Defining the 21st Century Republican Party?

For discussion of religion and politics

Moderators: LawBeefaroni, $iljanus

User avatar
Grifman
Posts: 22069
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 7:17 pm

Re: Defining the 21st Century Republican Party?

Post by Grifman »

The stupidity of the MAGA voter in one act:

Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions. – G.K. Chesterton
User avatar
LordMortis
Posts: 71886
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 11:26 pm

Re: Defining the 21st Century Republican Party?

Post by LordMortis »

I can't help but laugh this close to the election. A very rare turn on of the TV and CNBC this morning. Not sure why. Of course I turn it on from a discussion about how inflation is now the only solution to government debt now that inflation seems to have come down and begun to stabilize and the best way to do this is by tarriffs not by taxing the wealthy where Kernan goes into GOP angry shouting out everyone into silence with a both sides rant mode talking about lower taxes, less government, and degulation of the 80s is the responsible for all the growth and prosperity of the last 40 years. The next segment is about Starbucks that quickly devolves into an E Coli outbreak at McDonald's.
I used to be disgusted. Now I'm just amused.
User avatar
LawBeefaroni
Forum Moderator
Posts: 56091
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 3:08 pm
Location: Urbs in Horto, outrageous taxes on everything

Re: Defining the 21st Century Republican Party?

Post by LawBeefaroni »

Kernan is losing it more than usual. I take that as a good sign.
" Hey OP, listen to my advice alright." -Tha General
"No scientific discovery is named after its original discoverer." -Stigler's Law of Eponymy, discovered by Robert K. Merton

MYT
User avatar
LordMortis
Posts: 71886
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 11:26 pm

Re: Defining the 21st Century Republican Party?

Post by LordMortis »

It was the first time I turned them on in I don't know how many weeks, so I have no idea how it's been but him getting angry and controlling the the morning by shouting had been becoming more common place.

I don't take it as a good sign. This seems to be a more and more acceptable trend from the visible right and it's becoming normalized. The left will follow. I don't need a world of unfunny unthinking Lewis Blacks that think they are sage and funny.
User avatar
LawBeefaroni
Forum Moderator
Posts: 56091
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 3:08 pm
Location: Urbs in Horto, outrageous taxes on everything

Re: Defining the 21st Century Republican Party?

Post by LawBeefaroni »

LordMortis wrote: Wed Oct 23, 2024 7:42 am It was the first time I turned them on in I don't know how many weeks, so I have no idea how it's been but him getting angry and controlling the the morning by shouting had been becoming more common place.

I don't take it as a good sign. This seems to be a more and more acceptable trend from the visible right and it's becoming normalized. The left will follow. I don't need a world of unfunny unthinking Lewis Blacks that think they are sage and funny.
He's auditioning for Kudlow 2.0 and so when shit gets under his skin, you know it's getting under Trump's skin.

I agree that our standard of discourse is on a rapid decline but that is bigger than Trump or Kernan.
" Hey OP, listen to my advice alright." -Tha General
"No scientific discovery is named after its original discoverer." -Stigler's Law of Eponymy, discovered by Robert K. Merton

MYT
User avatar
Grifman
Posts: 22069
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 7:17 pm

Re: Defining the 21st Century Republican Party?

Post by Grifman »

The Senate vs Trump on campaign funding:

https://www.politico.com/news/2024/11/1 ... g-00189839

Donald Trump’s team — convinced that the Senate GOP campaign arm and its top allied super PAC are hiring “Never Trumpers” for key roles — is preparing to launch its own super PAC to compete in the next round of Senate races in 2026, according to two close allies of the president-elect.

The plan, if carried out, would upend the party’s traditional method of competing in Senate races and could cause major discord among powerful GOP financial players — pitting Trump and his new regime against longtime GOP donors seeking to influence competitive Senate races. The move could disperse money across multiple entities and hinder the Senate Leadership Fund, a group that was created to be a centralized GOP clearinghouse for Senate spending.
Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions. – G.K. Chesterton
User avatar
LordMortis
Posts: 71886
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 11:26 pm

Re: Defining the 21st Century Republican Party?

Post by LordMortis »

They keep advertising where they want to take us and we keep not listening.

https://www.npr.org/2024/11/24/nx-s1-51 ... reme-court
Inskeep: Mr. Leo, I want people to know about something called the Teneo Network, if I'm pronouncing it correctly. There's been some reporting on this, an effort that you're involved with to bring conservative influence to businesses Wall Street, Silicon Valley, Hollywood, in the same way that you brought more conservative influences to the judiciary, will you help me understand what you're doing there? With judges, you identified young law clerks, young lawyers to try to promote them into the judiciary. What are you doing with, say, Hollywood?

Leo: It's very important, in my view, to create pipelines of talent and networks of very driven, strategic people in all sectors of American life. If you want to introduce, you know, the Western cultural tradition and traditional values. So in the case of Hollywood, for example, the idea is to recruit and identify talented young professionals who have a knack for content creation and other aspects of the production of entertainment. People who believe in a sort of family-centered entertainment, where there's a high demand. And Hollywood recognizes that. And then really helping them find opportunities to use their skills to create that kind of entertainment in the Hollywood space and beyond. And there are a lot of young professionals in entertainment and in journalism and in business and finance who are looking for opportunities to inject their traditional values and the Western cultural tradition into other aspects of American social and cultural life.

