Abortion news and discussion

For discussion of religion and politics

Moderators: LawBeefaroni, $iljanus

Post Reply
User avatar
YellowKing
Posts: 31081
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 2:02 pm

Re: Abortion news and discussion

Post by YellowKing »

I'm pretty sure my mom is voting for Trump this year solely because she 100% believes the lie that Harris supports aborting nine-month old babies. Despite the fact that her vote is actually supporting laws that would have killed her daughter-in-law and led to her grandkids never existing. It's damn criminal the amount of psychological manipulation out there.

I know politicians have always spun their perspective, used half truths and lies of omission. But the level of outright blatant deceit going on in modern politics is incomprehensible.
User avatar
Daehawk
Posts: 65558
Joined: Sat Jan 01, 2005 1:11 am

Re: Abortion news and discussion

Post by Daehawk »

No offense meant YK but if your mom has that bad a brain there aint much you could do to change it.
--------------------------------------------
I am Dyslexic of Borg, prepare to have your ass laminated.
I guess Ray Butts has ate his last pancake.
http://steamcommunity.com/id/daehawk
"Has high IQ. Refuses to apply it"
Im a bilingual. A bilingual illiterate. I can't read in two languages.
User avatar
YellowKing
Posts: 31081
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 2:02 pm

Re: Abortion news and discussion

Post by YellowKing »

Yeah, and I'm not trying to. There's nothing I can say that's going to override her faith. She's super religious so that plays into it a great deal. She's always put the church's beliefs over her own. When NC voted on gay marriage, she voted against it. Not because she believed it (she has many gay friends and had no problem with gay marriage), but because the pastor told her to vote against it. I'm sure the church is probably standing up there strongly implying which way the congregation needs to vote.
User avatar
hepcat
Posts: 53884
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 3:02 pm
Location: Chicago, IL Home of the triple homicide!

Re: Abortion news and discussion

Post by hepcat »

hepcat wrote: Sun Oct 06, 2024 9:35 pm Little Napoleon DeSantis is now threatening tv stations airing ads supporting abortion rights.
And a federal judge just issued a temp restraining order against this crap and noted "To keep it simple for the State of Florida: it’s the First Amendment, stupid.” :lol:
Lord of His Pants
User avatar
Isgrimnur
Posts: 84713
Joined: Sun Oct 15, 2006 12:29 am
Location: Chookity pok
Contact:

Re: Abortion news and discussion

Post by Isgrimnur »

County judge strikes down Ohio abortion ban, citing voter-approved reproductive rights amendment
The most far-reaching of Ohio’s laws restricting abortion was struck down on Thursday by a county judge who said last year’s voter-approved amendment enshrining reproductive rights renders the so-called heartbeat law unconstitutional.

Enforcement of the 2019 law banning most abortions once cardiac activity is detected — as early as six weeks into pregnancy, before many women know they’re pregnant — had been paused pending the challenge before Hamilton County Common Pleas Judge Christian Jenkins.
...
“Despite the adoption of a broad and strongly worded constitutional amendment, in this case and others, the State of Ohio seeks not to uphold the constituional protection of abortion rights, but to diminish and limit it,” he wrote. Jenkins said his ruling upholds voters’ wishes.
...
Issue 1, the amendment Ohio voters passed last year, gives every person in Ohio “the right to make and carry out one’s own reproductive decisions.”

[Republican Attorney General Dave] Yost acknowledged in court filings this spring that the amendment rendered the Ohio ban unconstitutional, but sought to maintain other elements of the 2019 law, including certain notification and reporting provisions.

Jenkins said retaining those elements would have meant subjecting doctors who perform abortions to felony criminal charges, fines, license suspensions or revocations, and civil claims of wrongful death — and requiring patients to make two in-person visits to their provider, wait 24 hours for the procedure and have their abortion recorded and reported.
It's almost as if people are the problem.
User avatar
hepcat
Posts: 53884
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 3:02 pm
Location: Chicago, IL Home of the triple homicide!

Re: Abortion news and discussion

Post by hepcat »

Okay, this one REALLY pisses me off.

A Trump supporting group is putting out ads claiming that Ruth Bader Ginsburg would have agreed with Trump on reproductive rights, and that Trump does not support abortion bans.
Why did Ruth Bader Ginsburg agree with Donald Trump’s position on abortion?

Because RBG believed that the federal government shouldn’t dictate our abortion laws.

Donald Trump also does not support a federal ban on abortion.
On this issue, great minds think alike
.
Oh fuck you, you worthless lying sacks of shit. Burn in hell. :x
Lord of His Pants
User avatar
Victoria Raverna
Posts: 5621
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 2:23 am
Location: Jakarta

Re: Abortion news and discussion

Post by Victoria Raverna »

A Pregnant Teenager Died After Trying to Get Care in Three Visits to Texas Emergency Rooms.
It took three ER visits and 20 hours before a hospital admitted Nevaeh Crain, 18, as her condition worsened. Doctors insisted on two ultrasounds to confirm “fetal demise.” She’s one of at least two Texas women who died under the state’s abortion ban.

Candace Fails screamed for someone in the Texas hospital to help her pregnant daughter. “Do something,” she pleaded, on the morning of Oct. 29, 2023.

Nevaeh Crain was crying in pain, too weak to walk, blood staining her thighs. Feverish and vomiting the day of her baby shower, the 18-year-old had gone to two different emergency rooms within 12 hours, returning home each time worse than before.

The first hospital diagnosed her with strep throat without investigating her sharp abdominal cramps. At the second, she screened positive for sepsis, a life-threatening and fast-moving reaction to an infection, medical records show. But doctors said her six-month fetus had a heartbeat and that Crain was fine to leave.

Now on Crain’s third hospital visit, an obstetrician insisted on two ultrasounds to “confirm fetal demise,” a nurse wrote, before moving her to intensive care.

By then, more than two hours after her arrival, Crain’s blood pressure had plummeted and a nurse had noted that her lips were “blue and dusky.” Her organs began failing.

Hours later, she was dead.
User avatar
Punisher
Posts: 4651
Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2005 12:05 pm

Re: Abortion news and discussion

Post by Punisher »

Is there a realistic possibility of her family suing the hospital and/state for this or because the docs were following a law, regardless of the outcome they are all safe from it?
All yourLightning Bolts are Belong to Us
User avatar
Alefroth
Posts: 9169
Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2004 1:56 pm
Location: Bellingham WA

Re: Abortion news and discussion

Post by Alefroth »

Sure seems like a wrongful death and/or malpractice suit would be valid. Maybe hold them accountable for the death of the fetus, too.
User avatar
LawBeefaroni
Forum Moderator
Posts: 55909
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 3:08 pm
Location: Urbs in Horto, outrageous taxes on everything

Re: Abortion news and discussion

Post by LawBeefaroni »

Punisher wrote: Sat Nov 02, 2024 3:29 pm Is there a realistic possibility of her family suing the hospital and/state for this or because the docs were following a law, regardless of the outcome they are all safe from it?
A diagnosis of sepsis and they sent her home? What state law demands that?

The Texas law may have contributed but the hospitals in this case don't see to have their hands tied. I'd expect 2 of the 3, and possibly all 3, have severe liability here.
" Hey OP, listen to my advice alright." -Tha General
"No scientific discovery is named after its original discoverer." -Stigler's Law of Eponymy, discovered by Robert K. Merton

MYT
Post Reply