That is not dead which can eternal lie, and with strange aeons bring us some web forums whereupon we can gather
http://garbi.online/forum/
I want to hear from Scoop, and then I will do my big reveal. Not that I am usually right, I am almost always wrong..bb2112 wrote:RMC, who do you think is evil?
Big reveal? On Day One?? Okay.RMC wrote:I want to hear from Scoop, and then I will do my big reveal. Not that I am usually right, I am almost always wrong..bb2112 wrote:RMC, who do you think is evil?
A joke, as I have no big reveal... I have nothing really.. And when I think I have something, I am 99.9% of the time wrong. <shrug>theohall wrote:Big reveal? On Day One?? Okay.RMC wrote:I want to hear from Scoop, and then I will do my big reveal. Not that I am usually right, I am almost always wrong..bb2112 wrote:RMC, who do you think is evil?
As far as I can tell, Theohall has yet to back away from this position however he has been very low key about it. Is it possible Theohall really believe it is a "major faux pas"? With Theo, yes it is. However, I'm slightly inclined to believe instead he was testing Holman's reaction.theohall wrote:FYI Holman.... This is an example of a slip. Villagers (Pirates in this case) are supposed to poke the silents. When someone says time to poke the innocents, they are inadvertently admitting they are wolves.Scoop20906 wrote:Time to poke the innocents...ikfj dsfsd dslfs; nfasd fasd;jf nsakd gibberish I know what I did there..d;lkjfsafasdf. GIBreaertaaaBERISH srtrset. . . GrtaretaeaIBBERISH . . . .
BB2112
withdraw Remus West
Scoop20906
While you may be a character, Scoop, this looks like a major faux pas.
To me, it reads like Theo is joking with Remus. Also, looks like Theo is bored with Day One and wants to mix things up just to get things moving.theohall wrote:Remus, are you defending Scoop on Day One when no one has died???? Why???Remus West wrote:So theohall is allowed to make fun of me with "the only good Remus" comments but Scoop is not allowed to mock my famous slip?
Scoop20906 wrote:First off, my post was completely a joke anybody who read it should be able figure that out. Also While network I don't have access so I can't defend myself and then suddenly I have four votes on me because it's nothing.
And here is my analysis of the response:Scoop20906 wrote: scoop20906
Aargh. Just irritating.
I have a feeling that this time if you "wanted" to give us a wolf, you would be right.RMC wrote:I want to hear from Scoop, and then I will do my big reveal. Not that I am usually right, I am almost always wrong..bb2112 wrote:RMC, who do you think is evil?
RMC wrote:Well, that is one vote I can't follow you in Scoop, as I am not a wolf.
<sigh> I see I have once again, gotten myself painted as the wrong thing by my flippant comments.
so if you were a wolf would you then follow his vote?RMC wrote:Well, that is one vote I can't follow you in Scoop, as I am not a wolf.
He's an honest man. If he found a wolf, including himself, he would vote for him.Lassr wrote:so if you were a wolf would you then follow his vote?RMC wrote:Well, that is one vote I can't follow you in Scoop, as I am not a wolf.
Not trying to bust your balls but what are you referring to?pr0ner wrote:Well, that changes things....
Is it really? I just read him as bored. What do we usually get out of him?Remus West wrote:theohall makes an early joke vote (me) then latches onto his early bone (Scoop) then switches to follow that player's vote? In anyone else that wouldn't mean much to me on day 1. From theohall it is out of character.
theohall
Just a guess.Scoop20906 wrote:Not trying to bust your balls but what are you referring to?pr0ner wrote:Well, that changes things....
Previous State: No underwear
Event Causing Change: Getting underwear
New State: Wearing underwear
One vote held in place, in spite of all arguments to the contrary, for about the first 2 days of the game.Scoop20906 wrote:Is it really? I just read him as bored. What do we usually get out of him?Remus West wrote:theohall makes an early joke vote (me) then latches onto his early bone (Scoop) then switches to follow that player's vote? In anyone else that wouldn't mean much to me on day 1. From theohall it is out of character.
theohall
I find theohall's behavior odd also, the problem being it has been odd in many games and he ends up being nothing but a villager.Scoop20906 wrote:Is it really? I just read him as bored. What do we usually get out of him?Remus West wrote:theohall makes an early joke vote (me) then latches onto his early bone (Scoop) then switches to follow that player's vote? In anyone else that wouldn't mean much to me on day 1. From theohall it is out of character.
theohall
That does it. No one gives Scoop a compliment on my watch.theohall wrote:That was very well done, Scoop.
withdraw Scoop
RMC
Well, it was fascinating to me that Theohall went from going typical Theo bulldog style against you for your "poke the innocents" comment to agreeing with your rationale for voting for RMC. So, I went from thinking Theo was just being Theo to wondering why he would be so apt to change his mind about you.Scoop20906 wrote:Not trying to bust your balls but what are you referring to?pr0ner wrote:Well, that changes things....
Previous State: ??
Event Causing Change: ??
New State: ??
