Re: Ukraine
Posted: Mon Feb 28, 2022 1:19 pm
That is not dead which can eternal lie, and with strange aeons bring us some web forums whereupon we can gather
http://garbi.online/forum/
Yeah - that is the IT guy in me. UA is short-hand for Ukraine - it's from their web domain. I expect we'll see it become ubiquitous over the coming days and weeks.
I also have to wonder what will be reaction from a guy who has spent his entire political career developing the image of an alpha male to end all alpha males facing a spanking on the international stage. Would it be enough to drive him over the edge?LawBeefaroni wrote: ↑Mon Feb 28, 2022 1:15 pmHe may have vastly overestimated the damage his puppet had done.hepcat wrote: ↑Mon Feb 28, 2022 12:54 pmI just can't wrap my mind around Putin doing something that appears to be backfiring on him on such a monumental level. There has to be a different endgame here for him. That or I've vastly overestimated his intelligence.Grifman wrote: ↑Mon Feb 28, 2022 12:47 pm Now for the first time a majority of Finns support joining NATO:
https://yle.fi/news/3-12337202
In a sense it doesn’t matter. Both Sweden and Finland were recently invited to the NATO summit on the Ukraine invasion and both have been closely cooperating with NATO, even holding joint exercises in recent years. But still . . .
NATO (and non-NATO) nations came together relatively quickly despite our previous administration's attempts to break them up.
That is my worry too. I just hope there are enough checks in place in the Kremlin that if he goes "Fuck it, if I can't win then no one can" that someone will stop him. That was one of our fears with Trump but we had more faith in the Pentagon stopping a nutcase than I do with the Kremlin given how Putin has removed those that opposed himhepcat wrote: ↑Mon Feb 28, 2022 1:27 pmI also have to wonder what will be reaction from a guy who has spent his entire political career developing the image of an alpha male to end all alpha males facing a spanking on the international stage. Would it be enough to drive him over the edge?LawBeefaroni wrote: ↑Mon Feb 28, 2022 1:15 pmHe may have vastly overestimated the damage his puppet had done.hepcat wrote: ↑Mon Feb 28, 2022 12:54 pmI just can't wrap my mind around Putin doing something that appears to be backfiring on him on such a monumental level. There has to be a different endgame here for him. That or I've vastly overestimated his intelligence.Grifman wrote: ↑Mon Feb 28, 2022 12:47 pm Now for the first time a majority of Finns support joining NATO:
https://yle.fi/news/3-12337202
In a sense it doesn’t matter. Both Sweden and Finland were recently invited to the NATO summit on the Ukraine invasion and both have been closely cooperating with NATO, even holding joint exercises in recent years. But still . . .
NATO (and non-NATO) nations came together relatively quickly despite our previous administration's attempts to break them up.
If you're in an ever-shrinking echo chamber, you're making decisions based on what your yes men want you to hear, not on reality. That's my theory as to what is happening. It may not be that Putin is bad at chess. It may be that he thinks he's playing a different game entirely.hepcat wrote:I just can't wrap my mind around Putin doing something that appears to be backfiring on him on such a monumental level. There has to be a different endgame here for him. That or I've vastly overestimated his intelligence.
It's been ubiquitous enough lately for it to sink in. All over rally signs and hashtags.
Speaking of Trump, I have to agree that were he still president, America wouldn't be involved in this. Which is a pretty damning thing and NOT praise. He would've nixed the majority of the sanctions. And he would've seen everyone else doing so as a sign that he should double down on his resistance because...globalists?
He would have telegraphed non-involvement and UA would have had to go to the bargaining table to give up territory before the Superbowl.hepcat wrote: ↑Mon Feb 28, 2022 1:42 pmSpeaking of Trump, I have to agree that were he still president, America wouldn't be involved in this. Which is a pretty damning thing and NOT praise. He would've nixed the majority of the sanctions. And he would've seen everyone else doing so as a sign that he should double down on his resistance because...globalists?
Socialist Europe getting involved in globalist empire building against the very smart Putin. They're sure to lose. Zelensky is so weak, he wouldn't even come clean about Hunter Biden and they just want our weapons without paying for them. Weak and not very smart. The US needs a better deal. This is a very bad deal. Vladimir Putin just wants to rebuild the USSR and the people love him for it. Very smart man.hepcat wrote: ↑Mon Feb 28, 2022 1:42 pm Speaking of Trump, I have to agree that were he still president, America wouldn't be involved in this. Which is a pretty damning thing and NOT praise. He would've nixed the majority of the sanctions. And he would've seen everyone else doing so as a sign that he should double down on his resistance because...globalists?
Kasparov says this is decades in the making. We've appeased Putin every single time... why should this be any different? The west let him have the Crimea. They let him use chemical weapons in Syria.hepcat wrote: ↑Mon Feb 28, 2022 1:42 pmSpeaking of Trump, I have to agree that were he still president, America wouldn't be involved in this. Which is a pretty damning thing and NOT praise. He would've nixed the majority of the sanctions. And he would've seen everyone else doing so as a sign that he should double down on his resistance because...globalists?
