SCOTUS Watch
Moderators: LawBeefaroni, $iljanus
- Holman
- Posts: 30106
- Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 8:00 pm
- Location: Between the Schuylkill and the Wissahickon
Re: SCOTUS Watch
I woke up this morning unable to believe yesterday actually happened.
There are so many nauseating pieces to it, but the simple unambiguous fact of the nominee's declaration of naked partisanship should be enough to disqualify him. That's not how it's supposed to work, and every senator knows it.
There are so many nauseating pieces to it, but the simple unambiguous fact of the nominee's declaration of naked partisanship should be enough to disqualify him. That's not how it's supposed to work, and every senator knows it.
Much prefer my Nazis Nuremberged.
- Paingod
- Posts: 13225
- Joined: Wed Aug 25, 2010 8:58 am
Re: SCOTUS Watch
They have fully embraced the ideology of "Anti-Intellectualism"Zaxxon wrote: Fri Sep 28, 2018 8:15 amFacts are no longer mandatory, or even appreciated, by the R base.
And still, less than half of them care. This is their chance to install hardcore Republican values into the courts.Holman wrote: Fri Sep 28, 2018 8:36 am...the simple unambiguous fact of the nominee's declaration of naked partisanship should be enough to disqualify him. That's not how it's supposed to work, and every senator knows it.
Black Lives Matter
2021-01-20: The first good night's sleep I had in 4 years.
2025-01-20: The nightmares continue.
2021-01-20: The first good night's sleep I had in 4 years.
2025-01-20: The nightmares continue.
- Zaxxon
- Forum Moderator
- Posts: 28540
- Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:11 am
- Location: Surrounded by Mountains
Re: SCOTUS Watch
Just one more exhibit in the 'facts don't matter' line:
- LawBeefaroni
- Forum Moderator
- Posts: 56124
- Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 3:08 pm
- Location: Urbs in Horto, outrageous taxes on everything
Re: SCOTUS Watch
Yeah, it seems to be like, "Hey, don't ruin this guy's life for what may or may not have happened 30 some years ago. ". But even that line is so fucking asinine. No one is ruining this guy's life, just his highest career aspirations. Whether he gets the seat or not, he and his family are set for generations. A supreme Court appointment isn't a right that he has somehow earned. The sense of entitlement is sickening.
" Hey OP, listen to my advice alright." -Tha General
"No scientific discovery is named after its original discoverer." -Stigler's Law of Eponymy, discovered by Robert K. Merton
MYT
"No scientific discovery is named after its original discoverer." -Stigler's Law of Eponymy, discovered by Robert K. Merton
MYT
- msteelers
- Posts: 7320
- Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 9:30 pm
- Location: Port Saint Lucie, Florida
- Contact:
Re: SCOTUS Watch
So already this morning I was called a liar and told that Dr. Ford is clearly either a paid liberal activist or "off her rockers".
Darkest timeline indeed.
Darkest timeline indeed.
- msteelers
- Posts: 7320
- Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 9:30 pm
- Location: Port Saint Lucie, Florida
- Contact:
Re: SCOTUS Watch
Based on the conservatives I've spoken to this morning, the Republican Senators absolutely refuted Dr. Ford's facts in the case. They proved that the party either didn't happen, discredited Ford because she can't remember how she got there or how she got home, and questioned how she could be certain it was Kavanaugh.
In addition to Ford making it up, I've also heard a lot of "I believe something happened to her, but it wasn't Kavanaugh".
- hepcat
- Posts: 54512
- Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 3:02 pm
- Location: Chicago, IL Home of the triple homicide!
Re: SCOTUS Watch
Our country is fucked right now. The divide just got even wider and I'm not sure there's any coming back now. At least not in any form we're used to. I used to believe we could recover, but the vitriol is so bad that I've lost hope.
And to be fair, I think this whole debacle over Kavanaugh was handled poorly by Dems as well. They introduced this shit in the 11th hour, thus assuring that its timing would be called into question and used as a way to say "hey, they're just trying to save their bacon" (which, I'll be honest, I actually do believe now). I'm pretty much done with both parties at this point. This whole country is ruled by extremes and I hate that.
