Re: Lynching Liaisons - Day 2
Posted: Fri Jun 14, 2013 7:15 am
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/13e91/13e913985474beefbf03fac37d057e8e6ac82b18" alt="Image"
That is not dead which can eternal lie, and with strange aeons bring us some web forums whereupon we can gather
http://garbi.online/forum/
I have him as my 3rd wolf currently but it would take some strong arming to get put him high enough to vote for today as my beliefs are more strongly bound to vorret and much much much more strongly bound to bb2112:redrun wrote:Scoop, Lassr, and somebody.
So, who else has Lassr on their watch list?
bb2112
vorret
lassr
Grund
Guapo
RMC
Scoop
I thought I saw a peeping tom in my bathroom window last night. Hope you enjoyed the show.redrun wrote:Scoop, Lassr, and somebody.
So, who else has Lassr on their watch list?
Vorret wrote:I was going to suggest myself but then I realize it's stupid since LM will think I'm the Beserker...
I like the medium idea, we know now what's up instead of tomorrow.
Yes, if you want to use up the Séance on someone other than the seer...Vorret wrote: So I'm gonna start
Séance Newcastle
Am I doing this right?
Vorret wrote:I'm also a villager but if you want to lynch (or scan one) hit me, I've come up a lot in recent discussions so I'd be happy to sacrifice myself for the good of the village.
25 minutes later:Vorret wrote:To me Scoop is acting like good Scoop but I might be missing something
and finally he chimes in with a picture to reinforce the Lassr/Scoop 'disagreement'.Vorret wrote:Fair point, I prefer scoop to EG but I'd prefer Theo over Scoop, sadly, since he's in the "good" list he's untouchable for now which is annoying (such a long list).Lassr wrote:I hit submit to soon...Lassr wrote:Scoop is acting odd.Vorret wrote:To me Scoop is acting like good Scoop but I might be missing something
I don't know if it is good odd or bad odd though. My gut is starting to think good but I haven't bothered to move my vote yet.
my hesitancy on my moving my vote is centered around his admission after the last game that he does not handle being a bad guy well and the lying bothers him. So I keep wondering if this is his approach to handling that pressure. Disinterest and absence.
I guess we can move on with that lynch and get some more info going into tomorrow
Scoop
Vorret wrote:
Sure.Chaosraven wrote:well then let's look at that for a momentpr0ner wrote:Interestingly, the only people who haven't voted yet are all assumed to be good. The remaining wolves have all placed a vote.
Here's who voted for NO ONE:Qantaga, Unagi, Chaosraven, pr0ner, Lassr, Scoop, tru1cy, Vorret, LordMortis, Remus West, Newcastle
Here's who voted for someone else:Purge, Grundbegriff, Lagom Lite
The uncontested, pretty much sure to be good, are Lagom Lite, tru1cy, theohall, triggercut, redrun, Remus West, Chaosraven, and purge. Newcastle is dead.Against redrun (2) - RMC, Bakhtosh
Against Vorret (1) - triggercut
Against Remus (1) - redrun
Against theohall (1) - El Guapo
Against Purge (1) - bb2112
Against bb2112 (1) - theohall
I've struck through everyone that is either a) known to be good, or b) voted for our Day 1 wolf.Against Scoop (6) - RMC, pr0ner, El Guapo, bb2112, Vorret,tru1cy
Against El Guapo (4) - redrun, Lagom LIte, theohall, Grundbegriff
Against bb2112 (4) - LordMortis, Unagi, Lassr, Chaosraven
Against Grundbegriff (1) - Scoop20906
No votes (4) - Remus West, Qantaga, purge, triggercut
Most of the time you'll find a wolf off voting somewhere else besides the current train. Bakhtosh here was a wolf but he wouldn't be voting for himself anyhow. Would two wolves place lone votes on the same person? So would Bahktosh join fellow wolf RMC on a vote against redrun which we now assume to be the mentalist? I could see wolves piling on lone votes against a fellow wolf to use as "proof" later that they were trying to lynch a wolf. That's not the case here which makes me lean possibly good for RMC.pr0ner wrote: Here's who voted for someone else:
Against redrun (2) - RMC, Bakhtosh
Against Vorret (1) - triggercut
Against Remus (1) - redrun
Against theohall (1) - El Guapo
Against Purge (1) - bb2112
Against bb2112 (1) - theohall
and again I keep forgetting about Grund (Thanks Q). He also sitting there with no vote so add him to the El Guapo, BB list. Out of sight out of mind is working for him it seems.Lassr wrote:Most of the time you'll find a wolf off voting somewhere else besides the current train. Bakhtosh here was a wolf but he wouldn't be voting for himself anyhow. Would two wolves place lone votes on the same person? So would Bahktosh join fellow wolf RMC on a vote against redrun which we now assume to be the mentalist? I could see wolves piling on lone votes against a fellow wolf to use as "proof" later that they were trying to lynch a wolf. That's not the case here which makes me lean possibly good for RMC.pr0ner wrote: Here's who voted for someone else:
Against redrun (2) - RMC, Bakhtosh
Against Vorret (1) - triggercut
Against Remus (1) - redrun
Against theohall (1) - El Guapo
Against Purge (1) - bb2112
Against bb2112 (1) - theohall
El Guapo on theohall and bb2112 on Purge. I bet one of these is a wolf. The other wolves are probably on the bakhtosh vote.
