SCOTUS Watch

For discussion of religion and politics

Moderators: LawBeefaroni, $iljanus

Post Reply
User avatar
Max Peck
Posts: 15336
Joined: Fri Aug 05, 2005 8:09 pm
Location: Down the Rabbit-Hole

Re: SCOTUS Watch

Post by Max Peck »

Zarathud wrote: Wed Sep 26, 2018 9:39 pm Aside from the accusations, Kavanaugh's appearance on the talk circuit politicized his already political appointment of a former political operative to the SCOTUS.

He's not only toxic but willing to harm the Supreme Court to advance his cause. Disqualified.
<meme="Inigo Montoya">You used the word former. I don't think it means what you think it means.</meme>
"What? What? What?" -- The 14th Doctor

It's not enough to be a good player... you also have to play well. -- Siegbert Tarrasch
User avatar
pr0ner
Posts: 17534
Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2004 3:00 pm
Location: Northern Virginia, VA
Contact:

Re: SCOTUS Watch

Post by pr0ner »

Max Peck wrote: Wed Sep 26, 2018 10:16 pm
Zarathud wrote: Wed Sep 26, 2018 9:39 pm Aside from the accusations, Kavanaugh's appearance on the talk circuit politicized his already political appointment of a former political operative to the SCOTUS.

He's not only toxic but willing to harm the Supreme Court to advance his cause. Disqualified.
<meme="Inigo Montoya">You used the word former. I don't think it means what you think it means.</meme>
Inconceivable!
Hodor.
User avatar
Enough
Posts: 14689
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 11:05 pm
Location: Serendipity
Contact:

Re: SCOTUS Watch

Post by Enough »

My blog (mostly photos): Fort Ephemera - My Flickr Photostream

“You only get one sunrise and one sunset a day, and you only get so many days on the planet. A good photographer does the math and doesn’t waste either.” ―Galen Rowell
User avatar
Enough
Posts: 14689
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 11:05 pm
Location: Serendipity
Contact:

Re: SCOTUS Watch

Post by Enough »

Better summary of the craziness that continues,



https://twitter.com/eschor/status/1045141240205971456
My blog (mostly photos): Fort Ephemera - My Flickr Photostream

“You only get one sunrise and one sunset a day, and you only get so many days on the planet. A good photographer does the math and doesn’t waste either.” ―Galen Rowell
User avatar
tjg_marantz
Posts: 14692
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 12:54 pm
Location: Queen City, SK

Re: SCOTUS Watch

Post by tjg_marantz »

Zarathud wrote:Aside from the accusations, Kavanaugh's appearance on the talk circuit politicized his already political appointment of a former political operative to the SCOTUS.

He's not only toxic but willing to harm the Supreme Court to advance his cause. Disqualified.
His opening remarks when nominated politicized this from the get go.
Home of the Akimbo AWPs
User avatar
LawBeefaroni
Forum Moderator
Posts: 56125
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 3:08 pm
Location: Urbs in Horto, outrageous taxes on everything

Re: SCOTUS Watch

Post by LawBeefaroni »

Enough wrote: Wed Sep 26, 2018 11:11 pm
Better summary of the craziness that continues,



https://twitter.com/eschor/status/1045141240205971456
Lovely. #iamkanvanaugh
" Hey OP, listen to my advice alright." -Tha General
"No scientific discovery is named after its original discoverer." -Stigler's Law of Eponymy, discovered by Robert K. Merton

MYT
User avatar
em2nought
Posts: 5883
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 5:48 am

Re: SCOTUS Watch

Post by em2nought »

There hasn't been a soap opera this good since Luke raped Laura, and then turned around and married her. If they really wanted to keep rolling with GH they'd have had a ffm thing with Laura & Leslie and somebody without a perm. :roll:
Em2nought is ecstatic garbage
User avatar
Blackhawk
Posts: 46273
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 9:48 pm
Location: Southwest Indiana

Re: SCOTUS Watch

Post by Blackhawk »

Everybody's Evil Spartacus.
What doesn't kill me makes me stranger.
User avatar
Zarathud
Posts: 17124
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 10:29 pm
Location: Chicago, Illinois

Re: SCOTUS Watch

Post by Zarathud »

Let the Borking begin.
"A lie can run round the world before the truth has got its boots on." -Terry Pratchett, The Truth
"The presence of those seeking the truth is infinitely to be preferred to those who think they've found it." -Terry Pratchett, Monstrous Regiment
User avatar
Paingod
Posts: 13225
Joined: Wed Aug 25, 2010 8:58 am

Re: SCOTUS Watch

Post by Paingod »

I honestly don't know why the GOP is going through with a show. They're dead set that this guy is passing. He could walk in, flip everyone the finger, moon the press, sit down with a beer in hand, and McConnell would stand to applaud him.
Black Lives Matter

