SCOTUS Watch
Moderators: LawBeefaroni, $iljanus
- Unagi
- Posts: 28117
- Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2006 5:14 pm
- Location: Chicago
Re: SCOTUS Watch
Souring the 4th of July even more than it was already.
bleh.
bleh.
- Skinypupy
- Posts: 21036
- Joined: Tue Dec 07, 2004 10:12 am
- Location: Utah
Re: SCOTUS Watch
Well and truly.
While all of this may not have an huge impact on me personally before I’m dead (or it might…who the hell knows at this point), I truly fear for my kid's and my not-straight-white-Christian-male friend’s futures.
When darkness veils the world, four Warriors of Light shall come.
- Blackhawk
- Posts: 45843
- Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 9:48 pm
- Location: Southwest Indiana
Re: SCOTUS Watch
Entirely possible. It's simply the true point-of-no-return. Everything up to that will be shifting the odds, maybe even so much that it's moot, but until November, nothing is set in stone (after all, there was near zero chance of Trump taking 2016 to begin with!)WYBaugh wrote: ↑Mon Jul 01, 2024 1:13 pmAnd November is going to be a complete and utter shit show.Blackhawk wrote: ↑Mon Jul 01, 2024 1:11 pm November.
In November, I can either breathe a temporary sigh of relief, or i can give up, go back to bed, adopt a rocking chair lifestyle, and leave the news off for the next two or three decades until I move into a cozy grave.
Either way, the stakes are so high that I'm not calling it done until November.
So I'm following, but trying not to overthink it until November. Overthinking it is just as likely to ensure that I have a stress related breakdown long before then, if I don't straight up keep over from a heart attack. When November rolls around, then I'll decide whether or not to give up and just ride out the rest of my life in willful ignorance.
What doesn't kill me makes me stranger.
- Pyperkub
- Posts: 24158
- Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2004 5:07 pm
- Location: NC- that's Northern California
Re: SCOTUS Watch
Breaking News.
As an addendum, the Supreme Court has ruled that Nixon was Immune from Impeachment, and that Spiro Agnew's Bribes he took in the White House were just Official Duties.
As such, Nixon and Agnew have been Re-instated as President and Vice President, effective immediately.
As an addendum, the Supreme Court has ruled that Nixon was Immune from Impeachment, and that Spiro Agnew's Bribes he took in the White House were just Official Duties.
As such, Nixon and Agnew have been Re-instated as President and Vice President, effective immediately.
Black Lives definitely Matter Lorini!
Also: There are three ways to not tell the truth: lies, damned lies, and statistics.
Also: There are three ways to not tell the truth: lies, damned lies, and statistics.
- Alefroth
- Posts: 9190
- Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2004 1:56 pm
- Location: Bellingham WA
- Alefroth
- Posts: 9190
- Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2004 1:56 pm
- Location: Bellingham WA
- LordMortis
- Posts: 71593
- Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 11:26 pm
- Smoove_B
- Posts: 56002
- Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:58 am
- Location: Kaer Morhen
Re: SCOTUS Watch
Should immediately announce four more seats are being created. And once there are delays or obstructions or whatever, maybe people just start disappearing.
You know, officially - of course.
Maybe next year, maybe no go
- Archinerd
- Posts: 6975
- Joined: Fri Aug 25, 2006 11:18 am
- Location: Shikaakwa
Re: SCOTUS Watch
Why even do that? Biden can just arrest whichever ones he wants to get rid of. He's above the law.
- YellowKing
- Posts: 31101
- Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 2:02 pm
Re: SCOTUS Watch
The real point of this decision is to muddy the waters. They know that it's going to be next to impossible to determine what an illegal act in an "official" capacity is vs an illegal act in a "personal" capacity. The only system we have in deciding that is.....the courts.
It's a stacked deck. It's a get out of jail free card for Republican presidents. For Democrats - whoops, looks like our stacked courts are going to have to declare that a personal act, not an official one. Sorry!
It's a stacked deck. It's a get out of jail free card for Republican presidents. For Democrats - whoops, looks like our stacked courts are going to have to declare that a personal act, not an official one. Sorry!
- Archinerd
- Posts: 6975
- Joined: Fri Aug 25, 2006 11:18 am
- Location: Shikaakwa
Re: SCOTUS Watch
Dissolve the courts then. Or declare them as enemy combatants and send drones.YellowKing wrote: ↑Mon Jul 01, 2024 4:34 pm The real point of this decision is to muddy the waters. They know that it's going to be next to impossible to determine what an illegal act in an "official" capacity is vs an illegal act in a "personal" capacity. The only system we have in deciding that is.....the courts.