Inskeep: ProPublica obtained a video of you promoting this project and saying you wanted to "crush liberal dominance." Is that what you want to do?

Leo: Yes! And the reason Steve – and I would really call your attention to the words I used: I want to crush liberal dominance. In other words, I want to make sure that there's a level playing field for the American people to make choices about the lives that they want to have in their country. I'm perfectly happy having a world where people can make choices between various kinds of things. But what I don't want is a system where our entertainment system or our world of news media or our business and finance worlds are heavily dominated by left ideology that either chokes out other ways of thinking about things, or that just creates a system where sort of inappropriate political and policy decisions are being made in places where politics and policy don't really have a proper place.
He's this "choice" as the way "choice" of conservatism was introduced to the judiciary and the SC justices he advised on...
User avatar
Zarathud
Posts: 17092
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 10:29 pm
Location: Chicago, Illinois

Re: Defining the 21st Century Republican Party?

Post by Zarathud »

His level playing field is Right dominated just like the McCarthy era.
"A lie can run round the world before the truth has got its boots on." -Terry Pratchett, The Truth
"The presence of those seeking the truth is infinitely to be preferred to those who think they've found it." -Terry Pratchett, Monstrous Regiment
User avatar
Grifman
Posts: 22069
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 7:17 pm

Re: Defining the 21st Century Republican Party?

Post by Grifman »

I’m placing my bet now. Assuming Lara Trump is elected Senator from Florida, I bet at some point she subsequently runs for president.
Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions. – G.K. Chesterton
User avatar
hepcat
Posts: 54349
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 3:02 pm
Location: Chicago, IL Home of the triple homicide!

Re: Defining the 21st Century Republican Party?

Post by hepcat »

I doubt Eric Trump’s ego would allow himself to be a “first husband”. So he’ll either leave her for another Ivanka lookalike, or put his tiny little foot down….and get it crushed.
Master of his domain.
User avatar
Grifman
Posts: 22069
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 7:17 pm

Re: Defining the 21st Century Republican Party?

Post by Grifman »

hepcat wrote: Mon Dec 09, 2024 8:50 pm I doubt Eric Trump’s ego would allow himself to be a “first husband”. So he’ll either leave her for another Ivanka lookalike, or put his tiny little foot down….and get it crushed.
He’s never shown any real political interest. She’s been RNC chairperson, now Senator. Too late to put his foot down, she’d already going down the road.
Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions. – G.K. Chesterton
User avatar
hepcat
Posts: 54349
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 3:02 pm
Location: Chicago, IL Home of the triple homicide!

Re: Defining the 21st Century Republican Party?

Post by hepcat »

As long as Eric has his blocks and his little tape player, he’s probably good.
Master of his domain.
User avatar
Smoove_B
Posts: 56272
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:58 am
Location: Kaer Morhen

Re: Defining the 21st Century Republican Party?

Post by Smoove_B »

It's probably too soon for an article, but you might remember back in October that 19 GOP states sued the Biden administration to block DACA recipients (aka the "dreamers") from gaining access to the ACA marketplace. Well, a federal judge has just ruled they cannot purchase access to health care.

The judge is a Trump appointee, if you were wondering.

This fucking timeline already.
Maybe next year, maybe no go
User avatar
Isgrimnur
Posts: 85110
Joined: Sun Oct 15, 2006 12:29 am
Location: Chookity pok
Contact:

Re: Defining the 21st Century Republican Party?

Post by Isgrimnur »

Texas Tribune
The states argued that by allowing DACA recipients to benefit from subsidized health insurance and making them “lawfully present” in the health care system, they will want to stay in the country longer, causing states to spend more money on resources like education, health care and law enforcement.
...
U.S. District Judge Daniel M. Traynor temporarily halted the guidance from taking effect as the lawsuit proceeds, stating that the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services does not have the authority to “circumvent congressional authority” and redefine “lawfully present,” a term used to describe people who are legally permitted to remain in the U.S.
It's almost as if people are the problem.
User avatar
Blackhawk
Posts: 46183
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 9:48 pm
Location: Southwest Indiana

Re: Defining the 21st Century Republican Party?

Post by Blackhawk »

Dear god, can you imagine if the country were full of healthy, educated people?

They'd run out all of the real Americans!
What doesn't kill me makes me stranger.
User avatar
LawBeefaroni
Forum Moderator
Posts: 56091
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 3:08 pm
Location: Urbs in Horto, outrageous taxes on everything

Re: Defining the 21st Century Republican Party?

Post by LawBeefaroni »

ERs will be even more crowded and guess who is going to ultimately eat the cost?
" Hey OP, listen to my advice alright." -Tha General
"No scientific discovery is named after its original discoverer." -Stigler's Law of Eponymy, discovered by Robert K. Merton

MYT
User avatar
Skinypupy
Posts: 21221
Joined: Tue Dec 07, 2004 10:12 am
Location: Utah

Re: Defining the 21st Century Republican Party?

