SCOTUS Watch

For discussion of religion and politics

Moderators: LawBeefaroni, $iljanus

Post Reply
User avatar
Fretmute
Posts: 8513
Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2004 7:05 pm
Location: On a hillside, desolate

Re: SCOTUS Watch

Post by Fretmute »

noxiousdog wrote: Thu Sep 27, 2018 2:04 pm
GreenGoo wrote: Thu Sep 27, 2018 1:55 pm Anything above a small business almost certainly has a "no comments on physical appearance" as part of their sexual harassment policy. That most people choose to ignore this, especially with long standing co-workers and innocuous comments, doesn't mean it doesn't exist.
I've never been anywhere that had one of those.
At my job, if I tell someone, using these exact words, "You look nice today", and they decide that they want to interpret that in a sleazy way, I will absolutely get nailed for sexual harassment.
User avatar
Alefroth
Posts: 9366
Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2004 1:56 pm
Location: Bellingham WA

Re: SCOTUS Watch

Post by Alefroth »

Kurth wrote: Thu Sep 27, 2018 1:05 pm
Oh, come on. I agree with everything about the old white men of the GOP and reproductive rights, but that comment from Hatch is completely innocuous. Saying someone is an attractive witness is no different from my comment that she comes across as likeable. He's not saying "She's smoking hot!!!!!" That kind of thing is pure "gotchaism" (I think I made that up, but I'm sticking with it). But I'm sure it will be all over social media in no time.
Well, that says loads about you.
User avatar
Remus West
Posts: 33597
Joined: Mon May 09, 2005 5:39 pm
Location: Not in Westland

Re: SCOTUS Watch

Post by Remus West »

Kurth wrote: Thu Sep 27, 2018 1:05 pm
GreenGoo wrote: Thu Sep 27, 2018 12:57 pm
Captain Caveman wrote: Thu Sep 27, 2018 12:54 pm
HOLY MOTHER OF GOD
Don't forget that this is the party of old white men that are dead set on controlling a woman's reproductive system. I find comments like "she's attractive" to be so tone deaf as to be from another era. Like 70+ years ago era. Eventually they'll die off and a new crop of Reps will take their place, and they'll be much more savvy about their misogyny.

Plus...Utah.
Oh, come on. I agree with everything about the old white men of the GOP and reproductive rights, but that comment from Hatch is completely innocuous. Saying someone is an attractive witness is no different from my comment that she comes across as likeable. He's not saying "She's smoking hot!!!!!" That kind of thing is pure "gotchaism" (I think I made that up, but I'm sticking with it). But I'm sure it will be all over social media in no time.
Saying she is likeable implies her personality. Saying she is attractive implies her looks. Very different. Particularly in this situation.
“As democracy is perfected, the office of president represents, more and more closely, the inner soul of the people. On some great and glorious day the plain folks of the land will reach their heart's desire at last and the White House will be adorned by a downright moron.” - H.L. Mencken
User avatar
noxiousdog
Posts: 24627
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 11:27 pm
Contact:

Re: SCOTUS Watch

Post by noxiousdog »

Isgrimnur wrote: Thu Sep 27, 2018 2:06 pm
noxiousdog wrote: Thu Sep 27, 2018 2:04 pm
GreenGoo wrote: Thu Sep 27, 2018 1:55 pm Anything above a small business almost certainly has a "no comments on physical appearance" as part of their sexual harassment policy. That most people choose to ignore this, especially with long standing co-workers and innocuous comments, doesn't mean it doesn't exist.
I've never been anywhere that had one of those.
You work in the Texas oil industry.

And the phrase is: "making graphic or degrading comments about an individual or his/her appearance." which is a sight different from "no comments".
I work for a foreign company and it's a global code of conduct. It's complete reasonable. Don't be degrading or offensive, and more importantly if you're asked to stop, stop even if you don't think you're being degrading or offensive.
Black Lives Matter

"To wield Grond, the mighty hammer of the Federal Government, is to be intoxicated with power beyond what you and I can reckon (though I figure we can ball park it pretty good with computers and maths). Need to tunnel through a mountain? Grond. Kill a mighty ogre? Grond. Hangnail? Grond. Spider? Grond (actually, that's a legit use, moreso than the rest)." - Peacedog
User avatar
Isgrimnur
Posts: 85295
Joined: Sun Oct 15, 2006 12:29 am
Location: Chookity pok
Contact:

