I'm on team '6-year-old Leaf would suffice for a huge % of people,' so I don't disagree with your use case, or that it's a good car for most people. GM isn't producing nearly enough for everyone who could get by with one to buy one, though. 19k US Bolt/BoltEUV in 1Q23 isn't enough to move the needle. People want (and/or can get) the Tesla, not the Bolt. GM, as with Ford, just aren't yet producing enough. We're still in the 'lofty production plans, less lofty production reality' phase for both that we've been in for years now.stessier wrote: Fri Apr 07, 2023 3:29 pmSeriously though - The Bolt is 10k less and would work for 90% of the population who only drive around their towns. I have 65k miles on mine and have only DC fast charged 2x - both just to try it out. Hard sell that the Model 3 is the better option.Zaxxon wrote: Fri Apr 07, 2023 1:05 pmThis is the sort of deep analysis that I see all over social media.
Moreso with GM, and the now-6-year-old Bolt still producing such paltry numbers. Ford's late to the game (11k BEVs this year so far) but seems to be ramping more quickly. Remember that Bolt beat the Model 3 to market. 19k is embarrassing.
This is a common misconception. Or, rather, it's a selective truth (that Tesla overpromises on the parts that don't matter to the core goal of sustainable energy) applied where it doesn't fit (manufacturing). We could fill pages with the things Tesla has wildly missed deadlines on, but the one that matters (vehicle production), they're spot on. They've guided 50% annual growth, over a multi-year period, for many years. And that's where they're at. They have years of big jumps when a new model hits (2018, 2021), and years of less while they prep for a new model. Long-term, they've been remarkably accurate at this.LawBeefaroni wrote: Fri Apr 07, 2023 3:27 pmAny plan from TSLA needs to be taken with a silo of salt. This is the company thst promised us fully automated driving next year for the past decade The Cybertruck is due next year as well, for the past 5 or whatever it's been.
Their MO is to promise big, not deliver, and promise some some more, turning the equity boost into cash flow to keep the lights on and pump out more promises.
Now they promise to "power the world" with renewables?
57% CAGR in vehicle production since 2013, which was the first year the Model S was produced at any significant scale. Estimating 1.8M in 2023, they'd be at 55% CAGR since 2013 at the end of this year.
But that's all beside the point--this 'master plan' document isn't Tesla 'promising' to power the world themselves. It's a plan with sources detailing one way the world could power itself sustainably. Sure, Tesla plans to be a big part of a lot of that, but it's not the case that they're 'promising' to do it themselves. This is just an attempt at showing that it can be done, since there's still remarkable resistance to the idea even being feasible.
In short, the part I'm happy about is that the plan itself is being reacted to as reasonable by people who know better than we. Whether Tesla plays as large a part in carrying it out as they hope/plan is beside the point.