The Hillary Clinton thread

For discussion of religion and politics

Moderators: $iljanus, LawBeefaroni

Post Reply
User avatar
Defiant
Posts: 21045
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 11:09 pm
Location: Tongue in cheek

Re: The Hillary Clinton thread

Post by Defiant »

Holman wrote:
Defiant wrote:One question I have is, were these deplorables deplorable before, or are they just following Trump's lead? And if a bunch of them are, will their deplorable views wane once/if he's out of the picture?
They were deplorable before. Trump's nomination is the triumph of their deplorability, not the other way around. The least-qualified and most unstable candidate in American history overcame a major political party to seize the nomination by promising the deplorables what they wanted.
[..]
But only one of the leading candidates has made these views the centerpiece of his campaign and elevated them to such an influential role in the national discourse. Only one of the leading candidates actually supports these views and works to legitimize them. Only one of the candidates has invited leading proponents of these views to a privileged place at the political table.
But that's just it, I think by legitimizing them he has bad some of them follow his lead. I've seen this anecdotally (people who had opinion X and now that they follow Trump, they have opinion -X after Trump said -X) as well as among leaders in the republican party (some of which had spoken against what he said, and now go lock step behind him). I mean, some of it might just be supporting your candidate cause you want to win, even if you don't agree with everything he said, but still...
User avatar
GreenGoo
Posts: 43555
Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2004 10:46 pm
Location: Ottawa, ON

Re: The Hillary Clinton thread

Post by GreenGoo »

Unless I'm mistaken Bill is a private citizen who can give as many speeches for money as he wants. Or handjobs for that matter (but only in Nevada. Nigeria would kill him). That's standard fare for ex-presidents.

Drumpf is stroking Putin while criticizing the sitting president, but Bill needs to be held to a higher standard (Johnson doesn't know who Putin is or where Nigeria is, so he gets a pass)?

The Clintons are not nearly as bad as they are portrayed. Not even in the same orbit.
User avatar
ImLawBoy
Forum Admin
Posts: 15535
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 9:49 pm
Location: Chicago, IL
Contact:

Re: The Hillary Clinton thread

Post by ImLawBoy »

gameoverman wrote:Being President is grueling and it has a visible effect on the person who is President. Appearing weak, sickly, lethargic, or vulnerable to high stress activities(like campaigning) is not going to go unnoticed by the voters.

I'm not going so far as to say this will cost her the election but I'd be willing to bet there are a lot of people out there who might have been leaning towards voting for her who are now wondering if she could hack it for four years.

I'm assuming she's been given any and all assistance modern medicine has to offer for the sole purpose of marching through this campaign full speed ahead, and yet she got sick. That's not a good sign.
But are there really that many people who are going to vote for Hillary, but decide that if she won't be healthy for four years, they'd rather have Trump?
That's my purse! I don't know you!
User avatar
gilraen
Posts: 4589
Joined: Wed Sep 04, 2013 7:45 pm
Location: Broomfield, CO

Re: The Hillary Clinton thread

Post by gilraen »

gameoverman wrote:Being President is grueling and it has a visible effect on the person who is President. Appearing weak, sickly, lethargic, or vulnerable to high stress activities(like campaigning) is not going to go unnoticed by the voters.

I'm not going so far as to say this will cost her the election but I'd be willing to bet there are a lot of people out there who might have been leaning towards voting for her who are now wondering if she could hack it for four years.

I'm assuming she's been given any and all assistance modern medicine has to offer for the sole purpose of marching through this campaign full speed ahead, and yet she got sick. That's not a good sign.
She is constantly in crowds of hundreds of people, inhaling every bug under the sun, and she finally caught the pneumonia that was going around her campaign staff for the last few weeks. If that disqualifies her in the eyes of ANYONE, they weren't going to vote for her anyway.
User avatar
El Guapo
Posts: 42289
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2005 4:01 pm
Location: Boston

Re: The Hillary Clinton thread

Post by El Guapo »

gameoverman wrote:
I'm assuming she's been given any and all assistance modern medicine has to offer for the sole purpose of marching through this campaign full speed ahead, and yet she got sick. That's not a good sign.
You, uh, realize that modern medicine hasn't yet figured out how to stop people from ever getting sick?
Black Lives Matter.
User avatar
Holman
Posts: 30482
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 8:00 pm
Location: Between the Schuylkill and the Wissahickon

Re: The Hillary Clinton thread

Post by Holman »

Smutly wrote: A Nigerian newspaper publisher tied to the ruling People's Democratic Party (spoiler: they are not democratic) paid Bill Clinton $1.4 million to deliver two speeches in 2011 and 2012. The Clintons closed their eyes to the human rights abuses by Nigeria's brutal president, Goodluck Jonathan, as they collected their checks. Secretary Clinton made an official visit to Nigeria in 2012, congratulating Jonathan on his non-existent "reform efforts". American legitimacy was bestowed at a bargain price and was just the opposite of what Human Rights Watch implored her to do.
This makes it sound it sound like Jonathan's gov't personally paid off Clinton and got a free pass for tyranny in return.

