YellowKing wrote: Fri May 10, 2019 12:50 pm
It really depends on how you're defining "decency."
Are you defining it as the sum of all your actions? Or are you defining it as to whether you're a friendly colleague who is gracious enough to have you over for dinner even though you're from opposite ends of the political spectrum? From that conversation, I felt like Biden was defining it mostly by the latter.
Depends how many strangled and skinned cats he has in the basement, doesn't it? Particularly if discussing those cats is what he believes is polite dinner conversation.
The idea that polite, friendly people are inherently decent is ludicrous.
YellowKing wrote:The idea that polite, friendly people are inherently decent is ludicrous.
I said nothing of the sort. I'm just saying that the only person who knows what "decency" is in this context is Biden. The OO forum is not the final arbiter on what objectively defines decency.
YellowKing wrote:The idea that polite, friendly people are inherently decent is ludicrous.
I said nothing of the sort. I'm just saying that the only person who knows what "decency" is in this context is Biden. The OO forum is not the final arbiter on what objectively defines decency.
I suspect this isn't the last time we'll hear "Let Biden be Biden!" in this cycle.
YellowKing wrote: Fri May 10, 2019 4:26 pm
I'm just saying that the only person who knows what "decency" is in this context is Biden. The OO forum is not the final arbiter on what objectively defines decency.
I don't know about OO, but I certainly am.
edit: Although quite frankly, if cat strangling isn't over your line, you probably have a skewed perspective on "decent", subjective or no.
Holman wrote:I suspect this isn't the last time we'll hear "Let Biden be Biden!" in this cycle.
I just think it's a trivial thing to disqualify a candidate for. Especially when its from a guy who has a history of getting along with just about everyone. It's not like Biden is going to get in the White House and start another invasion of Iraq because his good buddy Dick Cheney told him so.
You already have 1 president who can't tell decent from a hole in the ground. I hear Putin and Kim are both decent fellows, while Trudeau is dishonest and weak.
I can't speak for Kraken, but it's disheartening to hear Biden being chummy with scumbags, and I say that without viewing all Republicans as the enemy.
Cheney is responsible for almost a half million deaths with nothing to show for it. Separately, he is personally responsible for some of the deterioration of cooperation and norms in political discourse. He's part of why drumpf is president and not a pariah.
GreenGoo wrote: Fri May 10, 2019 10:15 pm
I can't speak for Kraken,
I deputize you.
Verbally embracing Cheney went over the line for me, and I'm not an especially righteous guy. Other people are unbothered. I don't get how they can think it's OK, but we all have our own ideas about what is and isn't OK, and that's OK. OK?
Has drumpf set the bar that low? I mean, Biden is against torture. Fantastic. When did "are you pro/con torturing people who are helplessly in your complete control?" become a worthwhile question or any answer beyond "are you fucking kidding me?" noteworthy?
GreenGoo wrote: Sat May 11, 2019 3:38 pm
Has drumpf set the bar that low? I mean, Biden is against torture. Fantastic. When did "are you pro/con torturing people who are helplessly in your complete control?" become a worthwhile question or any answer beyond "are you fucking kidding me?" noteworthy?
GreenGoo wrote: Sat May 11, 2019 3:38 pm
Has drumpf set the bar that low? I mean, Biden is against torture. Fantastic. When did "are you pro/con torturing people who are helplessly in your complete control?" become a worthwhile question or any answer beyond "are you fucking kidding me?" noteworthy?
Given that seemingly all of the Republican party is OK with it now that John McCain has passed, I would say it's important to highlight occasionally.
GreenGoo wrote: Sat May 11, 2019 3:38 pm
Has drumpf set the bar that low? I mean, Biden is against torture. Fantastic. When did "are you pro/con torturing people who are helplessly in your complete control?" become a worthwhile question or any answer beyond "are you fucking kidding me?" noteworthy?
pffft. That question became important immediately following 9/11 since thats when we really ramped up our efforts.