Re: SCOTUS Watch

Post by Isgrimnur »

I know, I just like giving you a hard time.
It's almost as if people are the problem.
User avatar
LordMortis
Posts: 71964
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 11:26 pm

Re: SCOTUS Watch

Post by LordMortis »

Combustible Lemur wrote: Thu Sep 27, 2018 1:42 pm That being said. Based on previous Hatch quotes I don't think he gets the benefit of any doubts.
It's easy to imagine a scenario where attractive is conflated to mean having value that holds your attention over physical appeal. We do it all of the time, "That's an attractive offer" "this what the most attractive choice"

That said, no matter how easy to imagine, I also don't imagine giving anyone the benefit of the doubt. It's an ill conceived and inconsiderate reference and the further your tendencies sway from a person how hold consideration for people coupled with the more your livelihood is coupled with effective communication, the more negatively I view you while not giving you the benefit of the doubt.

On a scale from Merlkly to McConnell, Hatch is consistently a 7 or 8 in raising my dander. This is doesn't disappoint. I have as little use from him as I did before :roll: his language games.
User avatar
Enough
Posts: 14689
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 11:05 pm
Location: Serendipity
Contact:

Re: SCOTUS Watch

Post by Enough »

Remus West wrote: Thu Sep 27, 2018 2:11 pm
Kurth wrote: Thu Sep 27, 2018 1:05 pm
GreenGoo wrote: Thu Sep 27, 2018 12:57 pm
Captain Caveman wrote: Thu Sep 27, 2018 12:54 pm
HOLY MOTHER OF GOD
Don't forget that this is the party of old white men that are dead set on controlling a woman's reproductive system. I find comments like "she's attractive" to be so tone deaf as to be from another era. Like 70+ years ago era. Eventually they'll die off and a new crop of Reps will take their place, and they'll be much more savvy about their misogyny.

Plus...Utah.
Oh, come on. I agree with everything about the old white men of the GOP and reproductive rights, but that comment from Hatch is completely innocuous. Saying someone is an attractive witness is no different from my comment that she comes across as likeable. He's not saying "She's smoking hot!!!!!" That kind of thing is pure "gotchaism" (I think I made that up, but I'm sticking with it). But I'm sure it will be all over social media in no time.
Saying she is likeable implies her personality. Saying she is attractive implies her looks. Very different. Particularly in this situation.
Since none of us know how Dr. Ford would interpret the comment, there's that. Harassment 101 is that any comments like this can be harassment if the comment is unwelcome. I viewed the comment as par for the course for a bumbling old fool that is completely detached from reality. I see nothing wrong with bringing up the comments for derision, but I also agree we have far bigger fish to fry here.
My blog (mostly photos): Fort Ephemera - My Flickr Photostream

“You only get one sunrise and one sunset a day, and you only get so many days on the planet. A good photographer does the math and doesn’t waste either.” ―Galen Rowell
User avatar
noxiousdog
Posts: 24627
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 11:27 pm
Contact:

Re: SCOTUS Watch

Post by noxiousdog »

Isgrimnur wrote: Thu Sep 27, 2018 2:14 pm I know, I just like giving you a hard time.
No worries.
Black Lives Matter

"To wield Grond, the mighty hammer of the Federal Government, is to be intoxicated with power beyond what you and I can reckon (though I figure we can ball park it pretty good with computers and maths). Need to tunnel through a mountain? Grond. Kill a mighty ogre? Grond. Hangnail? Grond. Spider? Grond (actually, that's a legit use, moreso than the rest)." - Peacedog
User avatar
LordMortis
Posts: 71964
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 11:26 pm

Re: SCOTUS Watch

Post by LordMortis »

Fretmute wrote: Thu Sep 27, 2018 2:08 pm At my job, if I tell someone, using these exact words, "You look nice today", and they decide that they want to interpret that in a sleazy way, I will absolutely get nailed for sexual harassment.
I TiVo The Voice. I don't know why. Complementing so many women on The Voice for their look is so common it's probably unnoticeable to most but it makes me wince like it's the Wilhelm Scream. Conversely, they do it so rarely for a man, that is also sticks out and it sticks out so much they tease each other about it.

