Page 274 of 303

Re: The Trump Investigation(s) Thread

Posted: Mon Jun 26, 2023 6:53 pm
by Alefroth
And so it begins-

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/202 ... ents-judge
The federal judge presiding over the criminal prosecution of Donald Trump in the classified documents case ruled against the government in her first pre-trial order on Monday, denying a request from federal prosecutors to file a list of potential witnesses against the former US president under seal.

Re: The Trump Investigation(s) Thread

Posted: Mon Jun 26, 2023 8:33 pm
by Skinypupy
Good lord.


Re: The Trump Investigation(s) Thread

Posted: Mon Jun 26, 2023 8:45 pm
by Blackhawk
...in which he admits that, regardless of whether it is pages and pages of printed text or newspaper clippings, that it is, in fact, classified, and that he has no way to declassify it.

Re: The Trump Investigation(s) Thread

Posted: Mon Jun 26, 2023 8:46 pm
by Zarathud
The bootlicking sickens me as much as the retention of classified information.

Re: The Trump Investigation(s) Thread

Posted: Mon Jun 26, 2023 9:11 pm
by Victoria Raverna
Who is the staffer?

Re: The Trump Investigation(s) Thread

Posted: Mon Jun 26, 2023 10:58 pm
by Alefroth
Zarathud wrote: Mon Jun 26, 2023 8:46 pm The bootlicking sickens me as much as the retention of classified information.
So many fawning toadies. It's gross.

Re: The Trump Investigation(s) Thread

Posted: Mon Jun 26, 2023 11:14 pm
by Daehawk
Why do so many want to lick the golden haired turd? Get e-coli

Re: The Trump Investigation(s) Thread

Posted: Tue Jun 27, 2023 10:08 am
by Kasey Chang
Intent is no longer important when it comes to treating unclassified documents. In the indictment he and the aides were LAUGHING after mentioning "these documents are marked CONFIDENTIAL", and DOJ have this on tape.

It is clear Trump had always intended to keep as many of the classified documents as possible, including instructing his attorneys to lie for him (knowingly or not). Intent no longer matters. He knows it's wrong to show it around, he did so intentionally, even saying on tape "as president I could have declassified it, now I can't, you know but this is still a secret."

All that "I could have classified it in my head" was just bogus excuses dreamed up by Rudy, and look at what happened to EVERYONE of Trump's attorneys since. It's only good for MAGA propaganda and would never stand up in court.

The really sad part is GOP is still going on about "he may be a bastard, but he's our bastard", because GOP is still controlled by MAGA faction, and DeSantis is still living in his dreamland (aka Florida) and none of the other candidates is likely to draw big votes, despite all the vote rigging attempted last election and since.

Re: The Trump Investigation(s) Thread

Posted: Tue Jun 27, 2023 11:46 am
by Kurth
Victoria Raverna wrote: Mon Jun 26, 2023 9:11 pm Who is the staffer?
Margo Martin. More on her here:
The audio of Trump was recorded at his golf resort in Bedminster, New Jersey, as part of a meeting the former president had with people helping his former chief of staff Mark Meadows write his autobiography. Also in attendance was Trump aide Margo Martin, who regularly taped conversations authors had with the former president to ensure his comments were reported accurately.

Martin, a former deputy director of communications for Trump's Save America PAC who now works on his 2024 campaign, testified to a special grand jury in March as part of the classified documents probe after having her laptop and phones imaged by prosecutors in January.
Also, here. She has been referred to as “fake Melania” and has been mistaken for Melania numerous times.

You can’t make this stuff up.

Re: The Trump Investigation(s) Thread

Posted: Tue Jun 27, 2023 2:03 pm
by GreenGoo
Kurth wrote: Tue Jun 27, 2023 11:46 am You can’t make this stuff up.
True, but I've never seen an individual so fixated on a "type" before. I'm sure he would surround himself with clones of his daughter if he could get away with it. Just literally not having anyone within view in his org that wasn't a clone. The creepy things he's said about her is more than enough to repulse me.

