The Hillary Clinton thread

For discussion of religion and politics

Moderators: $iljanus, LawBeefaroni

Post Reply
malchior
Posts: 24795
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:58 pm

Re: The Hillary Clinton thread

Post by malchior »

Scoop20906 wrote:
malchior wrote:The FBI is also leaking information around this issue like crazy right now. Sometimes idealism isn't the best course and he is in many ways too rigid and then goes off track without warning. Possibly the worst combination of traits possible for that job.
Can you link to a new source that is reporting this?
A good recap and analysis of the political issues around the FBI now
User avatar
Defiant
Posts: 21045
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 11:09 pm
Location: Tongue in cheek

Re: The Hillary Clinton thread

Post by Defiant »

VLADIMIR PUTIN: WHY HE FEARS A HILLARY CLINTON WHITE HOUSE

Put up the wrong article. This is a good article about why Putin doesn't like Clinton.
User avatar
Smutly
Posts: 1921
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 12:47 am

Re: The Hillary Clinton thread

Post by Smutly »

geezer wrote:
Smutly wrote:This baseball fandom innuendo and tomfoolery is obviously Russian interference in our electoral process! Evidence people! Evidence!

:horse:
People who believe that Russia is messing with our election process: 17 Federal investigating agencies.

People who don't: Donald Trump, you.

:think:
Excellent. So you now agree that those same experts who are saying foreign entities hacked Hillary's homegrown server are correct. I'm glad we see eye to eye.
User avatar
GreenGoo
Posts: 43513
Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2004 10:46 pm
Location: Ottawa, ON

Re: The Hillary Clinton thread

Post by GreenGoo »

Cite please.

The US government has come out and publicly accused Russia of hacking the DNC.

Presumably there is similarly strongly worded comments about her server?

My assumption is that her server was compromised because it was an undefended, high value server sitting in a basement with little to no support. That's not the same thing as proof that it was, however.
User avatar
Smutly
Posts: 1921
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 12:47 am

Re: The Hillary Clinton thread

Post by Smutly »

GreenGoo wrote:Cite please.

The US government has come out and publicly accused Russia of hacking the DNC.

Presumably there is similarly strongly worded comments about her server?

My assumption is that her server was compromised because it was an undefended, high value server sitting in a basement with little to no support. That's not the same thing as proof that it was, however.
So an accusation is evidence and proof?
User avatar
GreenGoo
Posts: 43513
Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2004 10:46 pm
Location: Ottawa, ON

Re: The Hillary Clinton thread

Post by GreenGoo »

When it comes in public from the United States of America, it *usually* does.

Of course Iraq and Snowden tarnish that reputation.

In any case, are you suggesting that you have even less proof than the Feds claim to have?

You can undermine my claim if you want, but that undermines yours at the same time. Which leaves us...where, exactly?
User avatar
Pyperkub
Posts: 24399
Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2004 5:07 pm
Location: NC- that's Northern California
Contact:

Re: The Hillary Clinton thread

Post by Pyperkub »

Smutly wrote:
GreenGoo wrote:Cite please.

The US government has come out and publicly accused Russia of hacking the DNC.

Presumably there is similarly strongly worded comments about her server?

My assumption is that her server was compromised because it was an undefended, high value server sitting in a basement with little to no support. That's not the same thing as proof that it was, however.
So an accusation is evidence and proof?
It will be if Trump becomes president, apparently.
Black Lives definitely Matter Lorini!

Also: There are three ways to not tell the truth: lies, damned lies, and statistics.
User avatar
Smutly
Posts: 1921
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 12:47 am

Re: The Hillary Clinton thread

Post by Smutly »

GreenGoo wrote:When it comes in public from the United States of America, it *usually* does.

Of course Iraq and Snowden tarnish that reputation.

In any case, are you suggesting that you have even less proof than the Feds claim to have?

You can undermine my claim if you want, but that undermines yours at the same time. Which leaves us...where, exactly?
My point was solely that you can't have it both ways...
User avatar
GreenGoo
Posts: 43513
Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2004 10:46 pm
Location: Ottawa, ON

Re: The Hillary Clinton thread

Post by GreenGoo »

Smutly wrote: My point was solely that you can't have it both ways...
Why not? One is the official position of many organizations, the other is "leaked" information (with no actual details) from one of them.

It's not binary. You can't say that because one scientist calls climate change a hoax, you immediately discount the vast majority of opinions from the rest.
User avatar
Defiant
Posts: 21045
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 11:09 pm
Location: Tongue in cheek

Re: The Hillary Clinton thread

Post by Defiant »

The reputation of the FBI keeps sinking.
User avatar
gilraen
Posts: 4588
Joined: Wed Sep 04, 2013 7:45 pm
Location: Broomfield, CO

Re: The Hillary Clinton thread

Post by gilraen »

One of the MSNBC shows yesterday (I forget if it was Rachel Maddow, or maybe Chris Hayes) actually pointed out that Rudy Giuliani was boasting about "something up their sleeve" 2 days before the Comey letter hit, which would only indicate that FBI leaked this information to the Trump campaign. Of course, they were just guessing...who needs conspiracy theories when Rudy now just brags about it in the open.