And to be fair, I think this whole debacle over Kavanaugh was handled poorly by Dems as well. They introduced this shit in the 11th hour, thus assuring that its timing would be called into question and used as a way to say "hey, they're just trying to save their bacon" (which, I'll be honest, I actually do believe now). I'm pretty much done with both parties at this point. This whole country is ruled by extremes and I hate that.
Master of his domain.
- Holman
- Posts: 30106
- Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 8:00 pm
- Location: Between the Schuylkill and the Wissahickon
Re: SCOTUS Watch
Sorry, but there's no room for BothSidesism here.
Maybe the Dems were tactically stupid, but the GOP we saw yesterday is morally bankrupt.
Maybe the Dems were tactically stupid, but the GOP we saw yesterday is morally bankrupt.
Much prefer my Nazis Nuremberged.
- Zaxxon
- Forum Moderator
- Posts: 28540
- Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:11 am
- Location: Surrounded by Mountains
Re: SCOTUS Watch
Yep. No equivalency at all.
- LawBeefaroni
- Forum Moderator
- Posts: 56124
- Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 3:08 pm
- Location: Urbs in Horto, outrageous taxes on everything
Re: SCOTUS Watch
The ruling class are extemes like the Mets and Yankees are extremes. Rivals sure, but at the end of the day they are both getting rich playing the same game and drink in the same clubs. It's the fans, who never set foot on the field, that learn to actually hate each other. And pay for that privilege.
" Hey OP, listen to my advice alright." -Tha General
"No scientific discovery is named after its original discoverer." -Stigler's Law of Eponymy, discovered by Robert K. Merton
MYT
"No scientific discovery is named after its original discoverer." -Stigler's Law of Eponymy, discovered by Robert K. Merton
MYT
- El Guapo
- Posts: 42142
- Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2005 4:01 pm
- Location: Boston
Re: SCOTUS Watch
FWIW the magazine of the Jesuit Order of America called on Kavanaugh to withdraw this morning, and the ABA is calling for a delay and investigation. I suspect others will follow today, of varying importance. Though obviously little of this matters to McConnell.
This is reminding me of the health care and tax bill debacles. Shit keeps happening that makes going forward more and more insane, but McConnell is completely amoral and Trump periodically pops in to urge everyone forward in the insane path, and so the crazy train keeps rolling. It looks like it probably will ultimately come down to a vote, and thereby to whether there are two Republican senators (plus Manchin) willing to do the ol' thumbs down. They ultimately did with health care, but not with the tax bill, and now...
This is reminding me of the health care and tax bill debacles. Shit keeps happening that makes going forward more and more insane, but McConnell is completely amoral and Trump periodically pops in to urge everyone forward in the insane path, and so the crazy train keeps rolling. It looks like it probably will ultimately come down to a vote, and thereby to whether there are two Republican senators (plus Manchin) willing to do the ol' thumbs down. They ultimately did with health care, but not with the tax bill, and now...
Black Lives Matter.
- Holman
- Posts: 30106
- Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 8:00 pm
- Location: Between the Schuylkill and the Wissahickon
Re: SCOTUS Watch
News: Flake to vote Yes today. Full senate vote expected Tuesday.
Kavanaugh will be on the court. There have been leaks that Manchin (a Republican in all but name) will vote for him too, so even Collins and Murkowski voting No wont stop it.
Kavanaugh will be on the court. There have been leaks that Manchin (a Republican in all but name) will vote for him too, so even Collins and Murkowski voting No wont stop it.
Much prefer my Nazis Nuremberged.
