Re: Shootings
Posted: Sun Jun 05, 2022 12:38 pm
No joke: a good deal of "the problem with this Government" is truly "a problem with the voters in Kentucky"
That is not dead which can eternal lie, and with strange aeons bring us some web forums whereupon we can gather
http://garbi.online/forum/
Obviously nowhere, because Republicans would not pass it. They value gun rights more than lives. As I noted above, dead children are just part of the cost of freedom.Blackhawk wrote: Sun Jun 05, 2022 12:28 pm I'll ask it again separately, because most people are probably tuning the other discussion out:
If we had a great bill in hand right now, and figured out the best combination of reforms to prevent this from happening again, what would we do with it? Where would it go?
It would die in the Senate. But there is value in making the Senate kill it. People should continue to see who is stopping anything from happening and who is responsible for continuing to enable this bullshit.Blackhawk wrote:I'll ask it again separately, because most people are probably tuning the other discussion out:
If we had a great bill in hand right now, and figured out the best combination of reforms to prevent this from happening again, what would we do with it? Where would it go?
Most of that is accidental. Children killing children happens when mom or dad leaves the guns in a drawer or under the bed.dbt1949 wrote: Sun Jun 05, 2022 8:08 pm One of the problems is that children are shooting children. Maybe our society needs to change the way they think.
All political choices have risks. The Democrats have consistently been terrible at analyzing the risks and I think this could be one of them. We have to consider Americans at large don't understand that the Senate is broken. They generally don't understand the dynamics of what is happening at all. So it is hard to 'inform them' even if they cared to be informed. Which they mostly don't.Blackhawk wrote: Sun Jun 05, 2022 10:13 pm I swear to god, I feel like I'm having the same conversation twice.And yes, Schumer plans to force a vote for exactly that reason, hoping to affect the midterms, hoping to give the Democrats another chance. In other words, we're using unpassable gun control legislation as a tool to fix the government.
I just think it is a particularly risky tool, as it is one that has a history of energizing the right and driving them to vote, so it has the potential to backfire.
I mean, it's not really being used as a tool to fix the government, as slow as these iterations take - this is kinda how the government was designed to work. Learn how a man will vote on an issue -> decide if you want to vote for him. The mother-fuckers of Kentucky keep sending this man to do what he does. His party makes him the leader. He keeps us from 'fixing' the government because he thinks it's not broken.Blackhawk wrote: Sun Jun 05, 2022 10:13 pm I swear to god, I feel like I'm having the same conversation twice.And yes, Schumer plans to force a vote for exactly that reason, hoping to affect the midterms, hoping to give the Democrats another chance. In other words, we're using unpassable gun control legislation as a tool to fix the government.
I just think it is a particularly risky tool, as it is one that has a history of energizing the right and driving them to vote, so it has the potential to backfire.
Unagi wrote: Sun Jun 05, 2022 12:38 pm No joke: a good deal of "the problem with this Government" is truly "a problem with the voters in Kentucky"
I saw judge Salas on Morning Joe today talking about the bill to protect judges. This comes after an assassination of a former judge in Wisconsin. Her son was killed in an attempted assassination on her life. She didn't name him but the main blocker constantly is Rand. All they want to do is protect judges from being searchable in public databases.
But there is a complication to that. One side has abused the system such that those who actually decide who to vote for (as opposed to just blindly pressing the red or blue button) don't matter nearly as much as they are supposed to.Unagi wrote: Mon Jun 06, 2022 9:10 am I mean, it's not really being used as a tool to fix the government, as slow as these iterations take - this is kinda how the government was designed to work. Learn how a man will vote on an issue -> decide if you want to vote for him.
Major Republican donors, including some that have contributed to Gov. Greg Abbott’s campaigns, joined other conservative Texans in signing an open letter supporting congressional action to increase gun restrictions in response to the mass shooting in Uvalde that left 19 children and two teachers dead last week.
