Re: Bond II - The Prometheus Dawn -Chapter 2
Posted: Fri Feb 25, 2011 10:52 pm
On the poop deck..Ewww that's nasty.. hehe..Scoop20906 wrote:Naw. Just enjoying myself.
That is not dead which can eternal lie, and with strange aeons bring us some web forums whereupon we can gather
http://garbi.online/forum/
On the poop deck..Ewww that's nasty.. hehe..Scoop20906 wrote:Naw. Just enjoying myself.
Any further explanation on this? I'm trying to remember any game I may have played or followed where he rubbed some people the wrong way and honestly can't recall anything.Scoop20906 wrote:
As for why rshetts2? Anyone who's played with him could answer that and the list of suspects would include people not even playing in the game.
I've played two games with Rhett over at GT. He is a good player but can be a bit aggressive when he believes he is right and gets the blinders on. Wouldn't say he rubs people the wrong way but is aggressive.Lassr wrote:Any further explanation on this? I'm trying to remember any game I may have played or followed where he rubbed some people the wrong way and honestly can't recall anything.Scoop20906 wrote:
As for why rshetts2? Anyone who's played with him could answer that and the list of suspects would include people not even playing in the game.
you didn't even pop into my head when I saw that rshetts was their target...and probably wouldn't have either until you started posting.Scoop20906 wrote:
I'm pretty surprised at the choice so I'm assuming they want the attention off them and on me.
Interesting theoryScoop20906 wrote:Push theohall's lynch. Claim I will survive the night. Then kill the guy that razzed me about being my evil partner.
Good point. Theory discarded.God, I would be a OO WW stud!!
So, what did pop into your head when you saw rhetts was the target?Lassr wrote:you didn't even pop into my head when I saw that rshetts was their target...and probably wouldn't have either until you started posting.Scoop20906 wrote:
I'm pretty surprised at the choice so I'm assuming they want the attention off them and on me.
It popped into my head that they managed to kill 2 guys last night?Scoop20906 wrote:So, what did pop into your head when you saw rhetts was the target?Lassr wrote:you didn't even pop into my head when I saw that rshetts was their target...and probably wouldn't have either until you started posting.Scoop20906 wrote:
I'm pretty surprised at the choice so I'm assuming they want the attention off them and on me.
the usual "Why Rshetts2?"Scoop20906 wrote:So, what did pop into your head when you saw rhetts was the target?Lassr wrote:you didn't even pop into my head when I saw that rshetts was their target...and probably wouldn't have either until you started posting.Scoop20906 wrote:
I'm pretty surprised at the choice so I'm assuming they want the attention off them and on me.
Hmm, and who is the guy #2?Remus West wrote:It popped into my head that they managed to kill 2 guys last night?Scoop20906 wrote:So, what did pop into your head when you saw rhetts was the target?Lassr wrote:you didn't even pop into my head when I saw that rshetts was their target...and probably wouldn't have either until you started posting.Scoop20906 wrote:
I'm pretty surprised at the choice so I'm assuming they want the attention off them and on me.
rshetts2Scoop20906 wrote:Hmm, and who is the guy #2?Remus West wrote:It popped into my head that they managed to kill 2 guys last night?Scoop20906 wrote:So, what did pop into your head when you saw rhetts was the target?Lassr wrote:you didn't even pop into my head when I saw that rshetts was their target...and probably wouldn't have either until you started posting.Scoop20906 wrote:
I'm pretty surprised at the choice so I'm assuming they want the attention off them and on me.
Scoop, did you spell his name right when you turned in the kill order?Remus West wrote:rshetts2Scoop20906 wrote:Hmm, and who is the guy #2?Remus West wrote:It popped into my head that they managed to kill 2 guys last night?Scoop20906 wrote:So, what did pop into your head when you saw rhetts was the target?Lassr wrote:you didn't even pop into my head when I saw that rshetts was their target...and probably wouldn't have either until you started posting.Scoop20906 wrote:
I'm pretty surprised at the choice so I'm assuming they want the attention off them and on me.
Not 100% on this but:Chaosraven wrote:That actually may be a viable point. Who has played on gt with our former companion?
I think I played a game with him at GT.Scoop20906 wrote:Not 100% on this but:Chaosraven wrote:That actually may be a viable point. Who has played on gt with our former companion?
