Re: Corona Virus/Superbug Thread: It's the End of the World as We Know It...
Posted: Mon Mar 23, 2020 5:15 pm
DOW
18,591.93 −582.05 (3.04%)
18,591.93 −582.05 (3.04%)
That is not dead which can eternal lie, and with strange aeons bring us some web forums whereupon we can gather
http://garbi.online/forum/
Trump has tweeted or retweeted at least three times about this, obviously hoping that the announcement of a treatment would buoy up the markets.Smoove_B wrote: Mon Mar 23, 2020 5:06 pm It totally unrelated "the President needs to not be on live TV blathering about things he doesn't understand" news, a man died and his wife is now in critical care after ingesting chloroquine phosphate, an additive for fish tank cleaners.
Read more here.
You be correct!
While I agree with most of that, I think that this is absolutely NOT the time to include things like reducing airline carbon emissions and undoing executive orders.Defiant wrote: Mon Mar 23, 2020 7:12 pm Pelosi unveils $2.5 trillion counterproposal to GOP coronavirus stimulus
Well if the economy and DOW keep the way its been we'll be wiped in 4 weeks. The DOW has lost almost 8000 points in 2 weeks. It only has 18,500 left to it's name. So 4 weeks unless it all changes.malchior wrote: Mon Mar 23, 2020 6:56 pm Trump is likening this to auto accidents and the flu. We are deeply fucked. (We can't kill the economy) type talk. We are looking at a long period of protracted fuckery.
ImLawBoy wrote: Mon Mar 23, 2020 4:27 pmDid you just unblock Kraken or something?Skinypupy wrote: Mon Mar 23, 2020 3:52 pmAnd there's another new term I've learned. Never heard "packy" before.Kraken wrote: Mon Mar 23, 2020 3:45 pmThe manager of my packy is NOT thrilled about being "essential".El Guapo wrote: Mon Mar 23, 2020 3:31 pm Massachusetts is getting a statewide shelter in place order tomorrow, though as far as I can tell it's not going to change anything about what we've been doing thus far.
I learned and adopted the word soon after moving here 34 years ago. Now calling it a "liquor store" sounds like an affectation. Although we have taken to calling Total Wine the "booze barn," courtesy of JeffV.El Guapo wrote: Mon Mar 23, 2020 4:58 pm FWIW I didn't hear 'packy' until I was in my late 20s despite living in Boston for most of that - I attribute that to a glitch in the matrix for sure.
"Blinded By the Light" is a good primer on racism against Pakis in the UK (and a fun feel-good romcom, if you like that sort of thing).
“It looks likes a war zone,” said Saggar, Holy Name’s chief of infectious disease.
The hospital is in such dire need, it took the unprecedented step of pleading to the public for donations to buy critical supplies.
Holy Name is filling with COVID-19 patients. Supplies are running low. Doctors and nurses — already at risk of exposure — could be put in further danger if they run out of protective equipment, while some already have gotten sick, medical workers said.
The Bergen County hospital — located at the epicenter of New Jersey’s coronavirus outbreak — is on the brink, nearing its capacity and supply stock. And it’s not alone in this deepening crisis as hospitals throughout the state face diminishing supplies and equipment.
Holy Name is running out of ventilators. The facility is down to only a four-day supply of respirators. Its stock of protective gloves and eye shields are dwindling. And disposable gowns are already gone.
"Everything is running low,” Saggar said, speaking rapidly as a clamor of background noise carried over the phone line — the cacophony of doctors and nurses rushing around him, tending to patients.
The shortage of supplies puts health care workers at risk. The protective equipment is the only line of defense for them. Each infection means one less medical professional is available to care for the soaring number of COVID-19 patients, threatening the state’s already overburdened health care system.
New Jersey recorded 935 new cases of COVID-19 Monday, giving it 2,844 confirmed infections. There were also seven more deaths, raising the total to 27.
The escalating number of cases only taxes medical facilities, their supplies and their staff.
Holy Name has only three ventilators remaining with 85 patients in the hospital, Dr. Stavros Christoudias told NJ Advance Media on Monday.
