years before bringing up problems when it's too late to do anything about it.

Obama thanks you, though.

Does that even sound remotely like something he (Obama) would do?

Don't get mad at Rip for stinging you on the back while you swim across the river

Enough · Post by **Enough** » Thu Oct 13, 2016 5:56 pm

Unagi wrote:
Max Peck wrote:
Enough wrote:‘Bane’ Trump Delivers a Speech to the People
The weird thing is that the video is being posted by the Washington Free Beacon. Given their reputation, I'm left to wonder if they see it as a pro-Trump video...
Seriously.
That's just hard to understand, unless I lower my opinion Even Further of the element that supports him
Wtf!?

Dave Weigel, a WashPost reporter, tweeted this earlier:

The netizens provided and next for some odd reason the Beacon ran with it.

Defiant · Post by **Defiant** » Thu Oct 13, 2016 6:07 pm

Max Peck wrote: The weird thing is that the video is being posted by the Washington Free Beacon. Given their reputation, I'm left to wonder if they see it as a pro-Trump video...

I suspect they aren't supportive of Trump. Here's another example:

Gingrich: There’s a ‘Little Trump’ Who’s ‘Frankly Pathetic’

em2nought · Post by **em2nought** » Thu Oct 13, 2016 7:05 pm

Enough wrote:‘Bane’ Trump Delivers a Speech to the People

Except I think you'll find most Trump supporters to be more law abiding that any other group of voters out there. The orange jumpsuits belong to the other side, their cronies are even trying to enable them to vote whilst wearing their orange badges of honor.

Enough · Post by **Enough** » Thu Oct 13, 2016 9:17 pm

GreenGoo · Post by **GreenGoo** » Fri Oct 14, 2016 12:04 am

Can someone explain to her the difference between consensual and non-consensual and why that difference matters?

Alefroth · Post by **Alefroth** » Fri Oct 14, 2016 12:40 am

GreenGoo wrote:Can someone explain to her the difference between consensual and non-consensual and why that difference matters?

I doubt it.

Max Peck · Post by **Max Peck** » Fri Oct 14, 2016 1:40 am

hepcat · Post by **hepcat** » Fri Oct 14, 2016 7:08 am

em2nought wrote:
Enough wrote:‘Bane’ Trump Delivers a Speech to the People
Except I think you'll find most Trump supporters to be more law abiding that any other group of voters out there. The orange jumpsuits belong to the other side, their cronies are even trying to enable them to vote whilst wearing their orange badges of honor.

You saw the video. Trump is now dressing like Bane during his speeches. Wake up, man!

Defiant · Post by **Defiant** » Fri Oct 14, 2016 10:20 am

Defiant · Post by **Defiant** » Fri Oct 14, 2016 4:07 pm

Defiant · Post by **Defiant** » Fri Oct 14, 2016 5:33 pm

Enough wrote:

This may be the only time where "Based on what she wore, she was asking for it" might be a viable defense.

em2nought · Post by **em2nought** » Fri Oct 14, 2016 7:36 pm

Now we really know what happened to John Lennon

Max Peck · Post by **Max Peck** » Fri Oct 14, 2016 7:44 pm

The thing about deplorables is that they just don't know a joke when they see it.

Enough · Post by **Enough** » Fri Oct 14, 2016 11:25 pm

Max Peck · Post by **Max Peck** » Sat Oct 15, 2016 11:44 am

em2nought · Post by **em2nought** » Sat Oct 15, 2016 1:25 pm

The recent Republican agenda pre-Trump is summed by this douche

Jaymann · Post by **Jaymann** » Sat Oct 15, 2016 1:39 pm

What, is the "L" for Loser?

Enough · Post by **Enough** » Sat Oct 15, 2016 1:43 pm

Jaymann wrote:What, is the "L" for Loser?

Nope, it's for LIAR.

Max Peck · Post by **Max Peck** » Sat Oct 15, 2016 1:48 pm

Jaymann wrote:What, is the "L" for Loser?

Apparently, yes. The word on the street is that that is a picture of Moore flashing the "loser sign" at John McCain back in 2004, when McCain referred to him as a "disingenuous filmmaker" during a speech. Ironically(?), it is appropriate for not only the pre-Trump agenda, but also the lol-Trump and post-Trump GOP agendas.

RunningMn9 · Post by **RunningMn9** » Sat Oct 15, 2016 1:54 pm

Enough wrote:

Liberal lies. It's no wonder considering Politifact is run by the Clinton Foundation's Bilderberg Society.

Max Peck · Post by **Max Peck** » Sat Oct 15, 2016 1:57 pm

Enough wrote:
Jaymann wrote:What, is the "L" for Loser?
Nope, it's for LIAR.

I'm surprised that Palin scores so well in the actually true category. Was she graded on a curve? ("Hello, my name is Sarah Palin!" -- Yeah, we'll give her that one.)

Rip · Post by **Rip** » Sat Oct 15, 2016 2:04 pm

What is Obama a candidate for?

Max Peck · Post by **Max Peck** » Sat Oct 15, 2016 2:10 pm

Rip wrote:What is Obama a candidate for?

The chart tracks from 2007. Are you having trouble with the readin' or the 'rithmetic?

RunningMn9 · Post by **RunningMn9** » Sat Oct 15, 2016 2:14 pm

Max Peck wrote:
Rip wrote:What is Obama a candidate for?
The chart tracks from 2007. Are you having trouble with the readin' or the 'rithmetic?

Neither, he is compelled to find something unrelated to justify ignoring that the graphic shows that his belief that Hillary is a liar is apparently a load of horseshit (if you look at what she actually says, rather than what she says in Rip's fever dreams).

Rip · Post by **Rip** » Sat Oct 15, 2016 2:17 pm

Meh, not so unbiased themselves.

http://www.politifactbias.com/p/about-p ... -bias.html

Max Peck · Post by **Max Peck** » Sat Oct 15, 2016 2:23 pm

Rip wrote:Meh, not so unbiased themselves.

http://www.politifactbias.com/p/about-p ... -bias.html

Enough · Post by **Enough** » Sat Oct 15, 2016 2:45 pm

Max Peck wrote:
Rip wrote:Meh, not so unbiased themselves.

http://www.politifactbias.com/p/about-p ... -bias.html

Reality bites, lol.