Page 8 of 23
Re: Battle of the Presidents
Posted: Sat Dec 07, 2013 2:58 pm
by Chaosraven
theohall wrote:Chaosraven wrote:Newcastle wrote:for his willingness to jump on an innocent republicans train...
Yet your vote didn't move if trying to claim Newcastle knows something he should not.
His claim could refer to you or himself, as my vote was previously the second on him. Not sure that constitutes a train.
So it could be a slip that he knows about you, or simply talking about himself.
He ignored it, either way.
Re: Battle of the Presidents
Posted: Sat Dec 07, 2013 8:43 pm
by bb2112
Newcastle wrote:after deep and hard thought
theohall
as to why...meh why not and better he than me.
/heads back to his study to work on his bill entitled: Better Energy Entropy Radicalization legislation or BEER for short.
I like BEER and LAPDANCE. These are too concpts go together bettre than choclate and peanut butter. Brilliant!
Newcastle
Re: Battle of the Presidents
Posted: Sat Dec 07, 2013 11:16 pm
by Newcastle
AS the economic waters get choppier and choppier. As we as nation must navigate these perilous economic streams. I present to you my newest bill: Solving Americas Foreign Exchange Worries Over Record Debt.
This bill will help America find safe waters and further promote economic freedom so good young entrepreneurs can make an honest buck and living.
Re: Battle of the Presidents
Posted: Sun Dec 08, 2013 2:03 am
by Scoop20906
Newcastle, you a proving to me more and more each game you are a snake oil salesman.
Do not believe his lies.
Re: Battle of the Presidents
Posted: Sun Dec 08, 2013 7:22 pm
by Newcastle
So with my latest bill I think its worthy to praise previous efforts of our long past heroes: Scoop is Not Amused Knowing Empire Overran Iteration Last.
This is a fitting honor. I ask each of you to support it.
/goes back to working on BEER with a dash of LAPDANCE
Re: Battle of the Presidents
Posted: Mon Dec 09, 2013 9:05 am
by Chaosraven
and as he continues to ignore it... Newcastle
Will we see another impassioned set of posts this time?
Re: Battle of the Presidents
Posted: Mon Dec 09, 2013 9:23 am
by Scoop20906
I'm tempted to join the Newcastle vote just to see how he reacts but after last game's special fiasco I'm wondering if it might be better to shoot theo since he has already hit n-1 and claimed non-special.
I'm sticking with theohall.
Re: Battle of the Presidents
Posted: Mon Dec 09, 2013 9:25 am
by Vorret
Moliere can we get an updated vote count when you have a minute?
Newcastle is sounding like that game we had a few months ago where he kept speaking in Japanese proverbs or something.
Re: Battle of the Presidents
Posted: Mon Dec 09, 2013 9:27 am
by Vorret
Scoop20906 wrote:I'm tempted to join the Newcastle vote just to see how he reacts but after last game's special fiasco I'm wondering if it might be better to shoot theo since he has already hit n-1 and claimed non-special.
I'm sticking with theohall.
That's kinda why I don't want to move my vote.
As I said last week, he may not be a dem but he's also not a special. Day one is a crapshoot (we can get lucky) but at least that way we get some info and we don't damage our end game chances too much.
Re: Battle of the Presidents
Posted: Mon Dec 09, 2013 10:12 am
by Moliere
Vorret -> Scoop20906, theohall
triggercut -> theohall, Qantaga
Newcastle -> Vorret, Remus West, theohall, Chaosraven
RMC -> Remus West
El Guapo -> Vorret, Newcastle
Scoop20906 -> El Guapo, Vorret, Remus West, theohall
Lassr -> Scoop20906, theohall
theohall -> triggercut, Remus West
bb2112 -> El Guapo
Remus West -> Vorret, Scoop20906, theohall, Newcastle
Qantaga ->
Chaosraven -> Newcastle, theohall, Newcastle
tru1cy -> theohall
J.D. ->
theohall (4): Vorret, Lassr, tru1cy, Scoop20906
Remus West (2): RMC, theohall
Newcastle (3): El Guapo, Remus West, Chaosraven
Qantaga (1): triggercut
El Guapo (1): bb2112
The majority requires 8 votes. Let me know if I missed anything.