What about the fact that the main point of the visit was to shore up regional efforts against Boko Haram, the African crisis of greatest importance at the time? Or that Nigeria had been the focus of U.S. diplomatic efforts for much longer than Clinton had been Secretary of State? Or that our involvement in the country helped to bring along the 2015 election (internationally regarded as relatively free and fair) that saw Jonathan lose and step down in the country's first peaceful transfer of power?

Diplomacy happens. Sometimes you shake a bad guy's hand to get the treaty signed.
Much prefer my Nazis Nuremberged.
User avatar
Isgrimnur
Posts: 85798
Joined: Sun Oct 15, 2006 12:29 am
Location: Chookity pok
Contact:

Re: The Hillary Clinton thread

Post by Isgrimnur »

Partisan hack authors don't want you to think about realpolitik. If the people we deal with have an unpaid parking ticket, their opponents in government should have nuked them before working with them to fight a more dangerous group.
It's almost as if people are the problem.
User avatar
Smutly
Posts: 1921
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 12:47 am

Re: The Hillary Clinton thread

Post by Smutly »

GreenGoo wrote:Unless I'm mistaken Bill is a private citizen who can give as many speeches for money as he wants. Or handjobs for that matter (but only in Nevada. Nigeria would kill him). That's standard fare for ex-presidents.

Drumpf is stroking Putin while criticizing the sitting president, but Bill needs to be held to a higher standard (Johnson doesn't know who Putin is or where Nigeria is, so he gets a pass)?

The Clintons are not nearly as bad as they are portrayed. Not even in the same orbit.
Yes, Bill can. I have to go to work now, but I will try to provide the chain of reasoning as to why this is a bad thing. Bill making speeches by himself - no problem. Hillary making decisions as Secretary of State - no problem. A high correlation of favorable decisions for those who pay Bill by Hillary - problem.

Gotta go make the donuts.
User avatar
hepcat
Posts: 55187
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 3:02 pm
Location: Chicago, IL Home of the triple homicide!

Re: The Hillary Clinton thread

Post by hepcat »

Even Gary Johnson plays the politics for cash game. He's been on the payroll of the Koch brothers for quite some time.
Master of his domain.
User avatar
Rip
Posts: 26952
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 9:34 pm
Location: Cajun Country!
Contact:

Re: The Hillary Clinton thread

Post by Rip »

gilraen wrote:
gameoverman wrote:Being President is grueling and it has a visible effect on the person who is President. Appearing weak, sickly, lethargic, or vulnerable to high stress activities(like campaigning) is not going to go unnoticed by the voters.

I'm not going so far as to say this will cost her the election but I'd be willing to bet there are a lot of people out there who might have been leaning towards voting for her who are now wondering if she could hack it for four years.

I'm assuming she's been given any and all assistance modern medicine has to offer for the sole purpose of marching through this campaign full speed ahead, and yet she got sick. That's not a good sign.
She is constantly in crowds of hundreds of people, inhaling every bug under the sun, and she finally caught the pneumonia that was going around her campaign staff for the last few weeks. If that disqualifies her in the eyes of ANYONE, they weren't going to vote for her anyway.
Then she did the Democratic thing and went out there interacting with her supporters to make sure they could get it as well.

Nice.
Last edited by Rip on Tue Sep 13, 2016 9:54 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Zarathud
Posts: 17282
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 10:29 pm
Location: Chicago, Illinois

Re: The Hillary Clinton thread

Post by Zarathud »

Smutly wrote:A high correlation of favorable decisions for those who pay Bill by Hillary - problem.
Not causation. And not even unexpected that a former President would be courted by anyone trying to navigate Washington. Bill is also a tremendous speaker with a generally solid reputation. The Clintons were able to choose their events carefully to appear before friendly parties.

Most of the "suspicious" examples are parties who had a good relationship with the Clinton administration, and that was unlikely to change after Bill left office or Hillary held office.

