The 4th Estate Thread Has Surrendered
Moderators: LawBeefaroni, $iljanus
- Alefroth
- Posts: 9169
- Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2004 1:56 pm
- Location: Bellingham WA
Re: The 4th Estate Thread Has Surrendered
They banned me from the comments section earlier in the year and I let my subscription lapse in July.
- Skinypupy
- Posts: 20985
- Joined: Tue Dec 07, 2004 10:12 am
- Location: Utah
Re: The 4th Estate Thread Has Surrendered
This doesn’t seem particularly surprising. Ever since they hired Lewis (the managing editor from the Telegraph) it’s been pretty obvious this is the way things were heading.
It is kinda funny to watch MAGA doing victory laps over it though. WaPo haven’t been a “liberal” paper for quite a while…and you may have noticed they didn’t endorse your guy either.
When darkness veils the world, four Warriors of Light shall come.
- raydude
- Posts: 4004
- Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 9:22 am
Re: The 4th Estate Thread Has Surrendered
Same here. I would have thought Bezos would be all "fuck it, I've got my billions" but apparently not. I mean, why the hell would an untouchable billionaire even care?
- AWS260
- Posts: 12843
- Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 12:51 pm
- Location: Brooklyn
Re: The 4th Estate Thread Has Surrendered
Canceled my Washington Post subscription. This is the letter I just sent.
.Your subscription cancelation page does provide an appropriate option for explaining why I am canceling, so I am sending this missive to provide my rationale.
You will not be surprised to hear it, but I am ending my subscription because of the Post's decision not to endorse a candidate in the most consequential Presidential election in living memory. Fred Hiatt is surely rolling in his grave, and Katharine Graham is probably about to rise from hers as a vengeful spirit. It is a cowardly and shameful act that burns the Post's legacy to bitter ash.
It's not entirely fair to call this The Post's decision, since it is clear that no one who does actual work at the paper was involved. Nonetheless, I believe that every member of the Opinion section with a conscience should resign.
Anyway, that's why I canceled. I can't believe I have to write this. Jesus Christ, people
- Kraken
- Posts: 44973
- Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 11:59 pm
- Location: The Hub of the Universe
- Contact:
Re: The 4th Estate Thread Has Surrendered
Well said. I haven’t canceled (yet) because I value WaPo’s reportage and failure-to-endorse is not in and of itself a fireable offense, IMO. But they’re on probation, in case their editorial cowardice leaks noticeably into their news coverage.
- Unagi
- Posts: 28080
- Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2006 5:14 pm
- Location: Chicago
- Jaymann
- Posts: 20527
- Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 7:13 pm
- Location: California
Re: The 4th Estate Thread Has Surrendered
Surprise, surprise. CNN cuts away from DonOlds' lies at MSG to call him out in real time. Way too late to the party, but at least it is better than a sanewash.
Jaymann
]==(:::::::::::::>
Leave no bacon behind.
]==(:::::::::::::>
Leave no bacon behind.
- El Guapo
- Posts: 41939
- Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2005 4:01 pm
- Location: Boston
Re: The 4th Estate Thread Has Surrendered
Black Lives Matter.
- El Guapo
- Posts: 41939
- Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2005 4:01 pm
- Location: Boston
Re: The 4th Estate Thread Has Surrendered
I will also say that it's not just money. Trump will likely be looking to send DOJ after a prominent oligarch in order to get all the others to fall in line.
Black Lives Matter.
- Isgrimnur
- Posts: 84713
- Joined: Sun Oct 15, 2006 12:29 am
- Location: Chookity pok
- Contact:
Re: The 4th Estate Thread Has Surrendered
Over 200,000 subscribers flee 'Washington Post' after Bezos blocks Harris endorsement
Not all cancellations take effect immediately. Still, the figure represents about 8% of the paper’s paid circulation of 2.5 million subscribers, which includes print as well. The number of cancellations continued to grow Monday afternoon.
