Re: Trump vs. Biden - the Final Showdown
Posted: Sun Oct 18, 2020 11:44 pm
But, his laptop.
That is not dead which can eternal lie, and with strange aeons bring us some web forums whereupon we can gather
http://garbi.online/forum/
Never go near a frightened, hurt, and cornered animal if you can help it.malchior wrote: Sun Oct 18, 2020 11:26 pmHowever at first glance, the intensity feels off the charts right now.
This is what I worry about. Is this a collective tantrum or are they being riled up for other purposes?Paingod wrote: Mon Oct 19, 2020 8:30 amNever go near a frightened, hurt, and cornered animal if you can help it.malchior wrote: Sun Oct 18, 2020 11:26 pmHowever at first glance, the intensity feels off the charts right now.
Their golden boy is being slaughtered in the polls right now and the nation appears to be turning out in droves unseen before, despite the pandemic. The writing is on the wall, and it's in blood.
Instead of the rise of the Trump Reich, they're watching the sand castle getting toppled by the tide and are about to start throwing a tantrum of epic proportions.
I'm with tantrum. Anything else will actually mean effort. More than bluster and screaming at the TV.malchior wrote: Mon Oct 19, 2020 8:34 amThis is what I worry about. Is this a collective tantrum or are they being riled up for other purposes?
I hope so.Paingod wrote: Mon Oct 19, 2020 8:39 amI'm with tantrum. Anything else will actually mean effort. More than bluster and screaming at the TV.
Hunger and evictions are a real problem exacerbating the COVID-19 and potential electoral crises, if they arise.There may be another "militia" group that get slapped for idiotic plans, but there's not going to be some sort of mass uprising. These people aren't being starved out of their homes, chased down the street, or driven out of the country. The most they'll do is surge on Twitter and Facebook about how disgusting and unfair it all is.
We'll see. From what I'm seeing, the risk may be much higher than we think.Avoid those places, along with Faux News, and you should be okay.
The Director of National Intelligence has just come out claiming that there is no evidence linking the laptop to a Russian Disinformation Campaign.malchior wrote: Sun Oct 18, 2020 11:26 pm The right is losing its mind about this Hunter Biden stuff. There is a tweet going around tonight that I will not link that re-cast Hunter Biden as the force behind the Pizzagate 2.0. Almost exactly the same scheme. There are pictures of him where they claim he is smoking crack. They are saying Hunter is the secret head of the family and controls Joe. They say Hunter used the office of the VP to make money for the whole family. That the Chinese have copies of the videos of Hunter sexually abusing children and are blackmailing him. It is essentially the Steele Dossiers + Pizzagate + QAnon all wrapped up in a depraved sandwich of projection. It is pure delusion and I feel filthy for wading through it.
And these stories aren't being just perpetrated by fringe people anymore on Reddit or Facebook. They are being pushed by right-wing MSM media people. Worse the whole lot of them are furious that the 'liberal media' is ignoring the laptop story. One thing is clear. This doesn't seem aimed at changing the election. Instead it feels like they are being whipped up right now. Some might believe the story will blow wide but it really is deep QAnon closed circle conspiracy theory nonsense. That all said, what is very unclear is a sense of scale to see how concerned we should be about it. However at first glance, the intensity feels off the charts right now.
I saw that. Ratcliffe is a Trumpist stooge so I wouldn't be surprised by flat out lying about this. I have been trying to track down a reference he made about a statement by Schiff that he reacted to. As an aside Maria Bartiromo has completely thrown her reputation on a fire.Holman wrote: Mon Oct 19, 2020 9:08 amThe Director of National Intelligence has just come out claiming that there is no evidence linking the laptop to a Russian Disinformation Campaign.
There is a full-blown misinformation/influence war being conducted right now. You can see the edges of it if you know where to look on the Internet. For example, Microsoft announced they took down a Trickbot/Ryuk botnet meant to influence the election but it probably was ineffective.They're going all-in with this. It's going to be so ugly. Already is.
It won't be organized but you'll see more and more individual acts that go beyond tantrum. This is being cast as the ultimate good vs evil. In the name of saving trafficked children, nothing is off the table. People need meaning, this gives it to them, that's why it's so powerful.Paingod wrote: Mon Oct 19, 2020 8:39 amI'm with tantrum. Anything else will actually mean effort. More than bluster and screaming at the TV.malchior wrote: Mon Oct 19, 2020 8:34 amThis is what I worry about. Is this a collective tantrum or are they being riled up for other purposes?
There may be another "militia" group that get slapped for idiotic plans, but there's not going to be some sort of mass uprising. These people aren't being starved out of their homes, chased down the street, or driven out of the country. The most they'll do is surge on Twitter and Facebook about how disgusting and unfair it all is.
Avoid those places, along with Faux News, and you should be okay.
