That is not dead which can eternal lie, and with strange aeons bring us some web forums whereupon we can gather
http://garbi.online/forum/
Apparently, entitled freshman stupid.tgb wrote:I'm sorry, but how stupid do you have to be to attempt to shoplift something in China?
I'm mostly just shocked he didn't end it with "Clinton/Obama could never have gotten them released. Losers!"Kurth wrote: Wed Nov 15, 2017 11:45 amThis is beyond words.tjg_marantz wrote: Wed Nov 15, 2017 11:30 am Do you think the three UCLA Basketball Players will say thank you President Trump? They were headed for 10 years in jail!
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/sta ... 6460921856
They did. At a press conference. When he tweeted, it was before 8 am Pacific time.Carpet_pissr wrote:To be fair, if he actually was instrumental in getting them released as he boasted (but given his truthiness track record, odds are slim), I agree that they SHOULD thank him. Assholes! Making me semi-defend Trump. THANK HIM.
Political theater that goes nowhere.Daehawk wrote: Wed Nov 15, 2017 4:50 pm http://www.cnn.com/2017/11/15/politics/ ... index.html
House Dems introduce articles of impeachment against Trump
Yeah, I'm calling that an official "dick" tweet. What an asshole way to go about it.tjg_marantz wrote: Wed Nov 15, 2017 3:54 pmThey did. At a press conference. When he tweeted, it was before 8 am Pacific time.Carpet_pissr wrote:To be fair, if he actually was instrumental in getting them released as he boasted (but given his truthiness track record, odds are slim), I agree that they SHOULD thank him. Assholes! Making me semi-defend Trump. THANK HIM.
https://twitter.com/ddale8/status/930875011333795841
Politics IS theater. Or was there some other point to the ~80 odd attempts to repeal the ACA?Moliere wrote:Political theater that goes nowhere.Daehawk wrote: Wed Nov 15, 2017 4:50 pm http://www.cnn.com/2017/11/15/politics/ ... index.html
House Dems introduce articles of impeachment against Trump
Politics is not JUST theater.Isgrimnur wrote: Wed Nov 15, 2017 7:58 pmPolitics IS theater. Or was there some other point to the ~80 odd attempts to repeal the ACA?Moliere wrote:Political theater that goes nowhere.Daehawk wrote: Wed Nov 15, 2017 4:50 pm http://www.cnn.com/2017/11/15/politics/ ... index.html
House Dems introduce articles of impeachment against Trump
Will it even come up for a vote?Zarathud wrote: Wed Nov 15, 2017 9:20 pm Forcing Republicans to go on record as against Trump's impeachment will have value when it becomes clear Trump should have been removed.
Otherwise, they might complain that it was the Republic's fault for not shutting him down earlier.
It was clear on day one of this administration. He was taking foreign money before and after he took office.Zarathud wrote: Wed Nov 15, 2017 9:20 pm Forcing Republicans to go on record as against Trump's impeachment will have value when it becomes clear Trump should have been removed.
Otherwise, they might complain that it was the Republic's fault for not shutting him down earlier.
2019 at the earliest unless Mueller accelerates the timetable.Holman wrote:Will it even come up for a vote?Zarathud wrote: Wed Nov 15, 2017 9:20 pm Forcing Republicans to go on record as against Trump's impeachment will have value when it becomes clear Trump should have been removed.
Otherwise, they might complain that it was the Republic's fault for not shutting him down earlier.
Can you imagine being the guy who has to just sit on that and ride out his due process and watch the gears slowly churn while the bastard keeps destroying America? I mean, sitting there, with a folder on your desk marked "Treason" and watching the guy it's about scooting around the world, ruining the country you love, and smirking that shit-eating smirk. I'd have to keep a roll of leather in my mouth to bite down on to stop me from screaming.Pyperkub wrote: Thu Nov 16, 2017 2:44 am2019 at the earliest unless Mueller accelerates the timetable.Holman wrote:Will it even come up for a vote?Zarathud wrote: Wed Nov 15, 2017 9:20 pm Forcing Republicans to go on record as against Trump's impeachment will have value when it becomes clear Trump should have been removed.
Otherwise, they might complain that it was the Republic's fault for not shutting him down earlier.
I'd think that being focused on making sure you get them all rather than just the most noticeable vermin would be what kept me going at it. If the implied charges are indeed true (and I think they are) then there are a LOT of people who have betrayed our nation and need to pay the price.Paingod wrote: Thu Nov 16, 2017 11:38 amCan you imagine being the guy who has to just sit on that and ride out his due process and watch the gears slowly churn while the bastard keeps destroying America? I mean, sitting there, with a folder on your desk marked "Treason" and watching the guy it's about scooting around the world, ruining the country you love, and smirking that shit-eating smirk. I'd have to keep a roll of leather in my mouth to bite down on to stop me from screaming.Pyperkub wrote: Thu Nov 16, 2017 2:44 am2019 at the earliest unless Mueller accelerates the timetable.Holman wrote:Will it even come up for a vote?Zarathud wrote: Wed Nov 15, 2017 9:20 pm Forcing Republicans to go on record as against Trump's impeachment will have value when it becomes clear Trump should have been removed.
Otherwise, they might complain that it was the Republic's fault for not shutting him down earlier.
