At my job, if I tell someone, using these exact words, "You look nice today", and they decide that they want to interpret that in a sleazy way, I will absolutely get nailed for sexual harassment.noxiousdog wrote: Thu Sep 27, 2018 2:04 pmI've never been anywhere that had one of those.GreenGoo wrote: Thu Sep 27, 2018 1:55 pm Anything above a small business almost certainly has a "no comments on physical appearance" as part of their sexual harassment policy. That most people choose to ignore this, especially with long standing co-workers and innocuous comments, doesn't mean it doesn't exist.
SCOTUS Watch
Moderators: LawBeefaroni, $iljanus
- Fretmute
- Posts: 8513
- Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2004 7:05 pm
- Location: On a hillside, desolate
Re: SCOTUS Watch
- Alefroth
- Posts: 9366
- Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2004 1:56 pm
- Location: Bellingham WA
Re: SCOTUS Watch
Well, that says loads about you.Kurth wrote: Thu Sep 27, 2018 1:05 pm
Oh, come on. I agree with everything about the old white men of the GOP and reproductive rights, but that comment from Hatch is completely innocuous. Saying someone is an attractive witness is no different from my comment that she comes across as likeable. He's not saying "She's smoking hot!!!!!" That kind of thing is pure "gotchaism" (I think I made that up, but I'm sticking with it). But I'm sure it will be all over social media in no time.
- Remus West
- Posts: 33597
- Joined: Mon May 09, 2005 5:39 pm
- Location: Not in Westland
Re: SCOTUS Watch
Saying she is likeable implies her personality. Saying she is attractive implies her looks. Very different. Particularly in this situation.Kurth wrote: Thu Sep 27, 2018 1:05 pmOh, come on. I agree with everything about the old white men of the GOP and reproductive rights, but that comment from Hatch is completely innocuous. Saying someone is an attractive witness is no different from my comment that she comes across as likeable. He's not saying "She's smoking hot!!!!!" That kind of thing is pure "gotchaism" (I think I made that up, but I'm sticking with it). But I'm sure it will be all over social media in no time.GreenGoo wrote: Thu Sep 27, 2018 12:57 pmDon't forget that this is the party of old white men that are dead set on controlling a woman's reproductive system. I find comments like "she's attractive" to be so tone deaf as to be from another era. Like 70+ years ago era. Eventually they'll die off and a new crop of Reps will take their place, and they'll be much more savvy about their misogyny.
Plus...Utah.
“As democracy is perfected, the office of president represents, more and more closely, the inner soul of the people. On some great and glorious day the plain folks of the land will reach their heart's desire at last and the White House will be adorned by a downright moron.” - H.L. Mencken
- noxiousdog
- Posts: 24627
- Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 11:27 pm
- Contact:
Re: SCOTUS Watch
I work for a foreign company and it's a global code of conduct. It's complete reasonable. Don't be degrading or offensive, and more importantly if you're asked to stop, stop even if you don't think you're being degrading or offensive.Isgrimnur wrote: Thu Sep 27, 2018 2:06 pmYou work in the Texas oil industry.noxiousdog wrote: Thu Sep 27, 2018 2:04 pmI've never been anywhere that had one of those.GreenGoo wrote: Thu Sep 27, 2018 1:55 pm Anything above a small business almost certainly has a "no comments on physical appearance" as part of their sexual harassment policy. That most people choose to ignore this, especially with long standing co-workers and innocuous comments, doesn't mean it doesn't exist.
And the phrase is: "making graphic or degrading comments about an individual or his/her appearance." which is a sight different from "no comments".
Black Lives Matter
"To wield Grond, the mighty hammer of the Federal Government, is to be intoxicated with power beyond what you and I can reckon (though I figure we can ball park it pretty good with computers and maths). Need to tunnel through a mountain? Grond. Kill a mighty ogre? Grond. Hangnail? Grond. Spider? Grond (actually, that's a legit use, moreso than the rest)." - Peacedog
"To wield Grond, the mighty hammer of the Federal Government, is to be intoxicated with power beyond what you and I can reckon (though I figure we can ball park it pretty good with computers and maths). Need to tunnel through a mountain? Grond. Kill a mighty ogre? Grond. Hangnail? Grond. Spider? Grond (actually, that's a legit use, moreso than the rest)." - Peacedog
- Isgrimnur
- Posts: 85296
- Joined: Sun Oct 15, 2006 12:29 am
- Location: Chookity pok
- Contact:
Re: SCOTUS Watch
I know, I just like giving you a hard time.
