Re: The Trump Presidency Thread
Posted: Sun Sep 24, 2017 4:32 pm
The Steelers player is a former US Army Ranger I believe. Shockingly, no one has any problem with him doing what he believes is right.
That is not dead which can eternal lie, and with strange aeons bring us some web forums whereupon we can gather
http://garbi.online/forum/
I keep thinking we're about 3 months away from him actually saying that on Twitter. Possibly sooner depending on how many players start actively doing it every week.hepcat wrote:Trump hates it when his minorities get uppity.
My only problem is that for whatever reason (word is the team was ordered to "stay out of it") the entire team did something as a unit, except the one hold out. That may or may not cause issues within the team.RunningMn9 wrote:The Steelers player is a former US Army Ranger I believe. Shockingly, no one has any problem with him doing what he believes is right.
@realDonaldTrump wrote:Great solidarity for our National Anthem and for our Country. Standing with locked arms is good, kneeling is not acceptable. Bad ratings!
Team owner Richard Petty, who won a record-tying seven championships as a driver, said he would fire any employee that didn't stand for the anthem.
“Anybody that don’t stand up for that ought to be out of the country. Period,” Petty said. “If they don’t appreciate where they’re at … what got them where they’re at? The United States.”
Jesus Christ. We really are living in Animal Farm.DJT wrote:Standing with locked arms is good, kneeling is not acceptable.
Are there even minorities in NASCAR? I would think 9 out of 10 white supremacists are Team Petty and not fans of The Cavaliers.Smoove_B wrote:Football? Please. Real 'mericans support NASCAR - and I imagine Trump will be endorsing them soon enough.
Team owner Richard Petty, who won a record-tying seven championships as a driver, said he would fire any employee that didn't stand for the anthem.
“Anybody that don’t stand up for that ought to be out of the country. Period,” Petty said. “If they don’t appreciate where they’re at … what got them where they’re at? The United States.”
The Steelers held a players only meeting Saturday night to vote on what to do. The vote was split between standing on the sidelines with arms locked or standing in the tunnel out of sight. Villanueva was at the meeting and spoke to the team. There was discussion about having him exempt from whatever the team decided to do, given his history.GreenGoo wrote:That could be. Trying to keep up on all the details of each individual circumstances is challenging. It was my understanding that the Steelers didn't come out of their dressing Room until after the anthem had played.
Great.RunningMn9 wrote:I guarantee you that Villanueva coming out for the anthem will cause absolutely zero issues in that locker room. They understand his background and the sense of duty he feels personally from his service.
Great. This is all new information to me.msteelers wrote:The Steelers held a players only meeting Saturday night to vote on what to do. The vote was split between standing on the sidelines with arms locked or standing in the tunnel out of sight. Villanueva was at the meeting and spoke to the team. There was discussion about having him exempt from whatever the team decided to do, given his history.GreenGoo wrote:That could be. Trying to keep up on all the details of each individual circumstances is challenging. It was my understanding that the Steelers didn't come out of their dressing Room until after the anthem had played.
The team narrowly voted to stand in the tunnel. They told Tomlin, who called Goodell to let him know.
Obviously Villanueva stood just outside the tunnel. Pictures show the rest of the team right behind him at the edge of the tunnel. As soon as the anthem was over they jogged out to the field as a team.
Villanueva avoided the locker room after the game when the media was in there. I would love to hear his thoughts on the team's decision. He has previously said he supported Kaepernick's message, but disagreed with his actions. I have to think he at least supported his teammates decision, even if he didn't agree with it. Otherwise he would have been on the sidelines with the coaches, and not off in the corner near his teammates.
YK, I don't like the sentiment expressed this way, because as we saw today, you ARE free to believe whatever you want.YellowKing wrote:Welcome to America, where you're free to believe whatever you want as long as it aligns with straight white Christian values.
YG - "FDT (feat. Nipsey Hussle)" but don't worry, i got yaZaxxon wrote:Speaking of team unity, the Broncos apparently (per the Twitters...) were blasting a song called Fuck Donald Trump before coming out of the locker room.
Alejandro Villanueva's emergence from the Soldier Field tunnel during Sunday's national anthem surprised many members of the Pittsburgh Steelers, a source told ESPN.
Villanueva, a former Army Ranger who served terms in Afghanistan, was the lone Steeler to appear despite an expectation from Saturday's players-only meeting that the entire team would remain in the locker room, the source said.
The starting left tackle was a key figure in the team's protest planning because of his background. Players wanted to accommodate Villanueva, who expressed during their 30-minute session that he didn't want to be singled out, the source said. Moving the protest off the field entirely was a way to keep solidarity without isolating an individual.
"That's where the confusion came in," the source of the anthem sequence.
...
Teammates widely respect Villanueva for serving the country, and they made that clear Sunday.
"Al is a unique circumstance, what he's been through, some of the things he's talked about before," guard David DeCastro said of Villanueva's decision Sunday.
"I've got a lot of respect for Al. I wish there was a different way to do this thing. We've got some people who look at the national anthem as patriotism, soldiers, all the stuff that it means, and obviously, people are upset, and I understand that. I just wish both sides understand that they want the right thing, but doing it through the national anthem, I wish there was a different way."
