Page 4 of 23
Re: Battle of the Presidents
Posted: Mon Dec 02, 2013 6:28 pm
by El Guapo
RMC wrote:Newcastle wrote:Vorret wrote:Newcastle wrote:triggercut wrote:El Guapo wrote:I don't know about you guys, but I am strongly in favor of restricting the expansion of slavery into United States territories. What does everyone else think?
That sounds great. I think we'll need to take money and food from starving children and widows to do it.
Meanwhile, if someone's already copping to being Jimmy Carter here....
RMC is CLEARLY a jackass!
jimmy had admitted to being tempted by women in playbot
jimminy cricket
Who?
to not know who jimmy cricket is a mortal sin and a violation of time honored american values. What you said is such a chock full of anti american values right there. I do believe we foudn our first non god fearing democrat in our midst.
vorret
even though he says he's canadian we all know thats as good as being a yellow bellied democrat.
Maybe he is a Tori, or a wig??? In order to avoid an international incident with Canada, I embrace our Canadian possibly being republican, and
I vote for
Remus West
And I am an Elephant, not a donkey thank you very much.
Egad, Vorret is a Tori???
Vorret
No good can come from having a Tori around.
Re: Battle of the Presidents
Posted: Mon Dec 02, 2013 6:50 pm
by RMC
That's what I get for not checking... Tori was with a Y, ah well..
Re: Battle of the Presidents
Posted: Mon Dec 02, 2013 7:09 pm
by bb2112
Oh my god, I hate myself and the premise of this game already. In order to make this somewhat amusing, at least for me, I am going to channel my inner Lord Mortis for this game.
You have all been warned.
Re: Battle of the Presidents
Posted: Mon Dec 02, 2013 7:59 pm
by Remus West
bb2112 wrote:Oh my god, I hate myself and the premise of this game already. In order to make this somewhat amusing, at least for me, I am going to channel my inner Lord Mortis for this game.
You have all been warned.
pffft. You have no "inner LordMortis". Your anal nature will not allow it. I'm not even remotely worried.
Re: Battle of the Presidents
Posted: Mon Dec 02, 2013 8:22 pm
by theohall
Remus West wrote:bb2112 wrote:Oh my god, I hate myself and the premise of this game already. In order to make this somewhat amusing, at least for me, I am going to channel my inner Lord Mortis for this game.
You have all been warned.
pffft. You have no "inner LordMortis". Your anal nature will not allow it. I'm not even remotely worried.
R W is clearly Republican with this anti-gay sentiment.
Re: Battle of the Presidents
Posted: Mon Dec 02, 2013 9:00 pm
by Chaosraven
Doesn't matter, the only "Good" Remus is still a DEAD Remus.
Re: Battle of the Presidents
Posted: Mon Dec 02, 2013 9:31 pm
by Newcastle
well we can start a new streak...2 games in a row...remus is the day 1 lynch?
would be kind of funny ya know.
Re: Battle of the Presidents
Posted: Mon Dec 02, 2013 10:19 pm
by bb2112
Remus West wrote:bb2112 wrote:Oh my god, I hate myself and the premise of this game already. In order to make this somewhat amusing, at least for me, I am going to channel my inner Lord Mortis for this game.
You have all been warned.
pffft. You have no "inner LordMortis". Your anal nature will not allow it. I'm not even remotely worried.
You should me off know. You dirt repugs.
Re: Battle of the Presidents
Posted: Mon Dec 02, 2013 10:36 pm
by bb2112
Don't you hate it when you sit in you office area by yourself and someone comes in to ask a you were the assignment is you were supposed to done and you have no idea what the fuck the guy is talking about? Then he tells me he sent an email asking for some thing that is going to take 3 mo to complete and a budget of 2 quadrillion dolars this mornign but when I check my email ther is nothing there and he shrugs saying not his problem. Not your problem asshole?you need to go talk to the president because he vetoed that shit last week. Not my problem. Asshole repug. I need my morning coffeee,
You guys should really lynch me know, I will just be a distractoin later.
Re: Battle of the Presidents
Posted: Mon Dec 02, 2013 10:38 pm
by bb2112
SQUIRREL
Re: Battle of the Presidents
Posted: Mon Dec 02, 2013 10:40 pm
by Remus West
I refuse to lynch bb2112 due to the fact that I can see his skin crawling every time he reads his own posts there. The urge to correct himself has to be killing him. Right now he probably looks like a $5 crack whore in the first days of rehab.
Re: Battle of the Presidents
Posted: Tue Dec 03, 2013 12:04 am
by Scoop20906
bb2112 wrote:SQUIRREL
LOL!!!
Re: Battle of the Presidents
Posted: Tue Dec 03, 2013 12:05 am
by Scoop20906
LETS HAVE A
Re: Battle of the Presidents
Posted: Tue Dec 03, 2013 12:09 am
by Scoop20906
Can't vote for Grund!??!?
Lynch El Guapo
I bet he wants us to live in a socialist state with drum circles on every corner. Yer a friggin hippey, hippey!! GO BACK TO CANDADA!!!
