Yes, last game we should have used fire, the noose is too damn unpredictable it seems.pr0ner wrote:I think we just need to nuke the town from orbit. It's the only way to be sure.

Moderator: Zaxxon
I'll say it again. It doesn't scream "wolf" or "innocent", it screams "Oh yeah? How do you like it!?" Personally, I think (especially on day 1) - the retaliatory nature of the vote is unreadable one way or the other.Remus West wrote:The retaliatory vote thing is because it screams "Wolf" and Austin is smarter than that.
This really starts to become one of those "Unless he knows I know he knows that I know he knows, then....." things. You guys all have these rules-of-thumb that apply when and where you want them to, but are meaningless when applied where you don't want them to.Remus West wrote:Austin's vote looked to be an attempt to keep his head out of the noose - very wolfish move but also very transparent wolfish move.
Errrr, like declaring his attempts to crack "Unagi the Wolf" are finished and we should now focus on Lassr?Remus West wrote:Maybe I'm giving him to much credit but I think he plays the bad guy much more subtley than that so I can not imagine that being his move if he were. A wolf Austin would have been more likely to try redirecting suspicion away from you and he so that the flow carried the conversation away from him as much as possible.
Indeed.Austin wrote:you'll find, "wolf like" doesn't mean much anymore.
The difference between them is simply that Austin has offered more than just the retaliatory votes. Triggercut has ONLY offered retaliatory votes.Unagi wrote:I'll say it again. It doesn't scream "wolf" or "innocent", it screams "Oh yeah? How do you like it!?" Personally, I think (especially on day 1) - the retaliatory nature of the vote is unreadable one way or the other.Remus West wrote:The retaliatory vote thing is because it screams "Wolf" and Austin is smarter than that.
This really starts to become one of those "Unless he knows I know he knows that I know he knows, then....." things. You guys all have these rules-of-thumb that apply when and where you want them to, but are meaningless when applied where you don't want them to.Remus West wrote:Austin's vote looked to be an attempt to keep his head out of the noose - very wolfish move but also very transparent wolfish move.
I understand you've drawn some distinction between triggercut and Austin's "retaliatory votes". I accept the differences, however I have trouble jumping to the conclusions you have come to.Errrr, like declaring his attempts to crack "Unagi the Wolf" are finished and we should now focus on Lassr?Remus West wrote:Maybe I'm giving him to much credit but I think he plays the bad guy much more subtley than that so I can not imagine that being his move if he were. A wolf Austin would have been more likely to try redirecting suspicion away from you and he so that the flow carried the conversation away from him as much as possible.
Indeed.Austin wrote:you'll find, "wolf like" doesn't mean much anymore.
You must be refering to the other game I played, where Grundbegriff was lynched as the Seer on the first day. You really seemed to imply that I led the charge on his lynching. You actually started that vote, and a while later withdrew it, then came back and revoted for him soon again. Only then did I join you and Remus to lynch our Seer, Grundbegriff.Austin wrote:Unagi is blinded. I now know how Grund must have felt. I now understand the power of condescension. I will now be known as Austinbegriff.
Ha ha.Unagi wrote:You must be refering to the other game I played, where Grundbegriff was lynched as the Seer on the first day. You really seemed to imply that I led the charge on his lynching. You actually started that vote, and a while later withdrew it, then came back and revoted for him soon again. Only then did I join you and Remus to lynch our Seer, Grundbegriff.Austin wrote:Unagi is blinded. I now know how Grund must have felt. I now understand the power of condescension. I will now be known as Austinbegriff.![]()
As I mentioned his vote on the Austin wagon felt wrong to me. If Austin is a wolf I would bet Lassr was playing the "look I helped lynch him" card. If Austin is not a wolf then it looks like he was trying to roll the wagons onward. His switch from no Austin hate to vote just felt forced. Honestly, that move is the biggest stalling block I have in Austin right now as well but since I think it points to Lassr's guilt regardless of Austin's I paced my vote there. Its the best I have to go on right now so I'm thinking I'll keep up with the thread but that my vote is set for this day. If something drastic happens to change it then I will tell right away instead of holding back large chunks of my thinking and waiting for response.pr0ner wrote:So, Remus, why Lassr?
Unagi wrote:You must be refering to the other game I played, where Grundbegriff was lynched as the Seer on the first day. You really seemed to imply that I led the charge on his lynching. You actually started that vote, and a while later withdrew it, then came back and revoted for him soon again. Only then did I join you and Remus to lynch our Seer, Grundbegriff.Austin wrote:Unagi is blinded. I now know how Grund must have felt. I now understand the power of condescension. I will now be known as Austinbegriff.![]()
Posted last Friday:Remus West wrote:As I mentioned his vote on the Austin wagon felt wrong to me. If Austin is a wolf I would bet Lassr was playing the "look I helped lynch him" card. If Austin is not a wolf then it looks like he was trying to roll the wagons onward. His switch from no Austin hate to vote just felt forced. Honestly, that move is the biggest stalling block I have in Austin right now as well but since I think it points to Lassr's guilt regardless of Austin's I paced my vote there. Its the best I have to go on right now so I'm thinking I'll keep up with the thread but that my vote is set for this day. If something drastic happens to change it then I will tell right away instead of holding back large chunks of my thinking and waiting for response.pr0ner wrote:So, Remus, why Lassr?
Specifically, Lassr's vote reminded me of mine on Newcastle last game.
I focused on Unagi first since he was new trying to get some kind of read on him, but all along I was keeping my eye on Austin.Lassr wrote:Need I say it:
1. Austin
2. Everyone else
/boggletru1cy wrote:I find it hard to believe that 3 wolves have started a railroad against Austin. I know I am innocent, so that would mean Unagi, Pr0ner and Lassr are wolves. The Wolves would rather get the game moving as the more time we discuss this the more of a chance one of them will make a mistake.