I guess I'm saying it was inevitable, not a coincidence that the staffer looks like Melania.

Re: The Trump Investigation(s) Thread

Posted: Wed Jun 28, 2023 7:47 am
by malchior
It was all just secret plans for a ... golf course. General Milley had some great ideas about the 6th hole at his Trump Tehran resort.
Former President Donald Trump insisted on Tuesday that he was not showing off classified documents in an audio clip first published by CNN in which he referred to “highly confidential” material and “secret information” that he could no longer declassify.

“I would say it was bravado, if you want to know the truth, it was bravado,” Trump said in an interview aboard his plane with Semafor and ABC News. “I was talking and just holding up papers and talking about them, but I had no documents. I didn’t have any documents.”

...

Asked about his use of the word “plans” during a Fox News interview earlier Tuesday to describe some items he may have highlighted in the 2021 meeting, Trump insisted he was referring to “building plans” and plans for golf courses strewn about his desk.

“Did I use the word plans?” he said. “What I’m referring to is magazines, newspapers, plans of buildings. I had plans of buildings. You know, building plans? I had plans of a golf course.”

Re: The Trump Investigation(s) Thread

Posted: Wed Jun 28, 2023 7:51 am
by LordMortis
malchior wrote: Wed Jun 28, 2023 7:47 am It was all just secret plans for a ... golf course. General Milley had some great ideas about the 6th hole at his Trump Tehran resort.
Former President Donald Trump insisted on Tuesday that he was not showing off classified documents in an audio clip first published by CNN in which he referred to “highly confidential” material and “secret information” that he could no longer declassify.

“I would say it was bravado, if you want to know the truth, it was bravado,” Trump said in an interview aboard his plane with Semafor and ABC News. “I was talking and just holding up papers and talking about them, but I had no documents. I didn’t have any documents.”

...

Asked about his use of the word “plans” during a Fox News interview earlier Tuesday to describe some items he may have highlighted in the 2021 meeting, Trump insisted he was referring to “building plans” and plans for golf courses strewn about his desk.

“Did I use the word plans?” he said. “What I’m referring to is magazines, newspapers, plans of buildings. I had plans of buildings. You know, building plans? I had plans of a golf course.”


And it's going to work.

Re: The Trump Investigation(s) Thread

Posted: Wed Jun 28, 2023 8:16 am
by malchior
Interesting fall out from the Trump tape is now folks are wondering why the government never searched Bedminster considering there are filings indicating they knew that Trump was moving documents back and forth. The main line is that they believed the bulk of materials were at MAL but still...he had some serious materials and it seems potentially reckless to ignore the risk that he indeed very well could be hording some in NJ.

Re: The Trump Investigation(s) Thread

Posted: Wed Jun 28, 2023 9:22 am
by Octavious
Meanwhile he's counter suing for defamation the lady who won a defamation against him. Can he please just fucking die already?

Re: The Trump Investigation(s) Thread

Posted: Wed Jun 28, 2023 10:03 am
by GreenGoo
malchior wrote: Wed Jun 28, 2023 7:47 am
“Did I use the word plans?” he said. “What I’m referring to is magazines, newspapers, plans of buildings. I had plans of buildings. You know, building plans? I had plans of a golf course.”
Great, let's see them. First, plans for what golf course? Second, you have 15 mins to produce those plans. 10 mins. 5 mins.

Re: The Trump Investigation(s) Thread

Posted: Wed Jun 28, 2023 3:03 pm
by Montag
GreenGoo wrote: Wed Jun 28, 2023 10:03 am
malchior wrote: Wed Jun 28, 2023 7:47 am
“Did I use the word plans?” he said. “What I’m referring to is magazines, newspapers, plans of buildings. I had plans of buildings. You know, building plans? I had plans of a golf course.”
Great, let's see them. First, plans for what golf course? Second, you have 15 mins to produce those plans. 10 mins. 5 mins.
I know where it is, one sec. It's under the Republican health care plan... Where is that stack now...

