





Moderators: $iljanus, LawBeefaroni
Beginning Jan. 1, low-income, transgender adults in Maryland will have their gender-affirming care covered by the state’s Medicaid system.
For the state’s LGBTQ+ community, this is a reason to celebrate — “especially at a time when, across the country, we’ve seen this concerted effort to attack trans rights and many other rights,” Sam Williamson, one of the founders of the Trans Rights Advocacy Coalition, told The Baltimore Sun.
...
The Maryland Medical Assistance Program will be prohibited from denying gender-affirming treatment based on an adult patient’s gender identity or excluding certain treatments on the basis that they are cosmetic.
Run by the state, the Maryland Medical Assistance Program pays for health care services for low-income residents with state and federal funds.
Under the Trans Health Equity Act, Maryland’s Medicaid system will be required to cover all gender-affirming treatment, or treatment that is medically necessary health care prescribed by a medical professional to treat conditions related to their patient’s gender identity, to adults. This includes hormone therapy; puberty blockers; hair alteration; voice therapy; surgical alterations to an individual’s face, neck, chest, abdomen, genitals and buttocks; and fertility preservation procedures, among other treatments that align their body or physical appearance with their gender identity or alleviate distress caused by gender dysphoria.
Kim Davis, the former county clerk who refused to issue marriage licenses in Kentucky to same-sex couples, must pay a total of $260,104 in fees and expenses to attorneys who represented one couple, according to a federal judge’s ruling.
That is in addition to $100,000 in damages a jury said the former Rowan county clerk should pay the couple who sued.
Attorneys for Davis had argued that the fees and costs sought by the attorneys were excessive, but US district judge David L Bunning disagreed and said Davis must pay since the men prevailed in their lawsuit, the Lexington Herald-Leader of Kentucky reported.
Attorneys for Davis were expected to appeal the ruling.
I have to wonder, has a married woman that took the name of her husband ever been kicked off a ballot in Ohio for not disclosing her maiden name?A transgender woman running for the Ohio House was rejected from the ballot for not listing her former name.
Vanessa Joy was the only Democrat seeking the Ohio House 50th District seat, which forms a U-shape in Stark County and includes Canal Fulton, East Canton, Massillon and Minerva.
Joy had enough valid signatures to qualify. Problem was, Stark County's four-member Board of Elections found a flaw in her petitions because she legally changed her name in 2022 and did not include her former name on the petitions she'd circulated, as required by law.
Joy said she didn't know she had to include her former name. State law requires anyone who's changed names during the past five years — for almost any reason — to include his or her former name on petitions.
...
With Joy out of the 50th House race, Republican Matthew Kishman stands to win in the fall, unless a write-in candidate enters the fray. The 50th District incumbent, Reggie Stoltzfus, R-Paris Township, opted to run for Congress.
"But in the trans community, our dead names are dead; there's a reason it's dead — that is a dead person who is gone and buried," Joy said.
My guess is that they probably usually disclose it. Married women also don't usually consider their maiden names dead.
If any person desiring to become a candidate for public office has had a change of name within five years immediately preceding the filing of his statement of candidacy, both his statement of candidacy and nominating petition must contain, immediately following the person's present name, the person's former names. Any person who has been elected under the person's changed name, without submission of the person's former name, shall be immediately suspended from the office and the office declared vacated, and shall be liable to the state for any salary the person has received while holding such office.
Probably for standard stuff like preventing someone with a criminal history from tricking the voters into not finding out said history. This would have been before the widespread use of internet so tracking someone's name change would require a lot more research than any average voter would care to do.Smoove_B wrote: Thu Jan 04, 2024 5:11 pm It was a law that went into effect back in 1995, so I'm curious as to the reasoning back then:
Maybe, yeah. I can't seem to find out if this kind of law is common though - if other states have similar requirements. There's a story from 2012 about two House candidates running on made up names (Florida and Idaho) and a law change in NY state in 2021 based on something that affected two women that were disqualified because their registered voting names didn't match the names they used to run for office.gilraen wrote: Thu Jan 04, 2024 7:00 pm Probably for standard stuff like preventing someone with a criminal history from tricking the voters into not finding out said history. This would have been before the widespread use of internet so tracking someone's name change would require a lot more research than any average voter would care to do.
An excellent point from a reasonable person:Recently, two Muslim women running for elected office in Queens, Mary Jobaida and Moumita Ahmed, were removed from the ballot by the Board of Elections because the names they used on their designating petitions did not match their registered voter names.
"New York's greatest strength is its diversity and it is imperative that our state's government reflects the people it serves," Governor Hochul said. "This bill is a step in the right direction to removing the institutional barriers that limit political participation from any community."
This legislation addresses the fact that many people with ethnically traditional names unfamiliar to the general population adopt an alternate or anglicized name which is easier to remember or pronounce and that they should not be penalized for doing so. The legislation clarifies that the use of alternate or anglicized names on election petitions and ballots is acceptable as long as the chosen name is commonly used to identify that person in the person's community and its use is not intended to mislead voters or petition signers.