Re: Battle of the Presidents
Posted: Mon Dec 09, 2013 10:36 am
by Qantaga
Bear of a work/travel schedule last week. I'll catch up tonight.
Re: Battle of the Presidents
Posted: Mon Dec 09, 2013 10:45 am
by Lassr
J.D. wrote:I'm preparing my 24 hour speech so I can filibuster the shit out of this game.
Have you finished the speech yet?
Re: Battle of the Presidents
Posted: Mon Dec 09, 2013 11:27 am
by El Guapo
At least there is no seer to out this game.
Re: Battle of the Presidents
Posted: Mon Dec 09, 2013 11:34 am
by Moliere
Vorret -> Scoop20906, theohall
triggercut -> theohall, Qantaga
Newcastle -> Vorret, Remus West, theohall, Chaosraven
RMC -> Remus West
El Guapo -> Vorret, Newcastle
Scoop20906 -> El Guapo, Vorret, Remus West, theohall
Lassr -> Scoop20906, theohall
theohall -> triggercut, Remus West
bb2112 -> El Guapo, Newcastle
Remus West -> Vorret, Scoop20906, theohall, Newcastle
Qantaga ->
Chaosraven -> Newcastle, theohall, Newcastle
tru1cy -> theohall
J.D. ->
theohall (4): Vorret, Lassr, tru1cy, Scoop20906
Remus West (2): RMC, theohall
Newcastle (4): El Guapo, Remus West, Chaosraven, bb2112
Qantaga (1): triggercut
The majority requires 8 votes. I missed bb2112's last vote. Here is the updated count. Let me know if I missed anything else.
Re: Battle of the Presidents
Posted: Mon Dec 09, 2013 11:35 am
by Moliere
El Guapo wrote:At least there is no seer to out this game.
Reagan can identify those who are acting the part.
Re: Battle of the Presidents
Posted: Mon Dec 09, 2013 11:36 am
by Scoop20906
El Guapo wrote:At least there is no seer to out this game.
Did you forget something?
Re: Battle of the Presidents
Posted: Mon Dec 09, 2013 11:37 am
by J.D.
Lassr wrote:J.D. wrote:I'm preparing my 24 hour speech so I can filibuster the shit out of this game.
Have you finished the speech yet?
I'm just trying to decide which Dr. Seuss book will fit in nicely into hour 16.
Also, holy crap, not used to the OO style game. Over on GT we'd have done four rounds by now. I feel a bit out of my league here.
Re: Battle of the Presidents
Posted: Mon Dec 09, 2013 11:47 am
by J.D.
Also I need to shit or get off the pot so *deep breath*.
newcastle
Re: Battle of the Presidents
Posted: Mon Dec 09, 2013 11:54 am
by El Guapo
Scoop20906 wrote:El Guapo wrote:At least there is no seer to out this game.
Did you forget something?
mmmm, don't think so. Reagan's a quasi-seer but he only knows the good special roles, so he's not really.
Ohhh wait I left the oven on. Thanks!
Re: Battle of the Presidents
Posted: Mon Dec 09, 2013 12:00 pm
by Newcastle
i have a vote on CHAOSRAVEN
but no longer
scoop
for acting so unscoop like
And with that I'd like to promote my new bill - Keeping Interest in Science Super Motivating Young Americans Seeking Science
This bill is a true statement of how i feel about keeping america interested in Science strong. America needs to be a leader in science not a dang nabbit commie!
Re: Battle of the Presidents
Posted: Mon Dec 09, 2013 12:15 pm
by Moliere
El Guapo wrote:Scoop20906 wrote:El Guapo wrote:At least there is no seer to out this game.