Christoudias, who chairs the New Jersey Doctor-Patient Alliance, said Holy Name is “in the worst shape” of the hospitals he’s seen, but The Valley Hospital in Ridgewood “is very close behind them.”
The biggest fear among many might be over the shortage of respirators, the life-saving breathing machines that have become vital with the coronavirus attacking patients’ lungs.
Those are those Polish donuts, right?Smoove_B wrote: Mon Mar 23, 2020 4:54 pm Either the Matrix is glitching or I feel like we have the "packy" discussion every few weeks.
I must be in the wrong threads then, as this is the first time I've ever seen it.Smoove_B wrote: Mon Mar 23, 2020 4:54 pm Either the Matrix is glitching or I feel like we have the "packy" discussion every few weeks.
Same.Skinypupy wrote:I must be in the wrong threads then, as this is the first time I've ever seen it.Smoove_B wrote: Mon Mar 23, 2020 4:54 pm Either the Matrix is glitching or I feel like we have the "packy" discussion every few weeks.
I shared this on FB, hope you don't mind.Smoove_B wrote: Mon Mar 23, 2020 10:35 pm I'm going to try and get ahead of what you're all likely going to get hammered with tomorrow - the CDC's report (released earlier today) about the cruise ships and COVID-19 has some already suggesting "OMG! The CDC is saying the virus lives for 17 days on surfaces!" because of information buried inside the discussion part of the paper.
Of course the does not say that. Instead, it indicates they detected viral RNA on surfaces 17 days later, prior to sanitizing. Viral RNA isn't a living, infectious agent. It's evidence a virus was there.
In short, don't panic!
The airlines emissions makes some sense if you are giving airlines and aircraft manufacturers billions in the same bill.Skinypupy wrote: Mon Mar 23, 2020 7:50 pmWhile I agree with most of that, I think that this is absolutely NOT the time to include things like reducing airline carbon emissions and undoing executive orders.Defiant wrote: Mon Mar 23, 2020 7:12 pm Pelosi unveils $2.5 trillion counterproposal to GOP coronavirus stimulus
Those are certainly important things that should be addressed, but not when we’re facing this larger crisis. Including them weakens their position significantly. Let’s stick to the matter at hand, please.
If we were in a normal universe where the two sides would work together to find an acceptable middle position, then it wouldn’t be an issue. But we’re not, so it is.
Ayup.LawBeefaroni wrote:The airlines emissions makes some sense if you are giving airlines and aircraft manufacturers billions in the same bill.Skinypupy wrote: Mon Mar 23, 2020 7:50 pmWhile I agree with most of that, I think that this is absolutely NOT the time to include things like reducing airline carbon emissions and undoing executive orders.Defiant wrote: Mon Mar 23, 2020 7:12 pm Pelosi unveils $2.5 trillion counterproposal to GOP coronavirus stimulus
Those are certainly important things that should be addressed, but not when we’re facing this larger crisis. Including them weakens their position significantly. Let’s stick to the matter at hand, please.
If we were in a normal universe where the two sides would work together to find an acceptable middle position, then it wouldn’t be an issue. But we’re not, so it is.
Not when it drags down the entire desperately needed bill (because we're living in bizarro land and the GOP are irredeemable arseholes).LawBeefaroni wrote: Mon Mar 23, 2020 11:41 pmThe airlines emissions makes some sense if you are giving airlines and aircraft manufacturers billions in the same bill.Skinypupy wrote: Mon Mar 23, 2020 7:50 pmWhile I agree with most of that, I think that this is absolutely NOT the time to include things like reducing airline carbon emissions and undoing executive orders.Defiant wrote: Mon Mar 23, 2020 7:12 pm Pelosi unveils $2.5 trillion counterproposal to GOP coronavirus stimulus
Those are certainly important things that should be addressed, but not when we’re facing this larger crisis. Including them weakens their position significantly. Let’s stick to the matter at hand, please.
If we were in a normal universe where the two sides would work together to find an acceptable middle position, then it wouldn’t be an issue. But we’re not, so it is.