- LordMortis
- Posts: 71964
- Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 11:26 pm
Re: SCOTUS Watch
This is a rare occasion where got your back. I'm angry that my hand if forced though. And I resent the coercion that surrounds it from every side. While I desperately want to be done with a Democratic party I think is horrible, I don't fear their end game is JustUs. I don't know what else to do, short of buy guns and store them basement. And that's not hyperbole. We have a vote to keep us peaceful. We have to keep using it until a circumstance show the vote is an illusion. I pray that circumstance never becomes reality.hepcat wrote: Fri Sep 28, 2018 9:11 am Our country is fucked right now. The divide just got even wider and I'm not sure there's any coming back now. At least not in any form we're used to. I used to believe we could recover, but the vitriol is so bad that I've lost hope.
And to be fair, I think this whole debacle over Kavanaugh was handled poorly by Dems as well. They introduced this shit in the 11th hour, thus assuring that its timing would be called into question and used as a way to say "hey, they're just trying to save their bacon" (which, I'll be honest, I actually do believe now). I'm pretty much done with both parties at this point. This whole country is ruled by extremes and I hate that.
- El Guapo
- Posts: 42142
- Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2005 4:01 pm
- Location: Boston
Re: SCOTUS Watch
I hate keeping hearing this whole timing thing. Feinstein kept it under wraps at the request of the victim here. That's at least defensible. Second, it's only last minute IF THE VOTING SCHEDULE IS FIXED. It's *not*. There is no really defensible reason why the Senate can't take its time in deciding whether or not to confirm someone to a lifetime appointment. Even if there were a defensible non-partisan reason for confirming before the new Congress (itself hilarious in light of the GOP rationale for not voting on Garland), there's plenty of time to evaluate and investigate the allegations before a vote.hepcat wrote: Fri Sep 28, 2018 9:11 am Our country is fucked right now. The divide just got even wider and I'm not sure there's any coming back now. At least not in any form we're used to. I used to believe we could recover, but the vitriol is so bad that I've lost hope.
And to be fair, I think this whole debacle over Kavanaugh was handled poorly by Dems as well. They introduced this shit in the 11th hour, thus assuring that its timing would be called into question and used as a way to say "hey, they're just trying to save their bacon" (which, I'll be honest, I actually do believe now). I'm pretty much done with both parties at this point. This whole country is ruled by extremes and I hate that.
Black Lives Matter.
- ImLawBoy
- Forum Admin
- Posts: 15464
- Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 9:49 pm
- Location: Chicago, IL
- Contact:
Re: SCOTUS Watch
So, Will Ferrell pretty much has to play Kavanaugh on the SNL cold open this week, right?
That's my purse! I don't know you!
- Zaxxon
- Forum Moderator
- Posts: 28540
- Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:11 am
- Location: Surrounded by Mountains
Re: SCOTUS Watch
And Flake is in with a thumbs-up.
- pr0ner
- Posts: 17533
- Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2004 3:00 pm
- Location: Northern Virginia, VA
- Contact:
Re: SCOTUS Watch
This was inevitable the moment he was nominated. It continued to be inevitable even after the accusations came out. I hope no one here is genuinely surprised his nomination survived.
Hodor.
- Holman
- Posts: 30106
- Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 8:00 pm
- Location: Between the Schuylkill and the Wissahickon
Re: SCOTUS Watch
+1El Guapo wrote: Fri Sep 28, 2018 9:40 amI hate keeping hearing this whole timing thing. Feinstein kept it under wraps at the request of the victim here. That's at least defensible. Second, it's only last minute IF THE VOTING SCHEDULE IS FIXED. It's *not*. There is no really defensible reason why the Senate can't take its time in deciding whether or not to confirm someone to a lifetime appointment. Even if there were a defensible non-partisan reason for confirming before the new Congress (itself hilarious in light of the GOP rationale for not voting on Garland), there's plenty of time to evaluate and investigate the allegations before a vote.hepcat wrote: Fri Sep 28, 2018 9:11 am Our country is fucked right now. The divide just got even wider and I'm not sure there's any coming back now. At least not in any form we're used to. I used to believe we could recover, but the vitriol is so bad that I've lost hope.