It's a stacked deck. It's a get out of jail free card for Republican presidents. For Democrats - whoops, looks like our stacked courts are going to have to declare that a personal act, not an official one. Sorry!
- waitingtoconnect
- Posts: 1544
- Joined: Sun May 28, 2006 5:56 am
Re: SCOTUS Watch
The slow motion coup continues.Archinerd wrote: ↑Mon Jul 01, 2024 4:30 pmWhy even do that? Biden can just arrest whichever ones he wants to get rid of. He's above the law.
- Octavious
- Posts: 20049
- Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 2:50 pm
Re: SCOTUS Watch
Feels pretty quick now. I was holding out a bit of hope that they wouldn't go too far and they actually went even further than I would have ever imagined. We legit could have camps of homeless people and illegal immigrants this time next year.
I realized today that I might be doom scrolling the remainder of my life. Before Trump I would never have imagined this could happen here.
I realized today that I might be doom scrolling the remainder of my life. Before Trump I would never have imagined this could happen here.
Capitalism tries for a delicate balance: It attempts to work things out so that everyone gets just enough stuff to keep them from getting violent and trying to take other people’s stuff.
Shameless plug for my website: www.nettphoto.com
Shameless plug for my website: www.nettphoto.com
- hepcat
- Posts: 53961
- Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 3:02 pm
- Location: Chicago, IL Home of the triple homicide!
Re: SCOTUS Watch
So your criminal empire would primarily consist of you constantly crossing against the light?
You, sir, are the Moriarty of Moving Violations.
Last edited by hepcat on Mon Jul 01, 2024 8:26 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Lord of His Pants
- geezer
- Posts: 7616
- Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 1:52 pm
- Location: Yeeha!
Re: SCOTUS Watch
I suck.geezer wrote: ↑Tue Jun 25, 2024 9:58 amIANAL. But I can't image any outcome other than immunity for official acts, no immunity for things outside official acts, which will, I assume, immediately send Trump's lawyers off to demand a whole 'nother round of lower court motions to DQ the indictments because "official acts" which will of course be appealed even if dismissed, and put the final nail in the trial before the election coffin.YellowKing wrote: ↑Tue Jun 25, 2024 8:59 amThe thing is, Biden wouldn't take advantage of it because he's a good person.Punisher wrote:Part of me wants to see presidential immunity confirmed just to see if Biden takes advantage of it.
I also can't imagine any other outcome for Chevron except for one that continues to gut the power of "unelected regulatory bodies that are accountable to no one blah blah blah."
- waitingtoconnect
- Posts: 1544
- Joined: Sun May 28, 2006 5:56 am
Re: SCOTUS Watch
I’d wager the New York criminal and civil cases are also going to be overturned now.
Any evidence from when trump was in office is now inadmissible (effectively). This means he is going to get off these as nearly all brought in evidence from his time in office.
Any evidence from when trump was in office is now inadmissible (effectively). This means he is going to get off these as nearly all brought in evidence from his time in office.
- Blackhawk
- Posts: 45843
- Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 9:48 pm
- Location: Southwest Indiana
Re: SCOTUS Watch
My impression was that it wasn't 'in office', it was 'official duties.' If he was doing something that had nothing to do with the office of President, he'd still be open to prosecution.
What doesn't kill me makes me stranger.
- Octavious
- Posts: 20049
- Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 2:50 pm
Re: SCOTUS Watch
I would be shocked if the sentencing doesn't get delayed, kicked up to the supreme court and squashed like everything else. The actually went out of their way to finely detail all the ways to cover Trumps ass in their ruling. It's batshit insane.
Capitalism tries for a delicate balance: It attempts to work things out so that everyone gets just enough stuff to keep them from getting violent and trying to take other people’s stuff.
Shameless plug for my website: www.nettphoto.com
Shameless plug for my website: www.nettphoto.com
- Alefroth
- Posts: 9190
- Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2004 1:56 pm
- Location: Bellingham WA
Re: SCOTUS Watch
Which will ultimately be up to the courts to decide. So very convenient.
- Alefroth
- Posts: 9190
- Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2004 1:56 pm
- Location: Bellingham WA
Re: SCOTUS Watch
Let's not forget Mitch Fucking McConnell was one of the architects of this outcome.
- Victoria Raverna
- Posts: 5625
- Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 2:23 am
- Location: Jakarta
Re: SCOTUS Watch
To save "Democracy", Biden should get rid of Trump and declare GOP illegal and banned. Be a dictator now.