Re: Battle of the Presidents
Posted: Tue Dec 03, 2013 12:18 am
by J.D.
I'm preparing my 24 hour speech so I can filibuster the shit out of this game.
Re: Battle of the Presidents
Posted: Tue Dec 03, 2013 12:31 am
by triggercut
I have signed the order to hang RMC. When I sign an executive order, as your president I EXPECT IT TO BE CARRIED OUT!
However, I am willing to hang Scoop for perceived crimes against humanity.
For now, I'm going to be over here lobbying for legislation to put members of teacher's unions to work in salt mines over the summer. Let me know when one of those bleeding heart pinkos is ready to swing.
Re: Battle of the Presidents
Posted: Tue Dec 03, 2013 8:43 am
by tru1cy
I'll be in the Oval Office with the intern...
Re: Battle of the Presidents
Posted: Tue Dec 03, 2013 10:12 am
by Remus West
tru1cy wrote:I'll be in the Oval Office with the intern...
noted
Re: Battle of the Presidents
Posted: Tue Dec 03, 2013 10:14 am
by tru1cy
Remus West wrote:tru1cy wrote:I'll be in the Oval Office with the intern...
noted
you can't believe I would be that crazy to even drop a hint like that...
Re: Battle of the Presidents
Posted: Tue Dec 03, 2013 10:22 am
by Scoop20906
tru1cy wrote:Remus West wrote:tru1cy wrote:I'll be in the Oval Office with the intern...
noted
you can't believe I would be that crazy to even drop a hint like that...
Hey. We all got Oval Offices. Am I right, fellas? Huh? Am I right?
[FACE WITH STUCK-OUT TONGUE AND WINKING EYE]
Re: Battle of the Presidents
Posted: Tue Dec 03, 2013 10:27 am
by Vorret
I read orifice.
Enough internet for today.
Re: Battle of the Presidents
Posted: Tue Dec 03, 2013 11:20 am
by Lassr
Scoop
I hate tea parties!
Re: Battle of the Presidents
Posted: Tue Dec 03, 2013 3:19 pm
by RMC
Four score and seven years ago, I voted for Remus West. If you all want to be cool, you will too!
Re: Battle of the Presidents
Posted: Tue Dec 03, 2013 3:29 pm
by El Guapo
Rules Question: do we get notified if Clinton successfully converts a Republican? It appears not (the rules don't say anything about getting any notice), but I just want to check.
Re: Battle of the Presidents
Posted: Tue Dec 03, 2013 3:30 pm
by Scoop20906
Lassr wrote: Scoop
I hate tea parties!
But we will have crumpets!!!
Re: Battle of the Presidents
Posted: Tue Dec 03, 2013 3:37 pm
by Moliere
El Guapo wrote:Rules Question: do we get notified if Clinton successfully converts a Republican? It appears not (the rules don't say anything about getting any notice), but I just want to check.
No. The village will never know if the conversion was used (successful or not).
Re: Battle of the Presidents
Posted: Tue Dec 03, 2013 3:57 pm
by RMC
Moliere wrote:El Guapo wrote:Rules Question: do we get notified if Clinton successfully converts a Republican? It appears not (the rules don't say anything about getting any notice), but I just want to check.
No. The village will never know if the conversion was used (successful or not).
I think he was asking for the Democrats! He's a vile Democrat!!!!
Or maybe he is just a RINO? (Republican in Name Only)
Maybe we should all vote for El Guapo, the Democrat!
Re: Battle of the Presidents
Posted: Tue Dec 03, 2013 6:16 pm
by El Guapo
Moliere wrote:
b) Andrew Jackson has the ability to take down any Republican before being shot for treason. In other words, if he is found guilty of treason he will take one Republican with him - unless the Republican is being protected by Roosevelt. This Kamikaze action works even if Jackson is killed instantly by Roosevelt instead of found guilty of treason.
Rules Question #2: Andrew Jackson's ability doesn't work if he target's Roosevelt's protectee. Does Roosevelt protect anyone on Day 1?
If not, presumably we should try to avoid hitting Jackson until day 2 (to the extent that we can) because Jackson's more likely to fail in his berserk on day 2+, yes?
Re: Battle of the Presidents
Posted: Tue Dec 03, 2013 6:18 pm
by El Guapo
RMC wrote:Moliere wrote:El Guapo wrote:Rules Question: do we get notified if Clinton successfully converts a Republican? It appears not (the rules don't say anything about getting any notice), but I just want to check.
No. The village will never know if the conversion was used (successful or not).
I think he was asking for the Democrats! He's a vile Democrat!!!!
Or maybe he is just a RINO? (Republican in Name Only)
Maybe we should all vote for El Guapo, the Democrat!
Typical democrat, trying to squelch discussion. He must oppose the filibuster!