And to be fair, I think this whole debacle over Kavanaugh was handled poorly by Dems as well. They introduced this shit in the 11th hour, thus assuring that its timing would be called into question and used as a way to say "hey, they're just trying to save their bacon" (which, I'll be honest, I actually do believe now). I'm pretty much done with both parties at this point. This whole country is ruled by extremes and I hate that.
Complaints about the "last minute" make no sense unless you think examining the nominee is a mere formality.
Much prefer my Nazis Nuremberged.
- El Guapo
- Posts: 42142
- Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2005 4:01 pm
- Location: Boston
Re: SCOTUS Watch
Flake is such a turd. It's amazing how he's managed to wind up his Senate career by making himself useless to everyone of all political stripes.
Black Lives Matter.
- Smoove_B
- Posts: 56382
- Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:58 am
- Location: Kaer Morhen
Re: SCOTUS Watch
All you need to do is look and see the person elevated to the oval office. If that was possible, this was nothing in comparison.pr0ner wrote: Fri Sep 28, 2018 9:42 amI hope no one here is genuinely surprised his nomination survived.
Maybe next year, maybe no go
- El Guapo
- Posts: 42142
- Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2005 4:01 pm
- Location: Boston
Re: SCOTUS Watch
I go back and forth. Yesterday I was like, "he can't possibly survive this" and then I remembered the whole health care and tax bill procedures.
That said, even assuming Flake votes yes, the confirmation is not inevitable. It's entirely plausible (possibly even likely) that more will come out over the weekend, plus there's going to be more polling. I do think that this is going to come down to some midnight vote like healthcare, with the outcome uncertain.
I also think that it's political insanity for the GOP to be going ahead with this rather than just subbing in Barrett.
Black Lives Matter.
- RunningMn9
- Posts: 24598
- Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 11:55 pm
- Location: The Sword Coast
- Contact:
Re: SCOTUS Watch
There are no consequences (for them) in this timeline.
And in banks across the world
Christians, Moslems, Hindus, Jews
And every other race, creed, colour, tint or hue
Get down on their knees and pray
The raccoon and the groundhog neatly
Make up bags of change
But the monkey in the corner
Well he's slowly drifting out of range
Christians, Moslems, Hindus, Jews
And every other race, creed, colour, tint or hue
Get down on their knees and pray
The raccoon and the groundhog neatly
Make up bags of change
But the monkey in the corner
Well he's slowly drifting out of range
- coopasonic
- Posts: 21195
- Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2005 11:43 pm
- Location: Dallas-ish
Re: SCOTUS Watch
Some of us have maintained hope against all odds, but seeing that things are still full steam ahead I get the same ill feeling in the pit of my stomach I had late Nov 8, 2016.
-Coop
Black Lives Matter
Black Lives Matter
- El Guapo
- Posts: 42142
- Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2005 4:01 pm
- Location: Boston
Re: SCOTUS Watch
Just a reminder that Kavanaugh would be almost certainly doomed in a representative body.
Black Lives Matter.
- Holman
- Posts: 30106
- Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 8:00 pm
- Location: Between the Schuylkill and the Wissahickon
Re: SCOTUS Watch
For every reason, I think the role belongs to Kevin Spacey.ImLawBoy wrote: Fri Sep 28, 2018 9:41 am So, Will Ferrell pretty much has to play Kavanaugh on the SNL cold open this week, right?
Much prefer my Nazis Nuremberged.
- El Guapo
- Posts: 42142
- Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2005 4:01 pm
- Location: Boston
Re: SCOTUS Watch
That remains to be seen. The consequences-setting event isn't for a month or so.
Wow, that's closer than I had thought.
Black Lives Matter.
- El Guapo
- Posts: 42142
- Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2005 4:01 pm
- Location: Boston
Re: SCOTUS Watch
Black Lives Matter.
- Zaxxon
- Forum Moderator
- Posts: 28540
- Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:11 am
- Location: Surrounded by Mountains
Re: SCOTUS Watch
I mean, literally the entire GOP platform would be certainly doomed in a representative body. As would many of the specific representatives (we'd surely no longer have nearly as uniformly old white mannish of a body).El Guapo wrote: Fri Sep 28, 2018 9:49 amJust a reminder that Kavanaugh would be almost certainly doomed in a representative body.
