Ancient books influenced my view on government bureaucratic waste. They were written by Martin Gross and were called "Government Waste from A to Z". I believe they were published in the 1990s. They went over things like this (forgive me, but for time's sake I asked Copilot to pull some examples from the books):RunningMn9 wrote: Tue Mar 25, 2025 6:32 pmExcellent news on updating the selection protocol, and I can agree with that. In a battle of normal candidates, policy is a useful discriminator. In a battle of a normie against a clusterF like this, we go normie, in a battle of two clusterF’s, that’s probably game over anyway.msduncan wrote:I do think the incredible amount of government waste that occurs in these departments should be cleaned up. I do NOT support how Elon Trump or Donald Musk is doing it, the methods they are using, the crash teams with no clearance being involved -- basically the entire business. So my position that it should be cleaned up hasn't changed, but I certainly would just keep it status quo rather than have someone do what they are doing.
But I want to ask about this policy example, since I know more about this than the other.
Talk to me about this “incredible amount of government waste”. How are we defining waste? How do we quantify what amount qualifies as “incredible”?
Is there government waste? Absolutely. I see it every day. But I also know that a large percentage of people have had anti-government spending propaganda fire-hosed into their faces for decades, and ultimately believe a lot of wrong things about government spending.
I know people talk about $1200 hammers (which are generally an exaggeration, and ignore the context of WHY government procurement “seems” so crazy).
I know people think that federal employees don’t do anything (some don’t, most do).
I also know that most government spending falls into one of three buckets:
1) Money to old people in the form of Social Security.
2) Money to people that take care of old people (or people who need help) via Medicare/Medicaid.
3) Money to blow shit up via the DoD.
The rest is effectively noise.
So when I hear someone that believes there is an incredible amount of waste in the government, I have a lot of questions. I think it’s important to make sure it is clear that virtually everyone is against government waste and fraud.
What I’ve found is that waste is usually defined as “things I don’t think the government should spend money on”. But that’s not “waste”, that’s just a policy difference.
And when we get to the end of figuring out what you mean by waste and fraud, then we can talk about the impact of cleaning it up, and how damaging that can be (especially if you are right about the scale!).
We won’t waste time on how these idiots are going about it since we already agree that it’s stupid. I’m just curious to explore your belief about this policy if you are into it.
- Expensive Research Projects: Funding for projects like the National Swine Research Center, which Gross critiques for its questionable necessity.
- Costly Infrastructure: Spending millions on projects like a third golf course at Andrews Air Force Base.
- Duplicative Programs: Multiple government programs addressing the same issue, spread across different agencies, leading to inefficiency.
- Outdated Initiatives: Programs that were relevant decades ago but no longer serve a purpose, yet continue to consume taxpayer dollars.
So, I'm not talking about core mission stuff (making sure old people get their money or taking care of them). I'm not talking about making sure people get fair education (DoE). I'm talking about stuff like was outlined in his book decades ago, which I presume (maybe incorrectly, but I don't think any action has been taken to clean it up) is still a problem.
As for the DoD? That's a complicated question. We went through decades where I think defense spending could have been drawn down a lot and some of the wars or involvement avoided. However, China is busy ramping up their military spending at an alarming rate. I'm unsure if it would be wise for us to draw down while they are ramping up. I'm not suggesting we ramp up, but we also don't want to drop our defenses.