jpinard wrote:Ohhh, I didn't realize he was poking fun at himself. Sorry!
I didn't see any evidence that he was. He seems to be pretty eccentric, so he is kind of hard to read though.
Rincewind wrote:No I think this dude legitimately thinks he makes sense. Its funny, in a sad, odd sort of way.
Aren't you folks aware the the pickle/gherkin debates?
~Neal
Sorry, no clue...
Pickles and gherkins are the same thing jpinard.
For motivation and so Jeff V can make me look bad:
2010 Totals: Biking: 65 miles Running: 393 miles
2009 Finals: Biking: 93 miles Running: 158 miles (I know it sucked, but I had a hernia most of the year)
Good soundcards really do increase your sound quality and fps...
...the Nforce2 beat both the Aud2 and the Hercules...
One more myth debunked.
NVidia dumped that excellent sound chipset because it cost too much, and the new one is not nearly as good as the chipset NForce had. Myth not debunked. At any rate, comparing one mobo chipset, to one add-on sound card is not a good scientific sampling... and 90% of mobo manufacturers use crappy sound chips to save cost.
Good soundcards really do increase your sound quality and fps...
...the Nforce2 beat both the Aud2 and the Hercules...
One more myth debunked.
It's not debunked because it's entirely debatable. My NF2 card has the NF2-APU, but most NF2 boards did not (they used the shittier Realtek). And the Audigy 2 has been supplanted by the 2-ZS. There are no absolutes here.
You do not take from this universe. It grants you what it will.
Another reason why I would never want onboard audio is because if I do want to upgrade or something goes wrong with the audio, it's a hell of a lot easier having a card to pull and replace.
For motivation and so Jeff V can make me look bad:
2010 Totals: Biking: 65 miles Running: 393 miles
2009 Finals: Biking: 93 miles Running: 158 miles (I know it sucked, but I had a hernia most of the year)
jpinard wrote:Myth #2? If a gamer needs fps, they look for the sound card that will do the most work "on-card". Most crap-built mobo sound chips offload all that work to your cpu, thus lowering your fps potential.
NVidia dumped that excellent sound chipset because it cost too much, and the new one is not nearly as good as the chipset NForce had. Myth not debunked.
...the Nforce2 beat both the Aud2 and the Hercules...
The myth was: "mobo sound chips offload all the work to your cpu, thus lowering your fps potential".
The myth was rendered defunct: "the Nforce2 beat both the Aud2 and the Hercules."
Are you suggesting that the debunked myth became defunct?
jpinard wrote:Myth #2? If a gamer needs fps, they look for the sound card that will do the most work "on-card". Most crap-built mobo sound chips offload all that work to your cpu, thus lowering your fps potential.
NVidia dumped that excellent sound chipset because it cost too much, and the new one is not nearly as good as the chipset NForce had. Myth not debunked.
...the Nforce2 beat both the Aud2 and the Hercules...
The myth was: "mobo sound chips offload all the work to your cpu, thus lowering your fps potential".
The myth was rendered defunct: "the Nforce2 beat both the Aud2 and the Hercules."
Are you suggesting that the debunked myth became defunct?
I'm telling you that onboard sound chips purchased nowadays do exactly that. That's why NVidia dumped the good NForce2 soundchip they had (it cost money!). I'm not comparing the one gem of mobos that hasn't been produced in years, with all the other lumps of coal being made past/present/future.
Let me remind you most games use mp3's (or a modified mp3 format) to play game music. Unless you have the new AMD X2 multithreading processor, that's a serious hit on your cpu bottlenecked games unless you sound card can offload that work. Somehow I know you "know" I'm right, but you just don't want it admit it
When the Xi-fi chip comes out (which will offload ALL sound processing) from the cpu... and you compare it to all the built-in mobo sound chips... which do not offload sound from the cpu... well when those benchies come out you'll be chirping another song.
Lee wrote:Another reason why I would never want onboard audio is because if I do want to upgrade or something goes wrong with the audio, it's a hell of a lot easier having a card to pull and replace.
But you could just add the sound card after the onboard fails. It's really neither here nor there imo. Few games are cpu-limited today so if the cpu has to take up some slack bfd. OTOH, sound cards supposedly pump out better sound.
6 of one, a gherkin of the other.
You do not take from this universe. It grants you what it will.
Lee wrote:Another reason why I would never want onboard audio is because if I do want to upgrade or something goes wrong with the audio, it's a hell of a lot easier having a card to pull and replace.
But you could just add the sound card after the onboard fails. It's really neither here nor there imo. Few games are cpu-limited today so if the cpu has to take up some slack bfd. OTOH, sound cards supposedly pump out better sound.
6 of one, a gherkin of the other.
Had a friend with this problem, he couldn't get the onboard one disabled, it kept popping up in XP and causing a conflict. I told him to get his MoBo documentation and find the jumper to disable it. He didn't have the book, or the knowledge to do such a thing.
For motivation and so Jeff V can make me look bad:
2010 Totals: Biking: 65 miles Running: 393 miles
2009 Finals: Biking: 93 miles Running: 158 miles (I know it sucked, but I had a hernia most of the year)