And if you really hated money in politics, you should support campaign finance reform and a repeal of Citizens United.
"A lie can run round the world before the truth has got its boots on." -Terry Pratchett, The Truth
"The presence of those seeking the truth is infinitely to be preferred to those who think they've found it." -Terry Pratchett, Monstrous Regiment
User avatar
Rip
Posts: 26952
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 9:34 pm
Location: Cajun Country!
Contact:

Re: The Hillary Clinton thread

Post by Rip »

El Guapo wrote:
gameoverman wrote:
I'm assuming she's been given any and all assistance modern medicine has to offer for the sole purpose of marching through this campaign full speed ahead, and yet she got sick. That's not a good sign.
You, uh, realize that modern medicine hasn't yet figured out how to stop people from ever getting sick?
One of the things they figured long ago is if you have something contagious don't go out in public and give it to everyone else.

Hillary pneumonia tour.
User avatar
YellowKing
Posts: 31434
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 2:02 pm

Re: The Hillary Clinton thread

Post by YellowKing »

If she had stayed in, Republicans would have been raking her over the coals for hiding in seclusion and not interacting with her supporters. It's a lose-lose for her all around.
User avatar
Jaymann
Posts: 21030
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 7:13 pm
Location: California

Re: The Hillary Clinton thread

Post by Jaymann »

Uh, pneumonia is not contagious.
Jaymann
]==(:::::::::::::>
Leave no bacon behind.
User avatar
hepcat
Posts: 55187
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 3:02 pm
Location: Chicago, IL Home of the triple homicide!

Re: The Hillary Clinton thread

Post by hepcat »

Jaymann wrote:Uh, pneumonia is not contagious.
He was talking about being democrat. That shit's contagious as hell.
Master of his domain.
User avatar
geezer
Posts: 7642
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 1:52 pm
Location: Yeeha!

Re: The Hillary Clinton thread

Post by geezer »

Jaymann wrote:Uh, pneumonia is not contagious.
Forget it - he's rolling.
User avatar
Moliere
Posts: 12380
Joined: Sun Sep 03, 2006 10:57 am
Location: Walking through a desert land

Re: The Hillary Clinton thread

Post by Moliere »

geezer wrote:
Jaymann wrote:Uh, pneumonia is not contagious.
Forget it - he's rolling.
Image
"The world is suffering more today from the good people who want to mind other men's business than it is from the bad people who are willing to let everybody look after their own individual affairs." - Clarence Darrow
User avatar
Rip
Posts: 26952
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 9:34 pm
Location: Cajun Country!
Contact:

Re: The Hillary Clinton thread

Post by Rip »

Jaymann wrote:Uh, pneumonia is not contagious.
One hundred years ago, pneumonia and heart disease traded places for the number one cause of death. Now, the mortality rate is far lower, but 50,000 people in the U.S. still die each year from pneumonia. That’s just a fraction of the 2 to 5 million Americans the Centers for Disease Control estimates come down with the disease each year.

“Pneumonia’s an infection that involves the lungs,” says Dr. Mark Sprenkle, chief of pulmonary and critical care at the Hennepin County Medical Center. “It can be caused by many different kinds of organisms from viruses to bacteria to fungus.”

According to the American Lung Association, common symptoms include cough, fever, chills and shortness of breath. The term “walking pneumonia” is used to describe a less severe kind of pneumonia
.
Pneumonia can be contagious and spread from person to person.

“It can be inhaled. Some are caught by droplets from people when they sneeze or cough,” says Sprenkle. “Other times, it’s less clear. Bacteria can colonize the back of the throat and if people aspirate a little bit of that down in to the lungs, that can lead to it too.”

Sometimes, a viral infection, like influenza, can cause problems in the respiratory tract. That could also predispose people to developing more serious bacterial pneumonia.

http://minnesota.cbslocal.com/2016/09/1 ... pneumonia/

:hand:
User avatar
LordMortis
Posts: 72315
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 11:26 pm

Re: The Hillary Clinton thread

Post by LordMortis »

While I hate to encourage him, point Rip. As far as I know, pneumonia is a state of your lungs being filled by fluid and not contagious but the infections that commonly cause pneumonia usually are and in this case it has been reportedly known "to be going around"

http://www.people.com/article/hillary-c ... -pneumonia

And without any overt political agenda, I hate "those brave souls" who know they're sick and then go to work and expose other people and the next thing you know "it's going around." It's a big pet peeve of mine.
User avatar
Holman
Posts: 30482
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 8:00 pm
Location: Between the Schuylkill and the Wissahickon

Re: The Hillary Clinton thread

Post by Holman »

Clinton got the diagnosis on Friday and began immediate strong antibiotics (the effect of which we saw on Sunday). Walking Pneumonia is considered no longer contagious after the antibiotics kick in. The staff sickness went around before people knew what it was.