Even if you could find swiss cheese that big, it wouldn't stop head-sized cannon balls.Smoove_B wrote: Tue Jun 07, 2022 10:02 am Hey look, someone took the "Swiss cheese" model that was popularized during the early days of the pandemic and re-created it for firearm death:
![]()
But why do they wear cheese on their heads in Wisconsin then?LawBeefaroni wrote: Tue Jun 07, 2022 11:02 amEven if you could find swiss cheese that big, it wouldn't stop head-sized cannon balls.Smoove_B wrote: Tue Jun 07, 2022 10:02 am Hey look, someone took the "Swiss cheese" model that was popularized during the early days of the pandemic and re-created it for firearm death:
![]()
Douglas K. Uhde, the man accused of shooting and killing former Juneau County Circuit Court Judge John Roemer, died Tuesday after being in critical condition for four days, according to a news release from the Wisconsin Department of Justice.
Uhde, 56, was declared legally brain-dead at 9:41 a.m. Saturday and his body remained on life-support until Tuesday to allow for organ donation, the release said.
Judge Roemer, 68, was killed Friday in a New Lisbon, Wisconsin, home, the state's Justice Department said in a statement. Uhde was identified as a suspect, and was found in the basement of the home with an "apparent self-inflicted gunshot wound," according to the state DOJ.
It was later revealed that Uhde had been sentenced to prison by the judge more than 15 years ago, court documents show.
Christ, you can't make this shit up. There are people out there who think this.Decades of feminization, emasculation, and preferential hiring account for America’s low-intelligence, self-serving workforce. This malevolent matriarchy in the making increasingly lacks the higher-order capacity for altruism and heroism.
I think someone here has it in their sig: When you're accustomed to privilege, equality feels like oppression.hepcat wrote: Fri Jun 10, 2022 7:22 am My die hard extreme right coworker just posted a link to an article about the Uvalde shooting. According to its summary, we've been blaming the wrong things
Christ, you can't make this shit up. There are people out there who think this.Decades of feminization, emasculation, and preferential hiring account for America’s low-intelligence, self-serving workforce. This malevolent matriarchy in the making increasingly lacks the higher-order capacity for altruism and heroism.
In a final bit of irony, this hateful article, which starts off complaining about gay rights, ends with a quote from Oscar Wilde. Someone isn't as smart as they think they are, methinks.
10 days into June and we're at:YellowKing wrote: Fri Jun 10, 2022 9:02 pm Three were injured at a mall food court in Gastonia today when shooting broke out (right near my dad's place). Fortunately nobody was killed, so you won't hear about it. Those are the nearly daily incidents that are occurring but never break through to national discussion.
Total Shot: 103
Shot & Killed: 20
Shot & Wounded: 83
Year To Date
Total Shot: 1333
Shot & Killed: 249
Shot & Wounded: 1084
Total Homicides: 274
The lead Republican negotiator in US Senate dialogue toward a bipartisan gun safety bill walked out of the talks on Thursday, dimming the likelihood of a vote on the legislation before senators leave for a two-week July 4 recess.
Senator John Cornyn told reporters that he had not abandoned the negotiations, but he was returning to Texas amid difficulty reaching agreement.
“It’s fish or cut bait,” he said. “I don’t know what they have in mind, but I’m through talking.” Other senators in the huddle remained inside the room.
...
[T]he talks have become bogged down in disagreements over two main provisions: how to provide incentives to states to create so-called red flag laws, in which guns can be temporarily taken away from people deemed dangerous, and the “boyfriend loophole,” allowing authorities to block abusive spouses from buying firearms, but does not cover people who aren’t married.
Cornyn, whose home state of Texas does not have a red-flag law and is considered unlikely to enact one, wants the funding for that provision to cover other efforts towards tackling mental illness issues, such as “crisis intervention programs.”
Cornyn said earlier on Thursday negotiators would need to reach agreement that day to have legislation ready in time for a vote next week.
Pyperkub wrote: Sun Jun 05, 2022 2:18 am Please note that the GOP strategy is to do nothing.