It's almost as if people are the problem.
- geezer
- Posts: 7601
- Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 1:52 pm
- Location: Yeeha!
Re: The 4th Estate Thread Has Surrendered
Bezos just posted an editorial, basically saying, "People no longer trust the press so we have to stop taking stands and offending people that don't trust the press." Never mind how irrational or driven by dishonest actors that lack of trust is...
- raydude
- Posts: 4004
- Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 9:22 am
Re: The 4th Estate Thread Has Surrendered
You and I both know that trying to appease a dictator almost never works. Given the similarities to the 1939 MSG rally I'd put up Neville Chamberlain as an example. Hell, I even told the Post in my cancellation email "If I was Trump I would go after Bezos first, given how quickly he caved".
- Holman
- Posts: 29744
- Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 8:00 pm
- Location: Between the Schuylkill and the Wissahickon
Re: The 4th Estate Thread Has Surrendered
I assume that by now everyone has seen the references to Timothy Snyder's On Tyranny.
Much prefer my Nazis Nuremberged.
- Smoove_B
- Posts: 55955
- Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:58 am
- Location: Kaer Morhen
Re: The 4th Estate Thread Has Surrendered
USA Today will not endorse anyone for President:
NOTE:USA Today, the nation’s fourth largest newspaper, says it’s joining The Washington Post and the Los Angeles Times in not endorsing a presidential candidate this election.
A spokesperson for the paper told the Daily Beast on Monday that it will instead focus on providing “readers with the facts that matter and the trusted information they need to make informed decisions.”
That’s a stark difference from four years ago when USA Today broke with decades-old tradition to endorse Joe Biden for president. That endorsement claimed Donald Trump wasn’t a capable leader and that the U.S. was “dangerously off course.”
Unlike the billionaires overseeing of the Post and LA Times, there have been no reports that any single person in the leadership at Gannett, which is a publicly traded company, intervened to personally shut down an endorsement at USA Today.
Maybe next year, maybe no go
- Kraken
- Posts: 44973
- Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 11:59 pm
- Location: The Hub of the Universe
- Contact:
Re: The 4th Estate Thread Has Surrendered
A few minutes ago I jumped on the WaPo cancellation bandwagon, even though they offered to cut my rate from $4 to $2 per month. Yeah, two bucks a month is going to change my mind.
As I said earlier, I still value and want to support WaPo’s reporting, and I’m likely to re-up after Harris wins the election. Then cancel a time or two to drive it back down to $2.
Does anybody anywhere subscribe to USAToday or care about its editorial positions?
As I said earlier, I still value and want to support WaPo’s reporting, and I’m likely to re-up after Harris wins the election. Then cancel a time or two to drive it back down to $2.
Does anybody anywhere subscribe to USAToday or care about its editorial positions?
- Max Peck
- Posts: 14709
- Joined: Fri Aug 05, 2005 8:09 pm
- Location: Down the Rabbit-Hole
Re: The 4th Estate Thread Has Surrendered
I'm too tired to go and find the source, but I read that Trump had a meeting at Blue Origin the same day that the WaPo announced that it would not be endorsing either candidate, making it seem like Bezos muzzled the Post because he wants a slice of the action in the American space program for his favorite hobby company. Which would be hilarious if true, because Leon will never, ever let that happen if he ends up as Trump's "efficiency" czar.
"What? What? What?" -- The 14th Doctor
It's not enough to be a good player... you also have to play well. -- Siegbert Tarrasch
It's not enough to be a good player... you also have to play well. -- Siegbert Tarrasch
- Max Peck
- Posts: 14709
- Joined: Fri Aug 05, 2005 8:09 pm
- Location: Down the Rabbit-Hole
Re: The 4th Estate Thread Has Surrendered
The real kicker with Bezos deciding to muzzle the Post is that everyone who cares knows that the paper was going to endorse Harris, and why. All that Bezos has accomplished is to cement his place in history as a spineless coward (assuming, of course, that we have a future where truthful histories are written). I guess nobody ever told him about the Streisand effect.
