gbasden wrote: Wed Jan 25, 2023 8:06 pm
Unlike Hepcat, I don't generally have an issue with "cancel culture". Do stupid things, get shunned from society just as it always has been. From everything I've heard, domestic violence cases are a mess to untangle at best. Losing every professional gig in his life before he's been convicted seems a bit extreme.
I don't know the details, but this is my thought as well.
Separately, "cancelling" someone is usually tied to loss of ad revenue (or other income). I.e. our viewership will drop because we keep the person employed. I can't help but think that most of Rick and Morty's audience won't care. I feel like at least half of R&M's audience view Rick unironically as a hero, stigginit to anyone who has feelings, including his own family.
Are any of those people going to stop watching because a key cast member (and creator) is accused of abusing his spouse? Would they care if he was convicted?
I guess my point is, what kind of viewership reduction could they expect from keeping him on, versus firing him.
I also feel like this is the end of Rick and Morty. I can't see how it can survive this loss.
Personally, I love Rick and Morty, but I don't care enough to have a personal opinion on whether Justin should have been fired or not. I don't know enough and I don't care enough. I'm sure many people do though. I'm curious how they will react, as a fanbase.
Lastly, I thought Dan was the shady misogynist harasser. I was surprised when it was Justin that was the first one to be "cancelled".