Re: Election integrity and the transfer of power
Posted: Tue Nov 24, 2020 1:26 pm
Well if nothing else has come out of this post-election mess, at least a lot more people know what the word "ascertainment" means.
That is not dead which can eternal lie, and with strange aeons bring us some web forums whereupon we can gather
http://garbi.online/forum/
I thought you were saying that the EO was not a real thing. I have to read EOs (and fake EO letters to the SecTres) as an aspect of my work so I have made it a practice to read the EOs regularly for some years now.malchior wrote: Tue Nov 24, 2020 12:50 pmSo to get this straight, you were just reading the Federal Register and independently came up with the same conspiracy theory circulating on the right?Yojimbo wrote: Tue Nov 24, 2020 12:27 pmI'm not familiar with the Trumpet, I was just reading the EO, I assure you that its in the federal register and everything.malchior wrote: Tue Nov 24, 2020 12:23 pm None of the above is real. I'm presuming the source for this dose of crazy is similar to this but spun leftward. You are consuming thought poison.
https://www.federalregister.gov/documen ... s-election
I had thought it meant "twerking," but it turns out that's "assertainment."El Guapo wrote: Tue Nov 24, 2020 1:26 pm Well if nothing else has come out of this post-election mess, at least a lot more people know what the word "ascertainment" means.
I like it. As far as predictions go you nailed the fuzziness aspect. Dec 18th can expire and your prediction will still hold up because of fuzzy math. What about Jan 20? Can we agree that if Jan 20 comes and goes without a bombshell that this theory can expire with it?Yojimbo wrote: Tue Nov 24, 2020 12:16 pm If the various countdowns in EO13848 are any indication maybe the radio silence will have to break on Dec 18th (not sure about my math here).
I thought you were saying just doing your job is a low bar for integrity.Zaxxon wrote: Tue Nov 24, 2020 8:38 amYep, I realized that after posting. Whups! Agree.LordMortis wrote: Tue Nov 24, 2020 7:44 amI mean the 1 republican certifier who didn't put the desire of the GOP above the electoral process.Zaxxon wrote: Mon Nov 23, 2020 6:25 pmI'm not sure integrity means what you think it means.LordMortis wrote: Mon Nov 23, 2020 6:21 pmI just heard this 3-0 out of four. Thank you, to the one with integrity.Octavious wrote: Mon Nov 23, 2020 5:46 pm I was wrong. SUCK IT TRUMP! Michigan certifies that shit. It's so sad that we had to watch that like a f'n sports event.![]()
I'm not buying you all a coffee if that is what you are angling for (unless one of you catches me at Gibson's, then yes). But I will endure (another) public shaming for being incorrect. Kind of like how so many of you were SURE that Kavanaugh (sp?) was going to repeal Roe v Wade (despite stare decisis) within weeks if we didn't immolate him right away.raydude wrote: Tue Nov 24, 2020 2:56 pmI like it. As far as predictions go you nailed the fuzziness aspect. Dec 18th can expire and your prediction will still hold up because of fuzzy math. What about Jan 20? Can we agree that if Jan 20 comes and goes without a bombshell that this theory can expire with it?Yojimbo wrote: Tue Nov 24, 2020 12:16 pm If the various countdowns in EO13848 are any indication maybe the radio silence will have to break on Dec 18th (not sure about my math here).
It probably won't happen until, you know, a case reaches the Supreme Court. A shrewd but cynical investment would be in Mexican/Canadian abortion clinics.Yojimbo wrote: Tue Nov 24, 2020 3:14 pmI'm not buying you all a coffee if that is what you are angling for (unless one of you catches me at Gibson's, then yes). But I will endure (another) public shaming for being incorrect. Kind of like how so many of you were SURE that Kavanaugh (sp?) was going to repeal Roe v Wade (despite stare decisis) within weeks if we didn't immolate him right away.raydude wrote: Tue Nov 24, 2020 2:56 pmI like it. As far as predictions go you nailed the fuzziness aspect. Dec 18th can expire and your prediction will still hold up because of fuzzy math. What about Jan 20? Can we agree that if Jan 20 comes and goes without a bombshell that this theory can expire with it?Yojimbo wrote: Tue Nov 24, 2020 12:16 pm If the various countdowns in EO13848 are any indication maybe the radio silence will have to break on Dec 18th (not sure about my math here).