"What? What? What?" -- The 14th Doctor
It's not enough to be a good player... you also have to play well. -- Siegbert Tarrasch
It's not enough to be a good player... you also have to play well. -- Siegbert Tarrasch
- Grifman
- Posts: 21746
- Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 7:17 pm
Re: The 4th Estate Thread Has Surrendered
What about the fact that he just offended those that want the press to take a stand and do trust the press? And which group is/was subscribing to his newspaper? I mean if you have to offend someone, who should you offend and why?
Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions. – G.K. Chesterton
- waitingtoconnect
- Posts: 1512
- Joined: Sun May 28, 2006 5:56 am
- raydude
- Posts: 4004
- Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 9:22 am
Re: The 4th Estate Thread Has Surrendered
Two reasons why I think Bezos will still lose if Trump wins the White House. Even if Leon doesn't end up in the Administration.Max Peck wrote: ↑Tue Oct 29, 2024 12:50 amI'm too tired to go and find the source, but I read that Trump had a meeting at Blue Origin the same day that the WaPo announced that it would not be endorsing either candidate, making it seem like Bezos muzzled the Post because he wants a slice of the action in the American space program for his favorite hobby company. Which would be hilarious if true, because Leon will never, ever let that happen if he ends up as Trump's "efficiency" czar.
1. In Trump's mind for every winner there needs to be a loser. Leon and SpaceX are clearly winners, so Blue Origin will have to be the loser.
2. Trump never forgives nor forgets. See Sen. Romney and Chris Christie.
- Unagi
- Posts: 28080
- Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2006 5:14 pm
- Location: Chicago
Re: The 4th Estate Thread Has Surrendered
Seriously. It's kinda a stupid business move, one would think. I honestly think it's all about avoiding personal attacks from Trump - not $
- pr0ner
- Posts: 17505
- Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2004 3:00 pm
- Location: Northern Virginia, VA
- Contact:
Re: The 4th Estate Thread Has Surrendered
The unfortunate thing about all the canceled subscriptions is that they won't hurt Bezos one bit. They'll definitely hurt rank and file when more layoffs likely hit later this year as a result of all the cancellations.Isgrimnur wrote: ↑Mon Oct 28, 2024 5:36 pm Over 200,000 subscribers flee 'Washington Post' after Bezos blocks Harris endorsement
Not all cancellations take effect immediately. Still, the figure represents about 8% of the paper’s paid circulation of 2.5 million subscribers, which includes print as well. The number of cancellations continued to grow Monday afternoon.
Hodor.
- geezer
- Posts: 7601
- Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 1:52 pm
- Location: Yeeha!
Re: The 4th Estate Thread Has Surrendered
I suspect in his mind he'd rather sink the credibility of his toy than offend the dictator of the USA, and the attendant government contracts. He wants to, at worst, be Switzerland, not De Gaulle.
- Max Peck
- Posts: 14709
- Joined: Fri Aug 05, 2005 8:09 pm
- Location: Down the Rabbit-Hole
Re: The 4th Estate Thread Has Surrendered
De Gaulle was the French general who led the Free French forces. Did you intend to refer to Pétain, the traitor who led the Vichy government?
"What? What? What?" -- The 14th Doctor
It's not enough to be a good player... you also have to play well. -- Siegbert Tarrasch
It's not enough to be a good player... you also have to play well. -- Siegbert Tarrasch
- geezer
- Posts: 7601
- Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 1:52 pm
- Location: Yeeha!
Re: The 4th Estate Thread Has Surrendered
No, I meant that he wants to be neutral at worst, but definitely does NOT want to be the resistance. Pretty sure Elmo has the collaborator role locked up.
