That is not dead which can eternal lie, and with strange aeons bring us some web forums whereupon we can gather
http://garbi.online/forum/
I will vote against him.Defiant wrote:I'm beginning to get the impression that god will be on the ballot next year.
God is everywhere, so he'll be on all the tickets.Kraken wrote:I will vote against him.Defiant wrote:I'm beginning to get the impression that god will be on the ballot next year.
I think her explanation is plausible. She was making a joke about the cluster of natural disasters. Similar jokes were made around our IT office: "I don't think God likes the latest build" and so forth.Defiant wrote:Bachmann: Irene was political message from God
Clearly you weren't paying attention. We either pay for disaster relief with spending cuts or we don't pay for disaster relief.Captain Caveman wrote:God is mad about federal spending so he generates natural disasters that require more federal spending? That doesn't seem very smart. Anybody who thinks about this for more than a few seconds would realize that the disasters occurred because of his disapproval of gay marriage.
And with this, the derailment has become on topic.Smoove_B wrote:That Old Testament humor must be a big hit with Real Americans.
Your god is too busy being indicted for tax fraud!Captain Caveman wrote:God is mad about federal spending so he generates natural disasters that require more federal spending? That doesn't seem very smart. Anybody who thinks about this for more than a few seconds would realize that the disasters occurred because of his disapproval of gay marriage.
Easy with that New York sense of humor.malichai11 wrote:Your god is too busy being indicted for tax fraud!Captain Caveman wrote:God is mad about federal spending so he generates natural disasters that require more federal spending? That doesn't seem very smart. Anybody who thinks about this for more than a few seconds would realize that the disasters occurred because of his disapproval of gay marriage.
You mean Jewish, don't you?Mr. Fed wrote:Easy with that New York sense of humor.malichai11 wrote:Your god is too busy being indicted for tax fraud!Captain Caveman wrote:God is mad about federal spending so he generates natural disasters that require more federal spending? That doesn't seem very smart. Anybody who thinks about this for more than a few seconds would realize that the disasters occurred because of his disapproval of gay marriage.
It really doesn't. I consider the first 4 seasons to be some of the best TV of all-time and definitely think that "Two Cathedrals" is the best hour of television I've ever watched.malichai11 wrote:You mean Jewish, don't you?Mr. Fed wrote:Easy with that New York sense of humor.malichai11 wrote:Your god is too busy being indicted for tax fraud!Captain Caveman wrote:God is mad about federal spending so he generates natural disasters that require more federal spending? That doesn't seem very smart. Anybody who thinks about this for more than a few seconds would realize that the disasters occurred because of his disapproval of gay marriage.
You know, this isn't the appropriate place for this, but I feel that the West Wing just doesn't get the credit it deserves, probably because of how the show kind of sank after Sorkin left.
Palin would soon have two grandkids were that ticket to happen.Captain Caveman wrote:There is a truck parked outside my house with a Nugent/Palin '12 bumper sticker proudly displayed in the back window. I found it kind of humorous that of the two, the driver apparently feels more comfortable with Nugent at the top of the ticket.
THE WEEKLY STANDARD’s official reaction to last night’s Republican presidential debate: Yikes.
Reading the reactions of thoughtful commentators after the stage emptied, talking with conservative policy types and GOP political operatives later last evening and this morning, we know we’re not alone. Most won’t express publicly just how horrified—or at least how demoralized—they are.
Just for grins I was live-snarking the debate last night on Twitter. I actually came out (1) liking Huntsman and Johnson more, and being happy they were there, (2) liking Paul a bit more, but knowing he's got all sorts of issues (even from a libertarian standpoint), (3) having more mixed feelings about Perry (hating him more for some things, begrudgingly admiring him for standing by his beliefs on others), (4) taking Cain less seriously, (5) finding Romney more electable but less substantive, and (6) despising Santorum and Bachmann even more.Pyperkub wrote:When Bill Kristol of the Weekly Standard is dumbfounded by the lack of quality conservative candidates, you know something is wrong:
THE WEEKLY STANDARD’s official reaction to last night’s Republican presidential debate: Yikes.
Reading the reactions of thoughtful commentators after the stage emptied, talking with conservative policy types and GOP political operatives later last evening and this morning, we know we’re not alone. Most won’t express publicly just how horrified—or at least how demoralized—they are.
I mean, Santorum in double digits??Herman Cain: 37.11%
Rick Perry: 15.43%
Mitt Romney: 14.00%
Rick Santorum: 10.88%
Ron Paul: 10.39%
Newt Gingrich: 8.43%
Jon Huntsman: 2.26%
Michele Bachmann: 1.51%
Mr. Fed wrote:This will be very awkward for Romney.
They crossed an ant with a bear and got this guy?At this year’s Values Voters Summit Mitt Romney is speaking right before noted anti-gay, ant-bear activist Bryan Fischer
Try the veal. Isg will be here all week.Isgrimnur wrote:Especially when the elephants keep stomping on the funds for bear DNA studies?
If Romney has any sense of playfulness, he'll show up in full-on short-sleeve white-shirt & skinny-black-tie Mormon door-to-door regalia.Mr. Fed wrote:This will be very awkward for Romney. Though not as awkward as for the gay Indian grizzly bear who is the speaker after that.
"After much prayer and serious consideration, I have decided that I will not be seeking 2012 GOP nomination for president of the United states. As always, my family comes first and obviously Todd and I put great consideration into family life before making this decision."
Exodor wrote:Can we stop talking about her now?
"After much prayer and serious consideration, I have decided that I will not be seeking 2012 GOP nomination for president of the United states. As always, my family comes first and obviously Todd and I put great consideration into family life before making this decision."
I could enter if that makes you feel better.YellowKing wrote:That's disappointing that she's dropping out. What this race needed was more unelectable Republican candidates.
I believe I understand the appeal of Palin and the people I believe she is appealing to tend to be the people who scare the pancake out of me. They are the last people I want in charge.Mr. Fed wrote:I grasp the appeal of W. I grasp the appeal of Cain or Romney or Perry or even Bachmann.
I cannot fathom the appeal of Palin.
Nevada’s jump ahead in the GOP presidential nominating calendar has prompted new rounds of finger pointing, insider wrangling and political threats. But some Republicans worry the biggest losers may turn out to be voters.
Republicans in the Western state announced earlier this week that they would hold their caucuses on Jan. 14, a shift that triggered a domino effect forcing other states to rethink the timing of their own contests. And now, despite private warnings from Republican officials in Washington, it’s looking more and more likely that Iowa and New Hampshire could schedule the nation’s first presidential voting for the height of the coming holiday season.
...
Nevada is among a host of states that violated party rules by pushing up their elections to garner more influence in the presidential nominating process. It’s unclear whether there will be any consequences. An RNC spokesman declined to comment publicly Thursday.
The spotlight now turns to New Hampshire Secretary of State Bill Gardner, who has the sole discretion to schedule the Granite State’s first-in-the-nation primary. Iowa Republican Party Chairman Matt Strawn said he would like to schedule Iowa’s caucuses for Jan. 5, hoping that Gardner sets the New Hampshire primary for Jan. 10.
...
Gardner, who has set eight primary elections over the last three decades, said he is not likely to make a decision before Oct. 17. Strawn said he would make a decision in the next week to 10 days.
One consideration is a provision in New Hampshire law that directs Gardner to schedule the primary at least seven days before any other similar contest. It remains to be seen whether Gardner will interpret the Nevada election — which entail caucuses — as “similar” or not. Recent history offers a handful of examples of a New Hampshire primary less than a week before caucuses in other states.