If you can't put reasonable conditions on the money you are distributing why bother at all? Just have some Senate aides draft a bill the Senate will pass and be done with it.Skinypupy wrote: Mon Mar 23, 2020 11:51 pmNot when it drags down the entire desperately needed bill (because we're living in bizarro land and the GOP are irredeemable arseholes).LawBeefaroni wrote: Mon Mar 23, 2020 11:41 pmThe airlines emissions makes some sense if you are giving airlines and aircraft manufacturers billions in the same bill.Skinypupy wrote: Mon Mar 23, 2020 7:50 pmWhile I agree with most of that, I think that this is absolutely NOT the time to include things like reducing airline carbon emissions and undoing executive orders.Defiant wrote: Mon Mar 23, 2020 7:12 pm Pelosi unveils $2.5 trillion counterproposal to GOP coronavirus stimulus
Those are certainly important things that should be addressed, but not when we’re facing this larger crisis. Including them weakens their position significantly. Let’s stick to the matter at hand, please.
If we were in a normal universe where the two sides would work together to find an acceptable middle position, then it wouldn’t be an issue. But we’re not, so it is.
Plus it's not like if you write the most narrow, reasonable bill that McConnell is going to be like "oh ok, that makes sense". I just read in 2009 how he labeled census funding as part of the stimulus bill as a "Failed Census Bailout".LawBeefaroni wrote: Tue Mar 24, 2020 12:00 amIf you can't put reasonable conditions on the money you are distributing why bother at all? Just have some Senate aides draft a bill the Senate will pass and be done with it.Skinypupy wrote: Mon Mar 23, 2020 11:51 pmNot when it drags down the entire desperately needed bill (because we're living in bizarro land and the GOP are irredeemable arseholes).LawBeefaroni wrote: Mon Mar 23, 2020 11:41 pmThe airlines emissions makes some sense if you are giving airlines and aircraft manufacturers billions in the same bill.Skinypupy wrote: Mon Mar 23, 2020 7:50 pmWhile I agree with most of that, I think that this is absolutely NOT the time to include things like reducing airline carbon emissions and undoing executive orders.Defiant wrote: Mon Mar 23, 2020 7:12 pm Pelosi unveils $2.5 trillion counterproposal to GOP coronavirus stimulus
Those are certainly important things that should be addressed, but not when we’re facing this larger crisis. Including them weakens their position significantly. Let’s stick to the matter at hand, please.
If we were in a normal universe where the two sides would work together to find an acceptable middle position, then it wouldn’t be an issue. But we’re not, so it is.
Oil is cheap as hell. You're giving airlines a shit ton of money. It is perfectly reasonable to say, "now don't go spending all this on oil futures and inefficient planes.".
Index futures are up 4% or so on Trump's new timeline. You'd think the markets would be more evidence driven at least. But they're giving him what he wants. He needs another 25% or so though, who knows what he'll do next.Formix wrote: Tue Mar 24, 2020 5:13 am The Mangerine really really wants the country open. What happens when the president recommends stopping shutdowns, and governors keep them going? I'm looking forward to some epidemiologist writing an article (hopefully soon) about what the US looks like a year from now under those circumstances.
edited to fix tweet embedding.GungHo wrote: Tue Mar 24, 2020 1:58 am Oh and yes I'm totally on board with paying for Lootenant (governor) Dan (Patrick) to eat at the food truck park in Austin, every night of the week. Lunch too! Be out amongst the ppl Lootenant Dan and show them your leadership. (R) only however
Trump is going to be a grumpy boy when he reads credit for a positive bump is going to an impending Congressional deal.LawBeefaroni wrote: Tue Mar 24, 2020 6:05 amIndex futures are up 4% or so on Trump's new timeline. You'd think the markets would be more evidence driven at least. But they're giving him what he wants. He needs another 25% or so though, who knows what he'll do next.Formix wrote: Tue Mar 24, 2020 5:13 am The Mangerine really really wants the country open. What happens when the president recommends stopping shutdowns, and governors keep them going? I'm looking forward to some epidemiologist writing an article (hopefully soon) about what the US looks like a year from now under those circumstances.