That is not dead which can eternal lie, and with strange aeons bring us some web forums whereupon we can gather
http://garbi.online/forum/
He probably saw the movies.GreenGoo wrote: Fri Oct 20, 2017 6:17 pm And since then we've learned that Drumpf almost certainly has no idea who Patton or MacArthur are, except that they existed at one time and people tell him they were important and good at their jobs.
Trump knows Patton (George C. Scott) and MacArthur (Gregory Peck) because his dream generals each had their own Hollywood blockbusters.GreenGoo wrote: Fri Oct 20, 2017 6:17 pm And since then we've learned that Drumpf almost certainly has no idea who Patton or MacArthur are, except that they existed at one time and people tell him they were important and good at their jobs.
It was Character Count Week. He's bucking for access to the new 280 character Tweet limit.
He's probably aware that the movies exist. That's as far as I'm willing to go.Alefroth wrote: Fri Oct 20, 2017 8:54 pmHe probably saw the movies.GreenGoo wrote: Fri Oct 20, 2017 6:17 pm And since then we've learned that Drumpf almost certainly has no idea who Patton or MacArthur are, except that they existed at one time and people tell him they were important and good at their jobs.
*insert generic "Executive Order 66"/Emperor Trump joke here*malchior wrote: Fri Oct 20, 2017 10:23 pm Trump issued an EO that some are interpreting as preparation for war. The interpretation some are claiming is that he will have the ability to call retired military personnel back into active service. I'm skeptical about this but they amended the EO for a reason and they aren't explaining it so far.
Edit: Looks like it is targeted at the Airforce *right now* - specifically to bring 1000 pilots back in from the private sector.
Watch out, Angela Merkel.Holman wrote: Sat Oct 21, 2017 8:30 am Trump would *love* a war of his own.
..... the truth is probably just that he thinks he's bigger than FDR+Churchill and wants to prove it.
Maybe that's his whole plan is to make America 'great' again and fix the economy. America's greatest recovery, and our rise to prominence were both results of a world war.Holman wrote: Sat Oct 21, 2017 8:30 am Trump would *love* a war of his own.
The cynical take is that he knows what 9/11 did for Bush's poll numbers, but the truth is probably just that he thinks he's bigger than FDR+Churchill and wants to prove it.
I wonder if the Trump administration expects that Korea Part Deux will involve an intensive air phase...Daveman wrote: Fri Oct 20, 2017 11:16 pm*insert generic "Executive Order 66"/Emperor Trump joke here*malchior wrote: Fri Oct 20, 2017 10:23 pm Trump issued an EO that some are interpreting as preparation for war. The interpretation some are claiming is that he will have the ability to call retired military personnel back into active service. I'm skeptical about this but they amended the EO for a reason and they aren't explaining it so far.
Edit: Looks like it is targeted at the Airforce *right now* - specifically to bring 1000 pilots back in from the private sector.
Not that this is at all funny.
As is noted in the twitter thread, when this administration says "preemptive war" they actually mean "preventative war."WonkVJ wrote:Admin source tells me "Everyone wants 'preemptive war' now except for Mattis." Normal Korea experts have no idea how serious this is
And... the WH this week has been rush-shipping condolence letters to families of past casualties to try to make Trump's claim true.
No, but it's its own issue: trashing yet another important alliance, destabilizing a whole region, and possibly throwing ongoing operations (including those involving the dead green berets) into immediate confusion, all for no good reason whatsoever.Kraken wrote: Sun Oct 22, 2017 2:09 pm The comparison to Benghazi is forced, at best, and liberals would be ill-advised to force it. While these deaths raise some valid questions about our operations in Niger, nobody (AFAIK) is charging that presidential action or inaction led directly to preventable deaths or that there was a coverup attempt -- just that honey badger don't give a shit. Which is hardly a revelation. They knew what they signed up for.
Found on Facebook:RunningMn9 wrote: Sun Oct 22, 2017 1:34 pm Trumpghazi will go no where. Like everything else he does wrong. He’ll just distract us with more stupidity while his base only believes what he tweets them to believe.
Trump is a Denial of Service (DDoS) attack on democracy. There are so many jaw-dropping scandals we can’t focus on any single one.
One piece of this I don’t get or haven’t heard explained: Why does Chad’s inclusion on the travel ban mean they withdraw from Niger? Like why specifically are those 2 things connected?Holman wrote: Sun Oct 22, 2017 11:38 am --Chad predictably responded by withdrawing its military presence in Niger. Weeks later, U.S. forces acting on poor intelligence and without support in place were ambushed by ISIS fighters there. It's very possible that Chadian presence and patrols would have improved the intel or made the ISIS movements impossible as they had in the past.
