Zaxxon wrote: Tue Feb 04, 2020 11:31 am
I totally agree that my vision of where it could go may never come to fruition, or may take decades. But I 'saw' Amazon's potential but didn't buy in and hold, and I 'saw' Netflix's potential but didn't buy in and hold. I'm trying very hard not to make the same mistake a third time.
I saw Amazon's potential when I was making $18,000 a year before taxes and 60%+ of that was paying rent and then there was school debt and auto insurance and gas oh and food... I saw MS potential, when I was still under my parents roof so I could take on less school debt... Netflix being buyable happened about the time I came up with a downpayment for a house.
Designing a fantastic EV has very little in common with the skillsets of the old-guard majors. They already outsource virtually everything but the powertrain, and that powertrain is now a stranded asset. ICE engine designers are not motor/battery designers.
GM, in particular, are having a very hard time reconciling this reality. Hence the strike and the employees that still don't get the volume of parts (and therefore people) required to make an EV vs making an ICE.
Even today all the EVs coming to market are woefully inferior to Tesla's powertrain on an efficiency/kWh/weight basis, largely because no one but Tesla (and Rivian, who I will give credit once they are actually producing in volume) actually owns the whole system rather than outsourcing it.
I think Rivian are getting close, and yet my Ford stock keeps losing value year after year.
Add to this that all traditional automakers have to maintain a balance of slowly ramping up their loss-leading EV programs while not cooking the golden goose ICE programs so as to stay in business long enough to transition, all while the penalty for not having sufficient EVs sold continues to rise. And while people who actually pay attention to the products realize they'd be nuts to buy an EV that's not a Tesla, in most cases, at present.
That I don't buy. It seems like plants and tooling are modifying on about a five year or less basis right now. What they can do on paper and what they are willing to do in order to ... disrupt... what they have are different. I don't hate the unions but the real problem is volume of people employed and shifting the model that accounts for them. Tesla does not have a baggage of being been part the largest pool of employees into the 90s.