It's almost as if people are the problem.
- LordMortis
- Posts: 71965
- Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 11:26 pm
Re: SCOTUS Watch
It's easy to imagine a scenario where attractive is conflated to mean having value that holds your attention over physical appeal. We do it all of the time, "That's an attractive offer" "this what the most attractive choice"Combustible Lemur wrote: Thu Sep 27, 2018 1:42 pm That being said. Based on previous Hatch quotes I don't think he gets the benefit of any doubts.
That said, no matter how easy to imagine, I also don't imagine giving anyone the benefit of the doubt. It's an ill conceived and inconsiderate reference and the further your tendencies sway from a person how hold consideration for people coupled with the more your livelihood is coupled with effective communication, the more negatively I view you while not giving you the benefit of the doubt.
On a scale from Merlkly to McConnell, Hatch is consistently a 7 or 8 in raising my dander. This is doesn't disappoint. I have as little use from him as I did before his language games.
- Enough
- Posts: 14689
- Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 11:05 pm
- Location: Serendipity
- Contact:
Re: SCOTUS Watch
Since none of us know how Dr. Ford would interpret the comment, there's that. Harassment 101 is that any comments like this can be harassment if the comment is unwelcome. I viewed the comment as par for the course for a bumbling old fool that is completely detached from reality. I see nothing wrong with bringing up the comments for derision, but I also agree we have far bigger fish to fry here.Remus West wrote: Thu Sep 27, 2018 2:11 pmSaying she is likeable implies her personality. Saying she is attractive implies her looks. Very different. Particularly in this situation.Kurth wrote: Thu Sep 27, 2018 1:05 pmOh, come on. I agree with everything about the old white men of the GOP and reproductive rights, but that comment from Hatch is completely innocuous. Saying someone is an attractive witness is no different from my comment that she comes across as likeable. He's not saying "She's smoking hot!!!!!" That kind of thing is pure "gotchaism" (I think I made that up, but I'm sticking with it). But I'm sure it will be all over social media in no time.GreenGoo wrote: Thu Sep 27, 2018 12:57 pmDon't forget that this is the party of old white men that are dead set on controlling a woman's reproductive system. I find comments like "she's attractive" to be so tone deaf as to be from another era. Like 70+ years ago era. Eventually they'll die off and a new crop of Reps will take their place, and they'll be much more savvy about their misogyny.
Plus...Utah.
My blog (mostly photos): Fort Ephemera - My Flickr Photostream
“You only get one sunrise and one sunset a day, and you only get so many days on the planet. A good photographer does the math and doesn’t waste either.” ―Galen Rowell
“You only get one sunrise and one sunset a day, and you only get so many days on the planet. A good photographer does the math and doesn’t waste either.” ―Galen Rowell
- noxiousdog
- Posts: 24627
- Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 11:27 pm
- Contact:
Re: SCOTUS Watch
No worries.
Black Lives Matter
"To wield Grond, the mighty hammer of the Federal Government, is to be intoxicated with power beyond what you and I can reckon (though I figure we can ball park it pretty good with computers and maths). Need to tunnel through a mountain? Grond. Kill a mighty ogre? Grond. Hangnail? Grond. Spider? Grond (actually, that's a legit use, moreso than the rest)." - Peacedog
"To wield Grond, the mighty hammer of the Federal Government, is to be intoxicated with power beyond what you and I can reckon (though I figure we can ball park it pretty good with computers and maths). Need to tunnel through a mountain? Grond. Kill a mighty ogre? Grond. Hangnail? Grond. Spider? Grond (actually, that's a legit use, moreso than the rest)." - Peacedog
- LordMortis
- Posts: 71965
- Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 11:26 pm
Re: SCOTUS Watch
I TiVo The Voice. I don't know why. Complementing so many women on The Voice for their look is so common it's probably unnoticeable to most but it makes me wince like it's the Wilhelm Scream. Conversely, they do it so rarely for a man, that is also sticks out and it sticks out so much they tease each other about it.Fretmute wrote: Thu Sep 27, 2018 2:08 pm At my job, if I tell someone, using these exact words, "You look nice today", and they decide that they want to interpret that in a sleazy way, I will absolutely get nailed for sexual harassment.