They've been allies in the fight against ISIS and felt insulted by the travel ban so they're scaling back their support. If a piece I read elsewhere is correct, they were added to the ban for a very technical/picky point as well... they don't use a certain type of paper for passports that the US started expecting to be used (presumably to combat counterfeiting) and were given so many days to correct it but haven't.Mookee wrote: Mon Oct 23, 2017 6:25 amOne piece of this I don’t get or haven’t heard explained: Why does Chad’s inclusion on the travel ban mean they withdraw from Niger? Like why specifically are those 2 things connected?Holman wrote: Sun Oct 22, 2017 11:38 am --Chad predictably responded by withdrawing its military presence in Niger. Weeks later, U.S. forces acting on poor intelligence and without support in place were ambushed by ISIS fighters there. It's very possible that Chadian presence and patrols would have improved the intel or made the ISIS movements impossible as they had in the past.
Thanks!Daveman wrote: Mon Oct 23, 2017 6:49 amThey've been allies in the fight against ISIS and felt insulted by the travel ban so they're scaling back their support. If a piece I read elsewhere is correct, they were added to the ban for a very technical/picky point as well... they don't use a certain type of paper for passports that the US started expecting to be used (presumably to combat counterfeiting) and were given so many days to correct it but haven't.Mookee wrote: Mon Oct 23, 2017 6:25 amOne piece of this I don’t get or haven’t heard explained: Why does Chad’s inclusion on the travel ban mean they withdraw from Niger? Like why specifically are those 2 things connected?Holman wrote: Sun Oct 22, 2017 11:38 am --Chad predictably responded by withdrawing its military presence in Niger. Weeks later, U.S. forces acting on poor intelligence and without support in place were ambushed by ISIS fighters there. It's very possible that Chadian presence and patrols would have improved the intel or made the ISIS movements impossible as they had in the past.
Indonesia intends to send a diplomatic note to the U.S. secretary of state and summon Washington’s deputy ambassador in Jakarta to explain why the head of its military was denied entry to the United States, Indonesian officials said on Sunday.
Armed Forces Commander General Gatot Nurmantyo was about to board a flight on Saturday when the airline informed him that the U.S. Customs and Border Protection had denied him entry, military spokesman Wuryanto told a news conference in Jakarta.
Nurmantyo was going to the United States at the invitation of General Joseph F. Dunford Jr., chairman of the joint chiefs of staff, to attend a Chiefs of Defense Conference on Countering Violent Extremism being held in Washington on Oct. 23-24, Wuryanto said.
It was not clear why he was stopped from entering the United States, Wuryanto said, adding that the general did not have any problem during his visit to the United States in February 2016.
“We’ve asked for clarification to the U.S., to the Department of State as well as the embassy in Jakarta and until now we’re still waiting for that clarification,” Indonesia’s Foreign Affairs Minister Retno Marsudi told Reuters.
The ministry’s spokesman Arrmanatha Nasir earlier said Indonesia’s embassy in Washington was to send a diplomatic note to the U.S. secretary of state demanding explanation for the incident.The ministry will also summon the U.S. deputy ambassador in Jakarta on Monday to seek explanation, Nasir said, adding that the ambassador is presently not in Indonesia.
The U.S. embassy in Jakarta said in a statement it was in touch with Nurmantyo’s staff to facilitate his travel, but did not explain further.
“U.S. Ambassador Joseph Donovan has apologized to Foreign Minister Retno Marsudi for any inconvenience to General Gatot,” the embassy wrote. “We remain committed to our Strategic Partnership with Indonesia as a way to deliver security and prosperity to both our nations and peoples.”
Diplomacy is a subtle, nuanced game. Our new diplomatic capability, after being gutted, is about as subtle as a 12 gauge shotgun. Being wielded by a screaming harpy.Daveman wrote: Mon Oct 23, 2017 6:49 amThey've been allies in the fight against ISIS and felt insulted by the travel ban so they're scaling back their support. If a piece I read elsewhere is correct, they were added to the ban for a very technical/picky point as well... they don't use a certain type of paper for passports that the US started expecting to be used (presumably to combat counterfeiting) and were given so many days to correct it but haven't.Mookee wrote: Mon Oct 23, 2017 6:25 amOne piece of this I don’t get or haven’t heard explained: Why does Chad’s inclusion on the travel ban mean they withdraw from Niger? Like why specifically are those 2 things connected?Holman wrote: Sun Oct 22, 2017 11:38 am --Chad predictably responded by withdrawing its military presence in Niger. Weeks later, U.S. forces acting on poor intelligence and without support in place were ambushed by ISIS fighters there. It's very possible that Chadian presence and patrols would have improved the intel or made the ISIS movements impossible as they had in the past.
This can probably help the general in his bid for to become president of Indonesia.Max Peck wrote: Mon Oct 23, 2017 9:58 am In a similar vein, the US invited the commander of the Indonesian armed forces to a conference, then denied him entry to the country. This is what it looks like when the ship of state is rudderless.Indonesia intends to send a diplomatic note to the U.S. secretary of state and summon Washington’s deputy ambassador in Jakarta to explain why the head of its military was denied entry to the United States, Indonesian officials said on Sunday.