I don't know how Comey or FBI's NY field office can maintain ANY sort of legitimacy after this election, as they have blatantly violated the Hatch Act and aren't even trying to hide it.
User avatar
Blackhawk
Posts: 46908
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 9:48 pm
Location: Southwest Indiana

Re: The Hillary Clinton thread

Post by Blackhawk »

The one thing I can say for sure about this campaign: It turned me from a cautious optimist to a pessimist when it comes to humanity and the US.
What doesn't kill me makes me stranger.
User avatar
Defiant
Posts: 21045
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 11:09 pm
Location: Tongue in cheek

Re: The Hillary Clinton thread

Post by Defiant »

User avatar
RunningMn9
Posts: 24710
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 11:55 pm
Location: The Sword Coast
Contact:

Re: The Hillary Clinton thread

Post by RunningMn9 »

Defiant wrote:The reputation of the FBI keeps sinking.
No worries, I'm sure Jason Chaffetz and his Oversight committee are all over it.
And in banks across the world
Christians, Moslems, Hindus, Jews
And every other race, creed, colour, tint or hue
Get down on their knees and pray
The raccoon and the groundhog neatly
Make up bags of change
But the monkey in the corner
Well he's slowly drifting out of range
User avatar
tgb
Posts: 30690
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 10:33 pm
Location: Tucson, AZ

Re: The Hillary Clinton thread

Post by tgb »

gilraen wrote:One of the MSNBC shows yesterday (I forget if it was Rachel Maddow, or maybe Chris Hayes) actually pointed out that Rudy Giuliani was boasting about "something up their sleeve" 2 days before the Comey letter hit, which would only indicate that FBI leaked this information to the Trump campaign. Of course, they were just guessing...who needs conspiracy theories when Rudy now just brags about it in the open.
Don Lemon
I spent 90% of the money I made on women, booze, and drugs. The other 10% I just pissed away.
malchior
Posts: 24795
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:58 pm

Re: The Hillary Clinton thread

Post by malchior »

Next HP novel - Harry Potter and the Shitty Media
User avatar
Carpet_pissr
Posts: 20815
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 5:32 pm
Location: Columbia, SC

Re: The Hillary Clinton thread

Post by Carpet_pissr »

That does explain the sulfur smell that the dumbass on Infowars(?) referred to (or am I mixing up my crazy, right wing dumbasses? They are so many, it's hard to keep up).

But this shit would really be hilarious, if it didn't make me embarrassed to be an American. Not content to just absolutely trash another candidate, they will actually LITERALLY call you if not the literal Devil him/herself, certainly related to or working on behalf of Hell.

Mind? Boggled.
User avatar
Smutly
Posts: 1921
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 12:47 am

Re: The Hillary Clinton thread

Post by Smutly »

Image
User avatar
tgb
Posts: 30690
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 10:33 pm
Location: Tucson, AZ

Re: The Hillary Clinton thread

Post by tgb »

I spent 90% of the money I made on women, booze, and drugs. The other 10% I just pissed away.
User avatar
Unagi
Posts: 28679
Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2006 5:14 pm
Location: Chicago

Re: The Hillary Clinton thread

Post by Unagi »

Smutly wrote:
GreenGoo wrote:Cite please.

The US government has come out and publicly accused Russia of hacking the DNC.

Presumably there is similarly strongly worded comments about her server?

My assumption is that her server was compromised because it was an undefended, high value server sitting in a basement with little to no support. That's not the same thing as proof that it was, however.
So an accusation is evidence and proof?
Evidence is the proof behind the accusation. What don't you get?
User avatar
GreenGoo
Posts: 43513
Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2004 10:46 pm
Location: Ottawa, ON

Re: The Hillary Clinton thread

Post by GreenGoo »

You know what's disgraceful? Exerting your constitutional rights to plead the fifth.

Fucking constitution.

Pretty weak gotcha interview though.

Also Guiliani is getting more punchable every year.
Last edited by GreenGoo on Fri Nov 04, 2016 10:20 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
geezer
Posts: 7640
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 1:52 pm
Location: Yeeha!

Re: The Hillary Clinton thread

Post by geezer »

Well come on - he hasn't gotten any leaked info, but he's *heard* it. Lots of people are saying things, believe me.
User avatar
Smutly
Posts: 1921
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 12:47 am

Re: The Hillary Clinton thread

Post by Smutly »

Unagi wrote:
Smutly wrote:
GreenGoo wrote:Cite please.