pr0ner wrote:
That leaves us El Guapo, bb2112, RMC, and Grundbegriff.
Qantaga wrote:
Wolfish: Grund, RMC, bb
Mysterious-ish: Lassr, Vorret, El Guapo
BB2112 is also on my alternative list. Should he turn up wolf, it leads me towards a more narrow field...stessier wrote: Against Scoop (6) - RMC, pr0ner, El Guapo, bb2112, Vorret,tru1cy
Against El Guapo (4) - redrun, Lagom LIte, theohall, Grundbegriff
Against bb2112 (4) - LordMortis, Unagi, Lassr, Chaosraven
Against Grundbegriff (1) - Scoop20906
Oh, I know it's wolf 101 to vote on a barreling wolf train to provide some cover, but performing the analysis anyway does potentially clear up some issues and give us somewhere to focus. Would all the wolves throw themselves on the Bakhtosh train?Unagi wrote:My opinion on votes is that they are not very good indicators of 'wolfyness'. It's Wolf 101 to use your vote in a way to throw off attention - and then more veteran wolves use that to make themselves 'obviously not a wolf' (like maybe being the Nth vote, is a good example). So, ultimately I have trouble putting too much faith in what I feel I see in the vote analysis. BB2112 has had a number of exchanges where I felt he wasn't nearly his standard self - and that's whats mostly behind my vote.
I would assume that there's at least one on the train and one not. Not sure that really tells us all that much.pr0ner wrote:Oh, I know it's wolf 101 to vote on a barreling wolf train to provide some cover, but performing the analysis anyway does potentially clear up some issues and give us somewhere to focus. Would all the wolves throw themselves on the Bakhtosh train?Unagi wrote:My opinion on votes is that they are not very good indicators of 'wolfyness'. It's Wolf 101 to use your vote in a way to throw off attention - and then more veteran wolves use that to make themselves 'obviously not a wolf' (like maybe being the Nth vote, is a good example). So, ultimately I have trouble putting too much faith in what I feel I see in the vote analysis. BB2112 has had a number of exchanges where I felt he wasn't nearly his standard self - and that's whats mostly behind my vote.
that was me...it's like I play these games but I don't exist...geez!El Guapo wrote:I would assume that there's at least one on the train and one not. Not sure that really tells us all that much.pr0ner wrote:Oh, I know it's wolf 101 to vote on a barreling wolf train to provide some cover, but performing the analysis anyway does potentially clear up some issues and give us somewhere to focus. Would all the wolves throw themselves on the Bakhtosh train?Unagi wrote:My opinion on votes is that they are not very good indicators of 'wolfyness'. It's Wolf 101 to use your vote in a way to throw off attention - and then more veteran wolves use that to make themselves 'obviously not a wolf' (like maybe being the Nth vote, is a good example). So, ultimately I have trouble putting too much faith in what I feel I see in the vote analysis. BB2112 has had a number of exchanges where I felt he wasn't nearly his standard self - and that's whats mostly behind my vote.
However, I do agree with your analysis that it is unlikely that the wolves would want BakhtoshWolf and RMCWolf as the sole votes on a villager, which points towards RMC being a villager.