- Kraken
- Posts: 44986
- Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 11:59 pm
- Location: The Hub of the Universe
- Contact:
Re: SCOTUS Watch
Drazzil would be taking victory laps if he were here now.
- Unagi
- Posts: 28117
- Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2006 5:14 pm
- Location: Chicago
Re: SCOTUS Watch
Steve Bannon gets released from prison on Nov 1stWYBaugh wrote: ↑Mon Jul 01, 2024 1:13 pmAnd November is going to be a complete and utter shit show.Blackhawk wrote: ↑Mon Jul 01, 2024 1:11 pm November.
In November, I can either breathe a temporary sigh of relief, or i can give up, go back to bed, adopt a rocking chair lifestyle, and leave the news off for the next two or three decades until I move into a cozy grave.
Either way, the stakes are so high that I'm not calling it done until November.
- Carpet_pissr
- Posts: 20793
- Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 5:32 pm
- Location: Columbia, SC
Re: SCOTUS Watch
Completely disagree about November being ‘the turning point’. I honestly believe we just passed it with these two decisions. SC showing true colors now and not giving a fuck. At least before Roberts was still protesting about how they were impartial. Now he’s just letting it ride.
So much more important than any one presidential election. SC is firmly in control of the reigns now.
So much more important than any one presidential election. SC is firmly in control of the reigns now.
- raydude
- Posts: 4020
- Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 9:22 am
Re: SCOTUS Watch
This is one time where I think the law of unintended consequences should apply. Biden should declare Roberts, Amy, and drunk guy enemies of the state and have them arrested. After all, he is immune.Carpet_pissr wrote: ↑Tue Jul 02, 2024 8:56 am Completely disagree about November being ‘the turning point’. I honestly believe we just passed it with these two decisions. SC showing true colors now and not giving a fuck. At least before Roberts was still protesting about how they were impartial. Now he’s just letting it ride.
So much more important than any one presidential election. SC is firmly in control of the reigns now.
- GreenGoo
- Posts: 42991
- Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2004 10:46 pm
- Location: Ottawa, ON
Re: SCOTUS Watch
Yeah, but what's going to happen is that conservative presidents are going to be immune for these "reasons", but liberal presidents are not immune for these "other reasons".
When you have total control over something, the public reasons are just cover to keep the masses from rioting. In the meantime you do what you want, when you want.
When you have total control over something, the public reasons are just cover to keep the masses from rioting. In the meantime you do what you want, when you want.
- Exodor
- Posts: 17288
- Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 11:10 pm
- Location: Portland, OR
Re: SCOTUS Watch
The turning point was Trump winning in 2016 and replacing 1/3 of SCOTUS during his term.Carpet_pissr wrote: ↑Tue Jul 02, 2024 8:56 am Completely disagree about November being ‘the turning point’. I honestly believe we just passed it with these two decisions.
- LordMortis
- Posts: 71593
- Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 11:26 pm
Re: SCOTUS Watch
It was more of an arc that began with McConnell's proudest moment and concluded with TFG winning. I don't think I can ever forget McConnell being the worst American of lifetime. Though, he might yet get unseated. TFG is really trying and I'm fairly certain if/when he wins in November, he will grab the ring.Exodor wrote: ↑Tue Jul 02, 2024 9:49 amThe turning point was Trump winning in 2016 and replacing 1/3 of SCOTUS during his term.Carpet_pissr wrote: ↑Tue Jul 02, 2024 8:56 am Completely disagree about November being ‘the turning point’. I honestly believe we just passed it with these two decisions.
- Unagi
- Posts: 28117
- Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2006 5:14 pm
- Location: Chicago
Re: SCOTUS Watch
I feel like the true turning point was when we had the nerve to elect a black man - this they needed to absolutely never let happen again; all the norms were tossed.
- Unagi
- Posts: 28117
- Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2006 5:14 pm
- Location: Chicago
Re: SCOTUS Watch
Let's have space for both. Sorta a 'narcissist' award and a non-narcissist award.LordMortis wrote: ↑Tue Jul 02, 2024 9:51 amIt was more of an arc that began with McConnell's proudest moment and concluded with TFG winning. I don't think I can ever forget McConnell being the worst American of lifetime. Though, he might yet get unseated. TFG is really trying and I'm fairly certain if/when he wins in November, he will grab the ring.Exodor wrote: ↑Tue Jul 02, 2024 9:49 amThe turning point was Trump winning in 2016 and replacing 1/3 of SCOTUS during his term.Carpet_pissr wrote: ↑Tue Jul 02, 2024 8:56 am Completely disagree about November being ‘the turning point’. I honestly believe we just passed it with these two decisions.
