Page 7 of 23
Re: Battle of the Presidents
Posted: Fri Dec 06, 2013 10:27 am
by Qantaga
Remus West wrote:Don't make me filibuster...
Here,
let Patton do it for you.
Re: Battle of the Presidents
Posted: Fri Dec 06, 2013 10:35 am
by Moliere
Vorret -> Scoop20906, theohall
triggercut -> theohall
Newcastle -> Vorret, Remus West
RMC -> Remus West
El Guapo -> Vorret, Newcastle
Scoop20906 -> El Guapo, Vorret, Remus West
Lassr -> Scoop20906, theohall
theohall -> triggercut, Remus West
bb2112 -> El Guapo
Remus West -> Vorret, Scoop20906, theohall
Qantaga ->
Chaosraven -> Newcastle
tru1cy ->
J.D. ->
theohall (4): Vorret, triggercut, Lassr, Remus West
Remus West (4): Newcastle, RMC, Scoop20906, theohall
Newcastle (2): El Guapo, Chaosraven
El Guapo (1): bb2112
The majority requires 8 votes. Let me know if I missed anything.
Re: Battle of the Presidents
Posted: Fri Dec 06, 2013 10:52 am
by Vorret
The deadline is Monday, right?
Re: Battle of the Presidents
Posted: Fri Dec 06, 2013 11:00 am
by Moliere
Vorret wrote:The deadline is Monday, right?
No deadline, but let's not turn this into Jefferson v. Burr.
Re: Battle of the Presidents
Posted: Fri Dec 06, 2013 11:13 am
by Vorret
Moliere wrote:Vorret wrote:The deadline is Monday, right?
No deadline, but let's not turn this into Jefferson v. Burr.
But but...
There will be a TIME LIMIT for Specials to send in their PMs. The time limit will be 48 hours after the posting of the treason decision (NOT after the voting closes) on weekdays, and 72 hours if any of the 24 hours falls on Saturday or Sunday. There is a one week time limit for the treason vote.
Re: Battle of the Presidents
Posted: Fri Dec 06, 2013 11:15 am
by Lassr
I think every one vetoed the time limit, but the law was never updated.
Re: Battle of the Presidents
Posted: Fri Dec 06, 2013 11:19 am
by Vorret
I see.
Again you guys keep the Canadian out of the loop.
Re: Battle of the Presidents
Posted: Fri Dec 06, 2013 11:24 am
by Moliere
Vorret wrote:I see.
Again you guys keep the Canadian out of the loop.
It was a voice vote while you were out for a smoke.
Re: Battle of the Presidents
Posted: Fri Dec 06, 2013 11:58 am
by Newcastle
Vorret wrote:Moliere wrote:Vorret wrote:The deadline is Monday, right?
No deadline, but let's not turn this into Jefferson v. Burr.
But but...
There will be a TIME LIMIT for Specials to send in their PMs. The time limit will be 48 hours after the posting of the treason decision (NOT after the voting closes) on weekdays, and 72 hours if any of the 24 hours falls on Saturday or Sunday. There is a one week time limit for the treason vote.
do you really want to lose like last time? Time limits dont help the good guys at all. Because everyone wait until the last moment and rushes someone up on a vote. No time limits are better. More thoughts and more discussion and the lynch is achieved by consensus rather than a forced restriction.
go au naturel, much better.
Re: Battle of the Presidents
Posted: Fri Dec 06, 2013 12:20 pm
by Vorret
I agree.
I saw that in the main post and wanted to make sure we we're not running out of time already.
Re: Battle of the Presidents
Posted: Fri Dec 06, 2013 12:21 pm
by Scoop20906
Newcastle wrote:Vorret wrote:Moliere wrote:Vorret wrote:The deadline is Monday, right?
No deadline, but let's not turn this into Jefferson v. Burr.
But but...
There will be a TIME LIMIT for Specials to send in their PMs. The time limit will be 48 hours after the posting of the treason decision (NOT after the voting closes) on weekdays, and 72 hours if any of the 24 hours falls on Saturday or Sunday. There is a one week time limit for the treason vote.
do you really want to lose like last time? Time limits dont help the good guys at all. Because everyone wait until the last moment and rushes someone up on a vote. No time limits are better. More thoughts and more discussion and the lynch is achieved by consensus rather than a forced restriction.
go au naturel, much better.
It so much better with the wind.
Re: Battle of the Presidents
Posted: Fri Dec 06, 2013 12:22 pm
by Scoop20906
Vorret wrote:I agree.
