Re: The Trump Presidency Thread
Posted: Thu Oct 19, 2017 5:05 pm

That is not dead which can eternal lie, and with strange aeons bring us some web forums whereupon we can gather
http://garbi.online/forum/
Not a WTF at you. I accepted the tweet as legit too.
Alefroth wrote: Thu Oct 19, 2017 5:13 pm Kelly in a briefing believes Gold Star families are no longer sacred after the convention last summer. Hard to see that as anything other than a slam on Trump.
http://www.cnn.com/2017/10/19/politics/ ... index.html
How stupid do you have to be to take that, and get this from it?Kelly wrote:"He was doing exactly what he wanted to do when he was killed. He knew what he was getting into by joining that 1%. He knew what the possibilities were because we were at war," Kelly said, channeling Dunford's words to him upon the death of Kelly's son. "And when he died he was surrounded by the best men on this earth, his friends. That's what the President tried to say to the four families the other day."
Giving condolences takes tact and empathy. It's not easy for the best of us. For God's sake, Mr. President, get someone on your staff to do it. You are not cut out for it. Not even a little. This is less about Drumpf being a terrible person and more about Drumpf being completely incapable of doing the job (condolences) successfully.he knew what he signed up for, I guess
My wife said the exact same thing this morning. As much as we despise him, we agreed we might have cut him slack if he could have just apologized and clarified. He's incapable of being a decent person, much less president.GreenGoo wrote: Thu Oct 19, 2017 5:57 pm Giving condolences takes tact and empathy. It's not easy for the best of us.
Yeah, I'm empathetically challenged too, but I recognize that as a personal shortcoming and try to compensate. I usually know what words are expected in a given situation, and I can usually say them convincingly.Alefroth wrote: Thu Oct 19, 2017 7:24 pmMy wife said the exact same thing this morning. As much as we despise him, we agreed we might have cut him slack if he could have just apologized and clarified. He's incapable of being a decent person, much less president.GreenGoo wrote: Thu Oct 19, 2017 5:57 pm Giving condolences takes tact and empathy. It's not easy for the best of us.
There's a lot of videos of him defending himself with that exact same body language. If you looked up defensive lying in the body language dictionary, that's what you'd find.
"Pouty, petulant man-child somehow lives to be 71, is caught lying (again), wants his KFC tendies. "
Thanks. I can't read body language - he just looked constipated to me.LawBeefaroni wrote: Thu Oct 19, 2017 11:02 pm"Pouty, petulant man-child somehow lives to be 71, is caught lying (again), wants his KFC tendies. "
Crossed arms are an obvious defensive pose. Rounded shoulders make him look small. Trump is a man who ordinarily dominates the space around himself.Blackhawk wrote: Thu Oct 19, 2017 11:18 pmThanks. I can't read body language - he just looked constipated to me.LawBeefaroni wrote: Thu Oct 19, 2017 11:02 pm"Pouty, petulant man-child somehow lives to be 71, is caught lying (again), wants his KFC tendies. "
Trump is the head of a human centipede. Everyone behind him just eats whatever he shits out and passes it on.Holman wrote: Thu Oct 19, 2017 3:13 pmThis is his narcissism at work. He can't acknowledge even the slightest need for improvement. He's unmoored from reality.malchior wrote: Thu Oct 19, 2017 2:57 pm Trump just claimed he gets a 10 out of 10 for the Puerto Rico response. I'd die laughing if people weren't actually dying due to his incompetence. Sic semper moronis futundo.
Just this week he declared that no other president has ever done as much as he has in nine months. His toadies like Sean Hannity play the same game. Sheriff David Clarke this week insisted that there is literally no one alive more sensitive to the feelings of Gold Star families than Donald Trump.
This is Pyongyang-level bullshit.