Yeah the EO portion is the only thing about any of this that is real. All the rest of it is make believe.Yojimbo wrote: Tue Nov 24, 2020 2:24 pmI thought you were saying that the EO was not a real thing. I have to read EOs (and fake EO letters to the SecTres) as an aspect of my work so I have made it a practice to read the EOs regularly for some years now.malchior wrote: Tue Nov 24, 2020 12:50 pmSo to get this straight, you were just reading the Federal Register and independently came up with the same conspiracy theory circulating on the right?Yojimbo wrote: Tue Nov 24, 2020 12:27 pmI'm not familiar with the Trumpet, I was just reading the EO, I assure you that its in the federal register and everything.malchior wrote: Tue Nov 24, 2020 12:23 pm None of the above is real. I'm presuming the source for this dose of crazy is similar to this but spun leftward. You are consuming thought poison.
https://www.federalregister.gov/documen ... s-election
I don't think it is whether he fires anything. What I'm commenting on was the mentions of Lin Wood, the State Farm arena water leak, the Dominion and Smartmatic systems issues which are all key elements of a currently circulating conspiracy theory which got Sidney Powell disavowed for being too crazy for the *Trump camp*. However, I will also surmise that getting disavowed may confirm the whole thing to someone who consumes the type of mind poison that even fuels this crazy. That said, I welcome it because I suspect many people here aren't actually exposed to this on a regular basis and its good to see what is going on out there outside this bubble.I think that its a arrow in the administration's quiver and if POTUS thinks this election was tainted by massive fraud (and he keeps saying so in the most public way possible) I find it reasonable that he would take that arrow out and fire it, yes. I'm not needing you to believe me, I just want on the record here (for good or ill) as thinking this is what the POTUS (Pouts was funnier) is doing - nothing else makes sense to me about his recent actions.
The conservative legal pro-life movement is in sort of a weird place right now with Roe v. Wade. Obviously they're committed to opposing it. The tricky part is that they've 95% gutted it in practice without formally overturning it, because we're already at the point where states can regulate the number of abortion clinics down to one or zero through a variety of bad faith regulations. So they've basically already achieved their substantive policy aim, in practice.Jaymann wrote: Tue Nov 24, 2020 3:23 pmIt probably won't happen until, you know, a case reaches the Supreme Court. A shrewd but cynical investment would be in Mexican/Canadian abortion clinics.Yojimbo wrote: Tue Nov 24, 2020 3:14 pmI'm not buying you all a coffee if that is what you are angling for (unless one of you catches me at Gibson's, then yes). But I will endure (another) public shaming for being incorrect. Kind of like how so many of you were SURE that Kavanaugh (sp?) was going to repeal Roe v Wade (despite stare decisis) within weeks if we didn't immolate him right away.raydude wrote: Tue Nov 24, 2020 2:56 pmI like it. As far as predictions go you nailed the fuzziness aspect. Dec 18th can expire and your prediction will still hold up because of fuzzy math. What about Jan 20? Can we agree that if Jan 20 comes and goes without a bombshell that this theory can expire with it?Yojimbo wrote: Tue Nov 24, 2020 12:16 pm If the various countdowns in EO13848 are any indication maybe the radio silence will have to break on Dec 18th (not sure about my math here).
Any time Lin Wood is a key element of your plan, expect your plan to fail.malchior wrote: Tue Nov 24, 2020 3:43 pmI don't think it is whether he fires anything. What I'm commenting on was the mentions of Lin Wood, the State Farm arena water leak, the Dominion and Smartmatic systems issues which are all key elements of a currently circulating conspiracy theory which got Sidney Powell disavowed for being too crazy for the *Trump camp*. However, I will also surmise that getting disavowed may confirm the whole thing to someone who consumes the type of mind poison that even fuels this crazy. That said, I welcome it because I suspect many people here aren't actually exposed to this on a regular basis and its good to see what is going on out there outside this bubble.
Note: To anyone who cares, this is a part of how 74 Million people voted for Trump. Their minds are polluted with this QAnon adjacent nonsense. Not everyone though takes it to the right. It also skews into some of the deep populist left as well. I'm seeing more and more of this out there.