Unless she was sloppily kissing babies on Friday afternoon, Clinton wasn't knowingly putting anyone at risk. Walking Pneumonia patients undergoing treatment don't need quarantine.
Much prefer my Nazis Nuremberged.
User avatar
El Guapo
Posts: 42289
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2005 4:01 pm
Location: Boston

Re: The Hillary Clinton thread

Post by El Guapo »

The whole thing is just frustrating and infuriating as an "incident" / "scandal." She got pneumonia, she took antibiotics, she went to an event that she ultimately proved not up to given that she was sick. Maybe she should have stayed home instead, maybe the press statement could have been better, but that's all inconsequential details. Point is that this (as far as I can tell) raises no real long-term issues about her broader health - she just got pneumonia, as people do.

But because the Trump campaign has seeded the press environment with bullshit nonsense about her broader health, this gets reported as "Clinton has health issues!" and again spins bullshit out of nothing.
Black Lives Matter.
User avatar
Alefroth
Posts: 9580
Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2004 1:56 pm
Location: Bellingham WA

Re: The Hillary Clinton thread

Post by Alefroth »

Jaymann wrote:Uh, pneumonia is not contagious.
Most forms of pneumonia are contagious, but chances are that Hillary's wasn't anymore.

edit: Late to the party I see.
User avatar
Smoove_B
Posts: 56977
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:58 am
Location: Kaer Morhen

Re: The Hillary Clinton thread

Post by Smoove_B »

El Guapo wrote: Point is that this (as far as I can tell) raises no real long-term issues about her broader health - she just got pneumonia, as people do.
But you're not looking at the bigger picture here. She didn't tell us on Friday that she pneumonia. Clinton LIED about her health to everyone and people DIED (well, their belief that she wasn't sick). Don't you understand? How can she be TRUSTED to lead the country when she can't even be TRUSTED to disclose she has AN INFECTION? Is that the kind of person you want for President? A liar? URANIUM!
Maybe next year, maybe no go
User avatar
GreenGoo
Posts: 43555
Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2004 10:46 pm
Location: Ottawa, ON

Re: The Hillary Clinton thread

Post by GreenGoo »

Yawn.
User avatar
hepcat
Posts: 55187
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 3:02 pm
Location: Chicago, IL Home of the triple homicide!

Re: The Hillary Clinton thread

Post by hepcat »

I think there are a lot of people making medical guesses about an Electroid from the Eighth Dimension. But how many of them actually studied medicine in the Eighth Dimension? For all we know, fainting and falling over is a form of greeting in their society.
Master of his domain.
malchior
Posts: 24795
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:58 pm

Re: The Hillary Clinton thread

Post by malchior »

This does expoee the classic "Clinton" weakness. They want everything to be perfect. Every story has to be spun just right. Heck it is probably the root cause of the untrustworthy label they both wear. Bill got away with it because he has a CHR of like 19. Hillary is like a 7. So when the propaganda machine lands the occassional hit on she will tend to find a way to step in the shit. And I don't expect them to unlearn this now.
User avatar
ImLawBoy
Forum Admin
Posts: 15535
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 9:49 pm
Location: Chicago, IL
Contact:

Re: The Hillary Clinton thread

Post by ImLawBoy »

hepcat wrote:I think there are a lot of people making medical guesses about an Electroid from the Eighth Dimension. But how many of them actually studied medicine in the Eighth Dimension? For all we know, fainting and falling over is a form of greeting in their society.
I keep trying to come up with a "Bigboo-tay!" joke that doesn't come off as sexist here . . . .
That's my purse! I don't know you!
malchior
Posts: 24795
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:58 pm

Re: The Hillary Clinton thread

Post by malchior »

ImLawBoy wrote:
hepcat wrote:I think there are a lot of people making medical guesses about an Electroid from the Eighth Dimension. But how many of them actually studied medicine in the Eighth Dimension? For all we know, fainting and falling over is a form of greeting in their society.
I keep trying to come up with a "Bigboo-tay!" joke that doesn't come off as sexist here . . . .
And ewwww...gross. :)
User avatar
geezer
Posts: 7642
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 1:52 pm
Location: Yeeha!