Video confirms that his story was bogus.malchior wrote: Fri Oct 20, 2017 10:09 am What's amazing is he got a man like Kelly to go out, get outraged, get facts wrong, and just in general become a person who throws their reputation down the drain. It boggles the mind. There is something incredibly broken here. I'm not talking opinion here. They *constantly get verifiable facts wrong*. That is why it is so dangerous. If we can't agree on facts then the time for discussion is over. Sooner or later this will all blow up if this is the road we choose.
Edit: Just to further expand - Kelly made a personal attack on Wilson's character *and got the facts wrong there*. Someone clearly tried to clumsily dig up some dirt on Wilson and Kelly repeated it without verification. To smear her because she spoke up for a family who was hurting. Completely indefensible.
Dear General Kelly - last I checked, we aren't at war in Niger.GreenGoo wrote:Alefroth wrote: Thu Oct 19, 2017 5:13 pm Kelly in a briefing believes Gold Star families are no longer sacred after the convention last summer. Hard to see that as anything other than a slam on Trump.
http://www.cnn.com/2017/10/19/politics/ ... index.htmlHow stupid do you have to be to take that, and get this from it?Kelly wrote:"He was doing exactly what he wanted to do when he was killed. He knew what he was getting into by joining that 1%. He knew what the possibilities were because we were at war," Kelly said, channeling Dunford's words to him upon the death of Kelly's son. "And when he died he was surrounded by the best men on this earth, his friends. That's what the President tried to say to the four families the other day."
Giving condolences takes tact and empathy. It's not easy for the best of us. For God's sake, Mr. President, get someone on your staff to do it. You are not cut out for it. Not even a little. This is less about Drumpf being a terrible person and more about Drumpf being completely incapable of doing the job (condolences) successfully.he knew what he signed up for, I guess
The soldier knew the US was at war when he signed up, and signed up anyway. That's his point. Not that he knew the US was at war with Niger when he was stationed there. In this case, I agree with Chrisoc.Pyperkub wrote: Fri Oct 20, 2017 12:13 pm Dear General Kelly - last I checked, we aren't at war in Niger.
In this case I feel it is laziness. They likely did quick research. She isn't well known so there probably wasn't that much material lying around for attack. They just seized on something poorly sourced. In other words, the WH simply doesn't have the best minds working for it and this is the result.LawBeefaroni wrote: Fri Oct 20, 2017 12:08 pm Is their unrelenting and unabashedly false attack on her more dog whisting? Am I being paranoid?
A federal judge on Thursday shot down former sheriff Joe Arpaio’s bid to sweep his criminal record clean.
Arpaio, the controversial former lawman in Arizona’s Maricopa County, was granted a pardon by President Trump on Aug. 25. He had been found guilty of criminal contempt of a federal court order after a five-day bench trial earlier this year and faced the possibility of up to six months in jail. After the pardon, the 85-year-old Arpaio petitioned the court to clear his record and prevent the ruling from being used in future litigation.
The case raised the novel question of how far a presidential pardon actually reaches.
In her ruling, U.S. District Judge Susan R. Bolton said the pardon only freed Arpaio from possible punishment. In a four-page order offering a check on the president’s executive power, Bolton wrote that a pardon could not erase the facts of the case.
“The power to pardon is an executive prerogative of mercy, not of judicial recordkeeping,” Bolton wrote in the decision. “To vacate all rulings in this case would run afoul of this important distinction. The Court found Defendant guilty of criminal contempt.”
The president issued the pardon, and Arpaio was spared “from any punishment that might otherwise have been imposed,” the judge wrote. “It did not, however, ‘revise the historical facts’ of this case.”
Arpaio’s attorney immediately filed a notice of appeal with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit.
Sanders is so despicable.Holman wrote: Fri Oct 20, 2017 12:07 pmVideo confirms that his story was bogus.malchior wrote: Fri Oct 20, 2017 10:09 am What's amazing is he got a man like Kelly to go out, get outraged, get facts wrong, and just in general become a person who throws their reputation down the drain. It boggles the mind. There is something incredibly broken here. I'm not talking opinion here. They *constantly get verifiable facts wrong*. That is why it is so dangerous. If we can't agree on facts then the time for discussion is over. Sooner or later this will all blow up if this is the road we choose.
