That is not dead which can eternal lie, and with strange aeons bring us some web forums whereupon we can gather
http://garbi.online/forum/
By the way, are any OO'ers going to the march? My wife will be there, as are most of our good female friends and many of the men. I'd like to go, but I'm think having the kids in tow (as much as I would love for them to see it) would make the day logistically difficult.gilraen wrote:200 Buses Have Applied For Inauguration Parking — 1200 For The Women’s MarchAs of Friday, roughly 200 bus permits have been requested to park in Washington D.C.’s RFK stadium on Inauguration Day, a spokesperson for the District Department of Transportation confirmed to The Huffington Post. (A total of 393 have been granted within the entire district that day.)
By contrast, nearly 1,200 tour bus permits that have been requested for the Women’s March on Washington the following day.
To put that in context, The Washington Post reports that at President Barack Obama’s record-setting 2009 inauguration, more than 3,000 charter buses registered for parking permits in D.C.
I think Wife is going to the one in Boston. Last I heard she was gathering her coven at our house and they were all going to T in. Plans are fragile things with her, though, and I haven't heard anything more since she announced it a week ago. I was not specifically dis-invited, but men are not welcome in the coven.Holman wrote:By the way, are any OO'ers going to the march? My wife will be there, as are most of our good female friends and many of the men. I'd like to go, but I'm think having the kids in tow (as much as I would love for them to see it) would make the day logistically difficult.gilraen wrote:200 Buses Have Applied For Inauguration Parking — 1200 For The Women’s MarchAs of Friday, roughly 200 bus permits have been requested to park in Washington D.C.’s RFK stadium on Inauguration Day, a spokesperson for the District Department of Transportation confirmed to The Huffington Post. (A total of 393 have been granted within the entire district that day.)
By contrast, nearly 1,200 tour bus permits that have been requested for the Women’s March on Washington the following day.
To put that in context, The Washington Post reports that at President Barack Obama’s record-setting 2009 inauguration, more than 3,000 charter buses registered for parking permits in D.C.
What about Uncle Arthur?Kraken wrote:I was not specifically dis-invited, but men are not welcome in the coven.
He was kept out by those Goddamned Jews.hepcat wrote:What about Uncle Arthur?Kraken wrote:I was not specifically dis-invited, but men are not welcome in the coven.
Nobody would notice if Ferrari wasn't sold here. They would notice empty shelves at Walmart, though.Stefan Stirzaker wrote:So with the whole "you want to sell in america you produce in america" tweet storm last night, is there a percentage? 100% production in the states to sell in the states? I guess Ferrari just went out of business in America.
Superb!Apollo wrote:I'll be extremely disappointed if there's not a protester at Trump's inauguration holding up a giant Queen of Diamonds.
To Congress, under oath. That was kind of a big deal. I do agree with your point, though. Trump is so far off the chart that it doesn't even apply to him.YellowKing wrote:They impeached Bill Clinton for lying.
It's pretty clear that Trump has lied under oath, so it's only a matter of time until Trump testifies to Congress.Kraken wrote:To Congress, under oath. That was kind of a big deal.YellowKing wrote:They impeached Bill Clinton for lying.
I don't know much about Tiffany Trump, but I've seen the links you mean, and they are trashy clickbait on a level with "Doctors hate her! [YourTown] grandmother discovers two-dollar cure for cancer!"tgb wrote:What's the deal with Tiffy, anyway? I've seen a lot of links to stories as to why he never mentions her and she's hardly seen, but haven't taken the click-bait.
In the few photos I have seen she looks, umm, not too bright, but not necessarily dumber than Udai and Kusay.
A left-wing political group released a new video Monday of a counter-sting that has uncovered evidence of right-wing activists trying to sow chaos at Donald Trump’s inaugural ceremony, an effort to portray critics of Trump who march against him as violent fringe figures.