This is where I'm at. Putin hasn't just been embarrassed--it's looking like this will be an historic ass-whooping for Russia' s economy. Further, even if (when?) Russia eventually has military success in Ukraine, Putin's (real | perceived) image as a strategic thinker / masculine macho man-meat man is gone. That Ukraine is doing as well as it is would be embarrassment enough--the destruction of Russia's economy and position on the world stage for decades to come rests on top of that.Kurth wrote: ↑Mon Feb 28, 2022 1:34 pmPart of me is so happy to see Putin embarrassed, but there’s a voice in the back of my head also saying I should be careful what I wish for. I’m definitely in the “concerned” camp when it comes to thinking about what Putin’s next move will be, especially as we essentially nuke the Russian economy.
Amen.I completely agree it would be absurd to think Putin would use nukes of any type. But I also feel like we’re in the land of the absurd right now.
Also agreed, which cements Kurth's points above, IMO.noxiousdog wrote: ↑Mon Feb 28, 2022 2:05 pmKasparov says this is decades in the making. We've appeased Putin every single time... why should this be any different? The west let him have the Crimea. They let him use chemical weapons in Syria.
And let's not kid ourselves. Had Germany decided natural gas was slightly more important, things probably wouldn't look so unified. What if more Republicans tried to pin this on Hunter Biden?
Things look bad for Putin, but it wouldn't have taken much to put it huge disarray.
Ah, got it.noxiousdog wrote: ↑Mon Feb 28, 2022 2:28 pm @hepcat - I think I quoted the wrong post. I agree with you.
One huge concern here is that Putin has zero ways to really back down. He's trapped in being committed to the Invasion now. There really is no face-saving way to significantly de-escalate, and that is going to be very dicey.Zaxxon wrote: ↑Mon Feb 28, 2022 2:23 pmThis is where I'm at. Putin hasn't just been embarrassed--it's looking like this will be an historic ass-whooping for Russia' s economy. Further, even if (when?) Russia eventually has military success in Ukraine, Putin's (real | perceived) image as a strategic thinker / masculine macho man-meat man is gone. That Ukraine is doing as well as it is would be embarrassment enough--the destruction of Russia's economy and position on the world stage for decades to come rests on top of that.Kurth wrote: ↑Mon Feb 28, 2022 1:34 pmPart of me is so happy to see Putin embarrassed, but there’s a voice in the back of my head also saying I should be careful what I wish for. I’m definitely in the “concerned” camp when it comes to thinking about what Putin’s next move will be, especially as we essentially nuke the Russian economy.
Amen.I completely agree it would be absurd to think Putin would use nukes of any type. But I also feel like we’re in the land of the absurd right now.
Also agreed, which cements Kurth's points above, IMO.noxiousdog wrote: ↑Mon Feb 28, 2022 2:05 pmKasparov says this is decades in the making. We've appeased Putin every single time... why should this be any different? The west let him have the Crimea. They let him use chemical weapons in Syria.
And let's not kid ourselves. Had Germany decided natural gas was slightly more important, things probably wouldn't look so unified. What if more Republicans tried to pin this on Hunter Biden?
Things look bad for Putin, but it wouldn't have taken much to put it huge disarray.
He certainly has options - one of them being complete and total withdrawal. Saying that he has zero ways is not the case at all.Pyperkub wrote: ↑Mon Feb 28, 2022 3:32 pm One huge concern here is that Putin has zero ways to really back down. He's trapped in being committed to the Invasion now. There really is no face-saving way to significantly de-escalate, and that is going to be very dicey.
IMHO, the only way out for Russia is regime change, and that may actually be worse than where we are now.
They'd have been banned from the Olympics too had they pulled this shit a few weeks ago.
Complete and total withdrawal could easily imperil his regime. There are no shortage of dictators brought down by failed wars. So he'll definitely want something that he can tout as a win, even if it's a transparent fiction.Roman wrote: ↑Mon Feb 28, 2022 3:42 pmHe certainly has options - one of them being complete and total withdrawal. Saying that he has zero ways is not the case at all.Pyperkub wrote: ↑Mon Feb 28, 2022 3:32 pm One huge concern here is that Putin has zero ways to really back down. He's trapped in being committed to the Invasion now. There really is no face-saving way to significantly de-escalate, and that is going to be very dicey.
IMHO, the only way out for Russia is regime change, and that may actually be worse than where we are now.
Now will he take the options? That is another story all together.
Wait. are you talking about regime change in Russia?YellowKing wrote: ↑Mon Feb 28, 2022 3:39 pm I've been thinking along the same lines, Pyperkub. I see zero outcomes where this doesn't end in either regime change or some drastic escalation of the war.
I mean, even if Putin just said, "Whoops, my bad" and pulled all his troops and tried to reset everything back to the way it was, it's not like NATO's going to call no harm, no foul, reinstate all of Russia's finances, and pretend none of this ever happened.
It's important to note the FIFA only did this after massive, crippling financial sanctions.
I really think the only way this ends well is if someone takes out Putin. There is simply no scenario where he admits, "my bad...we're withdrawing."