Re: The Trump Investigation(s) Thread

Posted: Wed Jun 28, 2023 3:57 pm
by LordMortis
Montag wrote: Wed Jun 28, 2023 3:03 pm I know where it is, one sec. It's under the Republican health care plan... Where is that stack now...
Thank goodness they fixed health care in the first 100 days of 2016 with that super secret plan he had that the GOP bantered around as the great solution to Obamacare. No idea where we'd be now.

(In truth, I'm so glad they didn't gut the ACA, I'll looking at how to get on it in October, while I'm paying nearly $700 a month for COBRA right now, which is about 1/3 of my total monthly spend)

Re: The Trump Investigation(s) Thread

Posted: Thu Jun 29, 2023 6:37 pm
by Grifman
More charges may be incoming:


Re: The Trump Investigation(s) Thread

Posted: Thu Jun 29, 2023 6:38 pm
by Grifman


It’s not just campaign worker, it is his campaign manager.

Re: The Trump Investigation(s) Thread

Posted: Thu Jun 29, 2023 11:14 pm
by Carpet_pissr
Grifman wrote: Thu Jun 29, 2023 6:37 pm More charges may be incoming:
“And his allies”

PLEASE be Giuliani, please!

Re: The Trump Investigation(s) Thread

Posted: Fri Jun 30, 2023 11:30 am
by Pyperkub
Carpet_pissr wrote: Thu Jun 29, 2023 11:14 pm
Grifman wrote: Thu Jun 29, 2023 6:37 pm More charges may be incoming:
“And his allies”

PLEASE be Giuliani, please!
It is possible Guiliani is flipping...
Rudy Giuliani’s interview with federal prosecutors investigating Donald Trump’s push to overturn the 2020 election was carried out under a proffer agreement—which often foreshadows a cooperation agreement, The New York Times reports. Under such signed agreements, the subject of a criminal investigation shares information with prosecutors with the understanding that it generally will not be used against them in court

Re: The Trump Investigation(s) Thread

Posted: Fri Jun 30, 2023 2:31 pm
by Carpet_pissr
:pray: :pray: :horse: :pop:

Re: The Trump Investigation(s) Thread

Posted: Fri Jun 30, 2023 3:45 pm
by GreenGoo
Carpet_pissr wrote: Fri Jun 30, 2023 2:31 pm :pray: :pray: :horse: :pop:
Don't know him, never heard of him. I have my picture taken with a lot of people.

Re: The Trump Investigation(s) Thread

Posted: Fri Jun 30, 2023 4:36 pm
by Daehawk
I hope they bury hi, under the files.

Re: The Trump Investigation(s) Thread

Posted: Fri Jul 07, 2023 4:38 pm
by gilraen
D.C. bar panel issued an official recommendation to disbar Giuliani.

Re: The Trump Investigation(s) Thread

Posted: Fri Jul 07, 2023 7:43 pm
by Kurth
gilraen wrote: Fri Jul 07, 2023 4:38 pm D.C. bar panel issued an official recommendation to disbar Giuliani.
Good riddance. There are a lot of lawyers I could point to that probably shouldn’t have a license to practice law, but Giuliani is at the top of the list (or maybe he shares that top spot with Eastman and The Kraken).

Re: The Trump Investigation(s) Thread

Posted: Tue Jul 11, 2023 9:37 am
by malchior
Several developments on the Trump trial front - we'll get our clearest indicators of how this might go soon.

NY Times
Lawyers for former President Donald J. Trump asked a federal judge on Monday night to indefinitely postpone his trial on charges of illegally retaining classified documents after he left office, saying that the proceeding should not begin until all “substantive motions” in the case had been presented and decided.

The written filing — submitted 30 minutes before its deadline of midnight on Tuesday — presents a significant early test for Judge Aileen M. Cannon, the Trump-appointed jurist who is overseeing the case. If granted, it could have the effect of pushing Mr. Trump’s trial into the final stages of the presidential campaign in which he is now the Republican front-runner or even past the 2024 election.