I saw that in the main post and wanted to make sure we we're not running out of time already.
Are you nervous Canadadian? A?
Re: Battle of the Presidents
Posted: Fri Dec 06, 2013 12:25 pm
by Vorret
Never.
We did go a day with no lynch last game, wouldn't want to repeat the same mistake, do we?
Re: Battle of the Presidents
Posted: Fri Dec 06, 2013 12:27 pm
by Scoop20906
Vorret wrote:Never.
We did go a day with no lynch last game, wouldn't want to repeat the same mistake, do we?
Only Sith speak in absolutes. Or Republicans.
Re: Battle of the Presidents
Posted: Fri Dec 06, 2013 12:31 pm
by Vorret
Well I am certainly not a sith.
Re: Battle of the Presidents
Posted: Fri Dec 06, 2013 1:55 pm
by tru1cy
I am not a crook, but Theohall
might well be
Re: Battle of the Presidents
Posted: Fri Dec 06, 2013 6:28 pm
by bb2112
Remus West wrote:Don't make me filibuster. I will pad the shit out of this thread until nobody even cares what it used to be about.
Re: Battle of the Presidents
Posted: Fri Dec 06, 2013 7:43 pm
by Newcastle
/walks up to the podium
"we all know what the biggest threat here is. And i want to introduce my legislation: Common sense Republicans Against Pussies. Or CRAP for short. This signature piece of legislation will fight for American values and prevent the secular assault on christmas by these non god loving, secularist democrats. CRAP is now. CRAP is for you and I. CRAP TODAY!
/marches off in birkenstocks.
Re: Battle of the Presidents
Posted: Fri Dec 06, 2013 8:10 pm
by Newcastle
after deep and hard thought
theohall
as to why...meh why not and better he than me.
/heads back to his study to work on his bill entitled: Better Energy Entropy Radicalization legislation or BEER for short.
Re: Battle of the Presidents
Posted: Fri Dec 06, 2013 8:17 pm
by theohall
I'm good with being lynched. At least you will know one of us was a Republican. Unlike that Dem pretending to be one of us, triggercut.
Re: Battle of the Presidents
Posted: Fri Dec 06, 2013 8:19 pm
by Chaosraven
theohall
then.
Re: Battle of the Presidents
Posted: Fri Dec 06, 2013 8:27 pm
by Newcastle
meh changed my mind
withdraw theohall
chaosraven
for his willingness to jump on an innocent republicans train...and for his unwillingness to lynch remus west. just seems plain evil to me. i mean for a man who says he's got a grudge over the dude for like 30 years...he's not willing to drop a vote on remus.l..sounds fishy to me.
/heads back to his study to conitnue working on BEER
Re: Battle of the Presidents
Posted: Fri Dec 06, 2013 8:36 pm
by Newcastle
/comes back to the speakers chair.
You know what America needs? America needs my newest bill: Letting America Progress Dynamically Again not Coddling Environmentalists. This legislation will get America moving again. This bill will get America competing again. its the answer to everything. We need to pass LAPDANCE now, and make sure everyone knows and votes for LAPDANCE. This bill will save America, when every American can get LAPDANCE they will suceeed!
Re: Battle of the Presidents
Posted: Fri Dec 06, 2013 10:43 pm
by Chaosraven
Newcastle wrote:for his willingness to jump on an innocent republicans train...
Re: Battle of the Presidents
Posted: Fri Dec 06, 2013 10:44 pm
by Scoop20906
Newcastle wrote:/comes back to the speakers chair.
You know what America needs? America needs my newest bill: Letting America Progress Dynamically Again not Coddling Environmentalists. This legislation will get America moving again. This bill will get America competing again. its the answer to everything. We need to pass LAPDANCE now, and make sure everyone knows and votes for LAPDANCE. This bill will save America, when every American can get LAPDANCE they will suceeed!
Tell me you came up with this yourself!
Re: Battle of the Presidents
Posted: Fri Dec 06, 2013 10:58 pm
by Newcastle
all bills that i've come up with are authored by myself! ALL of one, and this bill crafter aint done yet! Got more coming out of my ears.
Re: Battle of the Presidents
Posted: Sat Dec 07, 2013 12:32 am
by theohall
Chaosraven wrote:Newcastle wrote:for his willingness to jump on an innocent republicans train...
Yet your vote didn't move if trying to claim Newcastle knows something he should not.
