Hayes: Madness. Democrats still aren’t taking the age issue seriously.
Defining the 21st Century Democratic Party
Moderators: LawBeefaroni, $iljanus
- Victoria Raverna
- Posts: 5727
- Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 2:23 am
- Location: Jakarta
- Holman
- Posts: 30026
- Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 8:00 pm
- Location: Between the Schuylkill and the Wissahickon
Re: Defining the 21st Century Democratic Party
Maybe rank and seniority matter too much. The question is whether he is genuinely the best person available for the job.Kraken wrote: Wed Dec 18, 2024 10:25 pm Rank and seniority matter. If this fellow waited 15+ years for his turn AND he now has cancer, maybe he deserves to grab the brass ring at last. (I'm assuming that he's qualified to do the job.) If he's near the end of his career and/or life, it will open up again in due time.
I'm not optimistic that time is a luxury we have.
Much prefer my Nazis Nuremberged.
- Smoove_B
- Posts: 56272
- Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:58 am
- Location: Kaer Morhen
Re: Defining the 21st Century Democratic Party
If I didn't know how old you are, I'd be able to tell from your post here.Kraken wrote: Wed Dec 18, 2024 10:25 pm Rank and seniority matter. If this fellow waited 15+ years for his turn AND he now has cancer, maybe he deserves to grab the brass ring at last. (I'm assuming that he's qualified to do the job.) If he's near the end of his career and/or life, it will open up again in due time.
Every workplace I've ever endured has been filled with Boomers that refuse to step aside or allow anyone else to hold any type of power. If by some reason it happens, they're quite salty about it because there's a belief that person didn't "earn" it by putting in the time. Maybe it's something that tilts heavy towards the public sector, but it's tiresome. AOC is whip-smart, she has a connection with a younger generation of voters and she's clearly demonstrated political savvy. But she's also tapped into "scary" ideas that are against the establishment so she can't be "rewarded" with any type of political power within the party - not when we have norms to maintain!
It's gross.
Maybe next year, maybe no go
- Zarathud
- Posts: 17094
- Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 10:29 pm
- Location: Chicago, Illinois
Re: Defining the 21st Century Democratic Party
It’s an internal popularity contest. That’s always gross.
"A lie can run round the world before the truth has got its boots on." -Terry Pratchett, The Truth
"The presence of those seeking the truth is infinitely to be preferred to those who think they've found it." -Terry Pratchett, Monstrous Regiment
"The presence of those seeking the truth is infinitely to be preferred to those who think they've found it." -Terry Pratchett, Monstrous Regiment
- Smoove_B
- Posts: 56272
- Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:58 am
- Location: Kaer Morhen
Re: Defining the 21st Century Democratic Party
It absolutely is. I am not sure I've heard anyone speak anything about Connolly ever. But I guess he's been there long enough that he knows "the rules" and won't rock the boat, so let's make sure he's in charge.
I guess his claim to fame is co-sponsoring a large bill in (checks notes) 2013 related to how the government purchases technology. I don't want to sound like I'm diminishing that, but that was a lifetime ago (politically).
To be clear, there's nothing in his Wiki page that's concerning; he seems to vote in a way that largely aligns with the current issues of concern and is arguably rather progressive. The issue is one of optics - specifically that he has zero connection to the current generation of voters that is spiraling because no one is listening to them. For the party to ignore the impact/connection AOC has with a rather large bloc of voters is penny-wise and pound foolish, imho.
Maybe next year, maybe no go
- Kraken
- Posts: 45208
- Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 11:59 pm
- Location: The Hub of the Universe
- Contact:
Re: Defining the 21st Century Democratic Party
Shut up or move to the back of the line, whippersnapper. You aren't ready yet.Smoove_B wrote: Thu Dec 19, 2024 11:34 amIf I didn't know how old you are, I'd be able to tell from your post here.Kraken wrote: Wed Dec 18, 2024 10:25 pm Rank and seniority matter. If this fellow waited 15+ years for his turn AND he now has cancer, maybe he deserves to grab the brass ring at last. (I'm assuming that he's qualified to do the job.) If he's near the end of his career and/or life, it will open up again in due time.
Every workplace I've ever endured has been filled with Boomers that refuse to step aside or allow anyone else to hold any type of power.
- Unagi
- Posts: 28257
- Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2006 5:14 pm
- Location: Chicago
Re: Defining the 21st Century Democratic Party
It's also totally dysfunctional - which is all that ultimately matters.Smoove_B wrote: Thu Dec 19, 2024 11:34 amIf I didn't know how old you are, I'd be able to tell from your post here.Kraken wrote: Wed Dec 18, 2024 10:25 pm Rank and seniority matter. If this fellow waited 15+ years for his turn AND he now has cancer, maybe he deserves to grab the brass ring at last. (I'm assuming that he's qualified to do the job.) If he's near the end of his career and/or life, it will open up again in due time.
Every workplace I've ever endured has been filled with Boomers that refuse to step aside or allow anyone else to hold any type of power. If by some reason it happens, they're quite salty about it because there's a belief that person didn't "earn" it by putting in the time. Maybe it's something that tilts heavy towards the public sector, but it's tiresome. AOC is whip-smart, she has a connection with a younger generation of voters and she's clearly demonstrated political savvy. But she's also tapped into "scary" ideas that are against the establishment so she can't be "rewarded" with any type of political power within the party - not when we have norms to maintain!
It's gross.
- LordMortis
- Posts: 71886
- Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 11:26 pm
Re: Defining the 21st Century Democratic Party
They faked it until they made it and they are loath to let it go because they have nowhere else to turn. They aren't alone in that. We'll have our share of protective authority Xers who don't know where to turn because they aren't prepared to let go and they put in their time but can't retire as they approach their 60s coming very soon... Like now... Cranky "Only so and so will remember..." "remember when..." "we got by with..." stuff.
I mean I feel like I put in my time and stepped aside an do feel entitled to what I've set up, which includes things like gub'ment benefits I contributed money to for my entire life, even if that's not how pay as you go gub'ment works.
I mean I feel like I put in my time and stepped aside an do feel entitled to what I've set up, which includes things like gub'ment benefits I contributed money to for my entire life, even if that's not how pay as you go gub'ment works.