The US government has come out and publicly accused Russia of hacking the DNC.

Presumably there is similarly strongly worded comments about her server?

My assumption is that her server was compromised because it was an undefended, high value server sitting in a basement with little to no support. That's not the same thing as proof that it was, however.
So an accusation is evidence and proof?
Evidence is the proof behind the accusation. What don't you get?
It's no fun when I have to point out what others don't get. All of this reminds me of the Bullshit Asymmetry Principle: The amount of energy necessary to refute bullshit is an order of magnitude bigger than to produce it. I'll just check out of double-standard circular logic taco stand and call it a night. Good night, John Boy.
User avatar
GreenGoo
Posts: 43513
Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2004 10:46 pm
Location: Ottawa, ON

Re: The Hillary Clinton thread

Post by GreenGoo »

Your brilliance is wasted on us.
User avatar
Jaymann
Posts: 21021
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 7:13 pm
Location: California

Re: The Hillary Clinton thread

Post by Jaymann »

I like tacos.
Jaymann
]==(:::::::::::::>
Leave no bacon behind.
User avatar
gbasden
Posts: 7952
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 1:57 am
Location: Sacramento, CA

Re: The Hillary Clinton thread

Post by gbasden »

Smutly wrote: Excellent. So you now agree that those same experts who are saying foreign entities hacked Hillary's homegrown server are correct. I'm glad we see eye to eye.
I'm pretty sure they did. So? We see hacking attempts all the time against email servers at all levels of state and local government. Undoubtedly some of those succeed. She was stupid to use a home based server. If I asked my aging mother to make IT decisions that's exactly the kind of crap I'd expect to happen. It probably happened to Powell and it probably happened to the RNC server that conveniently lost Bush's email.

While I roll my eyes at my mom when she can't remember the difference between Facebook and Twitter, I'd still elect her president over Drumpf.
User avatar
gbasden
Posts: 7952
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 1:57 am
Location: Sacramento, CA

Re: The Hillary Clinton thread

Post by gbasden »

Blackhawk wrote:The one thing I can say for sure about this campaign: It turned me from a cautious optimist to a pessimist when it comes to humanity and the US.
Yes. Fucking yes.
User avatar
gilraen
Posts: 4588
Joined: Wed Sep 04, 2013 7:45 pm
Location: Broomfield, CO

Re: The Hillary Clinton thread

Post by gilraen »

gbasden wrote:
Smutly wrote: Excellent. So you now agree that those same experts who are saying foreign entities hacked Hillary's homegrown server are correct. I'm glad we see eye to eye.
I'm pretty sure they did. So? We see hacking attempts all the time against email servers at all levels of state and local government. Undoubtedly some of those succeed.
Not just "some". Tons.

2014 (article from Computerworld)

2014 and 2015 (white paper from the Heritage Foundation)

IRS in 2016

FBI in 2016 (hacked by a 16-year-old)

Welcome to the 21st century. The only secure server is one that's not connected to the Internet.
User avatar
Isgrimnur
Posts: 85787
Joined: Sun Oct 15, 2006 12:29 am
Location: Chookity pok
Contact:

Re: The Hillary Clinton thread

Post by Isgrimnur »

gilraen wrote:Welcome to the 21st century. The only secure server is one that's not connected to the Internet.
Tell that to the Iranians.
It's almost as if people are the problem.
User avatar
GreenGoo
Posts: 43513
Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2004 10:46 pm
Location: Ottawa, ON

Re: The Hillary Clinton thread

Post by GreenGoo »

Isgrimnur wrote:
gilraen wrote:Welcome to the 21st century. The only secure server is one that's not connected to the Internet.
Tell that to the Iranians.
...with USB turned off.
User avatar
Rip
Posts: 26952
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 9:34 pm
Location: Cajun Country!
Contact:

Re: The Hillary Clinton thread

Post by Rip »

http://nypost.com/2016/11/06/clinton-di ... materials/
In a classified 2012 e-mail dealing with the new president of Malawi, another Clinton aide, Monica Hanley, advised Clinton, “We can ask Marina to print this.”

“Revisions to the Iran points” was the subject line of a classified April 2012 e-mail to Clinton from Hanley. In it, the text reads, “Marina is trying to print for you.”

Both classified e-mails were marked “confidential,” the tier below “secret” or “top secret.”

Santos also had access to a highly secure room called an SCIF (sensitive compartmented information facility) that diplomatic security agents set up at Whitehaven, according to FBI notes from an interview with Abedin.

From within the SCIF, Santos — who had no clearance — “collected documents from the secure facsimile machine for Clinton,” the FBI notes revealed.

Just how sensitive were the papers Santos presumably handled? The FBI noted Clinton periodically received the Presidential Daily Brief — a top-secret document prepared by the CIA and other US intelligence agencies — via the secure fax.