While timing is important in any criminal matter, it could be hugely consequential in Mr. Trump’s case, in which he stands accused of illegally holding on to 31 classified documents after leaving the White House and obstructing the government’s repeated efforts to reclaim them.

There could be complications of a sort never before presented to a court if Mr. Trump is a candidate in the last legs of a presidential campaign and a federal criminal defendant on trial at the same time. If the trial is pushed back until after the election and Mr. Trump wins, he could try to pardon himself after taking office or have his attorney general dismiss the matter entirely.

Re: The Trump Investigation(s) Thread

Posted: Tue Jul 11, 2023 10:24 am
by Smoove_B
Absolutely amazing. It's like an issue of "What If..." comics, but our entire democracy is at stake.

Re: The Trump Investigation(s) Thread

Posted: Tue Jul 11, 2023 11:06 am
by Octavious
Let the voters decide if a crime was committed! :P

Re: The Trump Investigation(s) Thread

Posted: Tue Jul 11, 2023 11:07 am
by malchior
I can't wait until he is "exonerated" with 46% of the vote or something equally preposterous.

Re: The Trump Investigation(s) Thread

Posted: Tue Jul 11, 2023 11:13 am
by Octavious
She will delay it until after the election and there's nothing we can do about it. He's rigged the country.

Re: The Trump Investigation(s) Thread

Posted: Tue Jul 11, 2023 11:30 am
by Scraper
Octavious wrote: Tue Jul 11, 2023 11:13 am She will delay it until after the election and there's nothing we can do about it. He's rigged the country.
A 2 day delay is not bad given the nature of this case. I would stop freaking out over his request to move it to after the election until that motion is ruled on. It seems pretty obvious he is just trying to run out the clock and get past the election as the only real basis of his motion so hopefully Cannon grows a spine and acts like a Judge instead of a Maga Stooge.

Re: The Trump Investigation(s) Thread

Posted: Tue Jul 11, 2023 11:37 am
by malchior
Right - a two-day delay is not concerning. I think the true test is how she rules on motions they agree on and those they do not agree on. The 2-day motion is the former. The other longer delay they requested and the "competing" DOJ request for a delay to around the Nov/Dec time frame are the latter.

Re: The Trump Investigation(s) Thread

Posted: Tue Jul 11, 2023 11:44 am
by Octavious
2 day of course.is not what I'm worried about. That's perfectly normal. I will not be surprised if she allows his motion to dealy until after the election. She already showed that she's just a stooge, but hey it could end up being fine.

Re: The Trump Investigation(s) Thread

Posted: Tue Jul 11, 2023 12:46 pm
by Smoove_B
Jury selection incoming:
Several Miami lawyers, some of whom asked to remain anonymous because they have active cases before Cannon, noted that Trump’s chances to win what otherwise appears to be an insurmountable criminal case increase the further north he goes.

“You drive around, and you’ll see ‘Trump’ flags and ‘Make America Great Again’ flying in front of houses,” said Paul Bernard, a criminal defense lawyer in Fort Pierce. “With Trump’s trial down this way, he’s going to have a bunch of supporters—and they’re going to make their way onto the jury panel.”

According to local court rules, federal trials in the Fort Pierce division draw jurors from five counties: Highlands, Indian River, Martin, Okeechobee, and St. Lucie.

It’s solidly MAGA country: all five counties voted heavily in favor of Trump in the 2020 election he ultimately lost, with Okeechobee topping out at 72 percent. Across the board, the former president nabbed 62 percent of the vote on average.
I'm assuming this was all accounted for in a worst-case scenario by the prosecution and that there are things happening behind the scenes that I just cannot appreciate, right?

Re: The Trump Investigation(s) Thread

Posted: Tue Jul 11, 2023 12:49 pm
by malchior
They'll very seriously tell you that jurors take such things with the upmost rigor because we're definitely a not broken society.

