New Game Engine thoughts

All discussions regarding Board, Card, and RPG Gaming, including industry discussion, that don't belong in one of the other gaming forums.

Moderators: The Preacher, $iljanus, Zaxxon

Post Reply
Greg Wak
Posts: 967
Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2004 8:29 pm
Location: Chicago IL

New Game Engine thoughts

Post by Greg Wak »

Let me start by saying that computer gaming has become my favorite hobby. Considering how much I enjoy sports and scifi and numerous other things this somewhat surprises me. I say this because I don't want to seem like I'm complaining, just observing.
I HATE the constant need to upgrade hardware or the fear of having to upgrade soon. One of the coolest things about the hobby is looking ahead to new games. Not so much fun is wondering if you will be able to run them in all or at least mostly all of their glory. Two new trends have helped me to worry less. Doom 3 and HL2 were very scalable, and prcessor speeds won't be increasing anytime soon. I think/ hope it will be a while until games can take much advantage of dual cpu's.
The whole point is there are some monster engines on the horizon. Oblvion, Unreal 3 and to a lesser extent, Gothic 3. Do most people think high end rigs now will be able to crank those games when they ship at the end of 05/ begining of 06? I just upgraded this year and it will be a good long while before I can do it again. That being said, Oblivion has become #1 on my long term radar. I'm Just wondering what other people thinK.
User avatar
The Mad Hatter
Posts: 6322
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 1:36 am
Location: Funkytown

Post by The Mad Hatter »

The only significant upgrade I've made to my system in the past two years is an extra 512 megs of ram. I'll probably upgrade the video card in the next month or so but otherwise it's still in the ballpark for everything that I've thrown at it. I'd say the pace of upgrading has slowed down considerably over the past few years.
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.
- George Orwell
Greg Wak
Posts: 967
Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2004 8:29 pm
Location: Chicago IL

Post by Greg Wak »

I think it has slowed down as well and I hope you are right. I had to get a new rig this year as my old one was 4 years old. I'm Hoping to get that much out of this one.
User avatar
Eel Snave
Posts: 2933
Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2004 6:09 pm
Location: Wisconsin
Contact:

Post by Eel Snave »

Mine is 4 years old and is still quite the workhorse. If I had some money to pump into it, I could probably scrape another year or two out of it, easy.
Downwards Compatible
We're playing every NES game alphabetically! Even the crappy ones! Send help!
User avatar
Rich in KCK
Posts: 974
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 1:59 pm
Location: 30 Miles South of KC

Post by Rich in KCK »

I figure I only spend $10-$20 a month per computer if you average it out on upgrades. Each main component still lasts 18-24 months for me and for a lot of people myself included researching and buying new parts is actually part of the fun of the hobby.
Dhruin
Posts: 882
Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 11:59 pm
Contact:

Post by Dhruin »

The Mad Hatter wrote:The only significant upgrade I've made to my system in the past two years is an extra 512 megs of ram. I'll probably upgrade the video card in the next month or so but otherwise it's still in the ballpark for everything that I've thrown at it. I'd say the pace of upgrading has slowed down considerably over the past few years.
Ditto! In fact, I recently wanted to upgrade but couldn't really justify it - my rig handles everything to satisfaction...although a new video card will be desirable in a few months.
User avatar
Kraken
Posts: 45840
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 11:59 pm
Location: The Hub of the Universe
Contact:

Post by Kraken »

My 2.66 GHz pentium is going on two years old, but 2.66 still seems respectable enough to me. I just doubled the RAM to 1 gig, and will buy a modern video card when I can afford one. Add in a new big honkin' hard drive, and I fully expect this machine to perform acceptably for at least two more years. Any game developer who pushes the tech too far risks losing the mass market, because the upgrade curve has definitely flattened, especially among more casual gamers. That's a very welcome development. I hate moving from one machine to another.

To answer your question, I don't expect to upgrade anything except my video card and main hard drives for years to come, and no game on the horizon is going to change my mind.
User avatar
RunningMn9
Posts: 24786
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 11:55 pm
Location: The Sword Coast
Contact:

Post by RunningMn9 »

A year ago I bought a 3.2 GHz P4 w/ HT, an ATI 9800 XT, 1GB of RAM and a 250 GB hard drive.

It still runs everything flawlessly (although I suppose I'm missing out on some goodies that the newer generation of vid cards offers).

I have since added another 160 GB of hard drive space, and an Audigy 2 sound card to replace the onboard audio.

It has to last me 2 more years before the wife will sanction a system-replacement level upgrade, so I'll keep telling myself that everything is running flawlessly. :)
And in banks across the world
Christians, Moslems, Hindus, Jews
And every other race, creed, colour, tint or hue
Get down on their knees and pray
The raccoon and the groundhog neatly
Make up bags of change
But the monkey in the corner
Well he's slowly drifting out of range
Greg Wak
Posts: 967
Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2004 8:29 pm
Location: Chicago IL

Post by Greg Wak »

So you guys think these rigs will run the new stuff pretty easily? Unreal 3 looks pretty amazing.
User avatar
Blackhawk
Posts: 47181
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 9:48 pm
Location: Southwest Indiana

Post by Blackhawk »

Four years.

Practically every game that is released will work on any system from the past four years. The majority of casual gamers do a serious upgrade every four years, so any developer that puts a game on the market that requires a machine built in the past year is locking out 3/4 of his audience. They know better than to do that, and they design their engines to scale appropriately. If you buy a machine right now, you will be able to run everything on the market for at least four years.

Note that the further into that four years you go, the more you have to compromise, though. A four year old system can run Doom 3, but not on the top quality setting at 1600x1200.

For more flexibility with settings, plan on replacing a video card every two years, and the mobo/RAM/CPU every three. Do that and you will be able to run everything at 80%+ detail all the time.
What doesn't kill me makes me stranger.
User avatar
\/\/olverine
Posts: 263
Joined: Wed Dec 29, 2004 2:43 pm
Location: Cali

Post by \/\/olverine »

A lot of upgrading depends on how picky you are with your graphics. Me, I'm an untter graphics whore, its why I rarely pick up a console game any longer. I bought my system around a year ago, its a P4 3.2, 1GB RAM, and originally came with a GeForce 5900. Since then I have only needed to upgrade my video card, so I currently own a Geforce 6800 GT. Everything runs about as good as it can, processor speeds seem to have hit a speed bump and most games coming out in the future really only ask that you have the latest video card anyhow if you want all the bells and whistles. If not, you can scale it down.
User avatar
raydude
Posts: 4163
Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 9:22 am

Post by raydude »

Greg Wak wrote:So you guys think these rigs will run the new stuff pretty easily? Unreal 3 looks pretty amazing.
I think so. I think current rigs can handle Silent Hunter III, Dangerous Waters, TC 1861 pretty handily. Oh, you mean the pure eye candy stuff? Don't know, don't care :).
Post Reply