Edit: Just to further expand - Kelly made a personal attack on Wilson's character *and got the facts wrong there*. Someone clearly tried to clumsily dig up some dirt on Wilson and Kelly repeated it without verification. To smear her because she spoke up for a family who was hurting. Completely indefensible.
I clocked that a while ago. It's definitely disturbing.GreenGoo wrote: Fri Oct 20, 2017 5:19 pm Um. I just noticed that her eyes point in different directions. That's a little...offputting.
Now it's about whether he speaks up or allows Trump/SHS to speak for him.Formix wrote: Fri Oct 20, 2017 5:34 pm This was Kelly's Colin Powell at the UN moment. A lifetime of credibility down the tubes.
Each time I see this behaviour, I can't help but wonder whether they gave a carrot or used a stick.Edit: Just to further expand - Kelly made a personal attack on Wilson's character *and got the facts wrong there*. Someone clearly tried to clumsily dig up some dirt on Wilson and Kelly repeated it without verification. To smear her because she spoke up for a family who was hurting. Completely indefensible.
Alefroth wrote: Fri Oct 20, 2017 4:20 pmSanders is so despicable.Holman wrote: Fri Oct 20, 2017 12:07 pmVideo confirms that his story was bogus.malchior wrote: Fri Oct 20, 2017 10:09 am What's amazing is he got a man like Kelly to go out, get outraged, get facts wrong, and just in general become a person who throws their reputation down the drain. It boggles the mind. There is something incredibly broken here. I'm not talking opinion here. They *constantly get verifiable facts wrong*. That is why it is so dangerous. If we can't agree on facts then the time for discussion is over. Sooner or later this will all blow up if this is the road we choose.
Edit: Just to further expand - Kelly made a personal attack on Wilson's character *and got the facts wrong there*. Someone clearly tried to clumsily dig up some dirt on Wilson and Kelly repeated it without verification. To smear her because she spoke up for a family who was hurting. Completely indefensible.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/10 ... attle.html
The fuck? He called her an empty barrel for supposedly taking credit for the FBI building. God, fuck these people.“As Gen. Kelly pointed out, if you're able to make a sacred act like honoring American heroes all about yourself, you’re an empty barrel,” Sanders said. “If you don't understand that reference, I will put it a little bit more simply as we say in the South, ‘all hat, no cattle.’”
It's pretty galling to insult her (wrongfully so) for something his boss does on a regular basis. Do they really think most people don't catch that? And then to say it's inappropriate to debate a 4 Star General? Ugh.LawBeefaroni wrote: Fri Oct 20, 2017 8:32 pmAlefroth wrote: Fri Oct 20, 2017 4:20 pmSanders is so despicable.Holman wrote: Fri Oct 20, 2017 12:07 pmVideo confirms that his story was bogus.malchior wrote: Fri Oct 20, 2017 10:09 am What's amazing is he got a man like Kelly to go out, get outraged, get facts wrong, and just in general become a person who throws their reputation down the drain. It boggles the mind. There is something incredibly broken here. I'm not talking opinion here. They *constantly get verifiable facts wrong*. That is why it is so dangerous. If we can't agree on facts then the time for discussion is over. Sooner or later this will all blow up if this is the road we choose.
Edit: Just to further expand - Kelly made a personal attack on Wilson's character *and got the facts wrong there*. Someone clearly tried to clumsily dig up some dirt on Wilson and Kelly repeated it without verification. To smear her because she spoke up for a family who was hurting. Completely indefensible.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/10 ... attle.htmlThe fuck? He called her an empty barrel for supposedly taking credit for the FBI building. God, fuck these people.“As Gen. Kelly pointed out, if you're able to make a sacred act like honoring American heroes all about yourself, you’re an empty barrel,” Sanders said. “If you don't understand that reference, I will put it a little bit more simply as we say in the South, ‘all hat, no cattle.’”