In writing
https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/p ... y-1362970/
UVALDE, Texas — A city police officer armed with an AR-15-style rifle hesitated when he had a brief chance to shoot the gunman approaching a school in Uvalde, Texas, because he did not want to hit children, according to a senior sheriff’s deputy who spoke to the officer.
The fateful decision, which has not been previously reported, represented the second missed opportunity for officers arriving at Robb Elementary School to prevent a massacre by intervening while the gunman was still outside the school. Officials have said that an officer from a different department, the Uvalde school district police force, arrived early but drove past the gunman, not seeing him in the parking lot of the school.
The quick arrival of several officers on May 24 reflected the speed with which the initial response took place, and contrasted sharply with what would become a protracted delay in finally confronting the gunman after he began shooting inside a pair of connected fourth-grade classrooms.
It also made clear the agonizing decisions law enforcement officers had to make as they confronted the gunman, who was firing shots outside the school; the officer who arrived with a rifle had only seconds to make a decision, and feared that firing his weapon could have meant hitting children, the senior sheriff’s deputy said.
That's at least an understandable reason to hesitate, as opposed to [ralph]"I'm in danger!" [/ralph] The training to not take risky shots when you might hit bystanders is intense, and filled with nightmarish scenarios that keep you awake at night, scenarios of civil suits that destroy your family, scenarios of years in prison for reckless homicide of a child. Taking out a hostage to take down the hostage taker is the kind of split-second decision that goes beyond what the average cop is ever expected to face, and it definitely opens the door to a few seconds of, "Oh, god, what do I do?"“I asked him, ‘Why didn’t you shoot? Why didn’t you engage?’ And that’s when he told me about the background,” he said. “According to the officers, they didn’t engage back because in the background there was kids playing and they were scared of hitting the kids.”
Especially when the word 'Uvalde' is anywhere on the uniform.Unagi wrote: Sun Jun 19, 2022 10:52 am It certainly underscores the problem with ‘more guns in school’.
Also, I hate to say it but I’m no longer feeling confident with trusting any accounting of the events, presented by the police.
Police lie. A lot. It is well documented.Blackhawk wrote: Sun Jun 19, 2022 11:01 amEspecially when the word 'Uvalde' police is anywhere on the uniform.Unagi wrote: Sun Jun 19, 2022 10:52 am It certainly underscores the problem with ‘more guns in school’.
Also, I hate to say it but I’m no longer feeling confident with trusting any accounting of the events, presented by the police.
I know. But most do it with bluster - "here is what we're telling you, no further comment", when the real truth is hidden and takes effort to dig out. The Uvalde chief, on the other hand, took it to Trump-like levels of absurdity and obviousness.malchior wrote: Mon Jun 20, 2022 10:27 amPolice lie. A lot. It is well documented.Blackhawk wrote: Sun Jun 19, 2022 11:01 amEspecially when the word 'Uvalde' police is anywhere on the uniform.Unagi wrote: Sun Jun 19, 2022 10:52 am It certainly underscores the problem with ‘more guns in school’.
Also, I hate to say it but I’m no longer feeling confident with trusting any accounting of the events, presented by the police.
Fair enough. It is not an exciting development.Blackhawk wrote: Mon Jun 20, 2022 10:30 amI know. But most do it with bluster - "here is what we're telling you, no further comment", when the real truth is hidden and takes effort to dig out. The Uvalde chief, on the other hand, took it to Trump-like levels of absurdity and obviousness.malchior wrote: Mon Jun 20, 2022 10:27 amPolice lie. A lot. It is well documented.Blackhawk wrote: Sun Jun 19, 2022 11:01 amEspecially when the word 'Uvalde' police is anywhere on the uniform.Unagi wrote: Sun Jun 19, 2022 10:52 am It certainly underscores the problem with ‘more guns in school’.
Also, I hate to say it but I’m no longer feeling confident with trusting any accounting of the events, presented by the police.