- El Guapo
- Posts: 42142
- Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2005 4:01 pm
- Location: Boston
- Smoove_B
- Posts: 56382
- Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:58 am
- Location: Kaer Morhen
- Carpet_pissr
- Posts: 20804
- Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 5:32 pm
- Location: Columbia, SC
Re: SCOTUS Watch
Locking in another hard right lifetime SCJ >possibility of losing one term to the demsEl Guapo wrote: I also think that it's political insanity for the GOP to be going ahead with this rather than just subbing in Barrett.
No brainer, from a party perspective. Individually sucks for those having to run , of course, but everyone seems on board to die on this SC nomination hill if necessary.
- RunningMn9
- Posts: 24598
- Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 11:55 pm
- Location: The Sword Coast
- Contact:
Re: SCOTUS Watch
Has the past two years taught you nothing? Not only is the coming outcome obvious, we will be sitting here in mid-November, shocked that once again a majority of white women have voted for this nonsense to continue. Which will in turn embolden these garbage humans to let loose for another two years.
And in banks across the world
Christians, Moslems, Hindus, Jews
And every other race, creed, colour, tint or hue
Get down on their knees and pray
The raccoon and the groundhog neatly
Make up bags of change
But the monkey in the corner
Well he's slowly drifting out of range
Christians, Moslems, Hindus, Jews
And every other race, creed, colour, tint or hue
Get down on their knees and pray
The raccoon and the groundhog neatly
Make up bags of change
But the monkey in the corner
Well he's slowly drifting out of range
- Smoove_B
- Posts: 56382
- Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:58 am
- Location: Kaer Morhen
Re: SCOTUS Watch
Yup. This is their contingency plan, knowing they're in trouble.Carpet_pissr wrote: Fri Sep 28, 2018 9:59 amLocking in another hard right lifetime SCJ >possibility of losing one term to the dems
Yup.RunningMn9 wrote: Fri Sep 28, 2018 10:02 am Which will in turn embolden these garbage humans to let loose for another two years.
Maybe next year, maybe no go
- Grifman
- Posts: 22077
- Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 7:17 pm
Re: SCOTUS Watch
The Democrats really should have made this point - I don't remember of any of them doing so.El Guapo wrote: Fri Sep 28, 2018 9:40 amI hate keeping hearing this whole timing thing. Feinstein kept it under wraps at the request of the victim here. That's at least defensible. Second, it's only last minute IF THE VOTING SCHEDULE IS FIXED. It's *not*. There is no really defensible reason why the Senate can't take its time in deciding whether or not to confirm someone to a lifetime appointment. Even if there were a defensible non-partisan reason for confirming before the new Congress (itself hilarious in light of the GOP rationale for not voting on Garland), there's plenty of time to evaluate and investigate the allegations before a vote.hepcat wrote: Fri Sep 28, 2018 9:11 am Our country is fucked right now. The divide just got even wider and I'm not sure there's any coming back now. At least not in any form we're used to. I used to believe we could recover, but the vitriol is so bad that I've lost hope.
And to be fair, I think this whole debacle over Kavanaugh was handled poorly by Dems as well. They introduced this shit in the 11th hour, thus assuring that its timing would be called into question and used as a way to say "hey, they're just trying to save their bacon" (which, I'll be honest, I actually do believe now). I'm pretty much done with both parties at this point. This whole country is ruled by extremes and I hate that.
Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions. – G.K. Chesterton
- $iljanus
- Forum Moderator
- Posts: 13947
- Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 3:46 pm
- Location: New England...or under your bed
Re: SCOTUS Watch
Flake probably realized that if he had any further presidential ambitions, it would be best to keep the evangelical voters happy. Or he voted his conscience, but if supporting an extreme right wing unhinged nominee fixated on blaming liberals who are getting revenge for Clinton then his conscience needs a bit of examination.
