Zaxxon wrote: Tue Oct 12, 2021 2:56 pm
That's why I linked the EO itself. Let me know what you think after reading it. I've definitely seen conflicting reporting, as you said.
I did some poking (having no familiarity with TX) and the additional codes he's referencing in his order are...odd. The first two relate to emergency management (individuals specifically in charge) and the last one (Chapter 81 Subchapter E) relates to mandatory HIV training for state employees and contractors. Either I'm really bad at looking up TX codes or something is ultra hinky.
But yes, the language of the order (not the summary at the top of the EO) is very much focused on COVID-19. It could be that when news broke, they were only given the title to the EO ("Relating to prohibiting vaccine mandates,subject to legislative action) and weren't given a fully copy until later.
He's basically saying in the EO that TX has the ability to decide what they mandate and Biden does not.
But...the very first thing he declares includes:
"I hereby suspend all relevant statutes to the extent necessary to enforce this prohibition"
If COVID-19 orders are somehow being enforced "through Chapter 161 of the Texas Health and Safety Code" (my brief check on Chapter 161 of the Texas Health and Safety Code suggests it guidance for vaccination requirements) then...it seems (to me) like he is suspending *all* statues as a way to make sure COVID-19 mandates aren't enforced.
And sure enough, part of Chapter 161 includes mandatory vaccination requirements for all TX children in schools.
So I still don't know, but it's being largely reported as a COVID-19 mandate issue. Maybe "to the extent necessary" is the out here. I just don't know. I guess if a parent in TX declares tomorrow they're not vaccinating their kid for school, we'll find out real quick.