I'm really thinking that Austin is now a wolf. If he wasn;t the wolves would have jumped on this vote awhile ago to get the game moving
Silky.Austin wrote:Who are you voting for again?Zurai wrote:Longest... day 1... evar!!
Seriously, can we just string someone up?
Code: Select all
Austin acc Zurai(1)
pr0ner acc Austin(1)
Silky acc triggercut(1)
Remus West acc Silky(1)
Austin wd Zurai(0)
tru1cy acc Austin(2)
triggercut acc Silky(2)
Unagi acc Austin(3)
Zurai acc Silky(3)
Remus West wd Silky(2)
Remus West acc triggercut(2)
Lassr acc Unagi(1)
Austin acc Unagi(2)
triggercut wd Silky(1)
triggercut acc Remus West(1)
Remus West wd triggercut(1)-
Newcastle acc Remus West(2)
triggercut wd Remus West(1)-
triggercut acc Silky(2)-
Lassr wd Unagi(1)
Austin wd Unagi(0)
Austin acc Lassr(1)
Lassr acc Austin(4)-
Remus West acc Lassr(2)-
Fixed Lassr.Grundbegriff wrote:
Against triggercut(1): SilkyCode: Select all
Austin acc Zurai(1) pr0ner acc Austin(1) Silky acc triggercut(1) Remus West acc Silky(1) Austin wd Zurai(0) tru1cy acc Austin(2) triggercut acc Silky(2) Unagi acc Austin(3) Zurai acc Silky(3) Remus West wd Silky(2) Remus West acc triggercut(2) Lassr acc Unagi(1) Austin acc Unagi(2) triggercut wd Silky(1) triggercut acc Remus West(1) Remus West wd triggercut(1)- Newcastle acc Remus West(2) triggercut wd Remus West(1)- triggercut acc Silky(2)- Lassr wd Unagi(1) Austin wd Unagi(0) Austin acc Lassr(1) Lassr acc Austin(4)- Remus West acc Lassr(2)-
Against Remus West(1): Newcastle
Against Silky(2): Zurai, triggercut
Against Lassr(2): Austin, Remus West
Against Austin(4): pr0ner, tru1cy, Unagi, Lassr
No vote registered: Mr Bubbles
Votes required for lynchification: 6
You've given us 1 meaningful post, and that post was to complain that not enough people are posting meaningful posts.Zurai wrote:Silky.Austin wrote:Who are you voting for again?Zurai wrote:Longest... day 1... evar!!
Seriously, can we just string someone up?
Not that it matters, since there's no one that's even really close to being hung. If I have to I'll change my vote, but there's still no one striking me as especially wolf-like.
How am I totally ignoring it? By your own admission he isn't really close to being strung up. "Really close to being hung" is 5 votes, not 4. If I was voting for Austin at the moment, we STILL would be on day 1. Thus, at the moment, my vote has no signifigance other than the fact that I have registered a vote (unlike Mr. Bubbles, like usual).Unagi wrote: You've given us 1 meaningful post, and that post was to complain that not enough people are posting meaningful posts.![]()
Also, 4 votes is only 1 vote away from being 'Really close to being hung'... I'd say Austin is actually close to being hung, and it's interesting that you have chosen to totally ignore that.
Um, by claiming that 4/6 doesn't actually equate to 'close'.Zurai wrote:How am I totally ignoring it?
Actually, I was trying to point out he was pretty darn close... The longer he hangs at 3, and now 4, votes - the more likely we are looking at a vote that the wolves don't really want to be a part of.Zurai wrote:By your own admission he isn't really close to being strung up.
I've barely even mentioned your name until this very moment. Rabid attack dog?Zurai wrote:Seriously, you're going to make me just not comment at all if you keep acting like a rabid attack dog.
Or a vote that theyare already a part of. It is not likely that they all place vote together. Or it wasn't, now that I've said it is unlikely it is. Of course now it isn't. I think you can see where I'm going here.Unagi wrote:The longer he hangs at 3, and now 4, votes - the more likely we are looking at a vote that the wolves don't really want to be a part of.
Really close, TYVM. Again, if I had voted for Austin from the start, we'd still be in exactly the same place we are now: waiting for someone to get hung. Nothing would have changed. That means the vote isn't close enough to qualify as "Really close to being hung".Unagi wrote:Um, by claiming that 4/6 doesn't actually equate to 'close'.Zurai wrote:How am I totally ignoring it?
You're assuming that the wolves havn't already voted for him, and that for some reason the wolves would dogpile on him if they weren't already voting on him. I don't think I've seen an actual wolf dogpile on day 1 in several months.Actually, I was trying to point out he was pretty darn close... The longer he hangs at 3, and now 4, votes - the more likely we are looking at a vote that the wolves don't really want to be a part of.Zurai wrote:By your own admission he isn't really close to being strung up.
[/quote]I've barely even mentioned your name until this very moment. Rabid attack dog?Zurai wrote:Seriously, you're going to make me just not comment at all if you keep acting like a rabid attack dog.
I guarantee I'm NOT a wolf. No asterisk either.Austin wrote:I'm finding it best not to engage Unagi too much. He enjoys naked twister and the spinner is so loud he can't hear past his own thoughts.
Vote Lassr for noose, I guarantee* he's a wolf.
* No actual guarantee real or implied, but really he probably is one.
Only one way to find out.Lassr wrote:I guarantee I'm NOT a wolf. No asterisk either.Austin wrote:I'm finding it best not to engage Unagi too much. He enjoys naked twister and the spinner is so loud he can't hear past his own thoughts.
Vote Lassr for noose, I guarantee* he's a wolf.
* No actual guarantee real or implied, but really he probably is one.