- Max Peck
- Posts: 14709
- Joined: Fri Aug 05, 2005 8:09 pm
- Location: Down the Rabbit-Hole
Re: The 4th Estate Thread Has Surrendered
Ah, OK, I guess you're talking about post-war France during the cold war. I was thinking of France during WW2.
"What? What? What?" -- The 14th Doctor
It's not enough to be a good player... you also have to play well. -- Siegbert Tarrasch
It's not enough to be a good player... you also have to play well. -- Siegbert Tarrasch
- geezer
- Posts: 7601
- Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 1:52 pm
- Location: Yeeha!
Re: The 4th Estate Thread Has Surrendered
No, I was too. I think I just stated my point really awkwardly de Gaulle was the leader of the Free French from exile in the UK after Germany rolled through France. My point was just that Bezos has no interest in being that leader.
- Max Peck
- Posts: 14709
- Joined: Fri Aug 05, 2005 8:09 pm
- Location: Down the Rabbit-Hole
Re: The 4th Estate Thread Has Surrendered
OK, I get it now.
"What? What? What?" -- The 14th Doctor
It's not enough to be a good player... you also have to play well. -- Siegbert Tarrasch
It's not enough to be a good player... you also have to play well. -- Siegbert Tarrasch
- Kurth
- Posts: 6374
- Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2005 1:19 am
- Location: Portland
Re: The 4th Estate Thread Has Surrendered
Yep. This idea that NYT and Post subscribers should cancel their subscriptions in protest over a decision not to endorse Presidential candidates is about as constructive as Muslims withholding their vote from Harris to protest U.S. foreign policy vis a vis Israel.pr0ner wrote: ↑Tue Oct 29, 2024 1:02 pmThe unfortunate thing about all the canceled subscriptions is that they won't hurt Bezos one bit. They'll definitely hurt rank and file when more layoffs likely hit later this year as a result of all the cancellations.Isgrimnur wrote: ↑Mon Oct 28, 2024 5:36 pm Over 200,000 subscribers flee 'Washington Post' after Bezos blocks Harris endorsement
Not all cancellations take effect immediately. Still, the figure represents about 8% of the paper’s paid circulation of 2.5 million subscribers, which includes print as well. The number of cancellations continued to grow Monday afternoon.
Except for Kraken, who is just trying to nickel and dime the Post into bankruptcy.
Just 'cause you feel it, doesn't mean it's there -- Radiohead
Do you believe me? Do you trust me? Do you like me? 😳
Do you believe me? Do you trust me? Do you like me? 😳
- Isgrimnur
- Posts: 84713
- Joined: Sun Oct 15, 2006 12:29 am
- Location: Chookity pok
- Contact:
Re: The 4th Estate Thread Has Surrendered
It's almost as if people are the problem.
- ImLawBoy
- Forum Admin
- Posts: 15377
- Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 9:49 pm
- Location: Chicago, IL
- Contact:
Re: The 4th Estate Thread Has Surrendered
That's a specious argument, to be generous about it. With the newspapers, if your gambit works and impacts the newspaper, you're likely to see a positive change in coverage/opinions. With the voting, if the gambit works and you impact the election, you're likely to see a negative change for Palestinians in Gaza.Kurth wrote: ↑Tue Oct 29, 2024 4:43 pmYep. This idea that NYT and Post subscribers should cancel their subscriptions in protest over a decision not to endorse Presidential candidates is about as constructive as Muslims withholding their vote from Harris to protest U.S. foreign policy vis a vis Israel.pr0ner wrote: ↑Tue Oct 29, 2024 1:02 pmThe unfortunate thing about all the canceled subscriptions is that they won't hurt Bezos one bit. They'll definitely hurt rank and file when more layoffs likely hit later this year as a result of all the cancellations.Isgrimnur wrote: ↑Mon Oct 28, 2024 5:36 pm Over 200,000 subscribers flee 'Washington Post' after Bezos blocks Harris endorsement
Not all cancellations take effect immediately. Still, the figure represents about 8% of the paper’s paid circulation of 2.5 million subscribers, which includes print as well. The number of cancellations continued to grow Monday afternoon.