Armed Forces Commander General Gatot Nurmantyo was about to board a flight on Saturday when the airline informed him that the U.S. Customs and Border Protection had denied him entry, military spokesman Wuryanto told a news conference in Jakarta.
Nurmantyo was going to the United States at the invitation of General Joseph F. Dunford Jr., chairman of the joint chiefs of staff, to attend a Chiefs of Defense Conference on Countering Violent Extremism being held in Washington on Oct. 23-24, Wuryanto said.
It was not clear why he was stopped from entering the United States, Wuryanto said, adding that the general did not have any problem during his visit to the United States in February 2016.
“We’ve asked for clarification to the U.S., to the Department of State as well as the embassy in Jakarta and until now we’re still waiting for that clarification,” Indonesia’s Foreign Affairs Minister Retno Marsudi told Reuters.
The ministry’s spokesman Arrmanatha Nasir earlier said Indonesia’s embassy in Washington was to send a diplomatic note to the U.S. secretary of state demanding explanation for the incident.The ministry will also summon the U.S. deputy ambassador in Jakarta on Monday to seek explanation, Nasir said, adding that the ambassador is presently not in Indonesia.
The U.S. embassy in Jakarta said in a statement it was in touch with Nurmantyo’s staff to facilitate his travel, but did not explain further.
“U.S. Ambassador Joseph Donovan has apologized to Foreign Minister Retno Marsudi for any inconvenience to General Gatot,” the embassy wrote. “We remain committed to our Strategic Partnership with Indonesia as a way to deliver security and prosperity to both our nations and peoples.”
Remember the "adoption" meetings?malchior wrote: Mon Oct 23, 2017 10:45 am
Edit: Oh and the US just revoked the visa of a top Putin critic in coordination with the Russians adding him to an interpol watch list. WTF is going on?
Edit2: Here is a NY Times piece giving the background on this - how the Russians are peddling an insane conspiracy theory to go after the guy who put the thumbscrews on Russian oligarchs money.
That bullshit about Trump being unbuyable because he is rich is so laughable. He's probably more buyable because he's so transparently envious of those who are richer than he is.In response to U.S. passage of the Magnitsky Act, Russia cut off the U.S. adoption of Russian children — which led to a meeting during last year's presidential campaign between a Moscow lawyer and representatives of the Trump campaign at Trump Tower.
Wow, that's tough. I can't imagine what she's going through, even without the Orange Menace involved. His tweet this morning:Captain Caveman wrote: Mon Oct 23, 2017 10:55 am It's worth watching the full interview with Myeshia Johnson.
https://twitter.com/DrTGIF/status/922467598121558016
(I'm not sure how to post a tweet anymore with the new forum software)
The fact that Trump continues to call her a liar is infuriating. I don't really care what was said at this point, what's important is what she heard. Here, allow me try this Presidenting thing again:I had a very respectful conversation with the widow of Sgt. La David Johnson, and spoke his name from beginning, without hesitation!
Apologies are for losers. That's not winning, that's losing. Loser. It's not about the American people, it's about Trump. And he's winner.Skinypupy wrote: Mon Oct 23, 2017 11:45 amWow, that's tough. I can't imagine what she's going through, even without the Orange Menace involved. His tweet this morning:Captain Caveman wrote: Mon Oct 23, 2017 10:55 am It's worth watching the full interview with Myeshia Johnson.
https://twitter.com/DrTGIF/status/922467598121558016
(I'm not sure how to post a tweet anymore with the new forum software)
The fact that Trump continues to call her a liar is infuriating. I don't really care what was said at this point, what's important is what she heard. Here, allow me try this Presidenting thing again:I had a very respectful conversation with the widow of Sgt. La David Johnson, and spoke his name from beginning, without hesitation!
"I apologize if my comments to Ms. Johnson did not convey the message I intended. I assure her that myself - and all the American people - are eternally grateful for her husband's service and sacrifice, and pledge our love and support to her during this difficult time."
See, not so fucking hard, is it?
No doubt just an abundance of caution.The U.S. Air Force is preparing for nuclear armed B-52 bombers to be put back on 24-hour alert for the first time in 25 years as tensions rise between North Korea and President Donald Trump.
“I look at it more as not planning for any specific event, but more for the reality of the global situation we find ourselves in and how we ensure we’re prepared going forward,” General David Goldfein, Air Force chief of staff, told Defense One in an interview Sunday.
While the order to have the bombers on alert hasn’t been given by the heads of U.S. Strategic Command or U.S. Northern Command, Gen. Goldfein—a member of the Joint Chiefs of Staff—said that in the current political climate the Air Force anticipates that it might come. “This is yet one more step in ensuring that we’re prepared,” he said of the preparations.
Trump offering and Trump actually doing has no real world correlation. He's "offered" to pay other lawyers, too. It's a wonder any of them would work with him.malchior wrote: Mon Oct 23, 2017 12:04 pm Just found this fun story in my backlog -- Trump is offered to pay for his staffers' legal bills due to investigations. Totally legit conduct for a President, right?