Did you forget something?
mmmm, don't think so. Reagan's a quasi-seer but he only knows the good special roles, so he's not really.
Ohhh wait I left the oven on. Thanks!
"Ronald Reagan: Can tell who is acting and therefore sees the true role of any ALIVE player."
My wording might be a little misleading so let me clarify Reagan's role. As a former actor (and Democrat) he has the ability to tell when someone is pretending to be a Republican and someone who really is a Republican. He doesn't identify Teddy and Lincoln.
Re: Battle of the Presidents
Posted: Mon Dec 09, 2013 12:30 pm
by El Guapo
Moliere wrote:El Guapo wrote:Scoop20906 wrote:El Guapo wrote:At least there is no seer to out this game.
Did you forget something?
mmmm, don't think so. Reagan's a quasi-seer but he only knows the good special roles, so he's not really.
Ohhh wait I left the oven on. Thanks!
"Ronald Reagan: Can tell who is acting and therefore sees the true role of any ALIVE player."
My wording might be a little misleading so let me clarify Reagan's role. As a former actor (and Democrat) he has the ability to tell when someone is pretending to be a Republican and someone who really is a Republican. He doesn't identify Teddy and Lincoln.
Huh? So he can tell us who the democrats are? At least if they speak and pretend to be a Republican?
Um, so I'm pretty sure I have this game won. Everyone post that they're a republican, and then Reagan will tell us who is lying.
I am a Republican.
Game set match, democrats.
Re: Battle of the Presidents
Posted: Mon Dec 09, 2013 12:53 pm
by Scoop20906
Lol. Now KISSMYASS is a bill I can get behind. Looks like I have no choice.
Shoot Scoop20906
Best bill yet, Newcastle. Lol.
Re: Battle of the Presidents
Posted: Mon Dec 09, 2013 12:54 pm
by Moliere
El Guapo wrote:Moliere wrote:"Ronald Reagan: Can tell who is acting and therefore sees the true role of any ALIVE player."
My wording might be a little misleading so let me clarify Reagan's role. As a former actor (and Democrat) he has the ability to tell when someone is pretending to be a Republican and someone who really is a Republican. He doesn't identify Teddy and Lincoln.
Huh? So he can tell us who the democrats are? At least if they speak and pretend to be a Republican?
Um, so I'm pretty sure I have this game won. Everyone post that they're a republican, and then Reagan will tell us who is lying.
I am a Republican.
Game set match, democrats.
He only has time to analyze one person a night.
Re: Battle of the Presidents
Posted: Mon Dec 09, 2013 12:55 pm
by El Guapo
Oh, ok. So he is a seer. "Misleading" may be understating it a bit, insofar as that is not at all what his role description says.
Re: Battle of the Presidents
Posted: Mon Dec 09, 2013 12:55 pm
by Remus West
El Guapo wrote:Moliere wrote:El Guapo wrote:Scoop20906 wrote:El Guapo wrote:At least there is no seer to out this game.
Did you forget something?
mmmm, don't think so. Reagan's a quasi-seer but he only knows the good special roles, so he's not really.
Ohhh wait I left the oven on. Thanks!
"Ronald Reagan: Can tell who is acting and therefore sees the true role of any ALIVE player."
My wording might be a little misleading so let me clarify Reagan's role. As a former actor (and Democrat) he has the ability to tell when someone is pretending to be a Republican and someone who really is a Republican. He doesn't identify Teddy and Lincoln.
Huh? So he can tell us who the democrats are? At least if they speak and pretend to be a Republican?
Um, so I'm pretty sure I have this game won. Everyone post that they're a republican, and then Reagan will tell us who is lying.
I am a Republican.
Game set match, democrats.
He is telling you outright that Reagan is the Seer.
Very weird that you did not recognize that either in the original rule or right now.