LIST OF PLAYERS
1. Qantaga - yes
2. Theohall - yes
3. MSteelers - yes
4. RMC - not sure
5. Scoop - yes
6. truicy - yes
7. Remus - no
8. Lassr - no
9. Stessier - not sure
10. Rshetts2 - Yes I'm sure he has played with himself
11. Chaosraven - no
12. Unagi - no
13. Grundbegriff - no
I didn't play or watch the last game so I'd love to hear how you think people from the last game are behaving differently.Qantaga wrote:It's funny. In the last Bond game, SPECTRE agents Lassr and Chaosraven were all kinds of chatty (and Remus wasn't exactly shy before he was exposed) as they led Her Majesty's agents to their doom. So giving the vocal agents a pass seems like a big mistake to me.
I'm here. I just haven't seen anything yet to make me cast a vote.
I was wondering why I was on this list, as I don't remember playing any games over at GT. Then I remembered Qantaga enlisted me for a game, and I was the night 1 kill. So I still don't think I've actually played a game over there.Scoop20906 wrote:Not 100% on this but:Chaosraven wrote:That actually may be a viable point. Who has played on gt with our former companion?
LIST OF PLAYERS
1. Qantaga - yes
2. Theohall - yes
3. MSteelers - yes
4. RMC - not sure
5. Scoop - yes
6. truicy - yes
7. Remus - no
8. Lassr - no
9. Stessier - not sure
10. Rshetts2 - Yes I'm sure he has played with himself
11. Chaosraven - no
12. Unagi - no
13. Grundbegriff - no
The site was down all morning I think.Remus West wrote:Wow, I figured you people would have something for me to read and catch up on when I got on this afternoon. Color me disappointed. Scoop
OMG!!! NOOOOOOOO!!Remus West wrote:Wow, I figured you people would have something for me to read and catch up on when I got on this afternoon. Color me disappointed.
Alright, for now let's see what this does
Scoop
Thats interesting.Unagi wrote: Grundbegriff
I think he's evil. My feeling is soley based on his vote for Theohall.
Liar.Scoop20906 wrote:Thats interesting.
Caught up?Lassr wrote:Hopefully get caught up tonight.
Ha, yeah not much happened i see.Unagi wrote:Caught up?Lassr wrote:Hopefully get caught up tonight.
Scoop20906 wrote:Thats interesting.Unagi wrote: Grundbegriff
I think he's evil. My feeling is soley based on his vote for Theohall.
No, I think it is very interesting. Your reaction to my post is odd.Unagi wrote:Liar.Scoop20906 wrote:Thats interesting.
No, the withdrawal seemed out of place even though he wrote sample above it. At the time he was talking to msteeler about lynching the quiet ones. Not sure what the sample withdrawal did other than make it look like the theohall vote was one less than it actually was. He fooled me until Newcastle posted the final vote count.stessier wrote:You're kidding, right?
He was responding to someone (can't remember who) that was on the train and said "here, follow this example Withdraw theo, accuse tru1cy". What a very odd thing to try and paint as nefarious.
I could go back to it if there is no interest in Grund. But really, to answer your question - we at least have yesterday's votes, etc... to look at. It's not Day 1. Still - I'm not reversed on tru1cy, I just don't feel like putting my vote there if no one else has any interest.stessier wrote:Unagi, why change from tru1cy?
It wasn't meant to confuse anyone, other than to start a trend. I was fairly vocal in being against voting for Theohall, so I'm not sure what level of attention I'd bestow on anyone that thought I had a vote on him. (Sorry to Newcastle though, who may have thought he missed a vote I had place)Lassr wrote:Unagi, why did you do the withdraw on theohall yesterday when you didn't have a vote on him?
At the time, I did it in the same spirtit as a number of players that 're-accuse' their player-of-choice, so as to entice others to follow suit and/or to simply communicate their resolution.Unagi wrote:sample
withdraw Theohall
tru1cy
I made a weak joke and you are reacting to it antagonisticly.Scoop20906 wrote:No, I think it is very interesting. Your reaction to my post is odd.
You're living in la-la land my friend. You can't remember who, beacuase it didn't happen. Blam your lame defense of me.stessier wrote:He was responding to someone (can't remember who) that was on the train and said "here, follow this example Withdraw theo, accuse tru1cy".