I'm not even sure I'd notice and therefore have a hangup if it weren't for a show called The Voice. Where is GG's idiosyncrasies thread? I could update that thing daily with stupid shit I can't get over.
- Fireball
- Posts: 4763
- Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:43 pm
Re: SCOTUS Watch
Dr. Ford did an excellent job in a terrible situation. After that, no decent person can support putting Kavanaugh on the Court.
Wed Oct 20, 2004 1:17 am
Zarathud: The sad thing is that Barak Obama is a very intelligent and articulate person, even when you disagree with his views it's clear that he's very thoughtful. I would have loved to see Obama in a real debate.
Me: Wait 12 years, when he runs for president. :-)
Zarathud: The sad thing is that Barak Obama is a very intelligent and articulate person, even when you disagree with his views it's clear that he's very thoughtful. I would have loved to see Obama in a real debate.
Me: Wait 12 years, when he runs for president. :-)
- Isgrimnur
- Posts: 85296
- Joined: Sun Oct 15, 2006 12:29 am
- Location: Chookity pok
- Contact:
Re: SCOTUS Watch
What makes you think the voters elected decent persons?Fireball wrote: Thu Sep 27, 2018 2:21 pm Dr. Ford did an excellent job in a terrible situation. After that, no decent person can support putting Kavanaugh on the Court.
It's almost as if people are the problem.
- msteelers
- Posts: 7320
- Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 9:30 pm
- Location: Port Saint Lucie, Florida
- Contact:
Re: SCOTUS Watch
Along that same vein, it bothers me that every time a woman posts a picture to social media, the comments are some variation of telling her how good she looks.LordMortis wrote:I TiVo The Voice. I don't know why. Complementing so many women on The Voice for their look is so common it's probably unnoticeable to most but it makes me wince like it's the Wilhelm Scream. Conversely, they do it so rarely for a man, that is also sticks out and it sticks out so much they tease each other about it.Fretmute wrote: Thu Sep 27, 2018 2:08 pm At my job, if I tell someone, using these exact words, "You look nice today", and they decide that they want to interpret that in a sleazy way, I will absolutely get nailed for sexual harassment.
I'm not even sure I'd notice and therefore have a hangup if it weren't for a show called The Voice. Where is GG's idiosyncrasies thread? I could update that thing daily with stupid shit I can't get over.
And it’s not just creepy guys that do it. A lot of woman will throw in the obligatory “beautiful!”... or “gorgeous!” to their comments.
- $iljanus
- Forum Moderator
- Posts: 13947
- Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 3:46 pm
- Location: New England...or under your bed
Re: SCOTUS Watch
Is it my imagination that Mitchell is trying to lay blame on Dr. Ford for giving testimony in the Senate vs in private? She should have submitted to a forensic interview? Well Dr. Ford wanted to talk to the damn FBI for crying out loud.
Mitchell set that up like a prosecutor, complementing Dr. Ford for her science references and how 5 minute questioning isn’t really the most effective way to get to the truth which elicited laughs all around. Then after commiserating with the witness, cites her own study about the best way to get testimony in sexual assault cases then asks why she didn’t pursue a forensic interview vs hiring lawyers and submitting to a polygraph. Again she wanted to be interviewed by the FBI who I would think have some experience in interviewing witness and assault victims vs investigators flying out to her from both sides of the aisle who would possibly have some political motivations?
Mitchell set that up like a prosecutor, complementing Dr. Ford for her science references and how 5 minute questioning isn’t really the most effective way to get to the truth which elicited laughs all around. Then after commiserating with the witness, cites her own study about the best way to get testimony in sexual assault cases then asks why she didn’t pursue a forensic interview vs hiring lawyers and submitting to a polygraph. Again she wanted to be interviewed by the FBI who I would think have some experience in interviewing witness and assault victims vs investigators flying out to her from both sides of the aisle who would possibly have some political motivations?
"Who's going to tell him that the job he's currently seeking might just be one of those Black jobs?"
-Michelle Obama 2024 Democratic Convention
Wise words of warning from Smoove B: Oh, how you all laughed when I warned you about the semen. Well, who's laughing now?
-Michelle Obama 2024 Democratic Convention
Wise words of warning from Smoove B: Oh, how you all laughed when I warned you about the semen. Well, who's laughing now?
- Paingod
- Posts: 13225
- Joined: Wed Aug 25, 2010 8:58 am
Re: SCOTUS Watch
Black Lives Matter
2021-01-20: The first good night's sleep I had in 4 years.