That's my purse! I don't know you!
- Kurth
- Posts: 6374
- Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2005 1:19 am
- Location: Portland
Re: The 4th Estate Thread Has Surrendered
Hmmm. I get your point: At least those who are cancelling their Post and NYT subscriptions can tell themselves that if their "gambit" works, they'll contribute to saving the 4th Estate. But I think you're wrong - and certainly not generous - in your analysis.ImLawBoy wrote: ↑Tue Oct 29, 2024 5:31 pmThat's a specious argument, to be generous about it. With the newspapers, if your gambit works and impacts the newspaper, you're likely to see a positive change in coverage/opinions. With the voting, if the gambit works and you impact the election, you're likely to see a negative change for Palestinians in Gaza.Kurth wrote: ↑Tue Oct 29, 2024 4:43 pmYep. This idea that NYT and Post subscribers should cancel their subscriptions in protest over a decision not to endorse Presidential candidates is about as constructive as Muslims withholding their vote from Harris to protest U.S. foreign policy vis a vis Israel.pr0ner wrote: ↑Tue Oct 29, 2024 1:02 pmThe unfortunate thing about all the canceled subscriptions is that they won't hurt Bezos one bit. They'll definitely hurt rank and file when more layoffs likely hit later this year as a result of all the cancellations.Isgrimnur wrote: ↑Mon Oct 28, 2024 5:36 pm Over 200,000 subscribers flee 'Washington Post' after Bezos blocks Harris endorsement
Not all cancellations take effect immediately. Still, the figure represents about 8% of the paper’s paid circulation of 2.5 million subscribers, which includes print as well. The number of cancellations continued to grow Monday afternoon.
Those cancelling their subscriptions think they are doing something to save journalism. Those withholding their vote because of current foreign policy toward Israel and the Palestinians think they are doing something to save the Democratic party from itself and change U.S. policy.
That both are wrong doesn't mean my argument is specious. My point is that both groups are cutting off their noses to spite their faces.
I think this piece from Slate today captures what I'm trying to convey:
If the people who are so outraged about the decision of the Post not to endorse really wanted to do something to protest, there is one obvious subscription they could cancel: Amazon Prime. As the Slate piece points out, though, "Unfortunately, this is a bridge too far for a lot of us. I’ve heard from a handful of very honest persons that canceling Prime calls for a “bravery” that they don’t possess. The free press is one thing, but do not come for our free two-day shipping!"If you’re like me, your social media feeds for the past few days have been full of posts with screenshots of “We’ve Canceled Your Subscription” notices and comments to the effect of “This will not stand, Washington Post!” Never before have so many people—200,000, according to one report—gotten such an ecstatic hit of online righteousness out of saving themselves 200 bucks a year.
These are the times that remind us of how little most people understand how journalism works . . .
The Washington Post is already a struggling institution, having undergone layoffs and buyouts just last month. If 200,000 subscribers permanently bail on the paper, it may never recover. Or it may survive with much of its coverage cut back, and that may trigger a spiral into oblivion somewhere down the road as the remaining subscribers decide that a pale shadow of the Post’s former self is not worth paying for. Many bad things would follow from this, including journalists losing their jobs and the elimination of noncore sections that I value, like the Washington Post Book World. Most of all, however, there’s a lot of good, important journalism that won’t happen if the Post isn’t around (or can’t afford) to do it . . .
When you cancel your subscription to the Post, you don’t punish Jeff Bezos. You punish the journalists who write such stories, including, ironically, the journalists who wrote and prepared to publish the very endorsement you’re so angry about. As one Post staffer told me, “The journalists who produce the Washington Post had no role in this decision, and yet they’re the only people who will be really hurt if you cancel your subscription.”