I'm not even sure I'd notice and therefore have a hangup if it weren't for a show called The Voice. Where is GG's idiosyncrasies thread? I could update that thing daily with stupid shit I can't get over.
User avatar
Fireball
Posts: 4763
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:43 pm

Re: SCOTUS Watch

Post by Fireball »

Dr. Ford did an excellent job in a terrible situation. After that, no decent person can support putting Kavanaugh on the Court.
Wed Oct 20, 2004 1:17 am
Zarathud: The sad thing is that Barak Obama is a very intelligent and articulate person, even when you disagree with his views it's clear that he's very thoughtful. I would have loved to see Obama in a real debate.
Me: Wait 12 years, when he runs for president. :-)
User avatar
Isgrimnur
Posts: 85295
Joined: Sun Oct 15, 2006 12:29 am
Location: Chookity pok
Contact:

Re: SCOTUS Watch

Post by Isgrimnur »

Fireball wrote: Thu Sep 27, 2018 2:21 pm Dr. Ford did an excellent job in a terrible situation. After that, no decent person can support putting Kavanaugh on the Court.
What makes you think the voters elected decent persons?
It's almost as if people are the problem.
User avatar
msteelers
Posts: 7320
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 9:30 pm
Location: Port Saint Lucie, Florida
Contact:

Re: SCOTUS Watch

Post by msteelers »

LordMortis wrote:
Fretmute wrote: Thu Sep 27, 2018 2:08 pm At my job, if I tell someone, using these exact words, "You look nice today", and they decide that they want to interpret that in a sleazy way, I will absolutely get nailed for sexual harassment.
I TiVo The Voice. I don't know why. Complementing so many women on The Voice for their look is so common it's probably unnoticeable to most but it makes me wince like it's the Wilhelm Scream. Conversely, they do it so rarely for a man, that is also sticks out and it sticks out so much they tease each other about it.

I'm not even sure I'd notice and therefore have a hangup if it weren't for a show called The Voice. Where is GG's idiosyncrasies thread? I could update that thing daily with stupid shit I can't get over.
Along that same vein, it bothers me that every time a woman posts a picture to social media, the comments are some variation of telling her how good she looks.

And it’s not just creepy guys that do it. A lot of woman will throw in the obligatory “beautiful!”... or “gorgeous!” to their comments.
User avatar
$iljanus
Forum Moderator
Posts: 13947
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 3:46 pm
Location: New England...or under your bed

Re: SCOTUS Watch

Post by $iljanus »

Is it my imagination that Mitchell is trying to lay blame on Dr. Ford for giving testimony in the Senate vs in private? She should have submitted to a forensic interview? Well Dr. Ford wanted to talk to the damn FBI for crying out loud.

Mitchell set that up like a prosecutor, complementing Dr. Ford for her science references and how 5 minute questioning isn’t really the most effective way to get to the truth which elicited laughs all around. Then after commiserating with the witness, cites her own study about the best way to get testimony in sexual assault cases then asks why she didn’t pursue a forensic interview vs hiring lawyers and submitting to a polygraph. Again she wanted to be interviewed by the FBI who I would think have some experience in interviewing witness and assault victims vs investigators flying out to her from both sides of the aisle who would possibly have some political motivations?
"Who's going to tell him that the job he's currently seeking might just be one of those Black jobs?"
-Michelle Obama 2024 Democratic Convention

Wise words of warning from Smoove B: Oh, how you all laughed when I warned you about the semen. Well, who's laughing now?
User avatar
Paingod
Posts: 13225
Joined: Wed Aug 25, 2010 8:58 am

Re: SCOTUS Watch

Post by Paingod »

Isgrimnur wrote: Thu Sep 27, 2018 2:22 pm
Fireball wrote: Thu Sep 27, 2018 2:21 pm Dr. Ford did an excellent job in a terrible situation. After that, no decent person can support putting Kavanaugh on the Court.
What makes you think the voters elected decent persons?
:As: :Ks: :Qs: :Js: :Ts:
Black Lives Matter

2021-01-20: The first good night's sleep I had in 4 years.
2025-01-20: The nightmares continue.
User avatar
Skinypupy
Posts: 21283
Joined: Tue Dec 07, 2004 10:12 am
Location: Utah

Re: SCOTUS Watch

Post by Skinypupy »

Fireball wrote: Thu Sep 27, 2018 2:21 pm Dr. Ford did an excellent job in a terrible situation. After that, no decent person can support putting Kavanaugh on the Court.
Which means nothing has changed from where we started, basically.
When darkness veils the world, four Warriors of Light shall come.
User avatar
Holman
Posts: 30107
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 8:00 pm
Location: Between the Schuylkill and the Wissahickon

Re: SCOTUS Watch

Post by Holman »

Hoo Boy Lindsey Graham is *melting down,* jabbering red-faced at reporters about how the majority was "ambushed" by Ford's accusations.