So either the GA board of elections in general or the GA SecofState in particular, along with poll workers in the State Farm arena, along with plumbers, coordinated to do a water leak to cover up ballot hijinks, in coordination with Dominion and Smartmatic, and the at least tens of people who would be involved in the software and hardware systems to change votes on the order of tens of thousands of ballotsYojimbo wrote: Tue Nov 24, 2020 4:10 pm I think its entirely possible that Trump and 2 heretofore successful attorneys are all completely crazy (or drumming up publicity).
But I am trying to play the "what is more likely" game in such a way that it does not end in simple crazy. (this may be my error)
I just see how they keep saying things about "foreign owned companies" and "massive election fraud". Those seem to match up with the definitions of Section One of the EO. Correlation is not causation, and it may be nothing and everyone may be infected with lunacy as you suggest.
The gnomes of Zurich spend 50 against this action.raydude wrote: Tue Nov 24, 2020 4:33 pm
So either the GA board of elections in general or the GA SecofState in particular, along with poll workers in the State Farm arena, along with plumbers, coordinated to do a water leak to cover up ballot hijinks, in coordination with Dominion and Smartmatic,
Oh man I've been dying to play that game again lately.LordMortis wrote: Tue Nov 24, 2020 4:38 pmThe gnomes of Zurich spend 50 against this action.raydude wrote: Tue Nov 24, 2020 4:33 pm
So either the GA board of elections in general or the GA SecofState in particular, along with poll workers in the State Farm arena, along with plumbers, coordinated to do a water leak to cover up ballot hijinks, in coordination with Dominion and Smartmatic,
See that's how Hugo Chavez fooled you. Create a vote stealing scenario that is so outrageously unlikely that no one will believe it.raydude wrote: Tue Nov 24, 2020 4:33 pmSo either the GA board of elections in general or the GA SecofState in particular, along with poll workers in the State Farm arena, along with plumbers, coordinated to do a water leak to cover up ballot hijinks, in coordination with Dominion and Smartmatic, and the at least tens of people who would be involved in the software and hardware systems to change votes on the order of tens of thousands of ballotsYojimbo wrote: Tue Nov 24, 2020 4:10 pm I think its entirely possible that Trump and 2 heretofore successful attorneys are all completely crazy (or drumming up publicity).
But I am trying to play the "what is more likely" game in such a way that it does not end in simple crazy. (this may be my error)
I just see how they keep saying things about "foreign owned companies" and "massive election fraud". Those seem to match up with the definitions of Section One of the EO. Correlation is not causation, and it may be nothing and everyone may be infected with lunacy as you suggest.
OR
Stacey Abrams and the Democrats organized voters to vote against Trump.
Occam's Razor tells me the simpler explanation is more likely.
Is that a new special card?
I'm not going to answer but put this out there:Yojimbo wrote: Tue Nov 24, 2020 4:37 pm The thing is, no plumbers were needed since there was no flood at all per the Facility Manager. But I take the rest of your point.
Then, why the subpoena for the camera footage, more crazy?
I'll just add this:raydude wrote: Tue Nov 24, 2020 7:18 pmDoes this mean that 75 million Americans are similarly lacking in how to use simple tools like Occam's Razor to figure out what's more likely to be true?
George Carlin wrote:Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
Where is the ABA? Seriously. Aren't they supposed to police unprofessional conduct? We have prominent lawyers spreading conspiracy theories and taking direct donations to follow them.Holman wrote: Thu Nov 26, 2020 11:54 am Unless something has changed, as of this morning the Georgia document wasn't even filed yet. It exists only as a prop on her website (where she suggests that donations to her legal defense fund may be sent as checks payable to Sidney Powell).
Yes, this is an excellent take down, been following it myself.Skinypupy wrote: Thu Nov 26, 2020 3:42 pm Another rather hilarious review of the filing starts here.
https://mobile.twitter.com/questauthori ... 5713824772
The ABA is not a licensing organization. I'm not even a member of the ABA. You need to look to the state licensing organizations where she is a member.malchior wrote: Thu Nov 26, 2020 3:29 pmWhere is the ABA? Seriously. Aren't they supposed to police unprofessional conduct? We have prominent lawyers spreading conspiracy theories and taking direct donations to follow them.Holman wrote: Thu Nov 26, 2020 11:54 am Unless something has changed, as of this morning the Georgia document wasn't even filed yet. It exists only as a prop on her website (where she suggests that donations to her legal defense fund may be sent as checks payable to Sidney Powell).