Re: Battle of the Presidents
Posted: Mon Dec 09, 2013 12:58 pm
by Vorret
Remus West wrote:El Guapo wrote:Moliere wrote:El Guapo wrote:Scoop20906 wrote:El Guapo wrote:At least there is no seer to out this game.
Did you forget something?
mmmm, don't think so. Reagan's a quasi-seer but he only knows the good special roles, so he's not really.
Ohhh wait I left the oven on. Thanks!
"Ronald Reagan: Can tell who is acting and therefore sees the true role of any ALIVE player."
My wording might be a little misleading so let me clarify Reagan's role. As a former actor (and Democrat) he has the ability to tell when someone is pretending to be a Republican and someone who really is a Republican. He doesn't identify Teddy and Lincoln.
Huh? So he can tell us who the democrats are? At least if they speak and pretend to be a Republican?
Um, so I'm pretty sure I have this game won. Everyone post that they're a republican, and then Reagan will tell us who is lying.
I am a Republican.
Game set match, democrats.
He is telling you outright that Reagan is the Seer.
Very weird that you did not recognize that either in the original rule or right now.
At first It thought he was fishing , now it's just weird.
Re: Battle of the Presidents
Posted: Mon Dec 09, 2013 1:01 pm
by El Guapo
Remus West wrote:El Guapo wrote:Moliere wrote:El Guapo wrote:Scoop20906 wrote:El Guapo wrote:At least there is no seer to out this game.
Did you forget something?
mmmm, don't think so. Reagan's a quasi-seer but he only knows the good special roles, so he's not really.
Ohhh wait I left the oven on. Thanks!
"Ronald Reagan: Can tell who is acting and therefore sees the true role of any ALIVE player."
My wording might be a little misleading so let me clarify Reagan's role. As a former actor (and Democrat) he has the ability to tell when someone is pretending to be a Republican and someone who really is a Republican. He doesn't identify Teddy and Lincoln.
Huh? So he can tell us who the democrats are? At least if they speak and pretend to be a Republican?
Um, so I'm pretty sure I have this game won. Everyone post that they're a republican, and then Reagan will tell us who is lying.
I am a Republican.
Game set match, democrats.
He is telling you outright that Reagan is the Seer.
Very weird that you did not recognize that either in the original rule or right now.
Really? Let's compare with some seer role descriptions:
Seer
Each night the Seer can ask about a player, and is told if that player is a Villager or a Werewolf. No other roles will be disclosed to the Seer about that person, with 1 exception: If the Seer scans the Beserker Werewolf, he will be told that the player is, in fact, the Beserker Werewolf.
Athena (good Cylon) –Each night she can scan to find Cylons.
Athena would submit a name to scan. The answer to her question will be Cylon or Human. If Athena is lynched the autopsy will show Cylon. If she finds Galen before D'Anna she will be told that she has found Galen. If she finds Galen after D'anna she will only be told she has found a Cylon.
She may also to get an extra scan during the day when a Cylon target is found; (Can be used only twice in the game) This scan determines which Cylon was detected (may be used anytime in the game as long as that Cylon is alive). Cylons will know they were scanned when used.
They use such words as "scanning", "asking about a player", "picking a player." Reagan's description just says that he sees the true role of anyone who is alive. No picking, scanning, references to seeing them nightly, anything. Given the absence of any of that in the description, I gathered that none of that was in the role.
Re: Battle of the Presidents
Posted: Mon Dec 09, 2013 1:11 pm
by Moliere
El Guapo wrote:They use such words as "scanning", "asking about a player", "picking a player." Reagan's description just says that he sees the true role of anyone who is alive. No picking, scanning, references to seeing them nightly, anything. Given the absence of any of that in the description, I gathered that none of that was in the role.
Moliere wrote:
Turn order during the night:
Reagan scans;
Roosevelt protects;
Democrats attack.
