Re: Ukraine
Posted: Sun Feb 27, 2022 3:04 pm
Crazy stuff. It'd be really interesting to talk to those tankers and understand what they were told about this mission.
That is not dead which can eternal lie, and with strange aeons bring us some web forums whereupon we can gather
http://garbi.online/forum/
I don't think so. I'm seeing it differently. The Ukrainians seem to be saying they are all in. In the sense that they say things like our military knows our country more, we have tons of weapons to kill you, and we are motivated to defend our land...and even if you get past us everyone here is armed to the teeth and will gut you too.El Guapo wrote: ↑Sun Feb 27, 2022 3:34 pm What's weird is the impression that I get from social media on this makes it seem like this is the Russian military vs. assorted Ukranian civilians. There are Ukrainian military units active, right? Seems like they're active around the airport at least. Maybe it's that they're engaging in irregular combat as much as possible rather than mass pitched battles. And I suppose Ukraine would want to encourage that frame as well to present a better "David vs. Goliath" image.
They have a few.El Guapo wrote: ↑Sun Feb 27, 2022 3:34 pm What's weird is the impression that I get from social media on this makes it seem like this is the Russian military vs. assorted Ukranian civilians. There are Ukrainian military units active, right? Seems like they're active around the airport at least. Maybe it's that they're engaging in irregular combat as much as possible rather than mass pitched battles. And I suppose Ukraine would want to encourage that frame as well to present a better "David vs. Goliath" image.
So, can I ask an obvious question? Why are the Russian's using them this way? Russia has armor. Why aren't they deploying that? Is it as simple as Putin thought an invasion of Ukraine would be Crimea 2.0, and the Ukrainians would just fold and accept a Russian takeover? Is Putin holding back his heavy weapons because he's trying to conquer Ukraine without entirely destroying infrastructure and decimating the people? That doesn't seem to be his usual MO.Grifman wrote: ↑Sun Feb 27, 2022 2:56 pmKurth wrote: ↑Sun Feb 27, 2022 2:35 pm Regarding the “bylat” spitting guy videoing the destruction of all that Russian military equipment, I don’t understand how the Ukrainians are inflicting that amount of damage on these mechanized columns. That’s an awful lot of destruction they appear to be dealing.
Those vehicles are only lightly armored. They aren’t tanks or Bradley AFV - they are more like armored Humvees or MRAPS. They can take some small arms fire, but only have about a 1/4 inch of armor. They are not meant to be used as the Russians are using them - to spearhead strikes into a heavily defended urban environment.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/GAZ_Tigr
And compete as the Russian World Cup Committee?El Guapo wrote: ↑Sun Feb 27, 2022 10:33 am What I'm reading makes the central bank sanctions + partial SWIFT shutdown as pretty devastating. As the article above says one concern with these types of sanctions is that that they have the potential to be *too* devastating - we don't want the Russian economy to collapse entirely. But what they did sounds pretty severe as is.
I will say I'm pretty shocked by the thoroughness and completeness of the pushback - everything from economic sanctions to air space removal to asset seizures to being kicked out of freaking eurovision. Plus Poland is refusing to play their world cup qualifier match against Russia. I kind of wonder the way things are trending whether Russia could be suspended from the world cup?
I don't know if it's some kind of "rope a dope" strategy to deplete the Ukrainian Army of anti armor and air missiles, terrible tactics an eventual escalation of force since Russia has the numbers or all of the above? NATO is very good at logistics however so I think we'll be very efficient in keeping the Ukanians supplied...Kurth wrote: ↑Sun Feb 27, 2022 4:06 pmSo, can I ask an obvious question? Why are the Russian's using them this way? Russia has armor. Why aren't they deploying that? Is it as simple as Putin thought an invasion of Ukraine would be Crimea 2.0, and the Ukrainians would just fold and accept a Russian takeover? Is Putin holding back his heavy weapons because he's trying to conquer Ukraine without entirely destroying infrastructure and decimating the people? That doesn't seem to be his usual MO.Grifman wrote: ↑Sun Feb 27, 2022 2:56 pmKurth wrote: ↑Sun Feb 27, 2022 2:35 pm Regarding the “bylat” spitting guy videoing the destruction of all that Russian military equipment, I don’t understand how the Ukrainians are inflicting that amount of damage on these mechanized columns. That’s an awful lot of destruction they appear to be dealing.
Those vehicles are only lightly armored. They aren’t tanks or Bradley AFV - they are more like armored Humvees or MRAPS. They can take some small arms fire, but only have about a 1/4 inch of armor. They are not meant to be used as the Russians are using them - to spearhead strikes into a heavily defended urban environment.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/GAZ_Tigr
None of this really makes sense to me.
Presumably they expected most of the defences to be placed in urban environments, where tanks aren't as useful due to being vulnerable to explosives and incendiaries from above and having difficulties manouvering around on narrow streets. Needless to say, things didn't exactly turn out that way.Kurth wrote: ↑Sun Feb 27, 2022 4:06 pm So, can I ask an obvious question? Why are the Russian's using them this way? Russia has armor. Why aren't they deploying that? Is it as simple as Putin thought an invasion of Ukraine would be Crimea 2.0, and the Ukrainians would just fold and accept a Russian takeover? Is Putin holding back his heavy weapons because he's trying to conquer Ukraine without entirely destroying infrastructure and decimating the people?
A lot of folks are scratching their heads. The long thread I posted above talks to it to some degree but there is a sense of bewilderment. It really looks like they unrealistically traded extreme speed to get to Kyiv for operational safety. They also are doing nonsensical things. For days there has been rumors of an amphibious landing from the Black Sea. It happened a few hours ago but the Russians already had a port and a beach head and didn't need to waste time on the landing. A defense analyst likened it to...we planned a landing...we're going to do a landing even if it were easier/safer/faster to just pull into port. If we learn in a few years that the Russian generals botched this intentionally it'd be believable at this point.Kurth wrote: ↑Sun Feb 27, 2022 4:06 pmSo, can I ask an obvious question? Why are the Russian's using them this way? Russia has armor. Why aren't they deploying that? Is it as simple as Putin thought an invasion of Ukraine would be Crimea 2.0, and the Ukrainians would just fold and accept a Russian takeover? Is Putin holding back his heavy weapons because he's trying to conquer Ukraine without entirely destroying infrastructure and decimating the people? That doesn't seem to be his usual MO.
None of this really makes sense to me.
Not 100% confirmed though it was referenced as a fact in that video I posted in P&R Videos. There was a lot of chatter about this yesterday. To the point that the Russians featured a social media clip with a 'phone call' with him which almost makes it seem like he was killed. About the only thing we know with high confidence was that a regiment sized element of Chechens was wiped out. Some accounts say they were the ones hit in the Bucha video upthread.Kurth wrote: ↑Sun Feb 27, 2022 4:28 pm I've also seen lots of reports that state the entire group of Chechen fighters sent into Ukraine were wiped out, along with their infamous general, Magomed Tushev. Anyone know if this has been confirmed? Also, do we know anything about the size and strength of this contingent of Chechens?
The Ukrainian government has repeatedly warned journalists and citizens not to post any footage of Uk military activity. This is to deny the Russians any intelligence they might get (geolocation, unit IDs, etc) from posted media.El Guapo wrote: ↑Sun Feb 27, 2022 3:34 pm What's weird is the impression that I get from social media on this makes it seem like this is the Russian military vs. assorted Ukranian civilians. There are Ukrainian military units active, right? Seems like they're active around the airport at least. Maybe it's that they're engaging in irregular combat as much as possible rather than mass pitched battles. And I suppose Ukraine would want to encourage that frame as well to present a better "David vs. Goliath" image.
I assume they were trying secure supply lines. Tanks use a ton of fuel and we've already seen many abandoned once they're out of gas. I think the light armor was trying to avoid that.Chraolic wrote: ↑Sun Feb 27, 2022 4:23 pmPresumably they expected most of the defences to be placed in urban environments, where tanks aren't as useful due to being vulnerable to explosives and incendiaries from above and having difficulties manouvering around on narrow streets. Needless to say, things didn't exactly turn out that way.Kurth wrote: ↑Sun Feb 27, 2022 4:06 pm So, can I ask an obvious question? Why are the Russian's using them this way? Russia has armor. Why aren't they deploying that? Is it as simple as Putin thought an invasion of Ukraine would be Crimea 2.0, and the Ukrainians would just fold and accept a Russian takeover? Is Putin holding back his heavy weapons because he's trying to conquer Ukraine without entirely destroying infrastructure and decimating the people?
It's seems like Putin sent in the JV team for what he thought was a quick and easy op. They used some special forces but mostly it's the compulsory conscripts. He may have been looking ahead to the next matchup.
This is not true, bad info.Holman wrote: ↑Sun Feb 27, 2022 9:41 pm In case you're wondering how the Kremlin thinks this is going...
That's going to send shockwaves through the military establishment. Sounds like a desperate attempt to name a scapegoat even before the failure is certain.
My fear is that he's out because he refused to consider nuclear weapons.
^^^hitbyambulance wrote: ↑Mon Feb 28, 2022 2:05 am i know the Russian people always, _always_ get the short end of the stick through history (to say the least), but i see things like this, and i keep feeling that not even Putin dying a slow, painful and extremely protracted death is good enough...
This is much closer to the total economic warfare that is needed. Not sure if I like the slow roll approach but at least they are getting there.malchior wrote: ↑Mon Feb 28, 2022 8:54 am
Japan joined in cutting off the Russian Central Bank so the Russians now have only access to the remnibi. In a feckless attempt to prop up the roubles they doubled the interest rate to 20% which effectively freezes the internal credit market. They have no access to forex at all and the Biden administration froze all central bank assets in place. The Russians are fucked.