Re: The Trump Investigation(s) Thread

Posted: Tue Jul 11, 2023 2:37 pm
by El Guapo
Smoove_B wrote: Tue Jul 11, 2023 12:46 pm Jury selection incoming:
Several Miami lawyers, some of whom asked to remain anonymous because they have active cases before Cannon, noted that Trump’s chances to win what otherwise appears to be an insurmountable criminal case increase the further north he goes.

“You drive around, and you’ll see ‘Trump’ flags and ‘Make America Great Again’ flying in front of houses,” said Paul Bernard, a criminal defense lawyer in Fort Pierce. “With Trump’s trial down this way, he’s going to have a bunch of supporters—and they’re going to make their way onto the jury panel.”

According to local court rules, federal trials in the Fort Pierce division draw jurors from five counties: Highlands, Indian River, Martin, Okeechobee, and St. Lucie.

It’s solidly MAGA country: all five counties voted heavily in favor of Trump in the 2020 election he ultimately lost, with Okeechobee topping out at 72 percent. Across the board, the former president nabbed 62 percent of the vote on average.
I'm assuming this was all accounted for in a worst-case scenario by the prosecution and that there are things happening behind the scenes that I just cannot appreciate, right?
Well, there are no easy answers here, and we shouldn't count on the criminal justice system to save us from Trump. The big question / decision point was around where to file the documents case. I get the general sense that filing it where they did is at least defensible. Beyond that they'll do what they can in jury selection.

Re: The Trump Investigation(s) Thread

Posted: Tue Jul 11, 2023 3:53 pm
by Pyperkub
Octavious wrote: Tue Jul 11, 2023 11:13 am She will delay it until after the election and there's nothing we can do about it. He's rigged the country.
This is the pessimistic take (and may well be what happens).

On the other hand, we, but more importantly the DoJ, will know if she is going to try to throw the trial right now based on her ruling here, and could be likely to start the appeal process to reassign/move the case to a different judge - which would IMHO, be very bad for her future as a Judge...

Re: The Trump Investigation(s) Thread

Posted: Tue Jul 11, 2023 6:25 pm
by msteelers
Smoove_B wrote:Jury selection incoming:
Several Miami lawyers, some of whom asked to remain anonymous because they have active cases before Cannon, noted that Trump’s chances to win what otherwise appears to be an insurmountable criminal case increase the further north he goes.

“You drive around, and you’ll see ‘Trump’ flags and ‘Make America Great Again’ flying in front of houses,” said Paul Bernard, a criminal defense lawyer in Fort Pierce. “With Trump’s trial down this way, he’s going to have a bunch of supporters—and they’re going to make their way onto the jury panel.”

According to local court rules, federal trials in the Fort Pierce division draw jurors from five counties: Highlands, Indian River, Martin, Okeechobee, and St. Lucie.

It’s solidly MAGA country: all five counties voted heavily in favor of Trump in the 2020 election he ultimately lost, with Okeechobee topping out at 72 percent. Across the board, the former president nabbed 62 percent of the vote on average.
I'm assuming this was all accounted for in a worst-case scenario by the prosecution and that there are things happening behind the scenes that I just cannot appreciate, right?
I mentioned it before, but I live in the town south of Ft Pierce where the trial will take place.

That news story is accurate, Trump flags are everywhere around here. St Lucie is a blue county, but it’s getting redder every election. And the counties south and north of us are deep red.

Re: The Trump Investigation(s) Thread

Posted: Tue Jul 11, 2023 6:36 pm
by malchior
Pyperkub wrote: Tue Jul 11, 2023 3:53 pmOn the other hand, we, but more importantly the DoJ, will know if she is going to try to throw the trial right now based on her ruling here, and could be likely to start the appeal process to reassign/move the case to a different judge - which would IMHO, be very bad for her future as a Judge...
How would it be bad for her? One reason this might happen is because she is untouchable.