I think part of it is that it's hard to see patterns without wading into all the evidence. I'm soaking in this shit because of work. Almost everywhere I go now discussions where QAnon comes up - say in this Krebs post about the QAnon take downs - has a comment pile on by a few crazies spouting this pedophile shit. I don't even read them anymore because -- its always the same crazy shit -- but I'm mentally tallying them and they are legion. Read the comments here and go look at a Twitter thread, or Reddit, or your local newspaper, etc. It's everywhere. This isn't going away soon.LawBeefaroni wrote: Mon Oct 19, 2020 9:57 amIt won't be organized but you'll see more and more individual acts that go beyond tantrum. This is being cast as the ultimate good vs evil. In the name of saving trafficked children, nothing is off the table. People need meaning, this gives it to them, that's why it's so powerful.
Will not happen. The shit is out of the bag. No putting it back.
CNN fact-checker Daniel Dale says that in the larger context this was presented more as a hypothetical than a confession. He's always a pretty accurate observer.
Why does it being a hypothetical make it better? A question only possible in this shittiest of time lines.
It's "I could do this but I don't because I'm not corrupt like Joe Biden."
That's exactly how I read it.
Steve Bannon said yesterday that if trump loses, he'll run again in 2024. And if you can't believe Bannon....LawBeefaroni wrote: Mon Oct 19, 2020 4:52 pmWill not happen. The shit is out of the bag. No putting it back.
Don Jr looks like a coked up car salesman. No way he makes it through a primary.Holman wrote: Mon Oct 19, 2020 7:35 pm There's no way Trump runs in 2024, but there's an even chance that the Trump base elevates Don Jr for it.
We said the same thing about Sr.Scraper wrote:Don Jr looks like a coked up car salesman. No way he makes it through a primary.Holman wrote: Mon Oct 19, 2020 7:35 pm There's no way Trump runs in 2024, but there's an even chance that the Trump base elevates Don Jr for it.
Trump’s method -is- bluster.Blackhawk wrote: Tue Oct 20, 2020 9:44 am The real danger is that they run a Quiet Trump. Someone with Trump's methods and intentions, but without the bluster.
I agree. A low-key lurking Trumpista wouldn't send his followers into a frothing orgy of hate like they do now. They need the fire and fury to stoke their self-righteousness. Take that away and leave the meaning and you've lost the magic. That that away and scandals like sexual assault, sleeping with porn stars, mocking handicapped people, etc may actually harm him.
So much this. He really did drive the point home, though. While I was waiting for the GOP to implode, I still was never blind with partisanism until DJT and watching his will be expressed through the GOP or the GOP's will to be expressed through him. Either way, as much I hated my state legislature and McConnell's senate, I was willing to accept there were single GOP representatives that could be worth considering. 2015 saw the last dirt thrown on that pile, though. The games played with the election around the Supreme Court leading to November 2016 were the last straw.Holman wrote: Tue Oct 20, 2020 10:12 am The arson and national vandalism he oversaw took a whole party to carry through.
This morning we crossed over 25% of the total 2016 vote count already cast in this election. Foregone conclusion that 2020's early voting count will set a new record by a wide margin. It'll be interesting to see the total including election day and how that total compares to 2016.Ralph-Wiggum wrote: Tue Oct 20, 2020 1:35 pm Currently in line to vote. This is the 2nd day that early voting has been open at this location, but it was open at another nearby location for the last two weeks. Nevertheless, it’s a pretty long line, especially for the middle of a Tuesday afternoon. I’ guessing it’ll take about an hour to get vote. But, all in all, seems pretty well organized and everyone is wearing a mask, so I can’t complain too much. And it’s encouraging to see so many people voting.
Yeah looks like we'll coast in around 35-40% early voting levels overall. It also means that the actual election day is incredibly important still.Zaxxon wrote: Tue Oct 20, 2020 2:07 pmThis morning we crossed over 25% of the total 2016 vote count already cast in this election. Foregone conclusion that 2020's early voting count will set a new record by a wide margin. It'll be interesting to see the total including election day and how that total compares to 2016.
In terms of voter suppression, there's a potential irony insofar as it seems like there's a real chance that the people left to vote on election day may be overwhelmingly Republican / Trumpist. Which means that if there's hugely long lines on election day, it could be Republicans who are disproportionately discouraged from voting as a result.malchior wrote: Tue Oct 20, 2020 2:10 pmYeah looks like we'll coast in around 35-40% early voting levels overall. It also means that the actual election day is incredibly important still.Zaxxon wrote: Tue Oct 20, 2020 2:07 pmThis morning we crossed over 25% of the total 2016 vote count already cast in this election. Foregone conclusion that 2020's early voting count will set a new record by a wide margin. It'll be interesting to see the total including election day and how that total compares to 2016.