Re: Battle of the Presidents
Posted: Tue Dec 03, 2013 6:42 pm
by Moliere
El Guapo wrote:Moliere wrote:
b) Andrew Jackson has the ability to take down any Republican before being shot for treason. In other words, if he is found guilty of treason he will take one Republican with him - unless the Republican is being protected by Roosevelt. This Kamikaze action works even if Jackson is killed instantly by Roosevelt instead of found guilty of treason.
Rules Question #2: Andrew Jackson's ability doesn't work if he target's Roosevelt's protectee. Does Roosevelt protect anyone on Day 1?
If not, presumably we should try to avoid hitting Jackson until day 2 (to the extent that we can) because Jackson's more likely to fail in his berserk on day 2+, yes?
Teddy's protection is not applied until Night 1. I can't respond to your second question as it relates to strategery.
Re: Battle of the Presidents
Posted: Tue Dec 03, 2013 6:55 pm
by RMC
El Guapo wrote:RMC wrote:Moliere wrote:El Guapo wrote:Rules Question: do we get notified if Clinton successfully converts a Republican? It appears not (the rules don't say anything about getting any notice), but I just want to check.
No. The village will never know if the conversion was used (successful or not).
I think he was asking for the Democrats! He's a vile Democrat!!!!
Or maybe he is just a RINO? (Republican in Name Only)
Maybe we should all vote for El Guapo, the Democrat!
Typical democrat, trying to squelch discussion. He must oppose the filibuster!
Please define 'the' .
Re: Battle of the Presidents
Posted: Tue Dec 03, 2013 11:12 pm
by bb2112
Re: Battle of the Presidents
Posted: Wed Dec 04, 2013 12:16 am
by theohall
triggercut wrote:I have signed the order to hang RMC. When I sign an executive order, as your president I EXPECT IT TO BE CARRIED OUT!
However, I am willing to hang Scoop for perceived crimes against humanity.
For now, I'm going to be over here lobbying for legislation to put members of teacher's unions to work in salt mines over the summer. Let me know when one of those bleeding heart pinkos is ready to swing.
Written in typical Obama fashion... the master of executive orders, particularly in relation to enforcing supposed laws...
triggercut
Re: Battle of the Presidents
Posted: Wed Dec 04, 2013 12:26 am
by triggercut
theohall
is absolutely a Democrat. Let's get rid of him.
Now.
Re: Battle of the Presidents
Posted: Wed Dec 04, 2013 12:45 am
by theohall
triggercut wrote: theohall
is absolutely a Democrat. Let's get rid of him.
Now.
says the man claiming he EXPECTS his Executive Orders to be carried out like the current Democratic President. He used the all caps first, not me. Who does that sound like?
Re: Battle of the Presidents
Posted: Wed Dec 04, 2013 12:48 am
by triggercut
theohall wrote:triggercut wrote: theohall
is absolutely a Democrat. Let's get rid of him.
Now.
says the man claiming he EXPECTS his Executive Orders to be carried out like the current Democratic President. He used the all caps first, not me. Who does that sound like?
It sounds like you're a Democrat, that's what it sounds like.
Anything else incriminating you want to say, or are you going to give away some more here so that everyone will be sure?
Re: Battle of the Presidents
Posted: Wed Dec 04, 2013 10:16 am
by bb2112
triggercut wrote:theohall wrote:triggercut wrote: theohall
is absolutely a Democrat. Let's get rid of him.
Now.
says the man claiming he EXPECTS his Executive Orders to be carried out like the current Democratic President. He used the all caps first, not me. Who does that sound like?
It sounds like you're a Democrat, that's what it sounds like.
Anything else incriminating you want to say, or are you going to give away some more here so that everyone will be sure?
Well I'm convinced.
El Guapo
Re: Battle of the Presidents
Posted: Wed Dec 04, 2013 10:31 am
by Vorret
bb2112 wrote:triggercut wrote:theohall wrote:triggercut wrote: theohall
is absolutely a Democrat. Let's get rid of him.
Now.
says the man claiming he EXPECTS his Executive Orders to be carried out like the current Democratic President. He used the all caps first, not me. Who does that sound like?
It sounds like you're a Democrat, that's what it sounds like.
Anything else incriminating you want to say, or are you going to give away some more here so that everyone will be sure?
Well I'm convinced.
El Guapo
???
Re: Battle of the Presidents
Posted: Wed Dec 04, 2013 10:59 am
by Lassr
Vorret wrote:bb2112 wrote:triggercut wrote:theohall wrote:triggercut wrote: theohall
is absolutely a Democrat. Let's get rid of him.
Now.
says the man claiming he EXPECTS his Executive Orders to be carried out like the current Democratic President. He used the all caps first, not me. Who does that sound like?
It sounds like you're a Democrat, that's what it sounds like.
Anything else incriminating you want to say, or are you going to give away some more here so that everyone will be sure?
Well I'm convinced.
El Guapo
???
are you claiming George Bush because you don't get it?
Re: Battle of the Presidents
Posted: Wed Dec 04, 2013 11:17 am
by Vorret
I'm confused since he quoted a bunch of people, none of them El Guapo, then voted for him... makes no sense to me.