2025-01-20: The nightmares continue.
2021-01-20: The first good night's sleep I had in 4 years.
2025-01-20: The nightmares continue.
- Skinypupy
- Posts: 21283
- Joined: Tue Dec 07, 2004 10:12 am
- Location: Utah
Re: SCOTUS Watch
Which means nothing has changed from where we started, basically.Fireball wrote: Thu Sep 27, 2018 2:21 pm Dr. Ford did an excellent job in a terrible situation. After that, no decent person can support putting Kavanaugh on the Court.
When darkness veils the world, four Warriors of Light shall come.
- Holman
- Posts: 30107
- Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 8:00 pm
- Location: Between the Schuylkill and the Wissahickon
Re: SCOTUS Watch
Hoo Boy Lindsey Graham is *melting down,* jabbering red-faced at reporters about how the majority was "ambushed" by Ford's accusations.
Then he says that he thinks that Dr. Ford (by being put up to it) is "just as much a victim" as Kavanaugh...
Yup. Said that.
Then he says that he thinks that Dr. Ford (by being put up to it) is "just as much a victim" as Kavanaugh...
Yup. Said that.
Much prefer my Nazis Nuremberged.
- Isgrimnur
- Posts: 85296
- Joined: Sun Oct 15, 2006 12:29 am
- Location: Chookity pok
- Contact:
Re: SCOTUS Watch
Checkmate.
It's almost as if people are the problem.
- Archinerd
- Posts: 6984
- Joined: Fri Aug 25, 2006 11:18 am
- Location: Shikaakwa
Re: SCOTUS Watch
I predict a nasty tweet storm heading our way.
- Kurth
- Posts: 6420
- Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2005 1:19 am
- Location: Portland
Re: SCOTUS Watch
I don't want to further derail this thread, but if you care to elaborate, feel free to PM me. I'd be interested to know your thoughts.Alefroth wrote: Thu Sep 27, 2018 2:10 pmWell, that says loads about you.Kurth wrote: Thu Sep 27, 2018 1:05 pm
Oh, come on. I agree with everything about the old white men of the GOP and reproductive rights, but that comment from Hatch is completely innocuous. Saying someone is an attractive witness is no different from my comment that she comes across as likeable. He's not saying "She's smoking hot!!!!!" That kind of thing is pure "gotchaism" (I think I made that up, but I'm sticking with it). But I'm sure it will be all over social media in no time.
Just 'cause you feel it, doesn't mean it's there -- Radiohead
Do you believe me? Do you trust me? Do you like me? 😳
Do you believe me? Do you trust me? Do you like me? 😳
- Holman
- Posts: 30107
- Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 8:00 pm
- Location: Between the Schuylkill and the Wissahickon
Re: SCOTUS Watch
I wonder. A few journos with WH connections have suggested that Trump is angry at fellow Republicans over this, like they should have vetted Kavanaugh better and known what was coming. He is reported to be furious with Don McGahn, who pushed hard for this nominee.
Obviously it makes the party look weak, but Kavanaugh going down in flames doesn't touch Trump personally the way Mueller's indictments do. He probably figures he can just pick another nominee to get the same results.
Trump isn't deeply in invested in anything but Trump.
Much prefer my Nazis Nuremberged.
- Blackhawk
- Posts: 46273
- Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 9:48 pm
- Location: Southwest Indiana
Re: SCOTUS Watch
And yet, as an autistic person with trouble communicating with people, the first piece of (professional, official) advice I always get is to compliment them on their appearance. Apparently they can decide that makes you a predator.Fretmute wrote: Thu Sep 27, 2018 2:08 pm t my job, if I tell someone, using these exact words, "You look nice today", and they decide that they want to interpret that in a sleazy way, I will absolutely get nailed for sexual harassment.
Fuck society.
What doesn't kill me makes me stranger.
- Holman
- Posts: 30107
- Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 8:00 pm
- Location: Between the Schuylkill and the Wissahickon
Re: SCOTUS Watch
OK. Here we go. "Angry preppy" it is.
He's going off on Democrats and "The Left" without even a pretense of judicial impartiality. Even Scalia hid his cards better than this.
Presumably he is not drunk at the moment, but he's certainly belligerent.
He's going off on Democrats and "The Left" without even a pretense of judicial impartiality. Even Scalia hid his cards better than this.