2021-01-20: The first good night's sleep I had in 4 years.
2025-01-20: The nightmares continue.
User avatar
Holman
Posts: 30107
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 8:00 pm
Location: Between the Schuylkill and the Wissahickon

Re: SCOTUS Watch

Post by Holman »

Paingod wrote: Thu Sep 27, 2018 9:53 am I honestly don't know why the GOP is going through with a show.
Well it's just started, but apparently it's so Chuck Grassley has a chance to look as dickish, condescending, and hostile as possible in his opening remarks.
Much prefer my Nazis Nuremberged.
User avatar
Defiant
Posts: 21045
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 11:09 pm
Location: Tongue in cheek

Re: SCOTUS Watch

Post by Defiant »

Well, given that opening statement by Grassley, it's no wonder why they got someone else to question ford.
User avatar
Isgrimnur
Posts: 85296
Joined: Sun Oct 15, 2006 12:29 am
Location: Chookity pok
Contact:

Re: SCOTUS Watch

Post by Isgrimnur »

Holman wrote: Thu Sep 27, 2018 10:20 am
Paingod wrote: Thu Sep 27, 2018 9:53 am I honestly don't know why the GOP is going through with a show.
Well it's just started, but apparently it's so Chuck Grassley has a chance to look as dickish, condescending, and hostile as possible in his opening remarks.
It's almost as if people are the problem.
User avatar
ImLawBoy
Forum Admin
Posts: 15464
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 9:49 pm
Location: Chicago, IL
Contact:

Re: SCOTUS Watch

Post by ImLawBoy »

Paingod wrote: Thu Sep 27, 2018 9:53 am I honestly don't know why the GOP is going through with a show. They're dead set that this guy is passing. He could walk in, flip everyone the finger, moon the press, sit down with a beer in hand, and McConnell would stand to applaud him.
You've got to admit, that would be pretty bad ass.
That's my purse! I don't know you!
User avatar
Unagi
Posts: 28348
Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2006 5:14 pm
Location: Chicago

Re: SCOTUS Watch

Post by Unagi »

I believed her already.... but I just wanna say that Ford is looking to be amazingly credible.

And her story sounds entirely real.
User avatar
Paingod
Posts: 13225
Joined: Wed Aug 25, 2010 8:58 am

Re: SCOTUS Watch

Post by Paingod »

I also believe her.

There's really nothing the GOP can ask except to try and nitpick tiny details to make it look mis-remembered, but I don't think they'll be able to sway anything about this with any significance.

*Edit: How is asking for copies so they can follow along being "rudely interrupted" ... ??
Black Lives Matter

2021-01-20: The first good night's sleep I had in 4 years.
2025-01-20: The nightmares continue.
User avatar
Defiant
Posts: 21045
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 11:09 pm
Location: Tongue in cheek

Re: SCOTUS Watch

Post by Defiant »

*Edit: How is asking for copies so they can follow along being "rudely interrupted" ... ??
I think he was making a joke about his intern, or something. Everyone laughed, from what I could see.

Grassley, however, should shut up. He keeps on coming off as a jerk.

Mitchell, on the other hand, is acting very professionally, IMO (at least, she doesn't come off as attacking her in any way), but she hasn't been very effective in terms of trying to discredit the story, just in fleshing out a few details to the incident.

On Fivethirtyeight, it was also pointed out how the five minute intervals hurt her ability of gaining any momentum.
Last edited by Defiant on Thu Sep 27, 2018 11:36 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Defiant
Posts: 21045
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 11:09 pm
Location: Tongue in cheek

Re: SCOTUS Watch

Post by Defiant »

And yeah, Ford comes off incredibly credible and sympathetic.
User avatar
Defiant
Posts: 21045
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 11:09 pm
Location: Tongue in cheek

Re: SCOTUS Watch

Post by Defiant »

User avatar
Scoop20906
Posts: 11820
Joined: Tue May 03, 2005 3:50 pm
Location: Belleville, MI

Re: SCOTUS Watch

Post by Scoop20906 »

Defiant wrote:
Wait, I thought all of this is part of the twilight zone.
Scoop. Makeup and hair are fabulous. - Qantaga

Xbox Gamertag: Scoop20906
Steam: Scoop20906
User avatar
Carpet_pissr
Posts: 20804
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 5:32 pm
Location: Columbia, SC

Re: SCOTUS Watch

Post by Carpet_pissr »

In all the hubbub, I initially scanned that post to read that two men had come forward accusing Kava'bra of sexual misconduct.
User avatar
Smoove_B
Posts: 56390
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:58 am
Location: Kaer Morhen

Re: SCOTUS Watch

Post by Smoove_B »

If this moment isn't listed in future history books as a flashpoint in American culture and society, I will be amazed. I honestly cannot believe what I'm hearing and seeing today. How they continued with all this after Dr. Ford's opening statement is unreal.
Maybe next year, maybe no go
User avatar
Captain Caveman
Posts: 11687
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 8:57 am

Re: SCOTUS Watch

Post by Captain Caveman »

If the GOP moves forward with the nomination after this, they really will have given up any pretense of decency. Ford's testimony was searing-- she was brave, emotional, powerful. I'm guessing the GOP is regretting holding this hearing, but maybe I'm seeing this all through sympathetic eyes. I'm guessing republicans saw her testimony differently.