Lassr wrote:that was me...it's like I play these games but I don't exist...geez!El Guapo wrote:I would assume that there's at least one on the train and one not. Not sure that really tells us all that much.pr0ner wrote:Oh, I know it's wolf 101 to vote on a barreling wolf train to provide some cover, but performing the analysis anyway does potentially clear up some issues and give us somewhere to focus. Would all the wolves throw themselves on the Bakhtosh train?Unagi wrote:My opinion on votes is that they are not very good indicators of 'wolfyness'. It's Wolf 101 to use your vote in a way to throw off attention - and then more veteran wolves use that to make themselves 'obviously not a wolf' (like maybe being the Nth vote, is a good example). So, ultimately I have trouble putting too much faith in what I feel I see in the vote analysis. BB2112 has had a number of exchanges where I felt he wasn't nearly his standard self - and that's whats mostly behind my vote.
However, I do agree with your analysis that it is unlikely that the wolves would want BakhtoshWolf and RMCWolf as the sole votes on a villager, which points towards RMC being a villager.
I looked this up since I couldn't recall what bb was doing in that. He was really beating the bushes at the end of day 1 (~ pp. 16 - 19) for a purge lynch. That's not good since purge is (evidently) good while the Bakhtosh wolf lynch was getting going.LordMortis wrote:For me it was bb2112's seeming attempt to prevent the bakhtosh train from ever even starting. Sorry. I guess I do put weight in voting patterns. Too much? I don't know. I'm sure I'm wrong way too often but I need to vote on something and I like to see other's reactions.
I'm not knocking your analysis, so much as saying that for me, it ends up being a bit of a wash.pr0ner wrote:Oh, I know it's wolf 101 to vote on a barreling wolf train to provide some cover, but performing the analysis anyway does potentially clear up some issues and give us somewhere to focus. Would all the wolves throw themselves on the Bakhtosh train?Unagi wrote:My opinion on votes is that they are not very good indicators of 'wolfyness'. It's Wolf 101 to use your vote in a way to throw off attention - and then more veteran wolves use that to make themselves 'obviously not a wolf' (like maybe being the Nth vote, is a good example). So, ultimately I have trouble putting too much faith in what I feel I see in the vote analysis. BB2112 has had a number of exchanges where I felt he wasn't nearly his standard self - and that's whats mostly behind my vote.
and I agree with this. As I said, often times there is a lone wolf off voting somewhere else. Not always though and in this case with wolf Bahktosh being the target would all the wolves want to jump on board the train? Maybe, just no way to tell but if one did avoid the train then BB, El Guapo and Grund would be my choices. I lean more BB or Grund than El Guapo though just from the feel I get from their posts or non-posts for Grund.Unagi wrote:My opinion on votes is that they are not very good indicators of 'wolfyness'. It's Wolf 101 to use your vote in a way to throw off attention - and then more veteran wolves use that to make themselves 'obviously not a wolf' (like maybe being the Nth vote, is a good example). So, ultimately I have trouble putting too much faith in what I feel I see in the vote analysis. BB2112 has had a number of exchanges where I felt he wasn't nearly his standard self - and that's whats mostly behind my vote.
LOL!!!Vorret wrote:
El Guapo wrote:Lassr wrote:that was me...it's like I play these games but I don't exist...geez!El Guapo wrote:I would assume that there's at least one on the train and one not. Not sure that really tells us all that much.pr0ner wrote:Oh, I know it's wolf 101 to vote on a barreling wolf train to provide some cover, but performing the analysis anyway does potentially clear up some issues and give us somewhere to focus. Would all the wolves throw themselves on the Bakhtosh train?Unagi wrote:My opinion on votes is that they are not very good indicators of 'wolfyness'. It's Wolf 101 to use your vote in a way to throw off attention - and then more veteran wolves use that to make themselves 'obviously not a wolf' (like maybe being the Nth vote, is a good example). So, ultimately I have trouble putting too much faith in what I feel I see in the vote analysis. BB2112 has had a number of exchanges where I felt he wasn't nearly his standard self - and that's whats mostly behind my vote.
However, I do agree with your analysis that it is unlikely that the wolves would want BakhtoshWolf and RMCWolf as the sole votes on a villager, which points towards RMC being a villager.I apologize, pr0ner.
Or the hunter, I guess.Remus West wrote:Lets pray he is not the Berserker.
bb2112
Indeed. At the risk of incurring Lassr's wrath we probably should've waited for him to speak in case he's the hunter.LordMortis wrote:Or the hunter, I guess.Remus West wrote:Lets pray he is not the Berserker.
bb2112