I would take the over on that estimate, though your point (and Guap's, awesomely) stands.malchior wrote: Tue Oct 20, 2020 2:10 pmYeah looks like we'll coast in around 35-40% early voting levels overall. It also means that the actual election day is incredibly important still.Zaxxon wrote: Tue Oct 20, 2020 2:07 pmThis morning we crossed over 25% of the total 2016 vote count already cast in this election. Foregone conclusion that 2020's early voting count will set a new record by a wide margin. It'll be interesting to see the total including election day and how that total compares to 2016.
Oh, sweet Karma.El Guapo wrote: Tue Oct 20, 2020 2:12 pmIn terms of voter suppression, there's a potential irony insofar as it seems like there's a real chance that the people left to vote on election day may be overwhelmingly Republican / Trumpist. Which means that if there's hugely long lines on election day, it could be Republicans who are disproportionately discouraged from voting as a result.malchior wrote: Tue Oct 20, 2020 2:10 pmYeah looks like we'll coast in around 35-40% early voting levels overall. It also means that the actual election day is incredibly important still.Zaxxon wrote: Tue Oct 20, 2020 2:07 pmThis morning we crossed over 25% of the total 2016 vote count already cast in this election. Foregone conclusion that 2020's early voting count will set a new record by a wide margin. It'll be interesting to see the total including election day and how that total compares to 2016.
Texas is still leading the way at 51% with 10 days of early voting left.Zaxxon wrote: Tue Oct 20, 2020 2:15 pmI would take the over on that estimate, though your point (and Guap's, awesomely) stands.malchior wrote: Tue Oct 20, 2020 2:10 pmYeah looks like we'll coast in around 35-40% early voting levels overall. It also means that the actual election day is incredibly important still.Zaxxon wrote: Tue Oct 20, 2020 2:07 pmThis morning we crossed over 25% of the total 2016 vote count already cast in this election. Foregone conclusion that 2020's early voting count will set a new record by a wide margin. It'll be interesting to see the total including election day and how that total compares to 2016.
Doubt it. If that is indeed the case, you can bet Trump/GOP will be calling shenanigans somehow or some way. It'll be ugly. What we want is smooth voting for everyone on EDay. Probably won't happen but it would be the best outcome.Jaymann wrote: Tue Oct 20, 2020 2:19 pmOh, sweet Karma.El Guapo wrote: Tue Oct 20, 2020 2:12 pmIn terms of voter suppression, there's a potential irony insofar as it seems like there's a real chance that the people left to vote on election day may be overwhelmingly Republican / Trumpist. Which means that if there's hugely long lines on election day, it could be Republicans who are disproportionately discouraged from voting as a result.malchior wrote: Tue Oct 20, 2020 2:10 pmYeah looks like we'll coast in around 35-40% early voting levels overall. It also means that the actual election day is incredibly important still.Zaxxon wrote: Tue Oct 20, 2020 2:07 pmThis morning we crossed over 25% of the total 2016 vote count already cast in this election. Foregone conclusion that 2020's early voting count will set a new record by a wide margin. It'll be interesting to see the total including election day and how that total compares to 2016.
Absolutely. There has been electoral outrage and screams of tampering and impending fraud ever since no reason absentee ballots were passed in Michigan in 2018 (and from the news of the battles in court a number of other states as well)). Screams that demanded 2016 was somehow both a fraudulent whammy pulled by the Clintons and illegal aliens and dead voters and a victory for the sitting POTUS. By all means we need a blue landslide but it should happen from a legit smooth untainted process in spite of voter suppression not because of it, even if GOP voter suppression ironically suppresses GOP votes.LawBeefaroni wrote: Tue Oct 20, 2020 2:43 pm What we want is smooth voting for everyone on EDay. Probably won't happen but it would be the best outcome.
Well, Trump's going to be calling shenanigans regardless (don't forget that he called shenanigans in 2016, when he *won*). But people who get discouraged from voting because of the length of the lines are disqualified regardless - there's no way to cause them to be counted after the fact.LawBeefaroni wrote: Tue Oct 20, 2020 2:43 pmDoubt it. If that is indeed the case, you can bet Trump/GOP will be calling shenanigans somehow or some way. It'll be ugly. What we want is smooth voting for everyone on EDay. Probably won't happen but it would be the best outcome.Jaymann wrote: Tue Oct 20, 2020 2:19 pmOh, sweet Karma.El Guapo wrote: Tue Oct 20, 2020 2:12 pmIn terms of voter suppression, there's a potential irony insofar as it seems like there's a real chance that the people left to vote on election day may be overwhelmingly Republican / Trumpist. Which means that if there's hugely long lines on election day, it could be Republicans who are disproportionately discouraged from voting as a result.malchior wrote: Tue Oct 20, 2020 2:10 pmYeah looks like we'll coast in around 35-40% early voting levels overall. It also means that the actual election day is incredibly important still.Zaxxon wrote: Tue Oct 20, 2020 2:07 pmThis morning we crossed over 25% of the total 2016 vote count already cast in this election. Foregone conclusion that 2020's early voting count will set a new record by a wide margin. It'll be interesting to see the total including election day and how that total compares to 2016.