Re: Battle of the Presidents
Posted: Sat Dec 07, 2013 12:33 am
by Moliere
Vorret -> Scoop20906, theohall
triggercut -> theohall
Newcastle -> Vorret, Remus West, theohall, Chaosraven
RMC -> Remus West
El Guapo -> Vorret, Newcastle
Scoop20906 -> El Guapo, Vorret, Remus West
Lassr -> Scoop20906, theohall
theohall -> triggercut, Remus West
bb2112 -> El Guapo
Remus West -> Vorret, Scoop20906, theohall
Qantaga ->
Chaosraven -> Newcastle, theohall
tru1cy -> theohall
J.D. ->
theohall (6): Vorret, triggercut, Lassr, Remus West, tru1cy, Chaosraven
Remus West (3): RMC, Scoop20906, theohall
Newcastle (1): El Guapo
El Guapo (1): bb2112
The majority requires 8 votes. Let me know if I missed anything.
Re: Battle of the Presidents
Posted: Sat Dec 07, 2013 1:00 am
by El Guapo
FWIW I still feel good (as good as I can on day 1, anyhow) about my Newcastle vote. That "feels like evil Remus" post is a little out of place and feels to me like a "Let's see if we can get something going on Remus, now I just need to think of something to type in support" post.
I'm not opposed to lynching theohall, though I am indifferent on it at this point.
Re: Battle of the Presidents
Posted: Sat Dec 07, 2013 2:52 am
by triggercut
Qantaga
Re: Battle of the Presidents
Posted: Sat Dec 07, 2013 11:17 am
by bb2112
I'm scared to put Theo at N -1. Theo, any last words before I drop a vote and someone scoops you?
Re: Battle of the Presidents
Posted: Sat Dec 07, 2013 11:18 am
by bb2112
triggercut wrote: Qantaga
Guess I should have looked at that...
Re: Battle of the Presidents
Posted: Sat Dec 07, 2013 12:19 pm
by Vorret
While theo may not be a democrat he's also not a republican special.
He said he was good with being lynched, so, even if he ends up being a plain old republican at least we get some info and, unlike last game, don't out all our specials on day one
Re: Battle of the Presidents
Posted: Sat Dec 07, 2013 1:29 pm
by theohall
Vorret wrote:While theo may not be a democrat he's also not a republican special.
He said he was good with being lynched, so, even if he ends up being a plain old republican at least we get some info and, unlike last game, don't out all our specials on day one
what he said.
Re: Battle of the Presidents
Posted: Sat Dec 07, 2013 1:30 pm
by Scoop20906
Theohall[\accuse]
Re: Battle of the Presidents
Posted: Sat Dec 07, 2013 1:31 pm
by Scoop20906
theohall
Re: Battle of the Presidents
Posted: Sat Dec 07, 2013 1:53 pm
by Remus West
Newcastle
Re: Battle of the Presidents
Posted: Sat Dec 07, 2013 1:57 pm
by Newcastle
Scoop20906 wrote: theohall
i want to to introduce new legislation that i think we all should look at at
Non Obvious Serpentine Characterisctics Of Obviating Personality Scoop.
or NOSCOOP Scoop for short.
Why no scooping there scoop? Thought you were ooooh so tempted by the kill eh? Instead you plopped a n-1 vote down? Shady shady behavior.
Re: Battle of the Presidents
Posted: Sat Dec 07, 2013 1:58 pm
by Scoop20906
Newcastle wrote:Scoop20906 wrote: theohall
i want to to introduce new legislation that i think we all should look at at
Non Obvious Serpentine Characterisctics Of Obviating Personality Scoop.
or NOSCOOP Scoop for short.
Why no scooping there scoop? Thought you were ooooh so tempted by the kill eh? Instead you plopped a n-1 vote down? Shady shady behavior.
Have you been saving that one?
Re: Battle of the Presidents
Posted: Sat Dec 07, 2013 2:00 pm
by Newcastle
Scoop20906 wrote:Newcastle wrote:Scoop20906 wrote: theohall
i want to to introduce new legislation that i think we all should look at at
Non Obvious Serpentine Characterisctics Of Obviating Personality Scoop.
or NOSCOOP Scoop for short.
Why no scooping there scoop? Thought you were ooooh so tempted by the kill eh? Instead you plopped a n-1 vote down? Shady shady behavior.
Have you been saving that one?
Nope, but my teeny brain has been coming up w/ other acronyms i'm more than happy to subject you all to. In due time of course.