No one tell Nikki Haley...State Senator John Liu said, "Candidates should be able to run for office using the nickname they are commonly known by in their communities, as long as they do not intend to mislead or confuse voters. In recent years, the Board of Elections tried to kick several immigrant women off the ballot for using the names they are widely known by personally and professionally, rather than their given names. This legislation changes that undemocratic practice once and for all, and helps candidates of color and immigrant candidates have equal access to the ballot as men with nicknames like 'Marty,' 'Tony,' or 'Bill.' Thank you to Governor Hochul for signing this important bill into law."
Ohio Gov. Mike DeWine announced proposals this month that transgender advocates say could block access to gender-affirming care provided by independent clinics and general practitioners, leaving thousands of adults scrambling for treatment and facing health risks.
...
DeWine announced the proposed rules amid a whirl of activity that could push Ohio further than most other states in controlling gender-affirming care and make it just the second to set forth restrictions on adult care.
He also signed an executive order to ban gender-affirming surgery for minors but vetoed a bill that would ban all gender-affirming care for minors. One chamber of the state legislature has already overridden it and the other is voting Jan. 24 on whether to do so.
“It is a policy project that attempts to make it so onerous, so restrictive to get care, that people are functionally unable to do so,” said Kellan Baker, executive director of the Whitman-Walker Institute, a Washington-based organization focused on the health of LGBTQ+ people.
The policies focused on care for adults come in draft administrative rules released this month by the Ohio Department of Health and the state’s Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services.
Of note:The Ohio Senate voted Wednesday to override Republican Gov. Mike DeWine’s veto of a bill that bans transition-related medical care for transgender minors and restricts trans athletes’ participation on school sports teams.
After the Senate’s 23-9 vote, the bill will become law in 90 days. The Ohio House already voted 65-28, along party lines, to override DeWine’s veto earlier this month.
Ohio is now the 22nd state with a law that restricts minors’ access to puberty blockers and hormone therapy and the 24th with a law that bars trans girls and women from playing on women’s school sports teams.
Health care providers who violate the law could face disciplinary action from their licensing board. The law also allows students in K-12 schools and colleges who believe they have been deprived of an athletic opportunity because of a trans student’s participation to sue their school, school district, interscholastic body or other related organization.
No surprise then there's so much political and policy push-back in schools and in legislative officies.More than 1 in 4 Gen Z adults in the U.S. identify as lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender or queer, dwarfing the percentages of LGBTQ Americans in older age groups, a new survey has found.
Twenty-eight percent of Gen Z adults — which the survey’s researchers specify as those ages 18 to 25 — identify as LGBTQ, according to a report released this week by the Public Religion Research Institute, or PRRI. That compares with 10% of all adults, 16% of millennials, 7% of Generation X, 4% of baby boomers and 4% of the Silent Generation, the institute found.
“With respect to LGBTQ identity, it’s very clear that Gen Z adults look different than older Americans,” said Melissa Deckman, PRRI’s chief executive.
The article is referencing a post made on Twitter (yeah, I know) from an attorney and clinical instructor:Transgender people in Florida could have their driver's licenses revoked or face prosecution if they try to change their gender markers, according to a memo shared on social media.
Robert Kynoch, the deputy executive director of the Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles, issued a memo dated January 26 that said "establishing gender on a newly issued Florida Driver License is based on the supporting documents provided with an application," according to a screenshot posted on X, formerly Twitter.
The documents "must be sufficient to establish the identity of the applicant" under Florida law, he said. "Furthermore, misrepresenting one's gender, understood as sex, on a driver license constitutes fraud under s. 322,212, F.S., and subjects an offender to criminal and civil penalties, including cancellation, suspension, or revocation of his or her driver license."
In other posts, Caraballo wrote that "if the language used in this directive is taken at face value, any trans person driving with a changed gender marker on their drivers license could be criminally charged with fraud. This interpretation could potentially apply to anyone driving in the state, including tourists."
Caraballo told Newsweek that the change will "forcibly out" transgender people and put them in danger.
"This is a 'show me your papers' policy for trans people in the state of Florida," she said. "Trans people are now at risk for having their licenses revoked or suspended at any time. It's the legal erasure and criminalization of the entire trans community. It's a dangerous change that will forcibly out trans people and put them at immense risk for discrimination and violence."
Because the mechanisms for stopping it have broken.Daehawk wrote: Tue Jan 30, 2024 11:58 pm Why do we as a world whole put up with this shit. Why do we stop moving forward for some assholes who stand around and spit on others?
Yes, welcome to the real world of genders.Daehawk wrote: Sat Apr 13, 2024 1:56 pm Do you know intersex? I didn't but now I do. Thanks to this video.
I understand that's not as flashy as a Youtube, but it was still a really good book."I was born twice: first, as a baby girl, on a remarkably smogless Detroit day of January 1960; and then again, as a teenage boy, in an emergency room near Petoskey, Michigan, in August of l974. . . My birth certificate lists my name as Calliope Helen Stephanides. My most recent driver's license...records my first name simply as Cal."