Presumably he is not drunk at the moment, but he's certainly belligerent.
Much prefer my Nazis Nuremberged.
- Fireball
- Posts: 4763
- Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:43 pm
Re: SCOTUS Watch
What a fucking snowflake.
Wed Oct 20, 2004 1:17 am
Zarathud: The sad thing is that Barak Obama is a very intelligent and articulate person, even when you disagree with his views it's clear that he's very thoughtful. I would have loved to see Obama in a real debate.
Me: Wait 12 years, when he runs for president. :-)
Zarathud: The sad thing is that Barak Obama is a very intelligent and articulate person, even when you disagree with his views it's clear that he's very thoughtful. I would have loved to see Obama in a real debate.
Me: Wait 12 years, when he runs for president. :-)
- Smoove_B
- Posts: 56390
- Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:58 am
- Location: Kaer Morhen
Re: SCOTUS Watch
I'm pretty sure at this point, the court of public opinion has ruled that Kavanugh is a giant pile of shit. I'm sure the GOP will fully take that into consideration.
Maybe next year, maybe no go
- LawBeefaroni
- Forum Moderator
- Posts: 56125
- Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 3:08 pm
- Location: Urbs in Horto, outrageous taxes on everything
Re: SCOTUS Watch
That's 20 years old advice.Blackhawk wrote: Thu Sep 27, 2018 3:16 pmAnd yet, as an autistic person with trouble communicating with people, the first piece of (professional, official) advice I always get is to compliment them on their appearance. Apparently they can decide that makes you a predator.Fretmute wrote: Thu Sep 27, 2018 2:08 pm t my job, if I tell someone, using these exact words, "You look nice today", and they decide that they want to interpret that in a sleazy way, I will absolutely get nailed for sexual harassment.
Fuck society.
Now you just say, "Hashtag: you're so amazing!" and smile vapidly. Unless you're a congresscreature or the president. Then you just do/grab whatever.
" Hey OP, listen to my advice alright." -Tha General
"No scientific discovery is named after its original discoverer." -Stigler's Law of Eponymy, discovered by Robert K. Merton
MYT
"No scientific discovery is named after its original discoverer." -Stigler's Law of Eponymy, discovered by Robert K. Merton
MYT
- Paingod
- Posts: 13225
- Joined: Wed Aug 25, 2010 8:58 am
Re: SCOTUS Watch
Naw, man. They good. They brought the Poo-Pourri. He might look bad, but he smells good.Smoove_B wrote: Thu Sep 27, 2018 3:26 pm I'm pretty sure at this point, the court of public opinion has ruled that Kavanugh is a giant pile of shit. I'm sure the GOP will fully take that into consideration.
Black Lives Matter
2021-01-20: The first good night's sleep I had in 4 years.
2025-01-20: The nightmares continue.
2021-01-20: The first good night's sleep I had in 4 years.
2025-01-20: The nightmares continue.
- Holman
- Posts: 30107
- Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 8:00 pm
- Location: Between the Schuylkill and the Wissahickon
Re: SCOTUS Watch
There's no martyr like a spoiled, entitled prick with his birthright at risk.
Much prefer my Nazis Nuremberged.
- Scoop20906
- Posts: 11820
- Joined: Tue May 03, 2005 3:50 pm
- Location: Belleville, MI
Re: SCOTUS Watch
He didn’t get what he deserves and It’s not fair.Fireball wrote:What a fucking snowflake.
Scoop. Makeup and hair are fabulous. - Qantaga
Xbox Gamertag: Scoop20906
Steam: Scoop20906
Xbox Gamertag: Scoop20906
Steam: Scoop20906
- Fretmute
- Posts: 8513
- Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2004 7:05 pm
- Location: On a hillside, desolate
Re: SCOTUS Watch
Holman wrote: Thu Sep 27, 2018 3:28 pm There's no martyr like a spoiled, entitled prick with his birthright at risk.
- Holman
- Posts: 30107
- Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 8:00 pm
- Location: Between the Schuylkill and the Wissahickon
Re: SCOTUS Watch
He's going all-in on the claim that Ford and Ramirez are part of Democratic Party conspiracy to derail him and get revenge for the Clintons.
This alone should disqualify him from the Supreme Court. How could he be trusted to rule impartially?
He himself has claimed that justices must be nonpartisan and don't sit on opposite sides of any aisle.
This alone should disqualify him from the Supreme Court. How could he be trusted to rule impartially?