Then he says that he thinks that Dr. Ford (by being put up to it) is "just as much a victim" as Kavanaugh...

Yup. Said that.
Much prefer my Nazis Nuremberged.
User avatar
Isgrimnur
Posts: 85295
Joined: Sun Oct 15, 2006 12:29 am
Location: Chookity pok
Contact:

Re: SCOTUS Watch

Post by Isgrimnur »

Paingod wrote: Thu Sep 27, 2018 2:25 pm
Isgrimnur wrote: Thu Sep 27, 2018 2:22 pm
Fireball wrote: Thu Sep 27, 2018 2:21 pm Dr. Ford did an excellent job in a terrible situation. After that, no decent person can support putting Kavanaugh on the Court.
What makes you think the voters elected decent persons?
:As: :Ks: :Qs: :Js: :Ts:
Checkmate.
It's almost as if people are the problem.
User avatar
Archinerd
Posts: 6984
Joined: Fri Aug 25, 2006 11:18 am
Location: Shikaakwa

Re: SCOTUS Watch

Post by Archinerd »

I predict a nasty tweet storm heading our way.
User avatar
Kurth
Posts: 6420
Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2005 1:19 am
Location: Portland

Re: SCOTUS Watch

Post by Kurth »

Alefroth wrote: Thu Sep 27, 2018 2:10 pm
Kurth wrote: Thu Sep 27, 2018 1:05 pm
Oh, come on. I agree with everything about the old white men of the GOP and reproductive rights, but that comment from Hatch is completely innocuous. Saying someone is an attractive witness is no different from my comment that she comes across as likeable. He's not saying "She's smoking hot!!!!!" That kind of thing is pure "gotchaism" (I think I made that up, but I'm sticking with it). But I'm sure it will be all over social media in no time.
Well, that says loads about you.
I don't want to further derail this thread, but if you care to elaborate, feel free to PM me. I'd be interested to know your thoughts.
Just 'cause you feel it, doesn't mean it's there -- Radiohead
Do you believe me? Do you trust me? Do you like me? 😳
User avatar
Holman
Posts: 30107
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 8:00 pm
Location: Between the Schuylkill and the Wissahickon

Re: SCOTUS Watch

Post by Holman »

Archinerd wrote: Thu Sep 27, 2018 2:50 pm I predict a nasty tweet storm heading our way.
I wonder. A few journos with WH connections have suggested that Trump is angry at fellow Republicans over this, like they should have vetted Kavanaugh better and known what was coming. He is reported to be furious with Don McGahn, who pushed hard for this nominee.

Obviously it makes the party look weak, but Kavanaugh going down in flames doesn't touch Trump personally the way Mueller's indictments do. He probably figures he can just pick another nominee to get the same results.

Trump isn't deeply in invested in anything but Trump.
Much prefer my Nazis Nuremberged.
User avatar
Blackhawk
Posts: 46273
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 9:48 pm
Location: Southwest Indiana

Re: SCOTUS Watch

Post by Blackhawk »

Fretmute wrote: Thu Sep 27, 2018 2:08 pm t my job, if I tell someone, using these exact words, "You look nice today", and they decide that they want to interpret that in a sleazy way, I will absolutely get nailed for sexual harassment.
And yet, as an autistic person with trouble communicating with people, the first piece of (professional, official) advice I always get is to compliment them on their appearance. Apparently they can decide that makes you a predator.

Fuck society.
What doesn't kill me makes me stranger.
User avatar
Holman
Posts: 30107
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 8:00 pm
Location: Between the Schuylkill and the Wissahickon

Re: SCOTUS Watch

Post by Holman »

OK. Here we go. "Angry preppy" it is.

