That is not dead which can eternal lie, and with strange aeons bring us some web forums whereupon we can gather
http://garbi.online/forum/
Because it's totally the same as sexual assault and violating the privacy of underage girls.The video was captured by CNN back in 2008 while then-Senator Obama was first running for the highest office in the land. The 1:38 clip (below) features Obama seeming to proudly show off his erection to giggling female reporters, even giving them a full 360-degree display of his manhood while they cheer him on.
Snopes is on the case, and they're not impressed.Rip wrote:
It should also be noted that this video has been circulating since at least 2008, when it was used to smear then-Senator Obama during his first presidential campaign. The web site Obambi was one of the first to share the video along with the baseless claim that it depicted Obama with an erection. Ironically, back then Obambi posted the video along with an exhortation to vote for Hillary Clinton:
We examined the video and tried to find screenshots where Obama's "erection" was most visible, but we came up empty-handed. While some viewers may argue that a bulge is visible in Obama's pants, there's no definitive evidence that the future president had an erection, and certainly nothing to suggest that he "flaunted" his manhood in front of female reporters.Obambi wrote:Regards Obama’s erection. I’ve seen middle school boys handle this with more decorum. This type of behavior is juvenile and just one more example of Obama’s exhibiting poor judgement.
Please, we have an admittedly flawed but exceedingly superior woman whom we could run against McCain.
I love Senator McCain, I really do. I’m an Arizonan. But change is what we need. The only woman who could deliver that for us right now is Senator Hillary Clinton. A classy lady. America will never opt for a classless Obama.
The weird thing is that the video is being posted by the Washington Free Beacon. Given their reputation, I'm left to wonder if they see it as a pro-Trump video...Enough wrote:‘Bane’ Trump Delivers a Speech to the People
Seriously.Max Peck wrote:The weird thing is that the video is being posted by the Washington Free Beacon. Given their reputation, I'm left to wonder if they see it as a pro-Trump video...Enough wrote:‘Bane’ Trump Delivers a Speech to the People
Does that even sound remotely like something he (Obama) would do?GreenGoo wrote:If that's true then I would be against him becoming President as well. Unfortunately this is a little late, Rip. Not like you to give a Dem a break for 8 years before bringing up problems when it's too late to do anything about it.
Obama thanks you, though.
Dave Weigel, a WashPost reporter, tweeted this earlier:Unagi wrote:Seriously.Max Peck wrote:The weird thing is that the video is being posted by the Washington Free Beacon. Given their reputation, I'm left to wonder if they see it as a pro-Trump video...Enough wrote:‘Bane’ Trump Delivers a Speech to the People
That's just hard to understand, unless I lower my opinion Even Further of the element that supports him
Wtf!?
I suspect they aren't supportive of Trump. Here's another example:Max Peck wrote: The weird thing is that the video is being posted by the Washington Free Beacon. Given their reputation, I'm left to wonder if they see it as a pro-Trump video...
Except I think you'll find most Trump supporters to be more law abiding that any other group of voters out there. The orange jumpsuits belong to the other side, their cronies are even trying to enable them to vote whilst wearing their orange badges of honor.Enough wrote:‘Bane’ Trump Delivers a Speech to the People
I doubt it.GreenGoo wrote:Can someone explain to her the difference between consensual and non-consensual and why that difference matters?
You saw the video. Trump is now dressing like Bane during his speeches. Wake up, man!em2nought wrote:Except I think you'll find most Trump supporters to be more law abiding that any other group of voters out there. The orange jumpsuits belong to the other side, their cronies are even trying to enable them to vote whilst wearing their orange badges of honor.Enough wrote:‘Bane’ Trump Delivers a Speech to the People
This may be the only time where "Based on what she wore, she was asking for it" might be a viable defense.Enough wrote:
Nope, it's for LIAR.Jaymann wrote:What, is the "L" for Loser?
Apparently, yes. The word on the street is that that is a picture of Moore flashing the "loser sign" at John McCain back in 2004, when McCain referred to him as a "disingenuous filmmaker" during a speech. Ironically(?), it is appropriate for not only the pre-Trump agenda, but also the lol-Trump and post-Trump GOP agendas.Jaymann wrote:What, is the "L" for Loser?
Liberal lies. It's no wonder considering Politifact is run by the Clinton Foundation's Bilderberg Society.Enough wrote:
I'm surprised that Palin scores so well in the actually true category. Was she graded on a curve? ("Hello, my name is Sarah Palin!" -- Yeah, we'll give her that one.)Enough wrote:Nope, it's for LIAR.Jaymann wrote:What, is the "L" for Loser?
The chart tracks from 2007. Are you having trouble with the readin' or the 'rithmetic?Rip wrote:What is Obama a candidate for?
Neither, he is compelled to find something unrelated to justify ignoring that the graphic shows that his belief that Hillary is a liar is apparently a load of horseshit (if you look at what she actually says, rather than what she says in Rip's fever dreams).Max Peck wrote:The chart tracks from 2007. Are you having trouble with the readin' or the 'rithmetic?Rip wrote:What is Obama a candidate for?
Reality bites, lol.Max Peck wrote:
