Lagom Lite wrote: Fair enough, but it was unintentional. I didn't mean to imply that the events in those sentences happened in order.

What! An unintentional slip!? In all my 11 months of OO, I have never seen anything like it before!

Moderator: Zaxxon
Lagom Lite wrote: Fair enough, but it was unintentional. I didn't mean to imply that the events in those sentences happened in order.
CR, is your vote count correct?Chaosraven wrote:VOTES
3 Lagom Lite - bb2112, Unagi, RMC, Lassr
Wow - I never really noticed the size of your head before.Lagom Lite wrote:I'm really creeped out by how you're trying to emulate my behavior. And flattered!Unagi wrote:Yes, partly, Lagom's type of reaction to my accusal was what I was looking for, as well as how bb2112 handled it all, himself.
I can't understand what you are trying to say. Really? I have no trouble understanding it at all.Remus West wrote:Grund is not hard to read when Evil? Hmmmm....what games have you been playing? I feel like I can read him.
nicely doneUnagi wrote:I can't understand what you are trying to say. Really? I have no trouble understanding it at all.Remus West wrote:Grund is not hard to read when Evil? Hmmmm....what games have you been playing? I feel like I can read him.
Heh. Should have read "I feel like I can not read him".Unagi wrote:I can't understand what you are trying to say. Really? I have no trouble understanding it at all.Remus West wrote:Grund is not hard to read when Evil? Hmmmm....what games have you been playing? I feel like I can read him.
THERE ARE FOUR LIGHTS! I MEAN VOTES!Unagi wrote:CR, is your vote count correct?Chaosraven wrote:VOTES
3 Lagom Lite - bb2112, Unagi, RMC, Lassr
I don't know. Maybe something besides the same thing every Day One when Austin is involved? Doing the same thing every Day One when another specific member is involved is an excellent way to hide, though.tru1cy wrote:Theohall what would you like for me to comment on? Day 1 is a crap shoot and I see no reason to change my vote. Now I might vote for Grundy if he continues to be absent
Ok Jean Luc calm down. I am going to ask you again. How many lights do you see?bb2112 wrote:THERE ARE FOUR LIGHTS! I MEAN VOTES!Unagi wrote:CR, is your vote count correct?Chaosraven wrote:VOTES
3 Lagom Lite - bb2112, Unagi, RMC, Lassr
Grundbegriff wrote:Meep
Wrong play. I'm no longer silent!tru1cy wrote:that's it.. grundbegriffGrundbegriff wrote:Meep
He did actually post twice.Mr Bubbles wrote:So we have the lets poke the silents.
The analyzers.
The one who post just enough to go unnoticed.
We also have the silents.
What group would they mostly hide in. I'm in the camp of those posting just enough. I do find it cute that grund posts once and expects to be taken out of the silents.
tru1cy seems to be cool with an Austin or Grundbegriff shot in the dark, but for some random reason is steadfast against voting anywhere else?tru1cy wrote:Day 1 is a crap shoot and I see no reason to change my vote. Now I might vote for Grundy if he continues to be absent
There's normally no benefit in waiting in a deadlined game. Usually deadlines punish the good guys, the lack of deadline in this game is a luxury. I see you're in a hurry, and neither of your "front runners" are presently a good lynch choice.bb2112 wrote:Since there is no deadline, the only way we are going to move things forward is if we start pushing induhviduals up to N-1. That or we start doing threat assessments, but I think day 1 threat assessments are kind of weak. That being said, they still may at least help build some kind of consensus.
Right now we have 2 front running candidates in LL and Grund. I believe we need to push one of these two up to N-1 and see what happens. Either that, or we can spin our wheels for a few more days, pick some arbitrary mistake like was vs is, and vote that person. It being day 1, with little to no information, at some point we going to have to pick someone.
I am sure I'm not saying anything that we aren't all thinking. I don't see the silents (Grund, Issy, Q, Tru1cy, ect) coming out until there is more information, and the rest of us (mostly me) will just keep posting nonsense because we have nothing else to go on. And without a deadline to drive us all to a decision, is there any huge benefit in waiting?
Blame the algorithm.Unagi wrote:I'm unflattered that Lagom thinks that Grund is such a potential contribution to the late game so as to take him off the table on Day 1 - but he started the game with a vote on me. Cheers.![]()
We know you're in awe of Grund from your earlier remarks but I didn't realize you had such a high opinion of yourself.Lagom Lite wrote:Pushing me or Grund to n-1 is either insane or brilliant.
Except when it's not and you get killed and prove time after time that the people making the assumptions are wrong. I'm look at you Unagi!Isgrimnur wrote:That kind of thing is why I actually have taken breaks from the games. When it becomes evident that your presence makes you an outsized target, it becomes difficult to play. Every move, every deviation, is seen as a tell.
I was kind of hoping that the LL train would gain a little more momentum. My thoughts? So glad you asked: LL seems the most wolfy to me based on his posts. Especially for a Day 1 when we don't have a whole lot else to go with.Remus West wrote:I'm willing to keep my vote where it is and see if we get more than a "meep" as he nears the threshold of lynch.
So there is a lot of criticism, but I"m not hearing any substance.Lagom Lite wrote: There's normally no benefit in waiting in a deadlined game. Usually deadlines punish the good guys, the lack of deadline in this game is a luxury. I see you're in a hurry, and neither of your "front runners" are presently a good lynch choice.
Pushing me or Grund to n-1 is either insane or brilliant.
I share your vision. I'm not convinced he's a villain but at the moment he's my best guess. I have no problem switching to a silent either.bb2112 wrote:I was kind of hoping that the LL train would gain a little more momentum. My thoughts? So glad you asked: LL seems the most wolfy to me based on his posts. Especially for a Day 1 when we don't have a whole lot else to go with.Remus West wrote:I'm willing to keep my vote where it is and see if we get more than a "meep" as he nears the threshold of lynch.
But if others don't share my vision, I will switch my vote to Grund either tonight or tomorrow. Assuming nothing new comes up, which I suspect it wont. As posted earlier, I would rather not stall out the game indefinitely.
I also find it interesting that 3 others (you included) saw the same thing I did right away and voted. Then there was nothing more on LL. Not one other person has joined in on the train since. Does this mean we are on to something and the wolfy people are trying to derail and distract? Or are we that off base and nobody else sees it? It just seems very weird to me that we got up to 4 votes in a very short amount of time, then nothing...Lassr wrote:I share your vision. I'm not convinced he's a villain but at the moment he's my best guess. I have no problem switching to a silent either.bb2112 wrote:I was kind of hoping that the LL train would gain a little more momentum. My thoughts? So glad you asked: LL seems the most wolfy to me based on his posts. Especially for a Day 1 when we don't have a whole lot else to go with.Remus West wrote:I'm willing to keep my vote where it is and see if we get more than a "meep" as he nears the threshold of lynch.
But if others don't share my vision, I will switch my vote to Grund either tonight or tomorrow. Assuming nothing new comes up, which I suspect it wont. As posted earlier, I would rather not stall out the game indefinitely.
I'm playing blind darts right now, and I have plenty of darts!
So why don't you have a vote out there? I see the silents and the people that will only vote for one or two targets that nobody else is voting for as part of the problem, not the solution.Isgrimnur wrote:Hell, we need a consensus of 9 people, and we haven't got anyone to even half that.