He's going off on Democrats and "The Left" without even a pretense of judicial impartiality. Even Scalia hid his cards better than this.

Presumably he is not drunk at the moment, but he's certainly belligerent.
Much prefer my Nazis Nuremberged.
User avatar
Fireball
Posts: 4763
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:43 pm

Re: SCOTUS Watch

Post by Fireball »

What a fucking snowflake.
Wed Oct 20, 2004 1:17 am
Zarathud: The sad thing is that Barak Obama is a very intelligent and articulate person, even when you disagree with his views it's clear that he's very thoughtful. I would have loved to see Obama in a real debate.
Me: Wait 12 years, when he runs for president. :-)
User avatar
Smoove_B
Posts: 56390
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:58 am
Location: Kaer Morhen

Re: SCOTUS Watch

Post by Smoove_B »

I'm pretty sure at this point, the court of public opinion has ruled that Kavanugh is a giant pile of shit. I'm sure the GOP will fully take that into consideration.
Maybe next year, maybe no go
User avatar
LawBeefaroni
Forum Moderator
Posts: 56125
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 3:08 pm
Location: Urbs in Horto, outrageous taxes on everything

Re: SCOTUS Watch

Post by LawBeefaroni »

Blackhawk wrote: Thu Sep 27, 2018 3:16 pm
Fretmute wrote: Thu Sep 27, 2018 2:08 pm t my job, if I tell someone, using these exact words, "You look nice today", and they decide that they want to interpret that in a sleazy way, I will absolutely get nailed for sexual harassment.
And yet, as an autistic person with trouble communicating with people, the first piece of (professional, official) advice I always get is to compliment them on their appearance. Apparently they can decide that makes you a predator.

Fuck society.
That's 20 years old advice.

Now you just say, "Hashtag: you're so amazing!" and smile vapidly. Unless you're a congresscreature or the president. Then you just do/grab whatever.
" Hey OP, listen to my advice alright." -Tha General
"No scientific discovery is named after its original discoverer." -Stigler's Law of Eponymy, discovered by Robert K. Merton

MYT
User avatar
Paingod
Posts: 13225
Joined: Wed Aug 25, 2010 8:58 am

Re: SCOTUS Watch

Post by Paingod »

Smoove_B wrote: Thu Sep 27, 2018 3:26 pm I'm pretty sure at this point, the court of public opinion has ruled that Kavanugh is a giant pile of shit. I'm sure the GOP will fully take that into consideration.
Naw, man. They good. They brought the Poo-Pourri. He might look bad, but he smells good.
Black Lives Matter

2021-01-20: The first good night's sleep I had in 4 years.
2025-01-20: The nightmares continue.
User avatar
Holman
Posts: 30107
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 8:00 pm
Location: Between the Schuylkill and the Wissahickon

Re: SCOTUS Watch

Post by Holman »

There's no martyr like a spoiled, entitled prick with his birthright at risk.
Much prefer my Nazis Nuremberged.
User avatar
Scoop20906
Posts: 11820
Joined: Tue May 03, 2005 3:50 pm
Location: Belleville, MI

Re: SCOTUS Watch

Post by Scoop20906 »

Fireball wrote:What a fucking snowflake.
He didn’t get what he deserves and It’s not fair.
Scoop. Makeup and hair are fabulous. - Qantaga

Xbox Gamertag: Scoop20906
Steam: Scoop20906
User avatar
Fretmute
Posts: 8513
Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2004 7:05 pm
Location: On a hillside, desolate

Re: SCOTUS Watch

Post by Fretmute »

Holman wrote: Thu Sep 27, 2018 3:28 pm There's no martyr like a spoiled, entitled prick with his birthright at risk.
User avatar
Holman
Posts: 30107
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 8:00 pm
Location: Between the Schuylkill and the Wissahickon

Re: SCOTUS Watch

Post by Holman »

He's going all-in on the claim that Ford and Ramirez are part of Democratic Party conspiracy to derail him and get revenge for the Clintons.

This alone should disqualify him from the Supreme Court. How could he be trusted to rule impartially?

He himself has claimed that justices must be nonpartisan and don't sit on opposite sides of any aisle.
Much prefer my Nazis Nuremberged.
User avatar
Kraken
Posts: 45287
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 11:59 pm
Location: The Hub of the Universe
Contact:

Re: SCOTUS Watch

Post by Kraken »

Smoove_B wrote: Thu Sep 27, 2018 3:26 pm I'm pretty sure at this point, the court of public opinion has ruled that Kavanugh is a giant pile of shit. I'm sure the GOP will fully take that into consideration.
Presidential material!
User avatar
Scoop20906
Posts: 11820
Joined: Tue May 03, 2005 3:50 pm
Location: Belleville, MI

Re: SCOTUS Watch

Post by Scoop20906 »

Wow. He is losing his composure. What’s wrong with this guy?
Scoop. Makeup and hair are fabulous. - Qantaga

Xbox Gamertag: Scoop20906
Steam: Scoop20906
User avatar
Grifman
Posts: 22077
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 7:17 pm

Re: SCOTUS Watch

Post by Grifman »

Holman wrote: Thu Sep 27, 2018 3:20 pm OK. Here we go. "Angry preppy" it is.

He's going off on Democrats and "The Left" without even a pretense of judicial impartiality. Even Scalia hid his cards better than this.

Presumably he is not drunk at the moment, but he's certainly belligerent.
After Ford, I think this is a mistake. “Hurt” and “bewildered” Kavanaugh would come off better than “angry” Kavanaugh .
Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions. – G.K. Chesterton
User avatar
Unagi
Posts: 28348
Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2006 5:14 pm
Location: Chicago

Re: SCOTUS Watch

Post by Unagi »

Hey, I drink beer. I drank beer. And I didn't assault someone too!

We should just let him get the seat.
User avatar
LawBeefaroni
Forum Moderator
Posts: 56125
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 3:08 pm
Location: Urbs in Horto, outrageous taxes on everything

Re: SCOTUS Watch

Post by LawBeefaroni »

Scoop20906 wrote: Thu Sep 27, 2018 3:39 pm Wow. He is losing his composure. What’s wrong with this guy?
He's hearing "No" and doesn't quite understand the concept. It's extremely frustrating (for infants and spoiled dickbros alike) and may result in tantrums.
" Hey OP, listen to my advice alright." -Tha General
"No scientific discovery is named after its original discoverer." -Stigler's Law of Eponymy, discovered by Robert K. Merton

MYT
User avatar
gbasden
Posts: 7898
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 1:57 am
Location: Sacramento, CA

Re: SCOTUS Watch

Post by gbasden »

It's amazing that he's constantly bring up his peers as character witnesses when so many of them from High School and College have talked about him being a frequent, mean drunk.
User avatar
$iljanus
Forum Moderator
Posts: 13947
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 3:46 pm
Location: New England...or under your bed

Re: SCOTUS Watch

Post by $iljanus »

So essentially if you think he sexually assaulted Dr. Ford, you hate beer.
"Who's going to tell him that the job he's currently seeking might just be one of those Black jobs?"
-Michelle Obama 2024 Democratic Convention

Wise words of warning from Smoove B: Oh, how you all laughed when I warned you about the semen. Well, who's laughing now?
User avatar
Default
Posts: 6524
Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2004 9:01 pm
Location: Handling bombs.

Re: SCOTUS Watch

Post by Default »

Heard some of his statement on the way back from getting a haircut. I turned it off because Kavanaugh's rebuttal was such an unhinged rant that I wanted to vomit.
Last edited by Default on Thu Sep 27, 2018 3:49 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"pcp, lsd, thc, tgb...it's all good." ~ Kraken
User avatar
The Meal
Posts: 28143
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 10:33 pm
Location: 2005 Stanley Cup Champion

Re: SCOTUS Watch

Post by The Meal »


Spoiler:
Trump and Pence have both phoned Kavanaugh to voice their support ahead of today's hearing. Trump had a message for Kavanaugh, per a person familiar with the call: Be aggressive and forceful in your denials. Don't be afraid to push back on these allegations.
"Better to talk to people than communicate via tweet." — Elontra
User avatar
Scoop20906
Posts: 11820
Joined: Tue May 03, 2005 3:50 pm
Location: Belleville, MI

Re: SCOTUS Watch

Post by Scoop20906 »

This is embarrassing to listen to. Even Trump would make a better showing.
Scoop. Makeup and hair are fabulous. - Qantaga

Xbox Gamertag: Scoop20906
Steam: Scoop20906
Post Reply