Post by Skinypupy »

Not sure where to put this, so I'll drop it here. How to turn around low US birth rates, according to conservatives

Ah yes, it’s “overeducation” and “lack of access to religious education” that is to blame for the declining birth rates. :roll:

It’s not the collapse of optimism about the future that’s being slowly strangled away from the average young person through corporate greed and political cronyism. It’s not the astronomical costs to have and raise a child, and the complete decimation of any sort of social safety net should something go wrong. It’s not the ever-increasing maternal risks for women as reproductive restrictions continue to expand. Nope, it’s all that dang book learnin’ that's the problem!
When darkness veils the world, four Warriors of Light shall come.
User avatar
LawBeefaroni
Forum Moderator
Posts: 56091
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 3:08 pm
Location: Urbs in Horto, outrageous taxes on everything

Re: Defining the 21st Century Republican Party?

Post by LawBeefaroni »

Lack of education and/or religious zealotry can overcome almost any valid reasoning for not having a child.
" Hey OP, listen to my advice alright." -Tha General
"No scientific discovery is named after its original discoverer." -Stigler's Law of Eponymy, discovered by Robert K. Merton

MYT
User avatar
Smoove_B
Posts: 56272
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:58 am
Location: Kaer Morhen

Re: Defining the 21st Century Republican Party?

Post by Smoove_B »

This feels related:
No women will lead a House committee for the first time in two decades after House Republicans revealed their list of committee leaders for the 119th Congress on Thursday.

The 17 standing committees, whose leaders were selected by the House Republican Steering Committee, will be dominated by white men when the new Congress is seated on Jan. 3. No people of color were selected, either.
I'm sure it's just a strange coincidence.
Maybe next year, maybe no go
User avatar
Holman
Posts: 30016
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 8:00 pm
Location: Between the Schuylkill and the Wissahickon

Re: Defining the 21st Century Republican Party?

Post by Holman »

Smoove_B wrote: Sat Dec 14, 2024 1:04 pm This feels related:
No women will lead a House committee for the first time in two decades after House Republicans revealed their list of committee leaders for the 119th Congress on Thursday.

The 17 standing committees, whose leaders were selected by the House Republican Steering Committee, will be dominated by white men when the new Congress is seated on Jan. 3. No people of color were selected, either.
I'm sure it's just a strange coincidence.
The opposite of DEI is HIS: Homogeneity, Inequity, and Supremacy.
Much prefer my Nazis Nuremberged.
User avatar
Pyperkub
Posts: 24264
Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2004 5:07 pm
Location: NC- that's Northern California

Re: Defining the 21st Century Republican Party?

Post by Pyperkub »

Holman wrote:
Smoove_B wrote: Sat Dec 14, 2024 1:04 pm This feels related:
No women will lead a House committee for the first time in two decades after House Republicans revealed their list of committee leaders for the 119th Congress on Thursday.

The 17 standing committees, whose leaders were selected by the House Republican Steering Committee, will be dominated by white men when the new Congress is seated on Jan. 3. No people of color were selected, either.
I'm sure it's just a strange coincidence.
The opposite of DEI is HIS: Homogeneity, Inequity, and Supremacy.
HISN.

You forgot nepotism
Black Lives definitely Matter Lorini!

Also: There are three ways to not tell the truth: lies, damned lies, and statistics.
User avatar
LordMortis
Posts: 71886
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 11:26 pm

Re: Defining the 21st Century Republican Party?

Post by LordMortis »

Remember when the GOP disguised at libertarians used to talk about open unelected shadow governments on the left and pointed to the UN, Trilats, and George Soros as examples. Why is it their conspiracy fears always eventually become their playbooks and how the hell does it always work?

The idea that we openly have President Musk and VP Thiel running the executive branch and directly the legislative branch while the Heritage Foundation and Fedrealists run the courts and collectively we shrug and cheer it on is just in mind blowing to me. All the while that swamp of unelected corrupt oligarchs calling the shots, out to destroy our way of life for a globalist rule by and for the rich elite?
User avatar
Isgrimnur
Posts: 85110
Joined: Sun Oct 15, 2006 12:29 am
Location: Chookity pok
Contact:

Re: Defining the 21st Century Republican Party?

Post by Isgrimnur »

Grifman wrote: Mon Dec 09, 2024 8:18 pm I’m placing my bet now. Assuming Lara Trump is elected Senator from Florida, I bet at some point she subsequently runs for president.
Lara Trump withdraws name from consideration for US Senate
She stepped down this month as co-chairwoman of the Republican National Committee (RNC)
...
She said she had a big announcement to share in January, without giving further details.
It's almost as if people are the problem.
User avatar
hepcat
Posts: 54349
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 3:02 pm
Location: Chicago, IL Home of the triple homicide!

Re: Defining the 21st Century Republican Party?

Post by hepcat »

Elon will probably name their kid Xylophone Pudding ZK. People tried telling her father in law not to let him near Melania or his son’s wives. But would he listen?
Master of his domain.
Post Reply