A 2012 “sensitive” but unclassified e-mail from Hanley to Clinton refers to a fax the staff wanted Clinton “to see before your Netanyahu mtg. Marina will grab for you.”

Yet it appears Clinton was never asked by the FBI in its yearlong investigation to turn over the iMac Santos used to receive the e-mails, or the printer she used to print out the documents, or the printouts themselves.
The maid? OMFG, you couldn't make this stuff up. Perhaps she will have the gardener take care of border security?
When a Post reporter confronted Santos at her DC apartment Friday, she would say only, “I don’t speak to reporters.”

According to a 2010 profile in The Philippine Star, close Clinton friend Vernon Jordan recommended Santos to the Clintons after she worked part-time for him.

Bill Clinton gave a speech in Manila as part of his foundation and took time to visit with the family of the “mayordoma [housekeeper] of his Washington, DC, home — Marina Santos.”

He was quoted as describing Santos as the “wonderful woman who runs our home in Washington, without whom Hillary will not be able to serve as secretary of state.” The article ended remarking, without a hint of irony: “Marina now runs his house so that he and his wife can better serve interests higher than their own.”

Santos could turn out to be the Betty Currie of the Clinton e-mail scandal. Currie was the secretary for President Clinton. She also came recommended by Jordan, and became famous as a central witness in the Monica Lewinsky scandal for her handling of gifts given to Clinton’s mistress.

Investigators had sought the gifts, allegedly hidden under Currie’s bed on orders from Clinton, as evidence.
If they had investigated 9/11 this thoroughly we would still be wondering if those planes flew themselves into the building.
User avatar
Smoove_B
Posts: 56953
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:58 am
Location: Kaer Morhen

Re: The Hillary Clinton thread

Post by Smoove_B »

Incidentally, the maid is probably more qualified to be President than Donald Trump.
Maybe next year, maybe no go
User avatar
Defiant
Posts: 21045
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 11:09 pm
Location: Tongue in cheek

Re: The Hillary Clinton thread

Post by Defiant »

malchior
Posts: 24795
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:58 pm

Re: The Hillary Clinton thread

Post by malchior »

Now she has my vote - Daylight Saving is pointless waste.
User avatar
Newcastle
Posts: 10168
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 1:22 am
Location: reading over a shoulder near you

Re: The Hillary Clinton thread

Post by Newcastle »

NYpost = one small step abnove the Nat'l enquirer. Isn't also owned by Murdoch?

And hey two cheers for Hillary for giving that maid a shot at climbing up the economic ladder right?

:roll:
User avatar
tgb
Posts: 30690
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 10:33 pm
Location: Tucson, AZ

Re: The Hillary Clinton thread

Post by tgb »

malchior wrote:
Now she has my vote - Daylight Saving is pointless waste.
Move to AZ.

When I was growing up, the Post was considered the "middle ground" between the proudly lowbrow Daily News and the Times. Ever since Murdoch took it over in the 70's and started modeling it on his Aussie newspapers, it hasn't been worth anything beyond lining birdcages. The L.I. Newsday seems to be the new Post.
I spent 90% of the money I made on women, booze, and drugs. The other 10% I just pissed away.
User avatar
Default
Posts: 6549
Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2004 9:01 pm
Location: Handling bombs.

Re: The Hillary Clinton thread

Post by Default »

Favorite NL and a favorite AL team. Not a problem!
"pcp, lsd, thc, tgb...it's all good." ~ Kraken
User avatar
Scoop20906
Posts: 11821
Joined: Tue May 03, 2005 3:50 pm
Location: Belleville, MI

The Hillary Clinton thread

Post by Scoop20906 »

I wouldn't be shocked if most Washington officials operate in this manner with sensitive information.

It's a double standard that the higher ups can get away with while lower level govies may be fired for it.

I doubt anyone would be prosecuted unless there was evidence that they sought to cause damage to the United States. Thus H. Clinton has not been charged. It's only an issue because one political side sees it as an opportunity to discredit a rival. None of them would care otherwise.

That's my opinion anyway.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Last edited by Scoop20906 on Sun Nov 06, 2016 5:04 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Scoop. Makeup and hair are fabulous. - Qantaga

Xbox Gamertag: Scoop20906
Steam: Scoop20906
User avatar
Alefroth
Posts: 9575
Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2004 1:56 pm
Location: Bellingham WA

Re: The Hillary Clinton thread

Post by Alefroth »

Rip wrote:The maid? OMFG, you couldn't make this stuff up.
Wrong.
User avatar
Defiant
Posts: 21045
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 11:09 pm
Location: Tongue in cheek

Re: The Hillary Clinton thread

Post by Defiant »

Alefroth wrote:
Rip wrote:The maid? OMFG, you couldn't make this stuff up.
Wrong.

Allow me.

Image
Post Reply