The problem I see here isn't primarily about lack of loyalty. It's in there but this causation is wrong IMO. My take is that in balance Biden has repeatedly demonstrated poor judgement by taking big risks with low reward. I dragged out that HuffPost piece mostly because I wanted to show that he was even forewarned of the danger, if he was listening. Lots of folks saw the reality that our soft power is diminished, that Biden was changing his stance on human rights issues that undercut our credibility (to wit, our position on MBS), and ultimately that the trip wasn't going to be worth the risks.
They’re dealing with Iran’s nuclear capability and Israel saying they might go beyond sabotage if necessary. Before the trip they’re blaming Biden for not getting anything. We’ll, he’s not getting anything until he speaks to Saudi leaders. They’re not good people, but they’re what we’ve got to limit Iran and get onboard if Israel acts more overtly.
Sure - sometimes you have to weigh risk with potential reward. And to be fair Trump is the reason Biden is left with what's appears to be considerably less soft power in the region. The Saudis no longer have a transactional President with a corrupt family that they can cut dirty deals with.
Still, a fist bump later with MBS for the Saudi propaganda corps and we see the worst end of those risks played out. The press corps here is rightly outraged, Biden looks like a sucker, and the despots got validated. Ugly stuff.
And Biden has to show he’s doing something about gas prices. Instead it’s drowned out by this backbiting. WTF.
This gets to the reward side. Was taking the risk covered by a reward big enough to take it? That's hard to say. One thing I'd consider though is that he put himself in this tricky spot to succeed from the jump. He took a hard position on MBS when he ran. His team spent considerable time debating this with stakeholders. He knew this risk in particular was acute. I would have figured he would not make the trip unless he had something tangible lined up. That appears to not be the case.
Into that murky situation, Biden and his team looked to change the story on energy. What's strange is that Saudi Arabia is running about 10M barrels right now and maxes out somewhere 12M. So they have some room to expand capacity but 2M per day is probably not enough to change the storyline. Perhaps they were looking for a timing effect. In this case, the plot line would be Saudi increases production, the summer driving season ends around the same time, demand loosens while supply comes up, and a reprieve in time for mid-terms. There might be some plausible play there.
Still it came down to rolling loaded dice, knowing they were loaded, and still rolling hoping to get a lucky break. He has been losing a lot of those sorts of die rolls. And everyone is telling him to stop. That's why he is seeing so much disloyalty.