Dean’s near-panicked take on the incoming president is shaped in large part by his years in the Nixon White House. In Trump, Dean says he has observed many of his former boss’s most dangerous traits—obsessive vengefulness, reflexive dishonesty, all-consuming ambition—but none of Nixon’s redeeming qualities.
“I used to have one-on-one conversations with [Nixon] where I’d see him checking his more authoritarian tendencies,” Dean recalled. “He’d say, ‘This is something I can’t say out loud...’ or, ‘That is something the president can’t do.’” To Dean, these moments suggested a functioning sense of shame in Nixon, something he was forced to wrestle with in his quest for power. Trump, by contrast, appears to Dean unmolested by any such struggle.
Dean agrees that “he’s carrying loads of potential problems into the White House with him,” and goes even further in his assessment: “I don’t think Richard Nixon even comes to close to the level of corruption we already know about Trump.”
Yet, he’s profoundly pessimistic about the prospect of Trump facing any true accountability while in office. In the four decades since Nixon resigned, Dean says, the institutions that are meant to keep a president’s power in check—the press, Congress, even the courts—have been rendered increasingly weak and ineffectual by a sort of creeping partisan paralysis. (Imagine, if you dare, the Breitbart headlines that would follow Woodward and Bernstein’s first scoop if they were breaking their story today.)
Yes, but I've been told by very reliable sources that any corruption of Trump's was done as a private citizen, so he's good to go for public office. Way better choice than Hillary.Dean agrees that “he’s carrying loads of potential problems into the White House with him,” and goes even further in his assessment: “I don’t think Richard Nixon even comes to close to the level of corruption we already know about Trump.”
I can't stand O'Keefe, but this spin on his video seems too easy. According to him (and backed up by his video, it appears), he met with some folks who were planning on disrupting an alt-right gathering (the Deploraball, I believe it's called). They were recorded talking about using stink bombs and what not. O'Keefe seems to have just sniffed out a group of liberals who wanted to take things too far. It would be like Michael Moore going to a KKK meeting that called itself a republican group and then condemning all republicans as de facto members.Paingod wrote:Okay, so ... O'Keefe (who Trump invited to a Presidential debate, and has been funded by Trump before) is attempting to hire out some liberals to act on the behalf of the conservatives and disrupt the Trump inauguration so that liberals look like crazy nutjobs - promising to go as far as shutting down bridges to help them raise hell.
This is normal now, isn't it?
So, did this happen?Defiant wrote:
You aren't good with time zones are you?Unagi wrote:So, did this happen?
Oops.coopasonic wrote:You aren't good with time zones are you?Unagi wrote:So, did this happen?
sooner than laterOctavious wrote:When will then be now?
That was the alleged victim of child rape. I doubt this is that, as she was represented by a different lawyer.Ralph-Wiggum wrote:It's not 2:30 EST yet. I wonder if this is the same person who was going to hold a press conference a few weeks before the election and then canceled right before it was supposed to happen.
Unagi wrote: So, did this happen?
In fairness, it is rather difficult to keep track of them all.Captain Caveman wrote:That was the alleged victim of child rape. I doubt this is that, as she was represented by a different lawyer.Ralph-Wiggum wrote:I wonder if this is the same person who was going to hold a press conference a few weeks before the election and then canceled right before it was supposed to happen.
In other, other news...Max Peck wrote:
In other news...
U.S. Intelligence Officials Reportedly Warn Israeli Counterparts Against Sharing Info With Trump Administration
Former CIA and NSA director Gen. (ret.) Michael Hayden rejected a recent report that Obama administration intelligence officials told Israeli officials to be wary of sharing intelligence with the incoming Trump administration.
He responded to Bergman’s report and similar reports regarding British Intelligence being concerned about sharing with the US, saying, “I don’t share those concerns. I saw the reporting. I don’t think, even looking at the dynamics we are talking about, I don’t think the Americans would do it. It is still America’s CIA.”