Today continues to go swimmingly for Alex Jones. You love to see it.
https://twitter.com/SebastianMurdoc/sta ... 4271191041
Moderators: $iljanus, LawBeefaroni
Today continues to go swimmingly for Alex Jones. You love to see it.
Running__ | __2014: 1300.55 miles__ | __2015: 2036.13 miles__ | __2016: 1012.75 miles__ | __2017: 1105.82 miles__ | __2018: 1318.91 miles | __2019: 2000.00 miles |
But that's not her job. If that was the intent, that is the President's prerogative. There were also probably safer less pointed ways of doing it. Moreso, I acknowledged that concern earlier but we did include text specifically crafted for Taiwan in the CHIPS act. They get a piece of the action here. In any case, it was likely in her math but a lot of people in the foreign policy sector think it was a fairly reckless move that now China is capitalizing on for domestic purposes.El Guapo wrote: Wed Aug 03, 2022 12:18 pmPart of the justification for the visit now is to clearly signal that the CHIPS Act doesn't mean that.
AP NewsSmoove_B wrote: Wed Aug 03, 2022 12:34 pm Holy crap! What are the stakes here exactly? What is Jones potentially facing with all this?
Conspiracy theorist Alex Jones arrived at a Texas courthouse for his defamation trial
...
The plaintiffs are seeking $150 million for emotional distress, as well as reputational and punitive damages.
Reynal told jurors that his client has been punished enough, losing millions of dollars being booted off major social media platforms.
He asked them to award the plaintiffs $1.
That's what's called "nominal damages". Essentially as a general rule you can't award a plaintiff nothing in damages if they win even if you conclude that there weren't any damages as a result of the violation. So in that situation you award the plaintiff $1. So his lawyer's not just pulling that number out of nowhere.Zaxxon wrote: Wed Aug 03, 2022 12:44 pm What was the rationale behind suggesting $1? I feel like that's a dick move that can only backfire.
That helps. Thanks.El Guapo wrote: Wed Aug 03, 2022 1:08 pmThat's what's called "nominal damages". Essentially as a general rule you can't award a plaintiff nothing in damages if they win even if you conclude that there weren't any damages as a result of the violation. So in that situation you award the plaintiff $1. So his lawyer's not just pulling that number out of nowhere.Zaxxon wrote: Wed Aug 03, 2022 12:44 pm What was the rationale behind suggesting $1? I feel like that's a dick move that can only backfire.
I'm wondering if he could get himself into criminal trouble through this civil trial.Smoove_B wrote: Wed Aug 03, 2022 12:34 pm Holy crap! What are the stakes here exactly? What is Jones potentially facing with all this?
Running__ | __2014: 1300.55 miles__ | __2015: 2036.13 miles__ | __2016: 1012.75 miles__ | __2017: 1105.82 miles__ | __2018: 1318.91 miles | __2019: 2000.00 miles |
Running__ | __2014: 1300.55 miles__ | __2015: 2036.13 miles__ | __2016: 1012.75 miles__ | __2017: 1105.82 miles__ | __2018: 1318.91 miles | __2019: 2000.00 miles |
Running__ | __2014: 1300.55 miles__ | __2015: 2036.13 miles__ | __2016: 1012.75 miles__ | __2017: 1105.82 miles__ | __2018: 1318.91 miles | __2019: 2000.00 miles |
Running__ | __2014: 1300.55 miles__ | __2015: 2036.13 miles__ | __2016: 1012.75 miles__ | __2017: 1105.82 miles__ | __2018: 1318.91 miles | __2019: 2000.00 miles |
And also apparently committing other crimes. Or at least that's what the hot Mic caught the defense lawyer implying when he said law enforcement would be interested...Zarathud wrote:And solid proof Alex Jones was concealing and lying. The incompetence of Jones and his attorneys is astounding.
Running__ | __2014: 1300.55 miles__ | __2015: 2036.13 miles__ | __2016: 1012.75 miles__ | __2017: 1105.82 miles__ | __2018: 1318.91 miles | __2019: 2000.00 miles |
This is the output of an investigation weaponized by Trump. This started back in 2018 and you can be damn sure he was targeted by Trump's political minions. They've been looking at every nook and cranny of his life for the last 4 years. Which is absurd in its own way.LordMortis wrote: Fri Aug 05, 2022 12:14 pmToo many different bits to post snippets but lets say investigations into Hunter are not over. Funny how this is popping up before elections, much like 1/6 investigations went into full swing. Perhaps they were a bit too early.
It's interesting how Trumps Executive Office was weaponized against democrats but Biden's try to stay above the fray and he gets dragged down.
And paid for by Putin (well, Firtash)malchior wrote:This is the output of an investigation weaponized by Trump. This started back in 2018 and you can be damn sure he was targeted by Trump's political minions. They've been looking at every nook and cranny of his life for the last 4 years. Which is absurd in its own way.LordMortis wrote: Fri Aug 05, 2022 12:14 pmToo many different bits to post snippets but lets say investigations into Hunter are not over. Funny how this is popping up before elections, much like 1/6 investigations went into full swing. Perhaps they were a bit too early.
It's interesting how Trumps Executive Office was weaponized against democrats but Biden's try to stay above the fray and he gets dragged down.
Who knows how it'll go in the end with that Texas law, but the jury awarded the parents $45.2M.stessier wrote: Thu Aug 04, 2022 6:38 pm Well, this stinks if true.
https://twitter.com/Txtriallawyer/statu ... 0471654402
Bankston already planned for that:pr0ner wrote:Who knows how it'll go in the end with that Texas law, but the jury awarded the parents $45.2M.stessier wrote: Thu Aug 04, 2022 6:38 pm Well, this stinks if true.
https://twitter.com/Txtriallawyer/statu ... 0471654402
Technically the labels were made in the USA. Or were they?Skinypupy wrote: Sat Aug 06, 2022 11:51 am If this doesn’t sum up the conservative faux-patriotic grift machine, I don’t know what does.
Utah company “Lions Not Sheep” (oh, the irony) tore off the “Made in China” tags and replaced them with “Made in the US” so the MAGA morons would buy them.![]()