And if those journalists lose their jobs, what happens to them? The most clueless subscription-cancelers of all maintain that they’ll just get jobs elsewhere. Apparently there are still people out there who don’t know that the business model for journalism is currently in free fall, with only brand-name legacy organizations, like the Post and the New York Times, able to hold on by their fingernails while still providing in-depth reporting. Last year alone, 131 local newspapers shuttered, a loss that has fostered the increasing polarization of their communities.
Just 'cause you feel it, doesn't mean it's there -- Radiohead
Do you believe me? Do you trust me? Do you like me? 😳
Do you believe me? Do you trust me? Do you like me? 😳
- waitingtoconnect
- Posts: 1512
- Joined: Sun May 28, 2006 5:56 am
Re: The 4th Estate Thread Has Surrendered
All you can really do these days is pick which oligarch you support sadly.
- Jaymann
- Posts: 20527
- Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 7:13 pm
- Location: California
Re: The 4th Estate Thread Has Surrendered
Mark Cuban is the thinking man's oligarch. And he actually lowered drug prices.waitingtoconnect wrote: ↑Tue Oct 29, 2024 7:37 pm All you can really do these days is pick which oligarch you support sadly.
Jaymann
]==(:::::::::::::>
Leave no bacon behind.
]==(:::::::::::::>
Leave no bacon behind.
- Unagi
- Posts: 28080
- Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2006 5:14 pm
- Location: Chicago
Re: The 4th Estate Thread Has Surrendered
I'd be willing to bet that this has been the case since time immemorial.waitingtoconnect wrote: ↑Tue Oct 29, 2024 7:37 pm All you can really do these days is pick which oligarch you support sadly.
- Kraken
- Posts: 44973
- Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 11:59 pm
- Location: The Hub of the Universe
- Contact:
Re: The 4th Estate Thread Has Surrendered
As I said, I intend to resubscribe after the election. I have a background in journalism and know the importance of reader support. Canceling was merely a gesture to register disapproval, and to remind TPTB who their readers are.
- Kurth
- Posts: 6374
- Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2005 1:19 am
- Location: Portland
Re: The 4th Estate Thread Has Surrendered
Also $$$. Two bucks a month is two bucks a month, amiright????? And you have a new house to furnish. Every little bit helps.Kraken wrote: ↑Tue Oct 29, 2024 9:25 pmAs I said, I intend to resubscribe after the election. I have a background in journalism and know the importance of reader support. Canceling was merely a gesture to register disapproval, and to remind TPTB who their readers are.
Just 'cause you feel it, doesn't mean it's there -- Radiohead
Do you believe me? Do you trust me? Do you like me? 😳
Do you believe me? Do you trust me? Do you like me? 😳
- gbasden
- Posts: 7841
- Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 1:57 am
- Location: Sacramento, CA
Re: The 4th Estate Thread Has Surrendered
So, withdrawing support from a newspaper and subscribing to another that seems to better represent free journalism is a bad thing? My total amount I am spending on journalism has gone up, not down. I get the argument, but I would argue the marketplace of ideas doesn't work very well if one blindly supports a single source and never considers what that their viewpoint is.Kurth wrote: ↑Tue Oct 29, 2024 4:43 pm
Yep. This idea that NYT and Post subscribers should cancel their subscriptions in protest over a decision not to endorse Presidential candidates is about as constructive as Muslims withholding their vote from Harris to protest U.S. foreign policy vis a vis Israel.
Except for Kraken, who is just trying to nickel and dime the Post into bankruptcy.
- Smoove_B
- Posts: 55955
- Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:58 am
- Location: Kaer Morhen
Re: The 4th Estate Thread Has Surrendered
Yeah, I'd think a real "protest" would be to cancel the WaPo and funnel that money into a local news agency (if they still exist for you).
Maybe next year, maybe no go
- gbasden
- Posts: 7841
- Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 1:57 am
- Location: Sacramento, CA