Re: Battle of the Presidents
Posted: Mon Dec 09, 2013 1:18 pm
by El Guapo
Yeah, I was just looking at the role descriptions in figuring out the roles, oddly enough. But in any event, I get it now and apparently I'm in the sole minority in not immediately reading that description as being the seer.
Re: Battle of the Presidents
Posted: Mon Dec 09, 2013 1:23 pm
by Newcastle
El Guapo wrote:Yeah, I was just looking at the role descriptions in figuring out the roles, oddly enough. But in any event, I get it now and apparently I'm in the sole minority in not immediately reading that description as being the seer.
becauseyoureadem say what?
Re: Battle of the Presidents
Posted: Mon Dec 09, 2013 1:48 pm
by Scoop20906
I read it as Seer but ...
Re: Battle of the Presidents
Posted: Mon Dec 09, 2013 9:18 pm
by Newcastle
In order to spur this discussion on. Its clear we need to grow our grass roots. To that end i propose: Becoming Opportunistic Republicans Innovating Nationally Groups
Re: Battle of the Presidents
Posted: Mon Dec 09, 2013 9:19 pm
by Newcastle
Scoop20906 wrote:Lol. Now KISSMYASS is a bill I can get behind. Looks like I have no choice.
Shoot Scoop20906
Best bill yet, Newcastle. Lol.
Why thanks Democratic Scoop.
/flashes him the peas sign.
Re: Battle of the Presidents
Posted: Mon Dec 09, 2013 10:27 pm
by theohall
Where is Qantaga
Re: Battle of the Presidents
Posted: Tue Dec 10, 2013 10:36 am
by Moliere
Newcastle wrote:Becoming Opportunistic Republicans Innovating Nationally Groups
Is this what happens when there is no time limit?
Re: Battle of the Presidents
Posted: Tue Dec 10, 2013 10:40 am
by Scoop20906
Moliere wrote:Newcastle wrote:Becoming Opportunistic Republicans Innovating Nationally Groups
Is this what happens when there is no time limit?
It seems OO is a cautious bunch. I can't even get people to react when I self vote anymore.
withdrawal scoop20906
I still think we stick with theohall today and then let our specials get to work. There is still a chance he's a stinkin democrat too. Not much to go on otherwise.
shoot theohall
Re: Battle of the Presidents
Posted: Tue Dec 10, 2013 11:00 am
by Lassr
Scoop20906 wrote:
I still think we stick with theohall today and then let our specials get to work. There is still a chance he's a stinkin democrat too. Not much to go on otherwise.
shoot theohall
I back this resolution.
Theohall says he is not a special and he still could be a democrat. Let's not risk a mass outing like last game.
Re: Battle of the Presidents
Posted: Tue Dec 10, 2013 11:13 am
by Moliere
Vorret -> Scoop20906, theohall
triggercut -> theohall, Qantaga
Newcastle -> Vorret, Remus West, theohall, Chaosraven, Scoop20906
RMC -> Remus West
El Guapo -> Vorret, Newcastle
Scoop20906 -> El Guapo, Vorret, Remus West, theohall, Scoop20906, theohall
Lassr -> Scoop20906, theohall
theohall -> triggercut, Remus West, Qantaga
bb2112 -> El Guapo, Newcastle
Remus West -> Vorret, Scoop20906, theohall, Newcastle
Qantaga ->
Chaosraven -> Newcastle, theohall, Newcastle
tru1cy -> theohall
J.D. -> Newcastle
theohall (4): Vorret, Lassr, tru1cy, Scoop20906
Remus West (1): RMC
Newcastle (5): El Guapo, Remus West, Chaosraven, bb2112, J.D.
Qantaga (2): triggercut, theohall
Scoop20906 (1): Newcastle
The majority requires 8 votes. Here is the updated count. Let me know if I missed anything else.
Re: Battle of the Presidents
Posted: Tue Dec 10, 2013 11:27 am
by Vorret
I'm going to switch my vote to Newcastle... he seems to be the "target of the day" and we need to move on at some point.
Newcastle