So begins the breathtaking story of Calliope Stephanides and three generations of the Greek-American Stephanides family who travel from a tiny village overlooking Mount Olympus in Asia Minor to Prohibition-era Detroit, witnessing its glory days as the Motor City, and the race riots of l967, before they move out to the tree-lined streets of suburban Grosse Pointe, Michigan. To understand why Calliope is not like other girls, she has to uncover a guilty family secret and the astonishing genetic history that turns Callie into Cal, one of the most audacious and wondrous narrators in contemporary fiction. Lyrical and thrilling, Jeffrey Eugenides's Middlesex is an exhilarating reinvention of the American epic.
What'ya, pregnant?
Four attorneys general in conservative states have abused their authority to investigate transgender patients and their health care, and hospitals must do more to protect them, a new Senate Finance Committee report argues.
The report, titled “How State Attorneys General Target Transgender Youth and Adults by Weaponizing the Medicaid Program and their Health Oversight Authority,” investigates how attorneys general in Tennessee, Missouri, Indiana and Texas have opened investigations into hospitals for alleged Medicaid fraud or violations of consumer protection laws. They opened the investigations, the report argues, “in order to further ideological and political goals,” and there has been “significant variation in hospitals’ responses to such requests and their approaches to safeguarding the privacy of one of their most vulnerable patient populations—LGBTQIA+ people.”
This is fantastic - more people to get hysterical about on Fox. A whole cottage industry of lawyers can spring up around this as well - it could become one of our top 100 industries. I really think we need to be bringing opportunities like this to my state.
Perhaps the report title should be "How a cottage industry of lawyers sprung up around denying people their rights... "Smoove_B wrote: Tue Apr 16, 2024 9:24 pm The report, titled “How State Attorneys General Target Transgender Youth and Adults by Weaponizing the Medicaid Program and their Health Oversight Authority,”
As part of his legal justification:A federal judge has blocked the implementation of a new Title IX rule that prohibits discrimination based on gender identity and sexual orientation.
Danny Reeves, chief judge in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky, handed down an opinion Monday that enjoined enforcement of that portion federal civil rights law, which was recently implemented by the administration of Democratic President Joe Biden.
Scheduled to take hold in August, the rule would have expanded Title IX civil rights protections explicitly to LGBTQ+ students for the first time since the enactment of the 1972 law.
The new rule would clarify that Title IX law applies to discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity.
Reeves in his 93-page decision Monday said, “There are two sexes: male and female.”
The Supreme Court on Monday agreed to hear the Biden administration’s challenge to a transgender care ban in Tennessee, delving into the complicated and politically fraught issue of gender-affirming care in a substantive way for the first time.
...
The case will be heard this fall.
We all know how this is going to come out. Thomas and his cronies will say that it is a States rights issue, because it's not directly addressed in the constitution. This is the guaranteed outcome. Thomas would have signed off on the Dredd Scott decision if he were on the bench in the 1860s. If you haven't read Dredd Scott, it's worth a read and Thomas echos their reasoning in all of his major anti civil liberties opinions. It's also an infuriating read if you believe in equality and everyone being created equal.Isgrimnur wrote: Mon Jun 24, 2024 12:52 pm Supreme Court to decide whether states can restrict gender-affirming care for minors
The Supreme Court on Monday agreed to hear the Biden administration’s challenge to a transgender care ban in Tennessee, delving into the complicated and politically fraught issue of gender-affirming care in a substantive way for the first time.
...
The case will be heard this fall.
[T]housands [of] convictions were overturned on Wednesday, after US President Joe Biden announced that he would pardon those found guilty of crimes under a military law that banned gay sex for more than 60 years.
...
In a statement on Wednesday, President Biden said he was "using [his] clemency authority to pardon many former service members who were convicted simply for being themselves".
"We have a sacred obligation to all of our service members - including our brave LGBTQ+ service members: to properly prepare and equip them when they are sent into harm's way, and to care for them and their families when they return home," he said.
US media reports that some 2,000 people could be granted clemency under the president’s proclamation.
The proclamation will now allow those affected to apply for a certificate of pardon, after which the service member can get their discharge status changed.
This will make them eligible for veteran benefits that may have previously been denied, though it is unclear how long the process will take.
The Biden administration cannot enforce new anti-discrimination rules in health care for transgender Americans, a federal judge in Mississippi ruled Wednesday, citing a recent landmark Supreme Court ruling that weakened the power of federal agencies.
The preliminary injunction from US District Judge Louis Guirola comes just two days before the new protections were set to take effect. The George W. Bush appointee said his block on the federal protections will apply nationwide.
I'm sure that was teed up and ready to go, waiting on Chevron. Expected more unexpected rulings like this.Alefroth wrote: Wed Jul 03, 2024 10:46 pm I wouldn't have expected this to be a consequence of the Chevron ruling-
https://www.cnn.com/2024/07/03/politics ... index.html
The Biden administration cannot enforce new anti-discrimination rules in health care for transgender Americans, a federal judge in Mississippi ruled Wednesday, citing a recent landmark Supreme Court ruling that weakened the power of federal agencies.
The preliminary injunction from US District Judge Louis Guirola comes just two days before the new protections were set to take effect. The George W. Bush appointee said his block on the federal protections will apply nationwide.