And hiring a prosecutor to basically cross-examine her and try to catch her in a lie? So shameful. She's a victim, not a criminal. And if they goal was to get to the facts, order an investigation and subpoena other witnesses.

It's insane that Ford has had to go through this, but I'm glad that she didn't shirk from the moment.
Last edited by Captain Caveman on Thu Sep 27, 2018 12:05 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Unagi
Posts: 28348
Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2006 5:14 pm
Location: Chicago

Re: SCOTUS Watch

Post by Unagi »

Smoove_B wrote: Thu Sep 27, 2018 11:57 am If this moment isn't listed in future history books as a flashpoint in American culture and society, I will be amazed. I honestly cannot believe what I'm hearing and seeing today. How they continued with all this after Dr. Ford's opening statement is unreal.
Same here. This is big history we are watching - with either direction it goes. Her opening statement and even her answers to all the questions... I can't imagine this nomination still going forward, and I keep being told "Oh, it's going forward".
User avatar
Holman
Posts: 30107
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 8:00 pm
Location: Between the Schuylkill and the Wissahickon

Re: SCOTUS Watch

Post by Holman »

Smoove_B wrote: Thu Sep 27, 2018 11:57 am If this moment isn't listed in future history books as a flashpoint in American culture and society, I will be amazed. I honestly cannot believe what I'm hearing and seeing today. How they continued with all this after Dr. Ford's opening statement is unreal.
I'm confident it will only get worse.
Much prefer my Nazis Nuremberged.
User avatar
Zaxxon
Forum Moderator
Posts: 28540
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:11 am
Location: Surrounded by Mountains

Re: SCOTUS Watch

Post by Zaxxon »

Captain Caveman wrote: Thu Sep 27, 2018 12:04 pmAnd hiring a prosecutor to basically cross-examine her and try to catch her in a lie? So shameful. She's a victim, not a criminal. And if they goal was to get to the facts, order an investigation and subpoena other witnesses.
This. I'm caught wondering whether their intention was to catch Ford in a lie, or to move the focus off of the actual R Senators in terms of who's doing the 'hard' questioning (it's election season, after all). Either way, it's true that if their goal was to actually get to the truth, this is not the forum for that. They opted to nuke that option in favor of rushing to a vote.
User avatar
$iljanus
Forum Moderator
Posts: 13947
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 3:46 pm
Location: New England...or under your bed

Re: SCOTUS Watch

Post by $iljanus »

Is Mitchell trying to discredit Ford by referencing Ford's fear of flying and then listing Ford's air travel? She obviously doesn't have PTSD because of travel to exotic locales? What the fuck?
"Who's going to tell him that the job he's currently seeking might just be one of those Black jobs?"
-Michelle Obama 2024 Democratic Convention

Wise words of warning from Smoove B: Oh, how you all laughed when I warned you about the semen. Well, who's laughing now?
User avatar
Defiant
Posts: 21045
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 11:09 pm
Location: Tongue in cheek

Re: SCOTUS Watch

Post by Defiant »

Wow, the questioning by mitchell has gotten a little bizarre. Especially going after her fear of flying? Is this really the best use of her five minutes?
User avatar
Captain Caveman
Posts: 11687
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 8:57 am

Re: SCOTUS Watch

Post by Captain Caveman »

Mitchell is trying to discredit her with this fear of flying line of question. It's insane and appalling.
User avatar
geezer
Posts: 7632
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 1:52 pm
Location: Yeeha!