“As democracy is perfected, the office of president represents, more and more closely, the inner soul of the people. On some great and glorious day the plain folks of the land will reach their heart's desire at last and the White House will be adorned by a downright moron.” - H.L. Mencken
Trump can dis-invite and treat like shit any news outlets he wants to, but I'm sure Warren bowing out of the Fox town hall will result in cries of snowflake outrage.
While losing ads sucks, she thinks Fox News is all about the ads and that they are struggling and that's wrong. Fox News is all about controlling the cable companies revenue streams. A la carte cable or cutting the cord is what will hurt Fox News. Ad revenue comes from the likes of MyPillow and such. They're not going anywhere unless they go belly up from you not buying MyPillows.
21st Century Fox Inc. doesn’t break down the network’s revenue sources, but S&P Global Market Intelligence estimates that about 37 percent of its $2.7 billion in operating revenue came from ads in 2018. Affiliate fees, meanwhile, generated about 60 percent.
Fox News Channel commands by far highest monthly subscriber fee among the cable-news networks, according to market research firm SNL Kagan/S&P Global Market Intelligence. Fox News is seen generating $1.55 per subscriber per month this year, Kagan said, compared to 79 cents for CNN and 26 cents for MSNBC. As a result, its revenue from distribution is significantly higher than the money it makes from advertising. Fox News Channel was projected to generate $1.67 billion in affiliate revenue in 2016, SNL Kagan said, compared with $952.8 million in net advertising revenue.
At my core I still support Warren but the more and more she is politicking instead of policy wonking the less and less she shines for me. I stand with a refusal to accept Fox news and yet that statement seems crafted to be correct without giving the real picture.
LordMortis wrote: Tue May 14, 2019 4:48 pm
At my core I still support Warren but the more and more she is politicking instead of policy wonking the less and less she shines for me. I stand with a refusal to accept Fox news and yet that statement seems crafted to be correct without giving the real picture.
Is *anybody* policy wonking 10% as much as Elizabeth Warren?
LordMortis wrote: Tue May 14, 2019 4:48 pm
At my core I still support Warren but the more and more she is politicking instead of policy wonking the less and less she shines for me. I stand with a refusal to accept Fox news and yet that statement seems crafted to be correct without giving the real picture.
Is *anybody* policy wonking 10% as much as Elizabeth Warren?
People don't vote for policies, so she has to get down in the mud with the rest of them. I do not see this as a mudbath, though, so much as a stand on principle. Maybe I've been hoodwinked, but I don't think so.
Kraken wrote: Tue May 14, 2019 5:07 pm
I do not see this as a mudbath, though, so much as a stand on principle. Maybe I've been hoodwinked, but I don't think so.
That's the thing though. I get the principle and I stand with it but then she crafts a statement other than the principle as her foundation. When that happens my trust goes down.
Hers is the first claim I have ever seen that Fox News is struggling. That's bold.
I can't find a breakdown for Fox News specifically
EBITDA for Fox’s cable network programming unit rose 7% to $741 million from $692 million. Revenue increased 4% to $1.38 billion from $1.32 billion. Affiliate revenues were up 5% and ad revenues rose 4%
I think she was specifically saying that some of the more hate-filled commentary shows are struggling with advertisers. Certainly we have seen over the last year a number of big advertisers drop their support of shows like Tucker Carlson.
Bill de Blasio, the Democratic mayor of New York City, announced on Thursday that he was running for president, seeking to show that his brand of urban progressive leadership can be a model for the rest of the nation.
He's my mayor -- and former city council rep -- and I genuinely like the guy. But he is not remotely presidential.
Bill de Blasio, the Democratic mayor of New York City, announced on Thursday that he was running for president, seeking to show that his brand of urban progressive leadership can be a model for the rest of the nation.
He's my mayor -- and former city council rep -- and I genuinely like the guy. But he is not remotely presidential.