Only if there is action taken. Idiot in Chief is allowed to express his stupid racist views as much as anyone else is allowed to express their views. Until some person or organization acts on his words there is nothing to sue for.GreenGoo wrote:I predict the aclu or someone similar will file a free speech lawsuit this week. I hope they win.
I agree with this. I lost respect for Kaepernick because he didn't vote.Remus West wrote:On a side note, Kapernick lost all credibility to me when he admitted he did not even vote.
I found this Seth Abramson Tweeter thread to be surprisingly on-point. Sad!YellowKing wrote:It's just another example of Trump dividing people. That's what he does.
That's not actually true. It gets hazy when there is no overt consequences to a government official chilling speech, but just as when Drumpf "hoped" the Russian inquiry would go away when he spoke to Comey, there is potentially room here to interpret the president's comments in the same way.Remus West wrote:Only if there is action taken. Idiot in Chief is allowed to express his stupid racist views as much as anyone else is allowed to express their views. Until some person or organization acts on his words there is nothing to sue for.GreenGoo wrote:I predict the aclu or someone similar will file a free speech lawsuit this week. I hope they win.
If you want to support that kind of behavior. They have every right to to make that decision. And I'm sure their customers will be more than willing to let them know if the market supports them in it.stessier wrote:There is a sports bar here that decided today to no longer show NFL games until "the players stop disrespecting the flag and our country." Should make it a lot easier to get into on Sundays.
If he feels that neither party has his best interests in mind, why on earth would he think voting was a way to effect meaningful change? I mean, WE have had conversations where the difference between parties is blurred until you can't tell the difference.msteelers wrote:I agree with this. I lost respect for Kaepernick because he didn't vote.Remus West wrote:On a side note, Kapernick lost all credibility to me when he admitted he did not even vote.
Yeah, especially once their revenue drops by 40%. It won't last. Fortunately for them it's a vague enough target so they can be back to showing games in a week or so.stessier wrote:There is a sports bar here that decided today to no longer show NFL games until "the players stop disrespecting the flag and our country." Should make it a lot easier to get into on Sundays.
I would love to see a documentary on a town/customer base that is more interested in holding to it's principles than participating in the Sunday afternoon ritual of football and beer. That would make for interesting viewing, I would think. It seems, unpossible, almost.Isgrimnur wrote:If you want to support that kind of behavior. They have every right to to make that decision. And I'm sure their customers will be more than willing to let them know if the market supports them in it.stessier wrote:There is a sports bar here that decided today to no longer show NFL games until "the players stop disrespecting the flag and our country." Should make it a lot easier to get into on Sundays.
Thanks for writing that YK. It couldn't be more true or more infuriating. As an outsider looking it, watching Americans turn on each other because of this man who was elected to a position that is expected to lead America as a whole, is sickening.YellowKing wrote:It's just another example of Trump dividing people. That's what he does. He is very good at pitting tribe against tribe. Doesn't matter if it's Democrats vs Republican, white vs black, or fans vs players. Forget his lying, his narcissism, his incompetence - a complete inability to unite - in fact an active drive to divide Americans - is one of the most reprehensible characteristics a President could possibly have.
Not the Bengals.GreenGoo wrote:The entire NFL took him seriously enough to specifically defy him.
Are they really an NFL team though?Remus West wrote:Not the Bengals.GreenGoo wrote:The entire NFL took him seriously enough to specifically defy him.
If you speak of working to solve an issue but then decline to participate in the simplest manner I reserve the right to no longer respect you. I still respect the need for change - something I did well before he began kneeling - but I simply view his protest as meaningless grandstanding rather than any true effort to effect change. Removing yourself from participating in the nation does nothing to attempt to fix the challenges facing it.GreenGoo wrote:If he feels that neither party has his best interests in mind, why on earth would he think voting was a way to effect meaningful change? I mean, WE have had conversations where the difference between parties is blurred until you can't tell the difference.msteelers wrote:I agree with this. I lost respect for Kaepernick because he didn't vote.Remus West wrote:On a side note, Kapernick lost all credibility to me when he admitted he did not even vote.
Is volunteering twice a week at a soup kitchen/homeless shelter a better or worse way to impact social change than pulling a lever? When you have a national audience, you don't think addressing that audience would have enormously more impact than anonymously writing someone's name down? If he voted and kept his mouth shut, would we even know who he is or what he thinks? Would the Drumpf have decided to criticize his voting habits? Would the entire NFL have defied Drumpf because of a lever that was pulled?
I've never heard such an asinine reason for dismissing a person out of hand.
Sure, yes, I completely agree that he should vote. Spoil your ballot at a minimum. But the idea that what he says is less than meaningless because he doesn't participate in the election process is bunk. If you haven't noticed, the election process seems to be experiencing some challenges that aren't going to be addressed with a larger turnout.
I'm sure it was all legit."Mr. Kushner uses his White House email address to conduct White House business," Lowell said in a statement. "Fewer than a hundred emails from January through August were either sent to or returned by Mr. Kushner to colleagues in the White House from his personal email account."