I would agree if this asshole wasn't tearing apart everything good about our country.YellowKing wrote: Thu Nov 16, 2017 9:02 pm Mueller's a stone cold pro. He's dotting i's, crossing t's, kicking ass and taking names. I feel like our patience will be rewarded.
with a Pence, unfortunately.YellowKing wrote: Thu Nov 16, 2017 9:02 pm Mueller's a stone cold pro. He's dotting i's, crossing t's, kicking ass and taking names. I feel like our patience will be rewarded.
The Department of Homeland Security's center for outreach to faith and community groups has resigned after it came to light that he had said black people turned cities into "slums" and Islam's only contribution to society was "oil and dead bodies," CBS News has learned.
In a 2008 radio discussion, Johnson said he believed black people were anti-Semitic out of jealousy of the Jewish people's success.
"I think one of the reasons why is because Jewish people from their coming to America in great waves in the early part of the 1800's immediately rolled up their sleeves and began to work so hard and applied themselves to education and other means of improvement and other means of climbing the, I hate this phrase, but the social ladder if you will," Johnson said. "And they have done exceptionally well for themselves. For only representing about 1.4 percent of America's population, they make up 12 percent of America's millionaires. Why? Because they work."
Johnson continued: "And it's an indictment of America's black community that has turned America's major cities into slums because of laziness, drug use and sexual promiscuity
Arguably, Ford was un-electable because of Nixon's pardon, rather than Nixon per se. IIRC, he started out with high approval ratings but they went in the dumper when he issued the pardon.Holman wrote: Thu Nov 16, 2017 11:04 pm Even if Pence were untouched by Trump-Russia (and he isn't), the degree to which he is associated with Trump would leave him stained and soiled for 2020.
Gerald Ford was moderate, bipartisan, and completely unconnected to Watergate, but he was still un-electable because of Nixon.
If Pence doesn't issue shameful pardons, his presidency will run parallel to months and months and months of prosecutions of Trump-Russia figures top to bottom. Their crimes will never be out of the headlines, and no one will be able to forget that these were the new president's closest associates in a totally criminal administration.Max Peck wrote: Thu Nov 16, 2017 11:16 pmArguably, Ford was un-electable because of Nixon's pardon, rather than Nixon per se. IIRC, he started out with high approval ratings but they went in the dumper when he issued the pardon.Holman wrote: Thu Nov 16, 2017 11:04 pm Even if Pence were untouched by Trump-Russia (and he isn't), the degree to which he is associated with Trump would leave him stained and soiled for 2020.
Gerald Ford was moderate, bipartisan, and completely unconnected to Watergate, but he was still un-electable because of Nixon.
He's claiming that the Dems want higher taxes, but wouldn't spend the money on the military. They'd waste it on things like healthcare and education.tjg_marantz wrote: Thu Nov 16, 2017 11:22 pm The bitch is back.
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/sta ... 0024687616
This? Dems want to raise taxes but not on military? I don't get it.
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/sta ... 3096233985
I mean, sure, Mueller's widely respected for decades on experience in law enforcement...but he's up against THIS GUY:YellowKing wrote: Thu Nov 16, 2017 9:02 pm Mueller's a stone cold pro. He's dotting i's, crossing t's, kicking ass and taking names. I feel like our patience will be rewarded.
Maybe he's grabbing the pussy. I hear they let you do that when you are rich/famous.tjg_marantz wrote: Thu Nov 16, 2017 11:22 pm The bitch is back.
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/sta ... 0024687616
I read it several times over the last few days. All right here on OO.tgb wrote: Sat Nov 18, 2017 10:04 am I read today that Trump plans to find the 8 turkeys Obama pardoned over the years and kill them all.
What is he referring to? Is this just desperation?
I had the same question.
Fitzy wrote: Sat Nov 18, 2017 7:21 pm However, it turns out Clinton gave an interview yesterday reaffirming her belief that Trump is a Putin puppet. I suspect that’s what set him off.
The top nuclear commander in the US says he would resist any "illegal" presidential order to launch a strike.
Air Force Gen John Hyten, said as head of the US Strategic Command he provided advice to a president and expected that a legal alternative would be found.
His comments come just days after US senators discussed a president's authority to launch a nuclear attack.
Some of them expressed concern that President Donald Trump might irresponsibly order such a strike.
Others though said a president must have the authority to act without meddling from lawyers. It was the first such hearing in more than 40 years.
In August, Mr Trump vowed to unleash "fire and fury like the world has never seen" on North Korea if it continued to expand its atomic weapons programme and threaten America.
Last month, the Senate Foreign Relations Committee's Republican chairman, Senator Bob Corker, accused the president of setting the US "on a path to World War Three".
Speaking at the Halifax International Security Forum in Canada, Gen Hyten said: "We think about these things a lot. When you have this responsibility, how do you not think about it?"
"I provide advice to the president, he will tell me what to do," he said.
"And if it's illegal, guess what's going to happen? I'm going to say: 'Mr President, that's illegal.' And guess what he's going to do? He's going to say, 'What would be legal?' And we'll come up with options, of a mix of capabilities to respond to whatever the situation is, and that's the way it works.
"It's not that complicated," Gen Hyten added.
He also added: "If you execute an unlawful order, you will go to jail. You could go to jail for the rest of your life."
President Trump has not publicly commented on Gen Hyten's remarks.