This is my thinking. Now, I do see the point that theo's odd behavior is different from his typical odd behavior (which tends to be a bit more Crusader-ish). But then, there's this odd WW view where any deviation from past behavior is deemed to be suspicious, when it's also consistent with learning.Lassr wrote:I find theohall's behavior odd also, the problem being it has been odd in many games and he ends up being nothing but a villager.Scoop20906 wrote:Is it really? I just read him as bored. What do we usually get out of him?Remus West wrote:theohall makes an early joke vote (me) then latches onto his early bone (Scoop) then switches to follow that player's vote? In anyone else that wouldn't mean much to me on day 1. From theohall it is out of character.
theohall
and this is what is causing my uneasiness. Theohall usually keeps his vote on someone, come hell or high water, and presses that person for an entire round or two. Not only did he back off Scoop quickly, he actually joined Scoop's crusade.pr0ner wrote:Well, it was fascinating to me that Theohall went from going typical Theo bulldog style against you for your "poke the innocents" comment to agreeing with your rationale for voting for RMC. So, I went from thinking Theo was just being Theo to wondering why he would be so apt to change his mind about you.Scoop20906 wrote:Not trying to bust your balls but what are you referring to?pr0ner wrote:Well, that changes things....
Previous State: ??
Event Causing Change: ??
New State: ??
Please... go look at my Day One track record. It's all over the map. Now, when we have more information to go on...yes, I tend to have blinders then. Like right now, I believe Scoop to be right. All of the comments he made about the reactions of others to his post seem to be spot on and the only one acting like they "know" something is RMC.Lassr wrote:and this is what is causing my uneasiness. Theohall usually keeps his vote on someone, come hell or high water, and presses that person for an entire round or two. Not only did he back off Scoop quickly, he actually joined Scoop's crusade.pr0ner wrote:Well, it was fascinating to me that Theohall went from going typical Theo bulldog style against you for your "poke the innocents" comment to agreeing with your rationale for voting for RMC. So, I went from thinking Theo was just being Theo to wondering why he would be so apt to change his mind about you.Scoop20906 wrote:Not trying to bust your balls but what are you referring to?pr0ner wrote:Well, that changes things....
Previous State: ??
Event Causing Change: ??
New State: ??
Then I would suggest you quit feeling and rely on what looks like the best evidence available on Day One. Hopefully, that will actually net us a wolf. But if you would rather be feely, go right ahead.Remus West wrote:Who said anything about not considering what Scoop said? I did. I actually think there is a little something there. I think there is a whole lot less there then in your behavior. See, the thing is I really feel you are acting out of character and have been but I felt it wasn't enough until you moved to follow Scoop.
RMC is the only one that mentions it in the thread. I suspected Scoop was up to something also because that "hissy fit" was a bit out of character. Now, on the other hand, IF I suspect that someone is setting a trap, I as a villager will not post I think it's a trap. All that does is destroy any chance the trap may work. So I wonder if a lot of us thought Scoop was up to something and only RMC posted it.theohall wrote:
Please... go look at my Day One track record. It's all over the map. Now, when we have more information to go on...yes, I tend to have blinders then. Like right now, I believe Scoop to be right. All of the comments he made about the reactions of others to his post seem to be spot on and the only one acting like they "know" something is RMC.
Just to point out, I am just finishing the thoughts of others at that day/time. I think BB was the one that asked the question if scoop could be up to something.. I don't have time to go back and look, but I think it was him.Lassr wrote:RMC is the only one that mentions it in the thread. I suspected Scoop was up to something also because that "hissy fit" was a bit out of character. Now, on the other hand, IF I suspect that someone is setting a trap, I as a villager will not post I think it's a trap. All that does is destroy any chance the trap may work. So I wonder if a lot of us thought Scoop was up to something and only RMC posted it.theohall wrote:
Please... go look at my Day One track record. It's all over the map. Now, when we have more information to go on...yes, I tend to have blinders then. Like right now, I believe Scoop to be right. All of the comments he made about the reactions of others to his post seem to be spot on and the only one acting like they "know" something is RMC.
THAT is where I wonder about RMC. Why give away the fact that you think Scoop is up to something and warn the wolves unless you are a wolf.
But how many times have villagers noted someone is up to something out of innocence/ignorance. A bunch.
So your flip flopping and RMC's announcement that Scoop could be up to something are the two big pieces if info I am working with right now. Nothing else has stood out to me.
No, that he says that because he's not thinking like a villager but like a wolf acting helpful.Remus West wrote:So, let me get this straight Mr. Helpful-Lassr, you think that a potential wolf-RMC posted that Scoop was up to something - in game thread - to warn the other wolves away from the bait? Is that correct?
RMC wrote:Don't you think this might be calculated to see whom does what? Hmmmm......bb2112 wrote:Wow. That is a total overreaction. I got the joke. I was playing along to see who else would follow. Theohall looks pretty suspicious. Not only does he follow, but he labels your innocent comment as a slip. But then you do this. Aren't you a little experienced to throw a tantrum and self vote? Especially on day one?Scoop20906 wrote: scoop20906
Aargh. Just irritating.
see above postRMC wrote: I think BB was the one that asked the question if scoop could be up to something.. I don't have time to go back and look, but I think it was him.
and yes, I do see what you are implying there. Am I being helpful? Imagine that.Remus West wrote:So, let me get this straight Mr. Helpful-Lassr, you think that a potential wolf-RMC posted that Scoop was up to something - in game thread - to warn the other wolves away from the bait? Is that correct?
What?Lassr wrote:and yes, I do see what you are implying there. Am I being helpful? Imagine that.Remus West wrote:So, let me get this straight Mr. Helpful-Lassr, you think that a potential wolf-RMC posted that Scoop was up to something - in game thread - to warn the other wolves away from the bait? Is that correct?