Isn't this going to be fun?
This post is just to chronicle my folly, in case I guess wrong on the last wolf.
Remus:
- If it turns out that Remus is the last wolf, I will go down as one of the most epicly manipulated players in the annals of OO WW games.
- Remus and I have been in PM contact from the start of the game. bb and I were in PM contact from the start of the game. They both pointed at each other from the start. I even went to great lengths with both of them to explain why I thought there was a decent chance that the other was good. I was dead solid wrong on bb. Am I that gullible that I could be wrong on both? Yes, I'm sure it is possible, but it would have taken a sustained, calculated effort from both of them for the entire game to maintain a two-step deception on me. I am certainly capable of such deception, but would they mount such an effort?
- Yesterday, when the vote was 1 on bb and 1 on theo (from each other), Remus was in a position to wait. There was still 2 hours and 15 minutes left (although RMC had just posted that there was only and hour and 20 minutes left, it was really two hours and 20 minutes because the deadline was Central). Remus was faced with voting theo or bb. For Remus to be a wolf, he would have to be bb's partner. So, why would a wolf vote for his partner in that situation? By PMs and by my posts in the main thread, Remus knew that I was leaning more toward an evil theo, than an evil bb. I had made it pretty clear, both in the main thread and in PMs to Remus and bb, that I was suspicious of theo being a wolf. If Remus and bb were teammates, they would have certainly shared my suspicions of theo and the PMs that I sent both of them, detailing why I thought both Remus and bb were possibly good. A Remuswolf would have known that and probably waited to at least see if I was going to vote theo, before he put his partner's neck in the noose. Or, if he felt the need to vote, why wouldn't Remuswolf put a vote on theo, knowing that if either RMC or I settled on theo, the wolves would have won outright? Also, Remus and I had just exchanged PMs, with me asking him his plan. It would have been very easy for him to wait to see which way I went. It would have meant a win for the wolves, if I voted theo, or Remus could have then killed bb and looked good for today, if I did vote on bb. But, placing the second vote on his partner makes me doubt that Remus was teamed with bb. It's certainly possible, but it would have meant that Remus by-passed the chance of winning yesterday for a gamble on winning today.
- When yesterday (game day) dawned, Remus sent me a PM saying that he needed to know why I thought there was a chance that bb was good. I went through seven possible reasons that bb might be good, in detail. Remus' response? He basically ignored my post and went into the game thread and said:
Remus West wrote:I think it would be silly to pursue anyone other than bb2112 today due to the Unagi angle though and I'd like to do that then we have either lost or get to see where we are at tomorrow. A final decision between theohall, RMC, and Qantaga will either be made easier or taken out of my hands entirely.
While that could easily be posturing by a Remuswolf, it doesn't seem to line up with a wolfy Remus. If I had gone to such pains to explain why I thought his wolfy partner might be good, he could have easily played that to the fullest extent and acted like my "logic" had swayed him, but he never wavered in his suspicion (both public and private) of bb.
That stands in stark contrast from what bbwolf actually did. bb sent me a PM, saying that he was planning to put a vote on Remus. I sent him a detailed PM of why I thought Remus was good. Then, bb changed his stance and voted publicly for theo. A vote that, in retrospect, was certainly designed to play on my suspicions and hope that I would join the theo vote. Remus did not change his stance to accomodate my suspicions. He remained decisive about bb, even when it would have benefitted him greatly to pretend to go along with some of my reasons.
Just the fact that bb (in his PMs to me) led with Remus being the one bb planned to vote on in the open thread, leads me to believe Remus good. bb didn't lead with theo or RMC, he led with Remus. Had I not been the one to say why I thought Remus was good, he would have needed to go through with the public vote on Remus or looked very suspicious when he didn't. Yes, it could have been a calculated play, but it would have meant giving up any chance of winning on Day 5 and betting everything on sacrificing a partner and trying to win on the final day.
RMC:
- I have been suspicous of RMC for most of the game. Mainly because of his almost complete absence during the Day 1 fireworks and because of his little swat at Lassr,
that still looks contrived. theo picked up on it, too. I originally thought that might mean that theo was a wolf, too, but I now think that theo's perceptions caught it, too.
- RMC's voting patterns on Day 4 and comments that day still strike me very strange. His non-commital mid-day shift from bb to Austin led to the higher probability of an Austin lynch than a bb lynch and he looked more like a wolf positioning than a villager in search of a wolf.
- As I looked, at the final wolf pairs yesterday, I narrowed the pairs down to {Remus/theo}, {theo/RMC}, {RMC/bb}. The only one left is {RMC/bb}.
bb's death
Either Remus or RMC is a wolf. Both of them participated in bb's lynching yesterday. Remus with vote number 2. RMC with the killing vote, after pausing.
Here's where the game hinges and where I'm going to kick myself for a long time, if I guess wrong here.
1. RMC posts that the deadline is only an hour and 20 minutes away (as mentioned above, we actually had 2 hours and 20 minutes since stess' deadline was CST).
2. RMC also says that he is probably going to vote bb, while questioning, "are we going to vote for either bb or theo? or does someone think neither theo or bb is a wolf?"
3. Remus comes in three minutes later and votes for bb, saying that he cannot see theo as a wolf.
4. RMC then says that neither can he see theo as a wolf.
5. RMC points out that following his logic through would mean that Remus was making a play for the next day.
6. RMC kills bb.
So, I'm left to wonder if (A) Remus jumped the bb vote, thinking RMC meant to vote bb and, thus set himself (Remus) up for today?, or (B) RMC put the killling vote on bb to make himself look good for today.
I've already discussed option (A) above but, just to re-iterate. If Remus and bb are teammates, Remus knows that I have an already biased opinion toward theo being a wolf. Plus, Remus and I had been in contact at that time, so that he knows that I am active in the game and still planning to cast a vote soon. It would have been easy for Remus to give it a little longer to see if I would cast the theo vote that would win him the game right there, without having to worry about what happens today.
While RMC knew that I was leaning theo over bb, he may have felt pressured by Remus' vote, knowing that if I came into the thread with the deadline looming and saw that bb had two votes and theo had one, that I might have put the vote on bb. So, RMC may have been looking for credibility today by casting the killing vote.
It's certain that one of them helped kill their teammate, I just hope I'm guessing the correct one.
The kicker
There is one, particular, over-riding reason that I think Remus is good. Way back on the night Unagi was killed, I got a PM from Remus. I'll provide it at game's end, if the discussion merits.
I realize that virtually anything goes in these PM games (and I have certainly learned a lot through the course of this one), but if Remus is a wolf, that PM will lands very firmly in the territory of a "trick." While I know other players (Austin and stess come to mind) advocate anything goes strategies like faking posts to look like they were in the wrong forum, etc., I don't think Remus is a player that resorts to "tricks." I could very well be wrong (and this is certainly not a judgement of him if it is a trick), but I just don't think Remus is a player that would use trickery.
Unfortunately for the village, my "analysis" has been off for most of this game. I was wrong about trig on Day 1 (although I was right about Lassr, thankfully). I was wrong about Newcastle (more on that post-game). I was wrong when I cast the vote on Austin (it came down to a figurative coin toss between he and bb with the deadline approaching), but at least I was right in my constant "defending" of Austin prior to that mis-placed vote. And, worst of all, I was dead wrong on bb.
For better or worse:
RMC