Re: tesla motors
Posted: Wed Mar 12, 2014 1:36 pm
cheeba wrote:But dealerships are organized and powerful and have political influence
That is not dead which can eternal lie, and with strange aeons bring us some web forums whereupon we can gather
http://garbi.online/forum/
cheeba wrote:But dealerships are organized and powerful and have political influence
What was that about your liquor stores?Vorret wrote:You guys* really lost the meaning of capitalism and free market, quite sad.
* The 3 states that are voting against it
Same here. This sucks for Tesla's retail stores in Jersey, and sucks for prospective customers, but it's not as big a deal as some articles make it out to be. You can still buy a Tesla in New Jersey--just not at a Tesla store. You would buy it online, pick it up either at a Tesla location in a neighboring state or via truck delivery, and then register it yourself with the state. I've seen articles saying you'd have to pay the higher NY sales tax, you can't buy at all, etc. All hogwash.LawBeefaroni wrote:I don't know about other states, but here Teslas [are] pretty well embraced. I also see a ton on the road now. Pretty sure the genie isn't going back into the bottle here at least.
Think of the children!McNutt wrote:But they protect us!
They protect us from buying a car without feeling like we were probed in our private areas?McNutt wrote:But they protect us!
Amen.Paul Graham wrote:Banning Tesla is an index of the corruptness of state governments as banning Uber is of city governments.
The end really baffles me, in NJ Tesla is considered a Monopoly since they're the only one selling Tesla.....Zaxxon wrote:Bloomberg had a 'debate' between a NJ dealer dude and a UMich law professor. It played out exactly as expected.
And yet comcast isn't even though they are the only ones selling comcast... sigh.Vorret wrote:The end really baffles me, in NJ Tesla is considered a Monopoly since they're the only one selling Tesla.....Zaxxon wrote:Bloomberg had a 'debate' between a NJ dealer dude and a UMich law professor. It played out exactly as expected.
It'll roll out as people on the wrong side of history, like a lot of things that have changed in the last century or two. Just because something is "how it always has been" doesn't make it right or worth protecting.Fretmute wrote:Amen.Paul Graham wrote:Banning Tesla is an index of the corruptness of state governments as banning Uber is of city governments.
If you have a Tesla store near you, go for a test drive. Unlike a dealer (natch), they are perfectly happy to take you out for a drive even if you won't be able or willing to afford this model. They're in it for the long game. This is a pretty accurate visualization of the experience.McNutt wrote:I was at a party last weekend and saw one of the guests getting into his Tesla. He showed me the car and he was obviously in love with it. I watched as he drove away, the only sound being the rubber contacting the road, along with my drool.
Early on this is key to getting up and running.Zaxxon wrote:Indeed Musk has said that he wants the service centers to operate at or close to break-even. I buy it, as it's in Tesla's interest as the new kid on the block to have either great reliability (unlikely with a new brand) or happy customers through great and not-too-pricey service. Time will tell...
True, but there's also nothing that says their profits have to come specifically from service.LawBeefaroni wrote:Eventually though, investors aren't going to settle for a 43x price to book, 61x forward PE, and all the other eye-popping metrics.
Of course, and business models change all the time. I'm just saying it's a potential revenue and margin source and people are paying a premium for TSLA expecting extreme revenue and margin growth.Zaxxon wrote:True, but there's also nothing that says their profits have to come specifically from service.LawBeefaroni wrote:Eventually though, investors aren't going to settle for a 43x price to book, 61x forward PE, and all the other eye-popping metrics.
Absolutely. The nice thing about Tesla is they have such a small market share right now that they can grow at a rather crazy rate for many years before really hitting up against any sort of wall (so long as their model costs come down at the rate they expect them to).LawBeefaroni wrote:Of course, and business models change all the time. I'm just saying it's a potential revenue and margin source and people are paying a premium for TSLA expecting extreme revenue and margin growth.Zaxxon wrote:True, but there's also nothing that says their profits have to come specifically from service.LawBeefaroni wrote:Eventually though, investors aren't going to settle for a 43x price to book, 61x forward PE, and all the other eye-popping metrics.
LordMortis wrote:I was just coming here to post that just for you.
Most of the controls are also accessible via the steering wheel + the two small configurable displays to either side of the speedometer.wonderpug wrote:I got to play around with a Model S at a Tesla store in a mall of all places. While it seemed super nifty overall, I found the gigantic center console touchscreen to be a big turnoff. Very futuristic and fancypants and all that, but physical controls are so much easier to use while distracted by, you know, driving. My current car's center console has both physical controls and a touchscreen for different commands, and I find I pretty much only utilize the touchscreen commands if I really really have to.
I didn't have any trouble while test driving, but I can't say that I stopped at noon with the sunroof open or anything. It's a lot easier to see than the screen in my Prius V, though.wonderpug wrote:Oh yeah? That's definitely a big help. Do you have any impression of how easy it is to see the center touchscreen if it's in direct sunlight?
Just saw that this morning. The guy talks a good game, and his ideas about innovation and competition are completely inline with my own. I hope it works out for him.
Its a great gesture, indeed and hopefully this spurs others to get into the market, because until someone can produce a solid performing and affordable electric vehicle they will only sell to the wealthy and remain a niche product. Its definitely a step in the right direction.GreenGoo wrote:Just saw that this morning. The guy talks a good game, and his ideas about innovation and competition are completely inline with my own. I hope it works out for him.
There's more to it than just that. It takes me 5 minutes to fill my tank with gas, making long trips practical. Hours to charge batteries makes long trips impractical. Car manufacturers have long co-lobbied with oil companies; this bond will need to be broken if the major automakers are expected to seriously pursue EV technology. Magic 8 Ball says cash still gushing from the oil industry will ensure a continued strong marriage with current automakers. Maybe this opens the door for more Tesla-type companies to come into being; but even among luxury cars, Tesla has a very tiny market share.rshetts2 wrote:Its a great gesture, indeed and hopefully this spurs others to get into the market, because until someone can produce a solid performing and affordable electric vehicle they will only sell to the wealthy and remain a niche product. Its definitely a step in the right direction.GreenGoo wrote:Just saw that this morning. The guy talks a good game, and his ideas about innovation and competition are completely inline with my own. I hope it works out for him.