He himself has claimed that justices must be nonpartisan and don't sit on opposite sides of any aisle.
Much prefer my Nazis Nuremberged.
- Kraken
- Posts: 45288
- Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 11:59 pm
- Location: The Hub of the Universe
- Contact:
Re: SCOTUS Watch
Presidential material!Smoove_B wrote: Thu Sep 27, 2018 3:26 pm I'm pretty sure at this point, the court of public opinion has ruled that Kavanugh is a giant pile of shit. I'm sure the GOP will fully take that into consideration.
- Scoop20906
- Posts: 11820
- Joined: Tue May 03, 2005 3:50 pm
- Location: Belleville, MI
Re: SCOTUS Watch
Wow. He is losing his composure. What’s wrong with this guy?
Scoop. Makeup and hair are fabulous. - Qantaga
Xbox Gamertag: Scoop20906
Steam: Scoop20906
Xbox Gamertag: Scoop20906
Steam: Scoop20906
- Grifman
- Posts: 22077
- Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 7:17 pm
Re: SCOTUS Watch
After Ford, I think this is a mistake. “Hurt” and “bewildered” Kavanaugh would come off better than “angry” Kavanaugh .Holman wrote: Thu Sep 27, 2018 3:20 pm OK. Here we go. "Angry preppy" it is.
He's going off on Democrats and "The Left" without even a pretense of judicial impartiality. Even Scalia hid his cards better than this.
Presumably he is not drunk at the moment, but he's certainly belligerent.
Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions. – G.K. Chesterton
- Unagi
- Posts: 28348
- Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2006 5:14 pm
- Location: Chicago
Re: SCOTUS Watch
Hey, I drink beer. I drank beer. And I didn't assault someone too!
We should just let him get the seat.
We should just let him get the seat.
- LawBeefaroni
- Forum Moderator
- Posts: 56125
- Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 3:08 pm
- Location: Urbs in Horto, outrageous taxes on everything
Re: SCOTUS Watch
He's hearing "No" and doesn't quite understand the concept. It's extremely frustrating (for infants and spoiled dickbros alike) and may result in tantrums.Scoop20906 wrote: Thu Sep 27, 2018 3:39 pm Wow. He is losing his composure. What’s wrong with this guy?
" Hey OP, listen to my advice alright." -Tha General
"No scientific discovery is named after its original discoverer." -Stigler's Law of Eponymy, discovered by Robert K. Merton
MYT
"No scientific discovery is named after its original discoverer." -Stigler's Law of Eponymy, discovered by Robert K. Merton
MYT
- gbasden
- Posts: 7898
- Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 1:57 am
- Location: Sacramento, CA
Re: SCOTUS Watch
It's amazing that he's constantly bring up his peers as character witnesses when so many of them from High School and College have talked about him being a frequent, mean drunk.
- $iljanus
- Forum Moderator
- Posts: 13947
- Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 3:46 pm
- Location: New England...or under your bed
Re: SCOTUS Watch
So essentially if you think he sexually assaulted Dr. Ford, you hate beer.
"Who's going to tell him that the job he's currently seeking might just be one of those Black jobs?"
-Michelle Obama 2024 Democratic Convention
Wise words of warning from Smoove B: Oh, how you all laughed when I warned you about the semen. Well, who's laughing now?
-Michelle Obama 2024 Democratic Convention
Wise words of warning from Smoove B: Oh, how you all laughed when I warned you about the semen. Well, who's laughing now?
- Default
- Posts: 6524
- Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2004 9:01 pm
- Location: Handling bombs.
Re: SCOTUS Watch
Heard some of his statement on the way back from getting a haircut. I turned it off because Kavanaugh's rebuttal was such an unhinged rant that I wanted to vomit.
Last edited by Default on Thu Sep 27, 2018 3:49 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"pcp, lsd, thc, tgb...it's all good." ~ Kraken
- The Meal
- Posts: 28143
- Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 10:33 pm
- Location: 2005 Stanley Cup Champion
- Scoop20906
- Posts: 11820
- Joined: Tue May 03, 2005 3:50 pm
- Location: Belleville, MI
Re: SCOTUS Watch
This is embarrassing to listen to. Even Trump would make a better showing.
Scoop. Makeup and hair are fabulous. - Qantaga
Xbox Gamertag: Scoop20906
Steam: Scoop20906
Xbox Gamertag: Scoop20906
Steam: Scoop20906