Re: SCOTUS Watch

Post by geezer »

Captain Caveman wrote: Thu Sep 27, 2018 12:09 pm Mitchell is trying to discredit her with this fear of flying line of question. It's insane and appalling.
Also desperate and ineffectual, in my opinion.
User avatar
Defiant
Posts: 21045
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 11:09 pm
Location: Tongue in cheek

Re: SCOTUS Watch

Post by Defiant »

User avatar
$iljanus
Forum Moderator
Posts: 13947
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 3:46 pm
Location: New England...or under your bed

Re: SCOTUS Watch

Post by $iljanus »

The Toddler In Chief is probably telling whoever is listening "Well, for a person who is" traumatized" and is afraid to fly she sure has flown to some nice places".
"Who's going to tell him that the job he's currently seeking might just be one of those Black jobs?"
-Michelle Obama 2024 Democratic Convention

Wise words of warning from Smoove B: Oh, how you all laughed when I warned you about the semen. Well, who's laughing now?
User avatar
Zaxxon
Forum Moderator
Posts: 28540
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:11 am
Location: Surrounded by Mountains

Re: SCOTUS Watch

Post by Zaxxon »

Boy, Grassley sure likes to interject between each speaker with any straw he can grasp to potentially say that his oversight hasn't been #Barkleyturrible. Doesn't come off very well.
User avatar
Defiant
Posts: 21045
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 11:09 pm
Location: Tongue in cheek

Re: SCOTUS Watch

Post by Defiant »

Defiant wrote: Thu Sep 27, 2018 11:35 am
Mitchell, on the other hand, is acting very professionally, IMO (at least, she doesn't come off as attacking her in any way)
I think this was premature, given all the absurd questions "Did you fly to arrive here?", "Why did you seek a lawyer?", "Where did you take the polygraph?"

I mean, it wasn't so much an attack the way Grassley comes off, but it seems irrelevant and/or unprofessional.
Last edited by Defiant on Thu Sep 27, 2018 12:42 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Kurth
Posts: 6420
Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2005 1:19 am
Location: Portland

Re: SCOTUS Watch

Post by Kurth »

Kavanaugh is toast.

I’ve only been listening for the last 25 minutes or so, but it seems like all of Mitchell’s questioning goes to process issues (when did you come forward, when did you retain counsel, did you know the committee was willing to come to you in CA, why did you take a polygraph, etc, etc).

None of this goes to to the credibility of her allegations. This is really weak, weak stuff.

Maybe there were some tougher more substantive questioning earlier, but if this is the best the Republicans have, it’s not at all impressive.

I agree with everyone who has opined that Ford comes off as credible and sincere. She’s also very likeable. Doesn’t cone across as any kind of zealot.

I think the Republicans are going to regret this hearing.
Just 'cause you feel it, doesn't mean it's there -- Radiohead
Do you believe me? Do you trust me? Do you like me? 😳
User avatar
Defiant
Posts: 21045
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 11:09 pm
Location: Tongue in cheek

Re: SCOTUS Watch

Post by Defiant »

Kurth wrote: Thu Sep 27, 2018 12:41 pm
Maybe there were some tougher more substantive questioning earlier, but if this is the best the Republicans have, it’s not at all impressive.
Nope, they weren't substantive (at least, from the Republican side)
User avatar
Combustible Lemur
Posts: 3961
Joined: Tue Jun 07, 2005 10:17 pm
Location: houston, TX

Re: SCOTUS Watch

Post by Combustible Lemur »

Or this was a way to rip the bandaid. Look a sex crimes prosecutor says she's telling the truth... Now we think it's a good idea to abandon Kavanaugh. And we don't have to wait for an investigation, or listen to any other women, or take responsibility for creating this shit show.

Tadaa! Look Barret's a woman vote her in next week!

Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk

Is Scott home? thump thump thump Crash ......No.
User avatar
noxiousdog
Posts: 24627
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 11:27 pm
Contact:

Re: SCOTUS Watch

Post by noxiousdog »

Kurth wrote: Thu Sep 27, 2018 12:41 pm I think the Republicans are going to regret this hearing.
They didn't want it in the first place.
Black Lives Matter

"To wield Grond, the mighty hammer of the Federal Government, is to be intoxicated with power beyond what you and I can reckon (though I figure we can ball park it pretty good with computers and maths). Need to tunnel through a mountain? Grond. Kill a mighty ogre? Grond. Hangnail? Grond. Spider? Grond (actually, that's a legit use, moreso than the rest)." - Peacedog
User avatar
Scoop20906
Posts: 11820
Joined: Tue May 03, 2005 3:50 pm
Location: Belleville, MI

SCOTUS Watch

Post by Scoop20906 »

That was an abrupt call for lunch. Makes me wonder if the toddler in chief is screaming on the phone at Grassley right now. Why aren’t you being tough on her????!?
Scoop. Makeup and hair are fabulous. - Qantaga

Xbox Gamertag: Scoop20906
Steam: Scoop20906
User avatar
GreenGoo
Posts: 43222
Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2004 10:46 pm
Location: Ottawa, ON

Re: SCOTUS Watch

Post by GreenGoo »

noxiousdog wrote: Thu Sep 27, 2018 12:47 pm They didn't want it in the first place.
Wait. So you're saying the Dems and/or Ford requested it?
Post Reply