- YellowKing
- Posts: 31101
- Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 2:02 pm
Re: SCOTUS Watch
My only hope (and this is a long shot), is that this ruling becomes #1 in people's minds when deciding who to vote for. And fence-sitters make the right decision on whether Biden or a self-proclaimed dictator is handed the reigns of unlimited power.
Biden needs to be hammering this point home in every single speech from here until election day.
Biden needs to be hammering this point home in every single speech from here until election day.
- LordMortis
- Posts: 71593
- Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 11:26 pm
Re: SCOTUS Watch
And now you and I agree.YellowKing wrote: ↑Tue Jul 02, 2024 10:00 am My only hope (and this is a long shot), is that this ruling Supreme Court becomes #1 in people's minds when deciding who to vote for.
- Unagi
- Posts: 28117
- Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2006 5:14 pm
- Location: Chicago
Re: SCOTUS Watch
alas...YellowKing wrote: ↑Tue Jul 02, 2024 10:00 am Biden needs to be hammering this point home in every single speech from here until election day.
In the debate, Biden used his 1 minute Reply Time on the abortion question asked to Trump and managed to change it into a conversation about illegal immigrants killing young American women.
He won't be hammering this point home, probably even once.
- YellowKing
- Posts: 31101
- Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 2:02 pm
Re: SCOTUS Watch
I don't think we can take one bad debate performance and apply it as the blueprint for the rest of Biden's campaign.
- Blackhawk
- Posts: 45843
- Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 9:48 pm
- Location: Southwest Indiana
Re: SCOTUS Watch
People will be arguing what the turning point was for decades - Trump's election? RvW? McConnell holding back a SC nomination? Clinton's impeachment?Carpet_pissr wrote: ↑Tue Jul 02, 2024 8:56 am Completely disagree about November being ‘the turning point’. I honestly believe we just passed it with these two decisions. SC showing true colors now and not giving a fuck. At least before Roberts was still protesting about how they were impartial. Now he’s just letting it ride.
So much more important than any one presidential election. SC is firmly in control of the reigns now.
November is not the turning point.
November is the point-of-no-return. Everything until then is just stacking the odds, and those odds are getting slimmer and slimmer.
What doesn't kill me makes me stranger.
- Unagi
- Posts: 28117
- Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2006 5:14 pm
- Location: Chicago
Re: SCOTUS Watch
Of course not.YellowKing wrote: ↑Tue Jul 02, 2024 10:22 am I don't think we can take one bad debate performance and apply it as the blueprint for the rest of Biden's campaign.
-cynicism
But please do let me know if you ever see the campaign making the point.
- YellowKing
- Posts: 31101
- Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 2:02 pm
Re: SCOTUS Watch
Well, they kind of already did. He called a press conference at 7:45 last night to talk about nothing but the decision and to denounce it.
Biden has a top-notch campaign team. There's no way they're not going to turn this into a leading issue heading into the election. From a "silver linings" perspective, it accomplished two things - it distracted the public from Biden's debate performance (which is all the media has been able to talk about), and it gives him another way to make this election about something other than him personally.
Biden has a top-notch campaign team. There's no way they're not going to turn this into a leading issue heading into the election. From a "silver linings" perspective, it accomplished two things - it distracted the public from Biden's debate performance (which is all the media has been able to talk about), and it gives him another way to make this election about something other than him personally.
- Unagi
- Posts: 28117
- Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2006 5:14 pm
- Location: Chicago
Re: SCOTUS Watch
I'm totally down for the red-meat that can be made from this (and the other topics that seem quite obvious)
I'm just totally used to the Dems sitting on these things and letting them go to no real good use.
I'm thrilled that Biden has denounced the ruling, but it's July 1st and we have 4 months to go.
I -quite sincerely- hope you are right.
I'm just totally used to the Dems sitting on these things and letting them go to no real good use.
I'm thrilled that Biden has denounced the ruling, but it's July 1st and we have 4 months to go.
I -quite sincerely- hope you are right.
- Unagi
- Posts: 28117
- Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2006 5:14 pm
- Location: Chicago
Re: SCOTUS Watch
topic should be changed to SCROTUM Watch.
Supreme Court Ruse of the Unbearable MAGAts
Supreme Court Ruse of the Unbearable MAGAts
- YellowKing
- Posts: 31101
- Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 2:02 pm
Re: SCOTUS Watch
Yeah, to be clear, I'm not doubting your doubting of the Dems. They always find new and unique ways to disappoint.