Re: The Hillary Clinton thread

Post by geezer »

Smoove_B wrote:
El Guapo wrote: Point is that this (as far as I can tell) raises no real long-term issues about her broader health - she just got pneumonia, as people do.
But you're not looking at the bigger picture here. She didn't tell us on Friday that she pneumonia. Clinton LIED about her health to everyone and people DIED (well, their belief that she wasn't sick). Don't you understand? How can she be TRUSTED to lead the country when she can't even be TRUSTED to disclose she has AN INFECTION? Is that the kind of person you want for President? A liar? URANIUM!
That said, anyone want to speculate on what the narrative would have been had she instead cancelled her attendance at the event citing illness? :lol:
User avatar
YellowKing
Posts: 31434
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 2:02 pm

Re: The Hillary Clinton thread

Post by YellowKing »

Releasing medical records multiple times, releasing full tax returns, releasing thousands of emails, multiple Congressional hearings = lack of transparency

Not releasing tax returns, one brief medical statement from sham doctor = A-OK!
User avatar
Holman
Posts: 30482
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 8:00 pm
Location: Between the Schuylkill and the Wissahickon

Re: The Hillary Clinton thread

Post by Holman »

YellowKing wrote:Releasing medical records multiple times, releasing full tax returns, releasing thousands of emails, multiple Congressional hearings = lack of transparency

Not releasing tax returns, one brief medical statement from sham doctor = A-OK!
Pointing out that racists and bigots support Trump and Trump's policies = insulting the American people.

Actually insulting immigrants, Muslims, Mexicans, Jews, refugees, women, African-Americans, the disabled, P.O.W.'s, journalists, American allies, protesters, and every other candidates' supporters at every stage of the race = making America great again.
Much prefer my Nazis Nuremberged.
User avatar
Alefroth
Posts: 9580
Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2004 1:56 pm
Location: Bellingham WA

Re: The Hillary Clinton thread

Post by Alefroth »

YellowKing wrote:Releasing medical records multiple times, releasing full tax returns, releasing thousands of emails, multiple Congressional hearings = lack of transparency

Not releasing tax returns, one brief medical statement from sham doctor = A-OK!
The transformation is nearly complete.
User avatar
Zarathud
Posts: 17282
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 10:29 pm
Location: Chicago, Illinois

Re: The Hillary Clinton thread

Post by Zarathud »

Welcome to Bizzarro world.
"A lie can run round the world before the truth has got its boots on." -Terry Pratchett, The Truth
"The presence of those seeking the truth is infinitely to be preferred to those who think they've found it." -Terry Pratchett, Monstrous Regiment
malchior
Posts: 24795
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:58 pm

Re: The Hillary Clinton thread

Post by malchior »

Part of bizarro world though is how incredibly flawed a candidate she is. I don't think it is hard to see Bernie absolutely trouncing Trump at this point. Biden even much older and with his own issues would probably be better.
User avatar
Archinerd
Posts: 7002
Joined: Fri Aug 25, 2006 11:18 am
Location: Shikaakwa

Re: The Hillary Clinton thread

Post by Archinerd »

I think Bernie or Biden would have made a fine president, but they are not without their own flaws.
User avatar
Smoove_B
Posts: 56977
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:58 am
Location: Kaer Morhen

Re: The Hillary Clinton thread

Post by Smoove_B »

The thing that astounds me most is that Hillary is 68 and Donald is 70. No matter which one is elected, they're going to look like the crypt keeper by 2019. I never thought after 8 years of Obama we'd be electing someone over the age of 55 any time soon. The idea that we're back to 70 year olds? Good grief.
Maybe next year, maybe no go
User avatar
Defiant
Posts: 21045
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 11:09 pm
Location: Tongue in cheek

Re: The Hillary Clinton thread

Post by Defiant »

Previously on this thread (back on pages 17 and 18 of this thread) there was a discussion of why the cost of tuition had risen so much

FiveThirtyEight takes a look at the issue
National trends for all public four-year schools mirror those from the research institutions of Pennsylvania, although there are sizable differences across states, as the table below shows. In the median state, South Carolina, the decline in state appropriations explains 81 percent of the increase in tuition revenue
malchior
Posts: 24795
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:58 pm

Re: The Hillary Clinton thread

Post by malchior »

Fair enough. Baby boomers are afraid to give Gen X a chance. It fairly mirrors how the Corporate world is working as well.

Also Presidents usually run around 55ish. I think this is the oldest pair to ever run.
User avatar
Defiant
Posts: 21045
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 11:09 pm
Location: Tongue in cheek

Re: The Hillary Clinton thread

Post by Defiant »

malchior wrote: Also Presidents usually run around 55ish. I think this is the oldest pair to ever run.
Pair, yes. But for individual candidates, McCain (2008), Bob Dole (1996) and Reagan (1984) were older than both of them, and Reagan (1980) was older than Clinton.
malchior
Posts: 24795
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:58 pm

Re: The Hillary Clinton thread

Post by malchior »

If we go by inauguration she'd be 2nd oldest after Reagan by about a half year and Trump would be oldest.
Post Reply