Holman wrote: Tue May 14, 2019 5:02 pm
Is *anybody* policy wonking 10% as much as Elizabeth Warren?
10%? Sure. I've seen policy proposals put forward by, at least, Gillibrand, Booker, Klobuchar and Harris. But yeah, Warren is way in the lead by an order of magnitude.
But if we wanted policies, Clinton would be President. (OK, to be fair - Clinton put a ton of proposals out there and the media largely ignored her policy talk)
16% of those interviewed are for delaying the election; 7% are for Trump staying in office even if defeated. Those numbers are nowhere remotely close to a majority, but are still way too high.
16% of those interviewed are for delaying the election; 7% are for Trump staying in office even if defeated. Those numbers are nowhere remotely close to a majority, but are still way too high.
Actually I would love to see him try to stay in office and the swat team is called in.
16% of those interviewed are for delaying the election; 7% are for Trump staying in office even if defeated. Those numbers are nowhere remotely close to a majority, but are still way too high.
Actually I would love to see him try to stay in office and the swat team is called in.
Can you be sure which side the SWAT team would support? If he tries to stay in office we are looking at civil war most likely.
“As democracy is perfected, the office of president represents, more and more closely, the inner soul of the people. On some great and glorious day the plain folks of the land will reach their heart's desire at last and the White House will be adorned by a downright moron.” - H.L. Mencken
Kraken wrote: Fri May 03, 2019 11:56 pm
Cheney is the biggest American war criminal since Kissinger. But I'm sure he's a nice guy if you get to know him.
Shrug. To me this is just saying that Cheney isn't a comic book villain - he was someone who did what he thought was best for America. I know lots of decent people with terrible beliefs.
YMMV, but this seems low bar for something completely disqualifying.
100% agree.
Just 'cause you feel it, doesn't mean it's there -- Radiohead
Do you believe me? Do you trust me? Do you like me? 😳
Ralph-Wiggum wrote: Tue May 14, 2019 6:34 pm
I think she was specifically saying that some of the more hate-filled commentary shows are struggling with advertisers. Certainly we have seen over the last year a number of big advertisers drop their support of shows like Tucker Carlson.
On a related note, Mayor Pete killed it last night on his Fox News town hall. He was perhaps the most animated I've seen him yet, and received a standing ovation at the end which even caught the host guy off guard. The host tried to bait him a few times on abortion, but other than that it seemed like a fairly benign environment. So much so that some were claiming he had filled the room with his friends lol.
Ralph-Wiggum wrote: Tue May 14, 2019 6:34 pm
I think she was specifically saying that some of the more hate-filled commentary shows are struggling with advertisers. Certainly we have seen over the last year a number of big advertisers drop their support of shows like Tucker Carlson.
On a related note, Mayor Pete killed it last night on his Fox News town hall. He was perhaps the most animated I've seen him yet, and received a standing ovation at the end which even caught the host guy off guard. The host tried to bait him a few times on abortion, but other than that it seemed like a fairly benign environment. So much so that some were claiming he had filled the room with his friends lol.
It really looks like he did a great job, and he seems to have won the crowd. This is especially impressive since I assume Fox must have put a finger on the attendance scale.
Meanwhile, Fox today is straight-up lying about what he said at the event.
If anyone wants to watch the Pete's Town Hall, you can watch it here:
Buttigieg continues to impress me. Solid answers to questions (I was most impressed with his response to the question on third trimester abortion - the section on it is about 8 minutes into the first video if anyone wants to jump to it). He pushes Democratic policies, but not with the standard talking points. And he took some well deserved shots at the some of Fox's commentators.
I might could get behind Mayor Pete. His position statements are fine, albeit bereft of details, and he's charismatic. He's the best of the centrists, anyway.
Jeff V wrote: Tue May 21, 2019 10:14 am
Wonder if this changed his polling numbers. The last batch I saw a few days ago had him as the only top 10 Dem that projects to lose to Trump.
I think he's actually polling third in Iowa right now.