"Who's going to tell him that the job he's currently seeking might just be one of those Black jobs?"
-Michelle Obama 2024 Democratic Convention
Wise words of warning from Smoove B: Oh, how you all laughed when I warned you about the semen. Well, who's laughing now?
-Michelle Obama 2024 Democratic Convention
Wise words of warning from Smoove B: Oh, how you all laughed when I warned you about the semen. Well, who's laughing now?
- El Guapo
- Posts: 42142
- Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2005 4:01 pm
- Location: Boston
Re: SCOTUS Watch
This shit isn't magic. Have you seen the House polling lately? That the consequences will be sufficient (that is, that one or both chambers of Congress will flip) is of course bar from certain - it's entirely possible that the Republicans may hold onto a narrow House majority, and the Senate. But by far the most likely outcome at the moment is a narrow to large Democratic majority in the House. And the fact that the Democrats have a non-trivial shot at the Senate (~30% per 538, last I checked) on *this* Senate map is a testament to how the Republicans are definitely not magically defying political gravity.RunningMn9 wrote: Fri Sep 28, 2018 10:02 amHas the past two years taught you nothing? Not only is the coming outcome obvious, we will be sitting here in mid-November, shocked that once again a majority of white women have voted for this nonsense to continue. Which will in turn embolden these garbage humans to let loose for another two years.
Black Lives Matter.
- El Guapo
- Posts: 42142
- Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2005 4:01 pm
- Location: Boston
Re: SCOTUS Watch
McConnell could have easily gotten Barrett confirmed before January.Smoove_B wrote: Fri Sep 28, 2018 10:05 amYup. This is their contingency plan, knowing they're in trouble.Carpet_pissr wrote: Fri Sep 28, 2018 9:59 amLocking in another hard right lifetime SCJ >possibility of losing one term to the dems
Yup.RunningMn9 wrote: Fri Sep 28, 2018 10:02 am Which will in turn embolden these garbage humans to let loose for another two years.
Black Lives Matter.
- El Guapo
- Posts: 42142
- Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2005 4:01 pm
- Location: Boston
Re: SCOTUS Watch
If he thinks he has any shot at the White House under either party, then he's a dumb turd.$iljanus wrote: Fri Sep 28, 2018 10:10 am Flake probably realized that if he had any further presidential ambitions, it would be best to keep the evangelical voters happy. Or he voted his conscience, but if supporting an extreme right wing unhinged nominee fixated on blaming liberals who are getting revenge for Clinton then his conscience needs a bit of examination.
Black Lives Matter.
- LordMortis
- Posts: 71964
- Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 11:26 pm
Re: SCOTUS Watch
Carpet_pissr wrote: Fri Sep 28, 2018 9:59 am No brainer, from a party perspective. Individually sucks for those having to run , of course, but everyone seems on board to die on this SC nomination hill if necessary.
If either a) you are believer, b) your palms have been properly greased and you are corrupt, c) you live in a state of believers, that's all it you need. 2016 was all about getting a SCJ seat for forty years, flipping one and unexpectedly extending another with a 20 year partisan direction setting trend insider, fixated on the Star, Rove, Clinton triangle? Bonus!
- LordMortis
- Posts: 71964
- Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 11:26 pm
Re: SCOTUS Watch
You say that as if RM9s fear isn't that his vote literally doesn't matter. As in if garbage people have no respect for anything beyond retaining power over others, what makes the integrity of the voting system different?El Guapo wrote: Fri Sep 28, 2018 10:15 am This shit isn't magic. Have you seen the House polling lately? That the consequences will be sufficient (that is, that one or both chambers of Congress will flip) is of course bar from certain - it's entirely possible that the Republicans may hold onto a narrow House majority, and the Senate. But by far the most likely outcome at the moment is a narrow to large Democratic majority in the House. And the fact that the Democrats have a non-trivial shot at the Senate (~30% per 538, last I checked) on *this* Senate map is a testament to how the Republicans are definitely not magically defying political gravity.