EULA ruling

All discussions regarding Board, Card, and RPG Gaming, including industry discussion, that don't belong in one of the other gaming forums.

Moderators: The Preacher, $iljanus, Zaxxon

Post Reply
wankerjr
Posts: 621
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 4:04 pm
Contact:

EULA ruling

Post by wankerjr »

Spotted this article on HardOCP.

All I have to say is it's about freaking time. I was always annoyed by the whole shrinkwrap licensing catch-22 we were stuck with. I wonder how soon game publishers are going to fall in line?
Yet another shameless plug..for something
User avatar
Blackhawk
Posts: 47129
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 9:48 pm
Location: Southwest Indiana

Post by Blackhawk »

Interesting. I wonder if this precedent will ever be applied to returns on software that is defective or fails to meet its claims.
What doesn't kill me makes me stranger.
Tareeq
Posts: 10374
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 11:07 pm

Post by Tareeq »

Blackhawk wrote:Interesting. I wonder if this precedent will ever be applied to returns on software that is defective or fails to meet its claims.
Assuredly. Rothkin's done the work litigating against Best Buy and Microsoft. EB and EA would be pushovers by comparison. Assuming he hasn't already filed suit against them.

Of course if any of our friends in California would like to be test plaintiffs, why not buy an online game (Sony's EULA is repulsive) and give it a try?
User avatar
Freezer-TPF-
Posts: 12698
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 2:41 pm
Location: VA

Post by Freezer-TPF- »

Damn, I wish they had videogame law back when I was considering law school.

"Your Honor, if it pleases the court, could you please refer to me by my legal handle, "STr8t K1llah"?
When the sun goes out, we'll have eight minutes to live.
Post Reply